frankster

Science is being applied to the phenomena of UFO Thanks....that why scientific rigor is needed. SETI is set up to scan space in search of communications between among or from other civilizations in space.... Not to detect UFO crafts/vehicles in outer space near orbit or in earth atmosphere.. The three reasons i remember being given was... Too near Too small Too fast hence refucus and recalibration was recommended Most scientific study was deemed non essential... Science is study for the sake of study....the quest is to know or find out - Knowledge aquisition....to describe explain understand repeat and predict. Yeah...That is good enough for you. Earth is in Space.....Some of us want to be able to utilize space if and when necessary It is a blessing....the curse is not exploring what the imagination says and sees - envision

That how science works....it is often learning for the sake of learning One thing it is never is wasted Wow... if that were the case then all the eyewitness reports paintings carving effigies and writtings would have suffice Science demands more than just eyewitness reports I know.. As a group they are telescopes looking for extraterrestrial life and the are specifically focus to that end ....they are call SETI The Methodology they are using is more focus on long distance searching way out among the stars...not necessarily near earth or in earth atmosphere. Yes....but a blip is only a blip when something crosses in front of the lens of a telescope that is focus on radio background of a star light yrs away. Sure....they also draw things they have seen This maybe essential for our survival....it is science I personally have no idea what their interest are...But have read of others who say they have some idea. It is good that you are fairly certain about that... I know what my interest are...

Not true it specifically mentions ....any social group into which humans can be divided according to perceived similarities in their physical characteristics: The dictionary even gave you an example....The British are an island race.

Well then you should be humble....and pay attention to some one who knows. So look up the word and post and link here.....the word is "Indistinguishable" I know its a challenged for you but try to be honest by reading the meaning and then the example of use on various different website then come to a consensus Race is a product of Social Power Social Power is the ability of one group to cause another group to act or not act Social Power is used to invent Social Constructs as a means or way to express social power What Is Social Power? - Your Civil Rights Guide It is inadequate and worse it is the source of certain types of oppression Race as a social construct presumes and implies certain inaccuracies that results in the oppression of groups of peoples. These false presumptions and implications are used to legitimize and perpetuate oppression. Describing some ones appearance is not about race but ethnicity. The thought is the action and the action is the role....otherwords whatever the person is doing is the role Incels prefer to be celibate.....they only desire to be sexual - they fear the consequencies or process of being or becoming sexual. Preference in a sense is liking one thing over the other in the moment.....which ever you are liking is you preference. Orientation is the action of procuring or enjoying your preference What ever he is doing is his preference So while celbate that is his preference... When he resumes sexual activity that is his preference.... His orientation depends on who he has sex with .....be it with men or women Yes...they then prefer(or pretend) to be celibate - for whatever reason. They maybe desire young boys or women Orientation is an act

It is neither....most definitely not a scar quotes as the article supports the idea of the originator of the term. When we repeat someone else’s words, it is important to give them their due using quotation marks. https://www.thesaurus.com/e/grammar/use-quotation-marks/ “Quotation marks serve primarily to tell the reader the exact words someone used” (Hope, 2010, p. 21). https://open.maricopa.edu/eng102forhealthsciences/chapter/quotation-marks/ Yes ....because it his not his words nor did he coin the phrase/term and it can be considered plagiarism What is important is that I provided an example of its used without quotation marks...and I did Try again You stated/made negative statements as facts so the burden of proof is on you Not me calling anything....The writers of the pubmed papers are the ones calling it "mini brain" I have to prove nothing.....The Writers and Publishers did that already Neither did the PhD's claim that the ''mini brain' contains or have a spinal cord or pineal gland.. You on the other hand boldly asserted it doesn't have a pineal gland or spinal cord with no study or proof to support your claim I made no such assertion or claims beyond copying and posting the claims of Doctors You on the other hand rejected and remain in denial to the findings and designations of the PhD's

Can't argue with that....but as you see the current administration is deadset on cutting all that and pocketing the proceeds. So I prefer it goes to scientific study and research than Maga. Not to me...money well spent - How can scientific research and study be wasting money? Because that is not what they are focus on other things.... The telescopes do pick up lots of stuff....but not enough relevant info to draw a firm conclusion as to what it is in some cases. For it to be scientific various parameters and characteristic within a specified scope most be observe recorded and measured for it to be studied True....that is their focus - planes drones balloons and birds etc traveling in flight pathways. They see thm all the time. The top secret surveillance will not be available to science for state security reasons.. Radar operators and satetillis systems operators fear ridicule and loss of job if they report it beyond in house. Most telescope are inefficient when it comes to tracking and recording small fast moving objects.. You would be surprised at whats flying around....And cannot be seen by the naked or unaided eye Ancient man has painted described made replicas leave instructions and written about flying vehicles for thousands of years So says you.. I think its time to spent that money on a scientific study and reseach of UFO/UAP

