Delano

Each is better or more successful at their chosen "objective" You can think about intelligence as skill sets. https://web.cortland.edu/andersmd/learning/MI theory.htm Multiple Intelligences According to MI Theory, identifying each student’s intelligences has strong ramifications in the classroom. If a child's intelligence can be identified, then teachers can accommodate different children more successfully according to their orientation to learning. Teachers in traditional classrooms primarily teach to the verbal/linguistic and mathematical/logical intelligences. The nine intelligences are: § VISUAL/SPATIAL - children who learn best visually and organizing things spatially. They like to see what you are talking about in order to understand. They enjoy charts, graphs, maps, tables, illustrations, art, puzzles, costumes - anything eye catching. § VERBAL/LINGUISTIC - children who demonstrate strength in the language arts: speaking, writing, reading, listening. These students have always been successful in traditional classrooms because their intelligence lends itself to traditional teaching. § MATHEMATICAL/LOGICAL - children who display an aptitude for numbers, reasoning and problem solving. This is the other half of the children who typically do well in traditional classrooms where teaching is logically sequenced and students are asked to conform. § BODILY/KINESTHETIC - children who experience learning best through activity: games, movement, hands-on tasks, building. These children were often labeled "overly active" in traditional classrooms where they were told to sit and be still! § MUSICAL/RHYTHMIC - children who learn well through songs, patterns, rhythms, instruments and musical expression. It is easy to overlook children with this intelligence in traditional education. § INTRAPERSONAL - children who are especially in touch with their own feelings, values and ideas. They may tend to be more reserved, but they are actually quite intuitive about what they learn and how it relates to themselves. § INTERPERSONAL - children who are noticeably people oriented and outgoing, and do their learning cooperatively in groups or with a partner. These children may have typically been identified as "talkative" or " too concerned about being social" in a traditional setting. § NATURALIST - children who love the outdoors, animals, field trips. More than this, though, these students love to pick up on subtle differences in meanings. The traditional classroom has not been accommodating to these children. § EXISTENTIALIST - children who learn in the context of where humankind stands in the "big picture" of existence. They ask "Why are we here?" and "What is our role in the world?" This intelligence is seen in the discipline of philosophy. Since Howard Gardner’s original listing of the intelligences in Frames of Mind (1983) there has been a great deal of discussion as to other possible candidates for inclusion (or candidates for exclusion). Subsequent research and reflection by Howard Gardner and his colleagues has looked to three particular possibilities: a naturalist intelligence, a spiritual intelligence and an existential intelligence. He has concluded that the first of these ‘merits addition to the list of the original seven intelligences’ (Gardner 1999: 52).

It is an interesting discusion on time and how it isn't like the other dimension. Plus the mention reality and consciousness, which are all topics that are fascinating to me.

It is difficult reading, well it was for me. https://textureoftime.wordpress.com/2020/02/14/a-fractal-topology-of-time/

All Biden needs is Nevada at the moment.

I totally agree.

Yes but Pioneer is a practical thinker, and can not imagine what he hasn't seen evidence of in his life. Cynique said that years ago. Once I realsied she was right my frustration with Pioneer disspiated. And I have even defended and sided with him on certain positions.

Don't forget the 3,000,000,000,000 Trump added to the National Debt. Which would make him number 1 in the amount of debt added.

Others can be Broken

Congratulations, you know you are a pawn. Does that make you better or worse off than those who don't know they are pawns. Knowledge isn't always power.

@Mel Hopkins Some people are the Wright Brothers the rest of us are laughing at visionaries until we get on the plane. THe KKK Scientists Entertainers Educators are pawns to the elite. The only people "free" to an extent are Inventors, homeless people , sociopaths and visionaries.

As an aside my own studies have shown me that things not only happen in time they are shaped by the time in which they happen. And I am just now starting to see and map the contours of time.

@Mel HopkinsThere is a way out. Once you free your mind or listen to the voice. it is what inventors and visionaries have always done. I have only realised that I have been trying to do so all of my life. What I posted was inspired.

You are mistaken White Supremacists, White Racists, and the Elite are not all the same. It's like a chess game your position decides your movement and what you can see. Pawns have the most limited movement, and can only move in one direction. The Rooks are the land holders(those with assets, The Knight is the military(athletes), The Bishop is the Clergy (education), The King and Queen are the ruling elite. The function of Royalty is to set the standard. So the King and Queen define the ultimate Man and Women in the country. Each of piece has a pawn that is in front. Notice they are White Pawns and Black pawns. Just like in the fairy tales after much trials a pawn can elevate Each Pawn occupies a unique position and the position shows their master King Pawn 2 and Queen Pawn 2. So based on that analogy you can work out what type of Pawn you are in life.

