Circa 1865 white men allowed black men to have the vote, and white women campaigned very hard against that and it was undone, while black women supported black men's right to vote. The fissure in the female populace in the usa has existed ever since and every female candidate for president, from Shirley Chisholm through Hillary Clinton to Kamala Harris has experienced the fracture in the female vote. Women may need their own party of governance to become president.
Barrack Obama was the first Black President and the last Presidential nominee who could use the ceiling breaking energy to win the white house. Ever since him, every ceiling breaking presidential nominee has lost, which means the people who were willing to vote to show the USA can vote for a president not a white male, want more quality and in absent of that quality will vote for a white male as a status quo. The black populace in the usa needs pro black policy to be invigorated and I don't see that coming from the donkeys or the elephants.
The big tent strategy of the donkeys, the democratic party of the usa has one great weakness, you can't say you support everyone and then make policy to help everyone cause it isn't realistic. If you support the real estate industry you can't support the homeless equally. if you support law enforcement then you can't support the imprisoned equally. And when people realize that you are promising everybody, they realize you will do for none and this is clearly evident in the results in the senate or house. You want to be tough on immigration while you also want to help all the immigrants, which is it? And no, you can't do both. You can't help the israelis plus the palestinians. It may be sad to say, but to truly help one means the detriment of the other.
The USA is a collection of 50 states, not one state, and the makeup of california or ny is extremely different than the makeup of mississippi or arkansas. The presidential election system is designed to let the variances of the fifty states hold value. And while the two donkey coast are equal rights/ multi phenotypical/seemingly want to maintain most of the global order of the 1900s with the usa western european alliance... the donkey middle wants inequalities, not slavery, but inequalities/wants a stop to the growth of mixed towns or cities/ want changes in the global order with a more isolationist usa partnered with fewer countries , some satraps like israel which is beholden to the usa but also some old enemies like russia and a disengagement to china. The usa isn't one, everyone knows it, but those in the red areas exhibit this truth while those in the blue areas try to deny it. Moreover, every single demographic in the usa has more internal multivision that advertised. Not all Blacks are about a black agenda. Not all whites are about a White agenda. Not all immigrants are about an immigrant agenda. The problem is the individuality in the usa has created populaces of people that may be linked on phenotype or religion or gender or language or philosophy but they are all, even the white jews, are loose in their association to each other. People don't admit how many jews in nyc marched for palestineans against israel, that isn't all jews as one block but fissures, like all populaces in the usa.
The old war hawks and fiscal conservatives of the statian elephants plus the socialistic independent liberals of the statian donkeys both lost, neither is in control of their party as they want but neither can exist attached to one of the two parties.
Social media has a lot of value, when you talk of someone in media all the time you are giivng free press and that free press transcends their message. The donkeys made Schrumpf a constant media point and in doing so kept him alive when they could had did as was to nixon and let him off into a sunset, but by wanting to make an example of him as the anti rainbow integrationists, they made it where he was able to succeed over rivals in the statian elephants and over the dysfunctional strategies of the statian donkeys.
Running mates matter and the statian donkeys have chosen three lame vice presidents, obama chose biden over clinton, biden chose kamala over stacy abrams or clinton and Kamala chose walz over stacey abrams or clinton....choosing a rival as a running mate can show the strength of one's character. Choosing lackeys or impotents can be problematic.
Some winners or losers
Hillary Clinton is a winner, she is no longer the last female candidate to lose a presidential bid.
Men who are thinking of killing themselves, are winners, if Schrumpf can have immigrant women with red hair or red lips, roger clark with ny1 can verify, call him a real man. So, any man can achieve with women, give it time, if a man who wears a cap, says disrespectful things to all can get women to shake their breast for him well...
Enemies of Schrumpf in New York city, in all levels, which thus includes me, are losers, he has won again, I never liked him as a real estate man, long before he got into reality tv or governance.
Melania Trump is a loser she has to go back to the white house and the media zoo/fiasco she can't stand
All the people who were certain the youth of the usa were on one page, toward a culture of multiphenotypical equality through individual acceptance or opportunity, are losers. The youth in the usa clearly are in camps.
I have spoken on a Black Party of governance
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2776&type=status