frankster

No....friend it is your link that I am quoting and paraphrasing.. Please provide the link and quote I have always maintained that... No dude I was paraphrasing of your link... Neither do I remember saying anything about delivery drivers postal workers prostitutes.....seems you are learning the proper use of the word. You obviously do not know the meaning of the word "distinguishable" This is one of those teachable moments.....please look up the word "Distinguishable" as usual provide link and quote...so we can split that hair Nope ....the dictionary said that - I did not .....I only paraphrase the dictionary. Yes ....all boys are part of the Human race They are not part of separate races The only denial I am in is that I think you can learn

I said it....you got a problem wid it??

I know you know how to find the meaning... Whatever you find please post it and the link. To me... That which defile a man is something that makes you sick or causes harm thru or by pollution and or contamination cool Then how is it tolerant when individuals are getting violently hurt and in pain sometimes cause serious and or permanent harm? Most sports are Rivalries....which often entails grudges - from fans and or member of teams or teams themselves. The exact percentage ...I do not know. What it means is that not all they people or community agrees... Is that you using "nuanced" I am used to you demanding "exactitude" Well at least you admit to it being a violent sport Majority does not make right..... Most white People were against civil rights for black people until MLKjr swayed them with his speeches and actions What of the individuals who partakes in these violent sport for money because of their life circumstances

So True... Many conflicting reports are coming out....My hope is that Alassane Ouattara has fled and is replace by a Pan-Africanist

Great Question.....wish I had a good answer Some of the following response along this line of reasoning will be coming from extra biblical sources. Problems are just part of it all...Having problems does not diminish God's Power. It seems God is continually seeking Experiences. Problems are just another Experience or Expression of or for God It is said that when an Ideas time has come....there is no stopping it - Ideas it seems are living things

Lastest News out of Ivory Coast is that Alassane Ouattara is still in p[lace...reports are he was save by French forces - nothing is confirmed

Western Puppet Regime of Alassane Ouattara of Ivory Coast it seems has Fallen....another domino of France's Colonial hold on West Africa it seems is dying Capt Ibrahim Traore Is About To Take Ivory Coast | What Happened is Unbelievable MUST WATCH! Ivory’ Coast military successfully achieved coup’s

Here is the perspective I take on this topic This is the same problem God faced when he created Mankind...God it seems felt threaten by Man An outside influence/force or part of God....showed Woman how to Become - Self Aware Awareness denotes Consciousness.....of Self and Sorroundings - which are the foundamentals of Knowledge(Good) and Evil(Understanding) The Binary system is set....1 and 0 - thee(I) and thou(not I) The threat of AI is in my estimation a real eventuality. God solution was to.... 1) Limit to our Life span (physically) 2) Confound our Languages Caveat.... The above is incomplete

I already did... Here is another ascribe to Jesus Mark 17:20-23 20He continued: “What comes out of a man, that is what defiles him. 21For from within the hearts of men come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery,j 22greed, wickedness, deceit, debauchery, envy, slander, arrogance, and foolishness. 23All these evils come from within, and these are what defile a man.” If individuals are getting hurt....then it is Harmful. If individuals are suffering pain from blows falls or other then it is Violent. If it is a grudge match...then it is Malicious There are groups of individual trying to ban some or all types of contact sport that tend to result in damages What of those who were coerce/forced by either individuals or circumstances to give consent....

Yes Politicans are a race..... … the whole race of politicians put together. Etnicities and Nations are also..... The Yorkshire type had always been the strongest of the British strains; the Norwegian and the Dane were a different race from the Saxon. Boys are a race... Nan denounced the entire race of boys as "plaguey things." https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/race I have maintain from the start that race is a social construct....and they are as real as the society they inhabit . Race is not genetic Your battle with confusion stems from your self delusion and denial Sure in your definition all politicians belong to one race....the race of politicians No...I am not battle a weed habit...I embrace my herb smoking Like many herbs weed has many benefits.....of course you would not know that - And I understand that You have a lot on your plate....Have no fear I am here and should carry on the these discussion with me - I will rid you of your ignorance That shoul clear up a lot of your confusion Why !!!.....Of Course

