richardmurray

If anyone reads my comment, comprehend the Office of the presidency has a subdivision called the office of management and budget, or something like that. Their job is to do the financial and legal research and implement the structure of the bills based on the agenda of presidents. The usa is an empire , like any empire, it has a government bureaucracy that is too big for one person to manage alone. But the policies the act to the people are of the president of the usa, whomever they are. No president is a figure head, or king, or lone operator in the usa government.

@ProfD well by musk own public statements Scrumpft's choices for various positions in the federal government were not musk's choices so... And anyway, a man named Conklin of New york State, very rich or powerful, some argued the most powerful man in the usa at that time , once felt he had a president at the hip ,that he could do similar to president harrison and it didn't go to plan, if you know your history of the usa.

@frankster bless you:) thanks for answering all the questions. Your favorite black stripper? well said What do you think about a heather hunter or sahara art? I actually know of heather hunter, she was a soul train dancer, and don cornelius allowed it until the network said no. these sound like great stories make sure you write them down for your children DO you or your wife have a favorite erotica literature by a black writer? and if not, what would either of you be interested in reading. I want to know from both of you. Please type her answer. It is important to me as a writer. You may know the following black artist work, but I am connected to them on deviantart , i think these all provide great examples of erotic black fantasy. Tell me what your significant other thinks too. https://www.deviantart.com/kiratheartist/art/Little-Friend-1113175550 https://www.deviantart.com/dualmask/art/Scan-20241029-1115834858 https://www.deviantart.com/ngart7/art/Illustration-1068449271 and connect back to me on AALBC please, thank you again for this comment, thank you for the time answering all these questions and the help, thank you

@Pioneer1 the exact wording I used matters:) I never said i never saw a fight:) hahaha I said the daily gun violence/everybody had a cousin shot/drugs sold everywhere on the street/ no place is clean/ the woe is us local black community which is seems manyy or most of the black populace in the usa suggest they were raised in, i wasn't while still deep in nyc. I saw street violence, i saw the police drag black people, club black people. I saw that. I can accept that some black people in the usa were raised in sections of the black populace that were negatively chaotic in myriad of ways, but I still think that is a minority of black people who actually lived like that while a majority of black people like to say they had a similar situation when discussing the black populace, while in truth they didn't. They had a normal local environment like the average white but like to exxagerate.

@ProfD So by your own words, Musk didn't act strategically when he was a cofounder of openai as he had to leave it when he didn't get his way. The strategic thing would had been to start xai from the beginning not invest in openaii and buy twitter to leverage the data needs of xai. I don't know if he has to , but he is. This is financial fact. And no one lets anyone borrow and borrow absent results. Recently a billion dollar firm has to file for bankruptcy because it will get no more loans and has huge debts from failed use of money from prior loans. Musk is paying back the loans but he will not get them if he fails repeatedly.

@Troy exactly, porn was the fiscal backbone of the world wide web in the internet. yes i do and I comprehended completely. I do have groups elsewhere and i have to remove content for both reasons, algorithms + people statse. I recall I fully comprehended. No, in my artistic journey I have seen much:) but when it comes to online activity the reality is, as always, the creative side the commercial. The creative is beyond infinity in volume. But the commercial is limited in volume. No one can be prude in a creative way because what you like creatively is always a matter of taste. No one's taste is excessive, it is merely the truth. And as for the commercial, the goal is to make money, and online money has two currencies, dollars and followers/viewers. To the dollars, if the algorithms that showcase content lead advertisers to support based on more porn all websites would welcome more porn . To followers/viewers every website has to know their membership/viewership and you do and they don't want. No excessive manners in any way. @Pioneer1 be careful and catch them quick , bitten in fruit spoils quicker

@ProfD half exactly, i didn't say well thought out, it is a myth that policies have to be well thought out. was the north american free trade agreement? was welfare to work? was the war on terror? A long list of policies that in hindsight were clearly half baked ideas initially became... policies It isn't a mask, it is the truth. @Pioneer1 As roman emperors were sometimes decided by the pretorian guard,or khalif's sometimes dictated who the sultan was, i am 100% certain powerful/influential/violent folk have a level of determination in who becomes president of the united states of america or what presidents of the united states of america do. BUT, policies are free to be made by all presidents and they do and that is that.