It would have been spent on something wasteful....best spent on something hopeful Exactly.. They have spent 50yrs investigating....I few yrs researching is fine by me It should have been but it was not Very few can do what NASA study teams says need to be done....and those few are not specifically calibrated to do what needs to be done. Can you name any that you know of? In my estimation they is some truth out there Which technology are you referring to? I do not believe the military is responsible for all of them.....as some of them has been reported from before mankind was capable of making flying machines The Military also wants this study and research to be done.. I cannot see how that is bad....more money for all concern is a good thing in my book

Why leave out the following that further defines the word Race....no mention is made of Biology or Genetics. Race only exist as a Social and or Political Construct Invention Convention or Agreement.... a group of people who share the same language, history, characteristics, etc.: The British are an island race. any social group into which humans can be divided according to perceived similarities in their physical characteristics: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/race

They were not studying or researching ufo reports....just investigating them I do not agree... True.... Once used properly....? Do you know how to use a phone prperly to take a picture....I do not. Yes....so lets come back in 3yrs and see what the NASA study has to say and add True....but are we using to look for and capture fast moving objects near and far? That was one of the topics the NASA study group arrived at...That the current technology can do but is not calibrated to do what is required. True. These technologies will have to be repurpose and retargeted and that will cost money.... Most of these tech are being used in the military and the military will not share the info because it may lead to security issues. When they do not act(maneuver) like a falling or billowing/sailing(wind driven) object or bird.

You are right to say you are not sure....cause you are in error Here is the first post of mine of page 2 "True And since race is about Politics(social power) and Economics(financial power). In the US both historically and currently for the most part he would be considered and treated as black once his ancestry is publicly recognized and accepted." I need go no further....Social Power - proves my assertions It cannot do so with any degree of accuracy or certainty.... If it is a thought then it is a action If he is celibate then it means for whatever reason he prefers to be celibate right now It has everything to do with it.....he is refraining from sexual activity as a result of his preference He is expressing his preference by being celibate.... An unexpress preference is a desire ok Both has their roots in Culture and Religion depending on Time and Place

Quotations are used to define exactly what is being spokne of... See below...no quotes The heart’s little brain: shedding new light and CLARITY on the ‘black box’ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7610721/ Of course its not the brain... Yes....the heart own brain that has thoughts and memory Yes.... You said it doesn't...... so prove it. Or just admit you expressing feces...

Can't say if I have when in a discussion with you.... If I have please repost with link and date... but be sure that I did not say before in the same or other thread that race is a social construct. If I use the word race with you it could be to facilitate converstaion....so I am using it in its social construct definition. Race as a social Construct is often considerd unreal/notreal ....because it is made up, definitions often changes, people who were considered of one race or the other are now of another race, Children of the same parentage can be considered of different races, Often the same individual is thought of as belonging to different races according to where they are and Racial designations are based on the political whims of the current day. The Census Bureau basically defines race as a self Identification category that reflects a persons personal self identification or social and cultural identity and allows you to choose any or how ever many different races you identify as. Well I specify many times I think I did so in our last discussion which you seem to have forgotten.... In any case I do so now and hold that I have held this position for a several decades now. Race cannot be proven to have any genetic base.... Show my turn around link post and date..... Homophobia is the same thing.... Allow me to paraphrase you........"you are actively Doing or Saying or Thinking something to or about someone else of your own sex." The water been muddy already by you Yes If you are a man and you Prefer to have sex with men....then you are not fulfilling your Social Role Thank you So this man is capable of sex but does not engage in sex....is therefore a Celibate or Ascetic Rumors abound that he is homosexual and people believe thses rumors to be true.....Then he will be treated as all other homosexuals are treated. Yes he is first victim of Rumors and disinformation/misinformation.....That resulted in him becoming a victim of homophobia. If He is Celibate....then he has no sexual preference or orientation while celibate - unless he expresses his preference.

What does "distinguishable " means to you @Pioneer1 Post you meaning and link to supprt meaning

I cannot say there isn't some of that..... Not true....or I would not call it Research There have been no real Research/Study only Investigations of eyewitnesses report.....AATIP/ARRO Now since the Congressional and Senate hearings....we have the first NASA's UAP Independent Study Team started in 2025 Lets talk in another 3 yrs....if we all still around. Many of the newest reports are not grainy NASA Study team is about to use all that.....funding is currently miniscule - so it is going to initially be Open Source Those grainy photos will still be coming in... but some well define and in vivid colors will be coming too... I tried take a picture of a brightly colored bird with my phone....shyte still came out grainy - my daughter then said put it in portrait mode next time.. True They were not set up for those purposes....now it maybe refocus and or repurpose in part Information already gather will be mined with that purpose. Of course if ever I am in Chi-town I will.... Sadly Though I most admit at this moment I am more interested in Mokele-Mbembe and LochNess.....being caught/captured - not killed.