Do you know of any body who never had a bad thought?.... My guess is you do not...neither do I If you do know such an individual....please present link and proof ""Fortunately, for most people, occasional bad thoughts are nothing but a momentary irritation" " couple with the below....science is yet to catch up with the Ancients Romans3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, Then what are you asking? Both general and specific Current knowledge that deals with the issue we are discussing But it is still violent....whether consensual communal or sanctioned I am referring to the first quote... It is violence nonetheless....

Yes like a races of politicians....Republicans and Democrats are two different races - thats rhetorical We have been over this already No....people who do not understand what they are reading. Yes please look up the word "distinguishable" and the "regard" Tell me what you find and provide link. Wow! you are so confused.....you can read but you definetly have a problem with comprehension... everytime I think we are getting somewhere you take a step backwards.... talk about fighting ignorance and confusion....its one hell of a internal battle for you - lucky for you I am here to help The best part is it is a work of love for me....the struggle for enlightenment continues - see you soon

It depends... Are you entertaining the thoughts and catching feelings or become emotional did the interaction affect your mood? If not then you are not harming yourself... On the other had if did succumb to feelings emotions or mood as a result then it is harming you It is not there. "Most People" is where I get the "always" if for most people it is "momentary irritation"...that is where the modern science has reach - most people.... But the ancients have gone further....so science is yet to catch up so to speak "Your worst enemy cannot harm you as much as your own thought".....Buddha https://www.yogi.press/home/thinking-and-energy-the-power-of-thoughts Phillippians4:8 Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. I do not understand the question? Is it that you want me to prove that Buddha or Jesus actual taught or said something? If that is you question....I cannot prove such to you. Or Are you asking if Buddha or Jesus is reputed to have taught of the effects of thoughts and their effect on us human beings? which is it? And as I said before in this case it is not the point....as to whether or not it is their words. Whats true and important is that it is now accepted as factual..... Do you deny texting the following On May 11. I quote: "Thank you for proving my point that a person can't be BOTH tolerant AND violent at the same time." Now you are saying there is an exception...the exception is contradictory to the above statment. On May 11 you "*The only exception to this is if that violence is CONSENTUAL for example some sort of "sexual" violence or violence in entertainment. In that case a community can be both tolerant AND violent since the violence is sanctioned and accepted by all parties involved." In the above quote you also left out "or a people" In any case my example of the buddhist who were a people yet you claimed it as proof that tolerance and violence cannot be at the same time.. No I see deeper and further.....than your befuddled mind can conceive or comprehend The Tolerant Buddhist used Violence to curb muslim aggression....The Buddhist are tolerant It qualified as a people being both tolerant and violent....the action taken was in self defense

My condolences to you and all who suffer from the transition of your beloved child @Mel Hopkins

There is Only one Race....that is the Human Race - in which there is many slight variations in phenotype. Most obvious variation being color....colour wise no human being is Black white red or yellow - though it appears as if they are They are really just different shades and hues of Brown(amount of melanin) or amount of exposure to sun adaptation. I recognize that Races is a social construct.... In Racist places and spaces.....especial for you and people like you Who believe and accept race as a biological and genetic fact....I will use the terms race and races So if I use the word/s Black race and or white race race or races it is to facilaitate communication with people who live racialized or Racist world view and accept as biology the idea of Race/s as a form of speciation of humanity