@ProfD That is an excellent question because many assume with the 36% . I remember in local news in nyc, how many people said they wouldn't vote, across phenotypical/gender/language or other racial categories. That to me is the point, investigative reporting is very expensive and yields the least profitable result, prose anyone can copy and paste so it is rarely done but your question demands investigation. well yes as per the constitution. The electoral college is in the constitution itself so the only way to actually undo it would be an amendment. It is possible to get amendments passed but unlike acts in the congress or acts through the executive branch or court orders through the supreme court, amendments truly require the popular vote you are talking about. Remember, fr an amendment to pass you need three fifths of the states to vote year, an each state gives it vote, not by electoral college, but popular vote. And this is why few in government are interested in amendments cause that requires positive strong quality as elected officials to regale and very few of them exist in the usa government. I think both major parties are at a crossroads, the success of the elephants doesn't deny their own problems. Major, major defined as party that won a presidency, Parties of Governance in the U.S.A. Independent Federalists alone [ first party from the founding fathers[[hamilton-immigrant via new york ]]: pro great britian/ industrialism/ federalism/ manufacturing/ us military support] Federalist vs Democratic-Republicans [commonly called republicans at the time, second party from the founding fathers[[jefferson-virginia+madison-virginia]]: pro france/agrarianism/decentralization/farming/republicanism ] Democratic-Republicans alone [ the federalist collapsed, I argue, the agrarian wealth of the southern states, wealthiest in the usa at the time + the ever growing agrarian immigrant populace, meant the urban/industrial /federal federalist were always doomed as the usa grows] Whigs vs Democrats [Two parts of the Democratic-Republicans, commonly called republicans, split ; Whigs[[henry clay-kentucky]]: business owners/protestant/urban/anti expansion/pro legislative branch over executive branch/neutral on slavery/pro bank/lessen federal power/federal power legally applied to states vs Democrats[[andrew jackson-carolinas , van buren-new york]]: farmer/rural/expansion/manifest destiny/executive power/pro slavery/anti bank/states rights over federal rights/ grow federal power ] Republicans vs Democrats [the whigs collapsed at the war between the states, their pro legislative stance couldn't survive the split in the legislature and the republicans were born the same time; Republicans [[ Lincoln-kentucky]] : industry, manufacturing,urban,anti expanding slavery, individual civil liberties + equality, federal right to preserve the union ] The Republicans and Democrats shifted in the 1960s becoming less big tent parties. They both became narrower [Republicans shed individual rights, added christian fundamentalism; Democrats shed the rural or agrarian and added extreme pro immigration+ moral bureaucracy] Black elected officials grew in prominence in the Democratic party started a rainbow image of members. Ross Perot and others started to challenge the honesty of the Republican party to its base. Obama/Hillary CLinton/ Kamala Harris non white male candidates for president dominate Democratic Party recent history. Schrumpft develops a refomr like party inside the Republican party. At the moment the Elephants have two sides: one side is Schrumpft acolytes/ anti imperial police/protectionism to the empire/states rights/free market fiscal capitalism absent the other side is War Hawks/international financing/maintaining government traditions the Donkeys have two sides one side is mass government projects/increase bureuacracy/federal powers to achieve moral or financial equality the other side is extreme pro immigration/ extreme individual rights/ righteous military use/socialism financial implementations Both of them have parts that do not fit together, no matter who wins or losses the current elections that is true. The question is what will the parts do? Success may keep the fiscal republicans with the Schrumpft but what will failure do? How long can the socialist+ federalist+ rainbow coalition faction of the democrats stay with the fdr bureaucrats? Both major , as defined by a president being elected from either, parties of governance in the usa is at a crossroad.

@ProfD really, i think they do. The border wall/ the tariff on china/ the forcing of european countries to pay in north atlantic treaty organization/the reduction of government spending on non governmental organizations/the support of abortion as a states right issue... no I see policy, is schrumpft good art articulating policies... no, no but he ahs policy

