Delano

Cynique I have a few parallels with your story. I was always seeking truth. The light and the truth seemed indistinguishable or oerhaps two sides of the same coin. And now I want to embrace love but more importantly for me compassion. My phone sometimes will type phrases, call people or refuse to show me the bottom of a page

Pioneer have you considered that maybe you are wrong pr perhaps mistaken?

@Mel What if she said cool?

Pioneer why do you want to viewthe Akashic Records.

She looks different in every photo.

I went to school with a few wealthy kids. But we didn't hang out or in. All ir most of the Black, Haitian and Spanish speaking kids all sat at the same table for lunch. There was a white Kid who loved hip hop. And another white kid who sat with us. I think Brothers were more into herb and the white kids were more into pills and Acid. Although there was some interracial smoking and drinking.

This is fascinating.

Pioneer you and I live in such different worlds. It is not possible for me to answer your question.Up until the last year or so I didn't judge people. Now I judge what level to engage with people. So in the first section you are saying only Lesbian women and straight men can judge a woman's attractiveness. Then you say common sense and instinct allows judgement of a woman's attractiveness. So if I put these two sentences together then Gay men and Straight Woman lack common sense and instinct. Which is the logical albeit nonsensical conclusion drawn from your statements.Since you are defining abilitiy along sexual orrientation to the object. Does the woman's sexual orientation matte. Or is all about the person looking.

@Pioneer1 You are welcome.

It sounds like you can only judge someone's attractiveness if they are a potential sexual partner.

I use numbers and words from the querent or the environment, to read the Akashic records. Glad to assist. It's what I try to do in life.

Yes i am reading a book. And I'll post an idea. And then i see the same r a similar idea. Which fo me is something new. HoweverI am developing some new ways of processing information.

There was a documentary on swinging. And they interviewed couples. One guy said he saw his parents at a swinging party. He said swinging just amplifies what ever is going on in your relationship. Although some like the idea of it. They are not emotionally prepared, balanced.

Yeah its an evocative answer along with a great story. You are also mentioning an idea that i have been working on and of Since January. Thinking intuition and imagination are the same thing. They don't feel different, it's their use that defines them. I have thought projects and think about my thinking. Since I believe that I am a non linear conceptual intuitive thinker/empath.

You say compromising positions like its a bad thing. Thats when the negotiations and deals get made. Hee hee hee. Visualise hands rubbing together.

It doesn't necessarily follow that monogamy leads to a happy home life. Being polygamous is not the same as cheating. I have known and met people who have open relationships. Otn one instance the adult child was more upset than the partner. What is moral, ethical and good is another debate. I also knew a couple where the woman was a leabian. However that was more of a business situation. Plus she did use sex as a weapon. But he didn't care. I also had a coworker that said certain sex acts her partner should see a prostitute. There's what works and what works for you. They are not always the same. Interesting. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher had an open relationship. But it broke yp when he hid one his lovers. At that point he was cheating. Its not cheating if the other person knows about your lover.

I remember a friend told me i should hook up with a woman who was checking me out. He couldn't comprehend me not sleeping with her.

Cynique you said it earlier. Somethings are difficult to express with language. Thinking or cognition may be one of those things.

Cynique I assume that people want to challenge their beliefs and do original thinking. I would say your synopsis or is it analysis, is on the money. There aren't too many places where you can have a provocative dialogue. The question is not what do you think about or how do you think. But what happens while you are thinking. My initial feeling was thinking is a mysterious process. Since you don't feel anything and then the answer pops out.

Lol-ly

I person could be shown how to ride a bike wearing shutters. Like a horse so the bike is never visible. Or a blind person could learn to ride a tricycke. Leonardo daVinci might disagree with you. Nor would Einstein or Farraday. They didn't accept the facts. They could see beyond what literalist can see.

Pioneer you can not imagine a situation where a person can do something that you can not. Or do something that you can not conceive. I can think of a least two situatuons where you can ride a bike without being able to fully identify a bike.

I don't need to know what a bike is, i just need to be able to identify it. Most of what you have posted I disgree with, yet for you it is self evident.

Pioneer there's a subtle difference: what I am asking, and what you think I am asking. Sometimes I am capable of deriving a question that's palatable to the person being asked. It took me 30 minute with someone who understands my thought process. So I thank you for the effort. I'll post my response to the question. I didn't have sn answer until a day ago. Del The tricky part of communicatin is that we use the same words, but the meanings are shaded by our experience. Which is where the distortion happens. Also even if you grow up in the same environment your temperment, beliefs and assumptions will influence and skew how you see things. Pioneer when you use the words true and false I think of them they way a logician philosophers or computer programmer would. So there can be things that are true and wrong . Veracity only means that if I accept your assumptions and follow your thinking I can come to the same conclusion. Personally most assumptions are opinions. I would say that there are no facts. And if i can think of a situation no matter how far fetched that fact is no longer solid. The reason i take this position is that I can not be certain of the unknown much less the unknowable. Pioneer we have a different style of communication and thought process. I am not wedded to any idea or belief. Except that I want to know and figure stuff out.

I am becoming aware that people have different thought processi and thoughts It was an attempt ti show process although what i am asking is not easily put into words. So I appreciate the effort.