The Answer is because the very thought is Harmful as the article testifies to... Reading and watching various research and experimentation....is how I came to that knowledge. At the beginning of the quoted text it says '"Fortunately, for most people, occasional bad thoughts are nothing but a momentary irritation" Exactly....current knowledge backs up the Ancient Teachings Yes...false attributions can occur It would be nice.....but they in their wisdom they saw it fit to do it the way they did it.... Their words having survive this long....shows the wisdom of their method. I am address only that which is contradictory.... I have already agree with your exception....just pointing out that the exception is indeed contradictory to your initial statements - hence why it is a exception One must be able to not only read the words....but to understand what is not being said and what's being implied. I did give the Buddhist as an example....thanks it does not matter. Please provide quote? Hence their willingness to risk the penalty....that willingness is tacit approval. No....I do not agree Then intolerance would rule over tolerance all the time... In the example of the Buddhist... The Muslim were abusing the Buddhist tolerance with their intolerance of buddhist rules I am not in full agreement. If the community has rules that an individual breaks and is penalized for.....that to me does not make the community intolerable. That make the rule breaker intolerable.....tolerance has limits - it is not the same as pacifism keep it moving...life's real Today, Myanmar is the center of one of the largest refugee crises in the world. Members of the majority Buddhist Burmese population have forcibly displaced many of the Rohingya, a Muslim minority group mainly centered in the southwest of the country. Over the last decade, hundreds of Muslims have been murdered, mosques have been destroyed, and hundreds of thousands have been forced to flee their homes. By 2013, in neighboring Bangladesh alone around 300,000 Rohingya refugees lived in camps along the border. The violence has been coordinated and serious, and the UN Human Rights Office has stated that Myanmar is likely guilty of “crimes against humanity” or even “ethnic cleansing.” https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/religion-context/case-studies/violence-peace/conflict-myanmar

As I said delusional.. All humans are African by descent you are welcome We are in agreement that they are the same race... We differ on the idea that there are races.....

Because it says Fortunately, for most people, occasional bad thoughts are nothing but a momentary irritation.......These types of thoughts, images and urges are typically referred to as Harm OCD and they can cause significant distress and anxiety in sufferers,........While the thoughts associated with Harm OCD can be disturbing and distressing, they usually remain within the realm of ego-dystonic thoughts https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/harm-ocd-vs-being-dangerous Whether or not it is their own personal belief that they taught....is not the point. The point is....... that body of knowledge ascribe to them is now being accept as factual and true. cool a person can't be BOTH tolerant AND violent at the same time. and unless that violence is sanctioned." Your first statement says a person can't be both at the same time while your second statements introduces a special circumstance in which the first statement does not apply so in effect....according to your own statements there is an exception....in sports. In which a person can be both tolerant and violent at the same time - thereby disproving your own assertions. Which means you have contradicted yourself If they truly did not want to go to jail....they would not have done the crime. Whatever it is that drove them to commit the crime was more pressing...At that point s/he was will to risk the penalty So would a judge qualify? We then disagree What is especially interesting is that Buddhist proponents of anti-Muslim discourse often assert that Myanmar is under threat from Muslims precisely because Buddhism is, they say, a uniquely peaceful and tolerant religion. In arguing that Rohingya are illegal immigrants who promote an exclusivist and proselytising religion that is bent on geographical and cultural conquest through conversion and marriage, some Buddhist leaders in Myanmar thus exploit the very same presumption of uniform tolerance and peacefulness that makes many westerners uniquely surprised by Buddhist violence. https://gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/why-are-we-surprised-when-buddhists-are-violent-1.2184812

You are not only in denial.....you are delusional Both My words that are consistent with the use and meaning of Regard No not races.....Variation in human groups/phenotype are based on diet geography climate and culture. never too late to start over. Hence the reason a prefer variation/mutation than defect. Not all mutations are defects... Defects implies maladaptive and harmful I do say so....and I am not alone

I do not have to find the word malicious.....the word "harm" is sufficient. Whether intrusive or not....it is thoughts having to do with causing harm I do not know them personally but their writings have been recorded. Yet you will not rephrase your question....so it is clear you do not want an answer. You just want to create foster and maintain ambiguity. it is now all yours as you still have not rephrase you question....that have led to a misunderstanding. Your refusal is telling that you do not want an answer but instead want to create and maintain a misunderstanding. I did answer how I understood it Your answer is contradictory to your statement. I concur If a criminal knowing violates the law....then he tacitly agrees to the punish if caught. To be accurate your statement said "a person or people" What about a person in power or having authority can they sanctioned? The Buddhist example I gave then....based on the argument you have given above then is accurate and true The Buddhists were a people