@Pioneer1 well you suggest an important question. In the usa it isn't illegal for a firm to go from private to public or public to private. So what your suggesting is a special case law. That doesn't allow social media firm online to be privately owned. Government subsidies are common in the usa, so even if government owned wbesites are unprofitable, the usa has a long history of supporting failed industries through subsidies, ala the airline industry to this day. Interesting, well, the type of service you speak of has precedence in the usa , the post office is a public service, started by the usa government when it was founded by benjamin franklin. so public services of a grand scale are not unheard of in the usa. It took the 1900s for the post office service to be tampered with, opened for private industry, so it had over a century. And today it is the only postal service that goes everywhere in the usa, all the other private services for all of their managed financial efficiency to specific locales or customers don't actually perform the robust duty of the post office. So the only question I see is a matter of a will. And that is the hurdle for your position pioneer. The social media companies are very wealthy: am*zon/the microsoft/google-abc/ they will not stand by and be forced to sell themselves to the government. The shareholders to these firms, the banks that own their loans will not want your position because making these firms government owned ends the profiteering potential for shareholders + banks. The common populace will not like it because many people make profit through the websites and their various private situations. When the government owns a thing its legality becomes more severe. I conclude with interesting idea, it has merit but the support for it will have many detractors

@ProfD No he bought twitter because the firm he part owned involved with AI didn't concur to his strategies. So he bought twitter to advance his own AI firm. H wanted to do it as part of the former firm but he had issues with the other owner. and if certain court cases don't go in musk favor his gambit will fail. but for the moment, leveraging the data of twitter to support xai is working financially well, but musk didn't buy twitter cause he could. remember he loaned money to buy twitter , those investors do not want their investment lost.

@ProfD Ahh i see, more questions So have you ever deemed porn or erotica or similar beautiful, artistically? whether as photography or film or video or literature? I don't want to assume. By your words I can guess no cause if you never looked at a photograph/film/illustration read a book that was erotica or porn then you never saw such things to deem artistic. But with all the women you have access to you have the photography of the eyes, so do you think erotic or orn photography could be eemed artistically beautiful?

from Moon Ferguson [ https://www.linkedin.com/in/moonleeferguson/ ; https://vimeo.com/moonferguson ; https://www.kweli.tv/creator/moon-ferguson ; mf@filledwithmagic.com ] We are officially wrapped up with our film festival journey, and after 33 festivals and eight awards, we're thrilled to announce that Skettel is available to watch on YouTube! https://youtu.be/b3BVSrd0PwA?si=u5U5vB8u8_00Bvjg Thank you to all of our backers for your support! We couldn't have gotten this far without you! Let us know what you think, and spread the word! With love, Moon

@ProfD thank you, i messed up, i should had a none of the above, thank you again I do have two question, and it is important to me if you give answers... 1. You don't enjoy porn or erotica in any medium but in what way have you achieved the pleasures others get through said mediums? I don't want to assume how, I rather you inform. 2. Are you suggesting most individual ,as they get older , don't need porn or erotica as "stimulants" or it is a specific to yourself? @Pioneer1 thank you for your input

@Pioneer1 wisdom is in your words

@ProfD I must add while no one denies the rich get richer the point of this post is to clarify why musk bought twitter

@Pioneer1 ok, I still feel that the presidential success comes from voters agendas matching his talking points, not liking. I am not suggesting no one likes Scrumpft but I don't think the majority of voters or his support in general comes from liking.

@Pioneer1 like scrumpft? I am not certain people like scrumpft. Do the immigrants who support Schrumpft ,who says he will make a better wall against the immigrants to be, like him or like his stance that most in the usa never publicly support as anti american? Do the non blacks who support schrumpft, who continues his fathers negative phenotypical bias toward blacks, like him or that stance which most whites in highly visible positions never make public if they have it? Do the laborers who support Schrumpft, who talks of tariffs and fiscal blockades not heard of since before franklin deleanor roosevelt, like him or that stance which hasn't been around since the early 1900s? Maybe people like Schrumpft, I don't know. But I would gamble sharing or liking a post that people support schrumpft because his agenda fits their needs. As it should be in government officials. One of the consequences of the global era of white european imperialism, which includes usa/japan/russia imperial activities not just western europe is that most populaces in humanity went from a complete white european control to a overseer control supported by distant white power. So most governments in humanity are locally controlled by the overseers who aided in the domination of their own people and thus, Nepotism/helping your clan... rewarding fealty/loyalty regardless of your quality... threats of violence cowering resistance all come from said global white european imperial era and just shifted into the future with local handlers, overseers. And that means the immigrants into the usa, ala the immigration act of 1964 or 1965 allowed millions of people who are used to nepotism/fealty/bullying as a standard a common practice to enter the usa, so what would become more desired than said three styles. But the immigrants didn't force the usa to open its borders, the nonblack fiscal aristocrats did it. So many misread the immigration act of 1964 , clearly with some dysfunctional idealism here is lyndon b johnson's speech as the proof https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2785&type=status

