frankster

There is more in Asia They are real currently on going and true... You want to run around the place maligning black and giving everybody else a pass and excuse North America exports its intolerance.....currently I think they are involve in about 15 wars They are ranked no. 6th out of 7 continents in terms of wars Just let it go bro........ I am not the only one stating these facts....a study was done and that was the conclusion...of all the continents historicall Africa is the Fifth in the amount of wars. So No I will not be letting it go....while you are going around castings aspersions against Africans Historically it is....bring your facts and or links No true.. Where is your evidence? In theory....what about in real life Tell that to all the innocent black people in prison and all the victims of stop and frisk In that case you doomed... Like Sarah Baartman and Ota Benga

In comparison to other continents and their history....it is tolerant I never said there was no wars in Africa.....more amicably than most other places in the world thoughtout history I am speaking from a historical perspective and the sum of wars which the study confirmed....that African ranks fifth in amount of wars through out history. The three wars above in South America is current and ongoing Well until you do....you are in actuality not going to be considered or treated as a citizen It means you cannot prove your citizenship....so you are not treated as a citizens If you are accused and suspected of a crime.....and you cannot proven your innocence - you will be treated as a criminal. Does that make you a criminal....ask all those innocents locked up in prisons Citizenship is political.... Human beings are biological and as such is self evident...That can easily be proven to a point beyond a reasonable doubt - often your presence will suffice. Politically you can be deem subhuman(3/5th of a man) and treated accordingly by being denied your Humanity and Human Rights. If how ever you or the people examining you can not prove you are a human being.....chances are you are not a human being

Black people are the First people.....And Easter(Ishtar) is the Rebirth of Life(spring equinox) You can not know that with certainty....that Jesus did not exist? Why does it matter whether he was or is a real person? Which one of your many great great grand parents can you prove existed? Support to me is too strong of a word to use....in the situation - bearing in mind this is a 2000 yr old Book. The bible deals with these issue in a manner congruent with the times I do not think there is a person tribe or nation....that can say their ancestors never endured such privations and humiliations. Yes....on the face of it it seems horrible and I would agree. It also taught us to love each other...lest we forget It does not invite understanding and there is too much to unpack for all to understand....most would prefer to criticise.. Some have made it so....others are still trying MLK used it to break many chains.... Yes Conscious Blacks used it to forged unity. True....and we already know what that is The marvel of using hate to get people to vote against their own self interest True I do not see it happening....but you never know. History have a way of repeating itself.

Neil deGrasse Tyson On The Flaws Of Eyewitness Testimony

OI see no real difference between one being less intolerant and the other being more tolerant....this is splitting hairs. Its not only about current wars....to show levels of intolerance a history of wars is also necessary - and the article states that Africa is #5 among the 7 continents. The Mapuche wars in Chile.. The Farc/ELN wars in Columbia... Chiapas conflict in Mexico.... What is the current state of affairs.....you cannt prove citizenship. If you cannot prove that you are a citizen in actuality you will be treated as alien....until proof is provided fine by me

Same difference.. I did mention them.....ELN etc... I did not say they are more violent....just that they are more conflicts battles and wars in S. America than in Africa. Wars by its Nature are violent. Thank you... You are immensely more in dangerous in Gaza and Ukraine than in South central and North Philly... In reality Danger can be experienced almost Every Where.... It is also a reality than some places danger is likely to be experience more often.... than others What determines Actuality?? Surprisingly we agree....maybe not for the same reasons - or how we arrive at it. For me the Creator is Nature....And thru the Study of Nature we Understand these things. That is one way Nature Speaks to Us...as we study Nature - Nature reveals Itself.

Of the seven continents Africa is ranked the fifth in terms of war hostilities.....that means they are more tolerant than four. Yes .....Gaza and the Ukraine are significantly more dangerous than South Central LA and North Philly. Contra Farc ELN and the Mapuche War.. Proof of Citizenship or birth papers are the ultimate determinants of citizenship. That may be so... How did we come to "ALREADY KNOWN" or "initally we KNEW"?