If you have a spiritual person, an intellectual, an athlete, a poet and a humanist on an island, the person with the gun will be in control. That doesn't make the gunner more evolved or elevated than the other inhabitants. Intelligence and stupidity are evenly distributed among groups, unless it is a group of stupid people. Even the king's subjects have power, the key is to realise and harness the power that you have at our disposal.

Rafael Nunez

How could we know until we understand consciousness? I don't think any symbol is real. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-universe-made-of-math-excerpt/ https://medium.com/however-mathematics/everything-in-our-life-has-only-mathematical-patterns-504a0e87ab3 How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality? Albert Einstein… One evening a few years ago, I was with friends from the college at the backyard of the college, and talking about the relationship between science and mathematics. One of my friends’ friends made a comment, “Science does not explain objects, it just describes them.” That made me utterly surprised because I was pretty sure that mathematics and science were the best languages to explain what is happening in the universe. https://www.kavlifoundation.org/science-spotlights/brain-or-universe-–-where-does-math-come#.X5x76Igza00 BRIAN BUTTERWORTH: We’ve pinpointed an area of the human brain where there’s a specialist neural network that responds to counting the number of objects in a set. This area of the brain can recognize numbers across modalities. In other words, it can recognize three cats, three tones or three wishes. A similar area in the brain of the monkey does the same job. We even discovered the guppy — a small fish with a tiny brain — has one system for detecting small sets of up to four objects and one for larger sets. My argument is that we evolved a brain-based system for detecting and comparing the number of items in groups. Humans have developed symbolism for these numbers and elaborated on them to create the kinds of mathematics that Max and Simeon need to describe the universe. Numbers are not necessarily a property of the universe, but rather a very powerful way of describing some aspects of the universe. Brian Butterworth—Emeritus Professor of Cognitive Neuropsychology at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College London; Which leads to a large question, that is debated in the Philosophy of Mathematics. are numbers invented or discovered. Personally I would say created since it is a symbolic language. Symbols only mean what we say hey mean. So if numbers are created and don't xist except as concepts then Mathematics and indeed all of science is on an ephemeral foundation. While you may think the answer is obvious one way or the other , it has not been proven and may not be provable. The Brain in a Vat is one of the biggest question in Philosophy. Basically if we lived in a world like the Matrix it would be artificial yet feel real to us. And we would have little way of know it isn't real unless we could break or bend fundamental laws of that system. https://www.vedicplanet.com/vedic-philosophy/vedic-model-of-reality-scientific-perspective/ In Hindu literature life or reality is called Maya which translates as illusion. Many mystical or shamanic practices are founded on the ability to break into another reality or place that exist outside of our normal experience. Priests, Rabbis and Iman also serve this function in organised religion.

opinion- NOUN 1A view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. ‘that, in my opinion, is right’ More example sentences Synonyms 1.1mass noun The beliefs or views of a group or majority of people. ‘the changing climate of opinion’ More example sentences 1.2An estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something. fact- NOUN 1A thing that is known or proved to be true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole The Roman Catholic Church continues to use corporations sole in holding titles of property: as recently as 2002, it split a diocese in the US state of California into many smaller corporations sole and with each parish priest becoming his own corporation sole, thus limiting the diocese's liability for any sexual abuse or other wrongful activity in which the priest might engage.

Apparently the Dogon tribe could see a star that wasn't visible without a telescope. Their belief system has some strong scientific correspondences.

I try to keep an open mind and consider that the other person could be correct and i could be mistaken. You are clearly wrong on at least one point. I will attempt to show you one instance. If you choose you can generalise from the particular to the general. Then you will be able to apply this globally. This is an instance of using both deductive and inductive logic. Here is an opinion. Chocolate Ice Cream is better than vanilla. Two things to note. Firstly an opinion is not a fact although it may be a factual statement. Secondly this doesn't apply if you aren't interested or concerned about making logical statements. Bonus point knowing etymology also helps. You believe you are making a factual statement and not expressing your personal opinion. Hence you are wrong. Do you realise that all of science could be a fiction? Just answer no so I can educate you. Or become incensed and or dismissive because you have more experience with mathematics and engineering than I do .Or be open to possibility having a different perspective on life science and knowledge. The other option is dismiss my statement as absurb.

All beliefs are based on faith. And opinions are never wrong they, but they can be misinformed.

Pioneer doesn't allow his ignorance to get in the way of being misinformed.

Gott Damn

In the past 5 years, astrologer I have made me aware of aspects of my personality I did not know. Correction. I read that decades ago, fortune telling for self discovery and education. Your fortune is also what you possess. Your second house and the part of fortune relate to your moveable possessions. House or land would be the fourth house in Astrology since you can't move them. I would put cars in the third with short term travel. And planes and ships in the 9th with long voyages. Thanks Twin. I am also looking at portents and signs . Since whatever catches the attention has meaning.