@Troy haha yes:) thank you, I have some things to think about for the erotic art challenge

@ProfD But as you say, being positive, the key isn't that black tribes exist in any country or in the larger humanity itself, but each tribe is managed from its members the best, and in that i see a greater failure, especially in the usa. As @Pioneer1 stated correctly, it isn't that the global black village can't be united, but that is a tall order. Strong people leading themselves isn't going to get the circa fifty million black people, skin color not language or geographic forbearance or gender, in the usa to act positive while collective. But mini Black collectives, a tribe, is less a challenge. Again Black Elephants, Republican party members, always complain about the larger black village in the usa being impotent or black individuals not republicans in the usa harming themselves the most/being their worst enemy but their tribe, black republicans, has done in my view, absolutely nothing since the 1960s except complain to other black tribes and be a set of individuals connected only by an individual association to the republican party which is mostly non black and producing nothing collective plus positive from themselves . And the lesson is, if any tribe is a set of individuals they can't turn around as ask for collective strength from the village, that is simply uneven. And they are not alone, certain black religious groups. Black Donkeys, Democratic party members. The Martha's vineyard blacks. The black people /village in the usa has quite a few tribes of black people who are small in populace but very vocal against blacks not in their tribe

@ProfD yes, while you are correct I have to add the why? The why is what maintains persistence. For the pre 1960s immigration act white populace it is the mythology said white populace in the usa started with. The founding father's mythos started at the time of washington was meant to be an idolatry. It was meant to make the original founders o the usa government, the post they held, mythologically good, and for many years as treated sacrosanct. I argue it was post war between the states, when you first start to see whites pull away from that idea, but when you look at the kennedy's , ala camelot in media, the mythos of government in the white populace in the usa is very strong, very very strong so said white populace emits that throughout all media. historically. Then you have the pre 1960s immigration act blacks. Well.. before the war between the states most blacks were completely enslaved so their relationship to teh usa, to whites i the usa is completely negative. Frederick Douglass side others who gained freedom before the ar between the states were a very small populace of black people in the usa. and this matters cause when the war between the states ends, what I will call in our dialog, the battle for black identity in the usa begins. At the end of the war between the stats you had three black groups. The free blacks , smallest but most educated, most financially opportune through white patronage. The ex soldiers, second largest, but a small percentage still, guns taken away but they have fought and a number of them would fight through many hurdles and start business become elected officials. The enslaved, by a long distance a much larger populace, but no money/no education/some very bad experiences in life and many of them going to be abused by whites who took advantage of their ignorance plus impotence to keep them enslaved in various conditions not legally considered slavery, ala jails/sharecropping/ or just keeping them enslaved in country places to remote to reach for most who might help them. So the black populace is an open canvas and you had the following three overall movements the leave usa folk, which is the oldest free black tradition in the usa, always individually possible but the best group after the war between the states being the garveyites The exodusters who wanted a black state in the union, the black cowboyheritage parallels the exoduster movement really. These were not blacks wanting to leave the usa or integrate with whites in the usa but who accepted segregation in the usa. or the integrationists, who wanted to live aside whites as usa folk as fellow citizens, in various ways...booker t washington and the HBCU's who were financed by whites usually wanted integration but strictly financial or wanted to be part of a religious union with white people. Dubois wanted a labor integration , and for the blacks oat the highest labor status to be a sort of lifter. Douglass wanted integrated individualism , he didn't want any strict black collectives as much as blacks working aside whites in the usa institutions. And so the fight began. The leave usa folk had the strongest internal momentum as most blacks in the late 1800s in the usa despised whites. , feared but despised. So the idea of leaving was great, but had little to no white financial support. Whites