According to a study published by the BBC....Europe is the bloodiest Continent having the most wars It looks like Europe and the US are the bloodiest parts of the world. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35685889 https://battles.nodegoat.net/viewer.p/23/385/scenario/1/geo/fullscreen Of the 7 continents Africa has less wars than Europe Asia and N and S America....thats tolerance in my opinion. In other words Africa is the fifth most violent continent out of seven. so cut the crapola I agree If you want to exercise your full rights and privileges as a citizens then you will need to be able to prove it Everyone born in the US is given a birth certificate and the government record it as a live birth....that is one basic proof of citizenship. Yes.... Being is Spiritual Citizenship is political. Some one studied the situation and did experimentations to prove it...answering most scepticism On that I never disagreed with You are entitled to your opinion....no matter how wrong it is Yes Yes....In society

No it does not....the fact that there is diversity on a large scale is evidence of Toleration. Yes nature is the creator of the diversity.....Africa being home to the earliest humans and some of the oldest human populations to still also have the most diversity is a testament to Africans toleration and acceptance of differences. Many innocents have gone to the gallows simply because they could not prove their truths or facts No its not...it is very relavant Without proof of citizenship you will not be granted or allow to exercise the rights of citizenship. You may very well be considered an illegal immigrant and end up in deportation proceedings. Our experiences are individual and personally subjected to biases of Prejudice Perspective and Perception We now only know it to be true because the situation was studied. Yes....Knowing and Proving are different Proving is not only to benefit a sceptic....it can also mean that you know how to use the knowledge That something occurred is true....but what and why is in question My content is not with what you observed but with your conclusion that it is a rarity to be observed in public by the public. That is you speaking for what other people have not seen. The name and password is useful in order to gain access to this space and exercise my rights as a member....if a cannot provide either I will not be granted access as frankster. That maybe true....there are also romurs that in some quarters he is known as Krasnov - I do not know in either case I do know....His legal Name in the US is Trump.

Yes That doesn't mean they are no wars in Africa.... The Diversity on the continent is testament in and of itself to the Tolerance that exist there. Yes...I know of Shaka That is an assumption...i will not argue assumptions that did not happen Truth falls in two broad categories....Objective and Subjective or Absolute and Relative In science and law one uses Empirical(objective) truth to discern reality or universal truth Scientists no longer like to use the terms subjective and objective in this contexts as it often becomes problematic. If there is no proof found or he cannot provide proof of citizenship.... He is in fact not a citizen until proven so and will in all regards be treated as a alien Yes...truth stands on its on veracity - but if only you know the truth then it is personal and subjective(relative) Truth is the reality or how things actually are Even when it is experienced it needs to be studied.... If the sun is hot why when I get closer to it I find snow....like the top of mountains Sometimes when a look at the moon it is a crescent and not round or spherical??? How do you prove anything? You must gather evidence and test them.....that is a system Yes....at that point it is a personal relative truth - it is not universal objective or factual It is called Confirmation Bias....its a human frailty You observed a happening.... You have very little idea as to why it is occuring and what factors are being played out or the context in which it is happening Then we will have to disagree... You said it is based in "Absolute fact".....those facts you have not produce Until you produce those facts...you lied. It is not what you have seen.....it is your conclusion and interpretation I am not disputing what you have seen or not seen... @Pioneer1 said However you rarely see Black men of ANY nationality piling up that close to eachother to eat. The "You" represents the general public /AALBC of which I am one....Here you are trying to tell everyone what they have seen or not seen. Since my experience is different to yours....I ask for any studies to back up your assumption Frankster is fictitious.....it is not my real true or factual name Trump on the other hand is his real name and we have a system of checks....to be asssured it is Donald Trump