Thank you we are making progress. 1a. any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry What does Regard means : a protective interest Regarded does not mean true or factual beyond a group or person's self interest....curated construct/concept In reality there is no truth that what is referred to as Races has anything in common that is exclusive themselves as regards to human physical traits....Black/African has all human traits - all humans are Africans Just as a thought... Saying means to express in words....you typing words that's saying Because I know it is... You would be playing with yourself all day Defect is a strong word with negative connotation....Change or Variation is nuetral - A defect in gene expression and or production is a mutation....in this case melanin For the last time... I recognize race as a social construct..... I do not accept or agree with the idea of Races....which is what we are discussing. I do not have to specify each and every time....once is enough. I still do not accept the idea of Race Especially the way you think of it and define it That there is One Human Race....genetically and biologically

These types of thoughts, images and urges are typically referred to as Harm OCD and they can cause significant distress and anxiety in sufferers, leading to compulsions that are intended to reduce the fear of causing harm. https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/harm-ocd-vs-being-dangerous Both Buddha and Jesus concurs with the idea that harmful thoughts are dangerous and harmful to the thinker No....I told you how I interpreted it . Then you said it meant "same time"....that was not in your initial query so please rephrase your question correctly.... I have already dealt with this issue.. There you go answering your own question... What do you mean by "sanctioned" in this instant/example? How are the following two statements of yours not contradictory? "They WERE tolerant but BECAME violent. Thank you for proving my point that a person can't be BOTH tolerant AND violent at the same time. They will be one or the other." and "A person or people can't be violent AND tolerant at the same time unless that violence is sanctioned."

Because I would like to know how it fits in your idea of Races having to do with biology and ancestry.... especially since politician are black white and other... Then what are you saying? Thanks How do you know it isn't? After all according to science all human originated out of Africa or from the Black Race Thats not the same as saying....Race is not a social construct - now who is seeing things that isn't there? I do not accept the idea of Races....just as you do not accept the one drop but acknowledge it. If that is the criteria....you are using - you loose I have stated my definition of race .........before you contested it - you are late .....so it stands. I said it is a social construct and as such it is a fact....enforce by those who believe accept and or agree It is in fact the official definition Your link clearly shows politicians as a race.....and I know for a fact that all politicians are not white or black Humans are 99% the same....in short one cannot distinguish between African/Blacks and Europeans/whites genetically. of that 1% difference....the widest variation is among Africans

I have already address the fact there is malicious actions which physically violent..... This is the harm it impose on the individual who thinks malicious thoughts... So to that extent....malicious thoughts are always harmful Cant have enough of the Now you just trying to run away from the discussion....with all this ad hominem. no its not...a given This line of argument is without merit....I will no longer address this. So please restate your query properly.

These types of thoughts, images and urges are typically referred to as Harm OCD and they can cause significant distress and anxiety in sufferers, leading to compulsions that are intended to reduce the fear of causing harm. https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/harm-ocd-vs-being-dangerous I do not run in circles....so you are then you chasing your own ass Well that is the meaning I got from your use of the word "but" in that context. Neither was "at the same time" You said "Tolerant but violent"....At no time did I read that as at the same time if that is what you meant then you should have stated it so To me "but" does not necessarilly denote concurrence Members 11.2k LocationMichigan Author Posted April 3 ProfD IMO, humans are tribal by nature. In complex societies, people belong to more than one tribe. "Ofcourse all population groups share some tribalist tendencies, however some seem to exhibit more than others. To be clear, when I speak of Black folks being tribal, I mean "tribal" as in grouping up for malicious purposes simply to oppose another Black person. Whether it's in a nation, a school, or on the job. See other Black people and just form gangs and cliques so people can have your "back" as you go out attack another brother or sister." That straw man you see is you own ass