either wanted blacks to rebuild the south through the prisons or strengthen their religious groups through colleges or universities or strengthen their parties of governance through membership. Whites could not agree on how to approach the blacks but they had one thing in common, or in overwhelming majority, don't let them leave. The exodusters is probably the saddest tale in that, they had a middle ground idea but one that went away from what most blacks really wanted, ala leave the usa. or what most whites wanted, blacks to support white groups. The exodusters wanted schools but not ones financed by whites. wanted black empwerment or nationalism but not outside the usa. And between the manifest destiny charge of whites which slaughtered the first peoples and any allies they had militaristically, while empowering white terrorism to not get blacks to leave the east , south or north , the blacks out westbecame a story of murder and diminishment. So much so if you look at a demographic map, you can see the western line of the usa based on where the black populace cuts off westward. that is what happened to the exodusters, whites who helped other blacks start schools or become elected officials in the south or north east wouldn't help them and whites who wanted the west killed them if they came west, Laslty the integrationists, who had the most white support. won the day as modernity proves. But to the issue of how blacks view elected officials. The early integrationists sought to embrace the usa, and the whites in it , which meant they pushed the idea of the usa or the whites in it being good. To this day , how many black people were raised in homes where Harvard/Yale/Colombia university/The Senate/ The congres/ the army or navy were spoken of in positive glaring terms? many , and that comes from the black integrationists basically campaigning home to home for the institutiosn of the usa as not white ones but human ones, ones welcoming to all and thus that idealism supports a narrative of inherent goodness. Remember in the 1960s , what many black people don't admit to is black churches, the black wealthy, black elected officials were not about the panthers or these anti white anti usa movements, and most black people were not publicly. That is the effect of black integrationists in the past Finally, you have the post 1960s immigration act populaces, all phenotypes. Most of these are people who came from all over the world for one thing, financial betterment, and sometimes a cultural friction as a secondary. But most also came from countries where government hasn't recovered from the age of white european imperialism, which includes the usa + japan + russia , not just western eruopean states . So what is the point? said immigrants came to the usa to make money as individuals but they mostly fear the conditions of the governments they came from. YEs they want money but they also dislike the governments of the countries they came from and that lends to a glorification of the usa. On the one hand, to stay, be accepted, they show love , but on the other hand out of spite to the country they came from, they want the usa to be a better other. So this is the why the populace in the usa in majority view the government in the usa as it does? @ProfD I am not educating you and you plus many others know this BUT my point is for any who may not know or for those who may be in doubt, or for those who simply want it stated somewhere which it usually isnt' and that is another problem. Too many people say, what you said prof d, which is the truth but by not explaining the why , allow for the idea that all one needs to do is snap a finger and that isn't the truth. Individuals can have epiphanies, moments to break out of mindset but I find groups never work that way and definitely not millions of people. Because humans are human, not all humans will come to the same conclusions no matter what anyone thinks or does. @Pioneer1 yeah, to each their own, But I think the issue you present has value. The idea of individualism says what, you are free to do what you want. But many people in the usa have this idea of merit. Which means what, whatever you get should be merited, whether positive or negative. It is a position on merit that oppose individualism. It is a collective view on merit, and that in my view, is where the discourse reside. I have heard various blacks plus non blacks say they will not treat clan members, those of their bloodline, in a protective way. And more to the governmental point, a populace of people support the idea that an elected official shouldn't help members of their clan. Schrumpft himself, helped many in his clan in his first term. For the second term he is helping those who show more fealty, loyalty , not clan members but either whether by clan/blood or fealty/loyalty neither is by merit of action to a collective. clan is by no action at all, while loyalty is by action to an individual, in this case schrumft.