No it does not..... At least three of the 5 or 7 major continents have wars on going today in and on them. The difference as you yourself stated aAfrica has the most Languages and tribes....that means they were allowed to survive and not subsumed by the stronger. That the tolerance I am referencing I will try not to....but we are talking about your general characterization as to whether or not it is a fact or an opinion. It remains an opinion until proven as true For it to be a fact is must be true and to be accept as true it must be proven No a study is not necessary for it to be true... But for us to know if it is true....a study is necessary Yes Yes No.... Proof Is a system design to test the veracity of an idea Yes but if you cannot provide your birth papers....I have not reason to accept your words as true You said: Even when it comes to observing something as simple as eating a meal together. I notice that Arabs, Asians, Latinos....the men...7 or 8 of them can pile up together and sit at ONE table eating, talking, and spiting over eachother having a GOOD time. No problem. However you rarely see Black men of ANY nationality piling up that close to eachother to eat. What you stated above has not been proven as fact and then you went on to say "Whatever what I'm saying is "rooted" in...it's absolute fact. If it's not fact, name me ONE thing in this discussion I lied about. For it to be a fact it must be studied and proven. "Whatever what I'm saying is "rooted" in...it's absolute fact. So your statement above is a lie....you have not shown where your statments are based in facts On the contrary they are rooted in an observation from which you unilateral draw a conclusion that you believe to be true. No...its an observation It is not a fact but an observation....for it to be a fact it must be tested and proven No...you obseving what you think is a man and a woman doing what you think is walking down the street. It could be two men and one is dressed as a woman....did they reveal their sex organs to you? and if the did are the real or fake facsimiles I understand what you are trying to say but it is inaccurate... There is a famous big foot case of a man claiming to have filmed big foot.....the question that has remained since the film was made public is Is it a bigfoot or a man in a bigfoot suit.....get my drift

It does matter if one is to prove intentionality ...... malice afore thought. There is no question as to whether or not she committed the act.....the question is was it intentional as in premeditated. Thats called in the heat of the moment/passion There is more to the human psyche...and lucky for some of us - the laws of many lands are beginning to recognize them and give weight to them Because acts done in the heat of passion are seen differently...They lay between intentional and accidental - A sudden irresistible urge it is tantamount to accidental - an automatic reaction done with little or no consideration. Yes....it is called "Impulse buying"....purchases made suddenly without planning

The difference is Tolerance.... Africans Tolerate Differences and Preserve Variety. Yes...There is Ethnic war on the continent......most can be traced back to European Interventionist Policies. Yes...until proven Your assertations remains unproven as a fact It is an anecdotal and personal observation....which mEANS it could be an isolated incident and or bias interpretation of the observation We are living out the Racist Play book ....called government social policy or Fighting crime - school to prison pipeline and mass incarceration Lied>>>> "Whatever what I'm saying is "rooted" in...it's absolute fact. If it's not fact, name me ONE thing in this discussion I lied about." No...you have an opinion on what you observed. You do not have enough information to generalize or state that your observation is a fact

Do you know that she planned the attack before the race began? Do you know that Tyson planned the attack before the fight? On the other hand Tonya Harding attack was commissioned intentional deliberate and even premeditated....please note the difference.

It is an act of racism because he did it in a place where systemic racism is. Yes.....His Affliction is the cause in both cases. Racism is an affliction He having been in prison can now become a contributing factor in his recividism The idea of race as we understand it today was not known then cool I have seen it in Arabia... and the Arabian Ruling Class Depending on your definition of race to most Western eyes they are all "sand nyggrs" Its called the "The duress defense"...look it up Not if it is "Entrapment" Self Taught

While I accept that pedophilia is wrong....I have questions Below what age does it become Pedophilia? What if they are both below the age...is it still pedophilia? What if they are maried? Does the sex of the individuals matter? Many cultures past and present allow pedophilia as legal and moral....so long as the parents consent.

Malcolm X - Who Taught You to Hate Yourself?

No it is not The system will support him throught the courts in most cases if you decided to litigate... If he is being targeted....then how can it not be? Unequal pay and fair and just treatment in law and social services. Some where what you would consider white..... Christians who were not Catholic were burned.... No...the Sabaean people came from Africa....Yemen is part of the Arabian peninsula. Many black Arabs are in Positions of leadership from time immemorial....the black arabs can hold any position in Arab society. If you are coerce into doing something....then you not guilty of it Again you fail to see....they whites have befuddle your mind. They kill your leaders and poison your people and you fail to see the connection..... You just do not want to accept the truth even after they admitted to it....boy have they fixed you. All victims except the government preps Anybody who agree with you is drinking the same cool aid.....the Government done admitted to it and here you are making excuses and blaming the victim....sheesh damn you so lost in the souce.