Intelligently direct UFO/UAP

Of course they drew a distinction....they said it was in the heart - the little brain in the heart. Yes....that why it is considered a brain - it acts and functions like the brain Do you have any post and link to back up those statements are are they just pure pablum see ya

Show copy post where I rejected race as a social construct? The dictionary does....agree with me Yes Currently science is tearing down those unjust and misleading suppositions and conventions First note it is an Action Second not the use of the word "especially" sexism noun sex·ism ˈsek-ˌsi-zəm 1 prejudice or discrimination based on sex especially : discrimination against women 2. behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism If you're still DIS-ORIENTED about the true meaning of "orientation", let me know...lol. And it turns out that you're WRONG...as is often the case, lol. The actual definition of orientation is: If you're still DIS-ORIENTED about the true meaning of "orientation", let me know...lol. Your own definition has the term "usually does" in it that denotes action.. Yes it is....he is not fulfilling his social role. Time to stand up and stop running. Me....you provide links that prove that orientation is an action

It is serious....they published it in pubmed Yes that is why it is a brain.....because it has neurons like what's in the brain. In some ways it acts and function like the brain....hence it's called "little brain" Quotes so you understand what they are specifically referring to See you around...

I think there is enough evidence... There seems to be a Financial Technological and Power interest why the evidence already Available and Collected is not being Accepted.. Only since the 2000's has real governmental and organizational efforts in the scientific fields has began to be made.. It has passed that stage.....we now have multiply corroborated instrumentational evidence..... They have... Yes... Because something is conspiratorial does not make in untrue or unreal. We know have instrumental recordings True... No they are not proof....but they are evidence that the idea holds value and should be investigated further.

To your opinions....not with who Only as social constructs....not genetically As a genetic and biological fact....no I do not accept it Even Your dictionary and link agrees with me....it is not biology but social. Making sure it is clear in your mind It does matter... In truth it is a Convention/(invention) or agreement that is imposed There is biological reality which are absolute and universally true and valid in all places and all the time Social Constructs are relative and temporary and not valid or true in all places and all the times cool I ask you first... then I will give you mine Orientation is an act or process....hence behavior. look it up. Everywhere you run...you run into a brick wall - face the truth bro....LOL But he is still a man...thats hated by other men - that is same sex hate You can run but you cannot hide or getaway.....lol Yes it is sexism....that is the thing about the truth - it is stubborn and gives no hiding place Then tell me your definition with link and post? Yet you will not provide a definition....I wander why - you running but you can't getaway from the truth

If that is your point...then you still wrong I am not the one who named it as such..... Doctors with PhD has named it and called it as such... discovered that the heart has its "little brain" or "intrinsic cardiac nervous system." This "heart brain" is composed of approximately 40,000 neurons that are alike neurons in the brain, meaning that the heart has its own nervous system. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31728781/ The potential to interact with the ‘heart’s little brain’ through direct stimulation, pharmacological or ablative approaches will increase as our understanding of the fundamental science deepens. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7610721/ You silly... I do not have to Pubmed and the doctors did it for me Thats up to you....call it what you want

One eyewitness can send a man to the gallows.....but for you 1400 is not enough. cool....we have had this conversation before - no use going over what has been already discussed in a whole new thread.. is it the quantity of or quality of Eyewitness that is important? bring up the ufo thread and I will try to be a little more convincing

Ok cool happens to me often when in a rush....and I am almost always in a rush "I read chariots of the gods a long time ago. Sounds like alien civilization is using the same arguments: there’s a carving that looks like a flying salsa therefore, it must be a flying saucer." But isn't that the point unitil we have more detail or evidence....to call it what it brings to mind. Yes there is....I conider you a doubter Reason being you do not believe because they have not reveal themselves to you.... Some claim to have done so...Our military says such things are a matter of National Security - only what is leaked is in the public domain Yes....you could say that Please do Ask this question in the UFO thread... Let me answer it this why...... "As of May 2023, there have been close to 1,400 sightings," https://www.statista.com/chart/8452/ufo-sightings-are-at-record-heights/ my guess it is not enough to convince you

Ok The Article deals with race as a Social Construct... It would support your ideas and lend credibility.... Do you know what a social construct is? if so please post and link you definition. Caught you.... Yes it is sexism Yes Yes....they are hated for their sexual behavior Not sure what you are saying here Usually male who have sexual relationships with other males are hated as a class/group. Yes.....because it is assumed they do not engage in sexual relationships with other males' I would not use the word love...as it is often confused or used in place of sex. It is sexism I think you are confusing Mysogyny and Sexism... Please use your dictionary and post and link what you have found as to the definition of sexism...

You missing the point....I did not set out to prove that the heart just has a brain.....but that the heart has memory and personality which goes directly to the heart being able to have thoughts.. Also in medical terms referred to also means localized... "The notion of the "heart brain," also referred to as the "little brain" or "intrinsic cardiac nervous system," was initially proposed by Dr. J. Andrew Armour in 1991. This conceptualization suggests that the heart possesses its own neural network, comprising around 40,000 neurons capable of sensing, feeling, learning, and retaining memories. The neurons found in the heart share similarities with those present in the brain..... . The heart maintains continuous bidirectional communication with both the brain and the entire body..... , this implies that the heart transmits more signals to the brain than it receives in return" It is emergent science....not colloquial talk If it pumps and the heart is also a pump....then it is a localized heart (as in a pump) It is to be taken seriously Cool