@ProfD exactly, I wish you had quoted the following as well yes, Obama is a good advertisement man. But my point is that you can beat any advertisement campaigner with policy quality , if you have policy quality

So Musk bought Twitter to make it a legally private data source that is being grown real time by the public users to his own private modern, circa 2025 , computer system commonly while falsely called an Artificial Intelligence, xai. The money he loaned to buy twitter he presented this to them in some way or form. Alot of data today is behind various paywalls, literally as in terms of service or legally through lawsuits if accessed. So getting data that is not only of a heavy quantity while still being added into plus private to all other data acquirers is priceless. Even if former twitter losses social media market share its value to growing xai is on course to making losses with x smaller than revenue earned from xai , potentially of a varying scale. Question: What will the ability of offline devices software having the generative functionality of OpenAI+ChatGPT+MidJourney aside the data of the google search engines internal encyclopedia have on humans? At some point devices will exist that don't need to be connected to the world wide web, which is in the internet , for the software inside said devices to exhibit the combined functionality plus base data content of multiple services of the most potent computer programs accessible online today, circa 2024. That moment will be a watershed in terms of online or world wide web usage. CITATIONS Segment Critics said Musk 'overpaid' for Twitter. Thanks to Trump and xAI, it could actually be a steal. ... Not only has X served as Musk's political megaphone — it has also been a lucrative source of training data for one of the billionaire's other ventures, xAI, a startup that has rocketed to a $50 billion valuation in 16 months. [ https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-xai-startup-valuation-history-chart-2024-11 : POSTSCRIPTA- segment] That fresh valuation means xAI has surpassed Musk's purchase price for X. It came with a $5 billion funding round, which The Wall Street Journal reported was backed by the Qatar Investment Authority and Sequoia Capital. [ https://www.businessinsider.com/xai-value-twitter-funding-elon-musk-x-2024-11 ] Musk launched xAI in July 2023 as a springboard to get in the AI race. He had cofounded and then left OpenAI over differences with its CEO, Sam Altman. The startup has made up significant ground on its rivals by using X as a source of third-party data, one of the key avenues for training large language models. [ https://www.businessinsider.com/generative-ai-wall-scaling-laws-training-data-chatgpt-gemini-claude-2024-11 ] In late 2023, Musk blocked other organizations from scraping X's data for free — but gave xAI continued access. That gave xAI a crucial boost. [ https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/08/x-updates-its-terms-to-ban-crawling-and-scraping/ : POSTSCRIPTB- segment] ... Though the number of X users has been falling, Musk said in May that it had 600 million monthly active users. "This is a level that neither OpenAI nor any other third party can access, or at least not as easily, which provides a huge competitive edge and therefore makes xAI a valuable company," Keenan-O'Malley added. Wired reported last year that access to 0.3% of X's data would cost about $500,000 annually. [ https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-data-api-prices-out-nearly-everyone/ ; title: Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone ; subtitle : Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets.~] "Clearly X's or indeed any social-media platform's data is valuable," Advika Jalan, the head of research at MMC Ventures, told BI. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/critics-said-musk-overpaid-for-twitter-thanks-to-trump-and-xai-it-could-actually-be-a-steal/ar-AA1v6Ojy?ocid=socialshare POSTSCRIPTA It took OpenAI, last valued at $157 billion in October, about nine years to reach the $50 billion milestone, according to PitchBook data. ... Elon Musk, starting with a team of 12 people in July 2023, did it in less than a year and a half. POSTSCRIPTB The new terms, which are effective from September 29, ban any kind of scraping or crawling without “prior written consent.” [ https://x.com/en/tos ] NOTE: crawling or scraping the Services in any form, for any purpose without our prior written consent is expressly prohibited. The previous version of the terms allowed crawling in accordance with robots.txt. “NOTE: crawling the Services is permissible if done in accordance with the provisions of the robots.txt file, however, scraping the Services without our prior consent is expressly prohibited,” it read. In the last few months, Twitter has also altered its robots.txt file — a file that gives instructions to robot crawlers about what parts of the site they are permitted to visit — to remove instructions for all crawler bots apart from Google. In 2015, Twitter confirmed that it had a firehose deal in place with Google to surface tweets in search results. It is not clear if the nature or terms of that deal have changed under the new management. We have reached out to Google to understand if the search giant has an agreement in place. We will update the story if we hear back. X has also altered the robots.txt file to disallow crawlers to get information such as likes and retweets related to specific posts. It also bars robots from looking at an account’s likes, media and photos. Earlier this month, X changed its privacy policy to state it might use public data to train AI models. Musk has previously noted during a Twitter space that xAI, a company founded in July, would use public data such as tweets to train its models. X’s new privacy policy also has provisions for the collection of biometric data of users along with education and job history.

@Troy that is fine. You have mentioned how my queries confuse you before and other members said similar:) not safe for work , n.s.f.w. hmm thank you. I wanted to state the range of content that is considered adult. and again, thank you for your answer, you have made me think Lastly, what is your definition of erotica? what is your definition of porn? focus on how they are different to you

I have a black artist group for erotica , and I want all black folk i can reach to answer some questions. I will use all answers to develop my challenge in the group, which has interest from the artist , but I am certain my mentality , which is artistically open, hasn't considered everything. PLEASE COPY THE QUESTIONS BELOW AND ANSWER IN COMMENTS SO I CAN SEE THE ANSWERS AND DECIDE MY CONTEST What visual erotica/porn/nsfw content do you like the most that involves black people? Do you think erotic literature is better with or without illustrations? What was the first erotic thing with black people you saw and at what age ? When did you first feel porn/erotica/nsfw was acceptable to be viewed by you with no shame and what was it you looked at?