Yes that is what I know tribalistic and tribalism to mean....fierce loyalty to tribe Yet for the most part all ethnic groups retain their language and customs... Lets take England for instance The Welsh Scots and Irish are all losing their language and culture to the Anglo-saxons.... Because the English demands that their culture be relegated....not so much so in Africa "Whatever what I'm saying is "rooted" in...it's absolute fact".... Thats a lie so far - as I have ask you for studies that backs up your assertions and you have not provided any... It is an ancedotal observation at most and could verywell be a downright lie. Now to be clear I did not say you were a liar....just that your questions and statements seems to be coming from the racist playbook You just did.... An Observation is not the same as a fact

True....

I agree with @Troy here it may not be Intentional I Think it is not Intentional or Deliberate but action taken in the heat of the Moment or as pepe Le Pew would say " Faute Passionnelle".... For it to be intentional or deliberate one most prove that she planned to do it before the race began with the idea of causing harm on purpose. After all Mike Tyson did something similar to Evander Holyfield in the spur of the moment too....shyte happens Is she at fault of course.

Without the systemic and institutional support it is not racism...it is bigotry or prejudiced. Racism as experince by black people is always systemic institutionalized and legalized If he is being targeted then it most definitely is connected It was not indirect....it is and was direct. They were kicked as the jews were for religious reasons. I can proved to you it was as a result of religious intolerance and cultural xenophobia. Yes... The people living there were black Africans called Sabaeans who are traced back to the African Kingdom of Sheba But you did not use the word racist instead you choose antiblack?? You do not want to place the blame where it belongs.....It is a known fact that CIA agents introduced and poisoned those communities and peoples. While you here trying to make excuses for them....and blaming the victims They never choose....it was pushed on to them - that is why the dope dealers are called PUSHERS You are so ignorant of history.....they killed all who cared and tried to make the community better Exactly Yes....oppressors will always be finding ways to PUSH black people into TRAPS The Government introduced it and flooded black communities with it....they used alcohol on the indians and opium on the chinese Excuse me while I use some street lingo here maybe it is the only way you understand.... You sound just like Nancy Reagan with some just say NO bullshyte...thats the hand book you reading from - silly wrabbit now that the chickens done come home to roost and there communities are suffering from Opiod crisis they doing everything to save their communities while they did nothing for our community except push more drugs in blame the victims by throwing them in prison... No No do not give opiod junkies medical treatment just tell them to say NO. Wake the fcup up n.g.a They done admitted to this and you up here making excuses for them...trying to but the blame on the victims - get outta here with that bullshyte.

Being Tribalistic means sticking with and to ones people......everybody else is not your people Tribalism is a form of loyalty and cohesion to owns people at the expense of all other peoples. This is the case in Africa I do not know you are the one espousing concepts that is rooted in racist ideology and not facts. Yes....I have seen black men doing this throught out my life Yes I have seen it What are you trying to say???

Where did I say "n.g.as" are united? Being divided and tribalistic are two different things....really Yes. The Continent of Africa as the birth placeof humanity has the most genetically diverse human population Yes... That diversity is a result of people accepting differences among themselves and remaining amicable towards each other Yes....it would help? I am not sure what you are refering to...... but I have seen black Africans eating together in huge numbers my whole life growing up...and still do today. When Continental Africans greet each other it is customarily a hug while shifting heads over shoulders.....Black Americans used a dap turned fisted hand clasp one handed hug "hugged up" not sure what you mean by that? Yes as a form of greeting... Especially when it is some one i have not seen for some time.

Fair enough True I question the circles you are in as this question is based solidly in a racist stereotyping of black Africans. Any studies to back this up? Thank you