Democratic Socialist- Mamdani part 2

@ProfD

On 7/6/2026 at 1:42 PM, ProfD said:

While there have been several Black movements in the USA dating back to slave revolts & Exodusters & Pan Africanism & Civil Rights, etc., a majority of Black folks have not embraced any one of them.

true , but two questions exists. First, could a majority of black people join any movement in the usa? pre war between the states we were enslaved. The seminoles originally was a collection of first peoples/native americans + a collection of Black DOSers/escaped slaves or free folk, fighting the usa in florida. Frederick Douglass was alive and young adult when the seminole wars against the usa was going on, which ended only a few years before the war between the states started, and lasted about thrity years. So how could a majority of blacks join on the side of the seminoles in the seminole wars? But a thirty year movement even if only accessible to a minority of black people I argue can be considered embraced by the majority who could embrace it, meaning free folk. After the war between the states... No movement has ever been thirty years. the usa federal government kicked garvey out. the black panthers were infiltrated/manipulated/subterfuged/attacked by white power. How could the panthers live to thirty years when fred hampton could be assasinated by the chicago law enforcement like that.

Again, your correct, but white power is real and before 1980, at least my view, white power used all of its resources to undermine black communal activity, and was usually or eventually succcesful, and it wasn't from a lack of desire of blacks to embrace, but resources matter and power matters.

On 7/6/2026 at 1:42 PM, ProfD said:

Along similar lines, starting a political party in the USA has been a non-starter because Black folks vote predominantly Democratic for many decades now & counting.

but before the party of andrew jackson it was the party of abraham lincoln. I argue it is more even to say that black voters have voted as a block to at least one party since allowed by whites/non blacks to vote, though as with all demographics overalll voting percentages or quantities are down over time.

And, strategically I think your being short, as a black woman told me years ago, the modern reality , which started in the late nineteen hundred and sixties is that many black people don't live in black voting zones. Between black people who don't live in black districts, which is ever increasing since the 1960s + blacks who live in black districts in white states, which has been the case for al blacks in the usa since the end of reconstruction, the legal environment made a black party of governance an entity that can't exist across the whole black spectrum in the usa, geographically.

As I have said in this very forum, a black party of governance in the usa, has 100% possibility in black counties,, the largest municipal zones that are majority black. So I argue, it is a non starter but based not on black voting patterns but the environment of the usa. I mean, that is why what whites called the napir of american race relations occured. Whites wanted to make sure not one state in the usa was majority black and killed black people until it happened. And that violence was the source of the so called great migration, not economy which black people for some reason keep lying about.

On 7/6/2026 at 1:42 PM, ProfD said:

The largest movement to which Black folks belong is Christianity. Unfortunately, religious folks aren't overly interested in power & self-reliance & autonomy.

Religion is an opiate that keeps Black adherents transfixed on toiling in life towards meeting the sky fairy & taking up residence in heaven when they die.

really? here is the problem, christianity in the black populace in the usa is a five hundred year old social engineering scheme by whites, Black enslaved people starting circa 1492 were made christian and christianity was peddled every year since then by whites down the throats of a majority of black peple till 1865. so... you say we are apart of christianity like black people are christian by choice and not an inheritance from enslavement. And what is may point? does that make black people crhisitan or merely a people maintaining a heritage started from their own enslavement?

From a participation standpoint, many DOSers have left christianity and religion for a long while. They still believe in a god/great spirit/divine, but I think most of the religious fervor in hthe black populace in the usa comes from post 1965 black immigrants from here or their moreso than black dosers.

MY COMMENT

@undefined



Reads like the majority of FBA/ADOS Black folks are stuck in a infinite loop of imprisonment within the system of racism white supremacy.

Interesting I know you view the opposition to black folk globally or in every land under each government is centered on a system based on white supremacy. It's dismantling or destruction in your view is the path to freedom for black folk anywhere in humanity.

I also know you view the usa as a best option country. Beyond whether the usa is good or not, liked or not, by those living in it, your point is that, even if a black person was born in a small black town still being terrorized in 2026 by the local whites, the usa is a better option for that descended of enslaved than any other government.

Sequentially, you use the word stuck.

All your points have positive value or truth. White European descended people sometimes, not all the time, coordinate against non whites or non white europeans.. Many people in humanity, gardless their phenotype, love the individualism of the usa. The usa is the country where the individual can defeat the group. Women in religious strict homes or communities can be lesbians or start businesses or live by themselves. Blacks whose entire clan have a negative bias to whites can marry a white person. The usa as the center of a global empire, started at world war two by franklin deleanor roosevelt, is the best place to be for the fiscally wealthy and has opportunity, albeit more and more fleeting for the fiscally poor , and in either case, rich or poor, definitely in comparison to most other countries.

I comprehend your point, but I think the usa as an environment is the problem. Not from white supremacy but the simple design of the government.



The history of willing immigration in the usa proves it works overall for willing immigrants . Yes, willing immigrants starting wth the first illegal ones who landed on plymouh rock but if any group in the usa has a non financial grievance, the usa can't handle it because it was never designed to or to change and be able to. ala the first poeple / native americans or the black/DOSers situation. The best parallel are the lower castes in india. India when it was created, wasn't designed to handle the greivance of the lower castes and so, the caste survives while the country upholds the law to protect the individual.

What can the usa do about non monetary grievance? what can non blacks do, even if they want to hel blacksp, about non monetary grievance?

I argue nothing and never will be able to, and every sean bell only reinforces the non monetary grievance for current ro future generations.

USA can change more than any other government in humanity, but not enough to heal the wounds that are older than itself, between its oldest residents.



I believe the majority of FBA/ADOS Black folks have some type of religious &/or spiritual belief. It is the opiate, coping mechanism to deal with their existence.😎

as james baldwin said, his father and the other members of his fathe'rs church prayed ot god for the damnation of whites. his father hated whites but never once spoke ill to them .

his father like many black people live with ahate to the usa or to whites of the usa, which is to be honest, heritage.

Remember profd, what it seems so many black folk in the usa don't seem to realize, when the usa was founded, whites cheered but blacks were not happy. Most black people knew about what the english offered, in terms of freedom, the creation of the usa was a hateful day for blacks, that i think many modern black people stemming from the 1900s have tried to reimagine for their convenience. But whites in the usa constantly remind black people of the sincerity of that hate. And I repeat, JAmes Forten was a black successful business owner who fought for the creation of the usa. and I think he had a faith that the usa will eventually change to a place where all black people are free.

but james forten like the modern black one percent or honstly pro usa black folk are a minority in the lack populace. And yes, the black militants, like the commonly called black loyalist who sought violence against the whites of the eventual usa were also another minority, , larger in number, smaller in fiscal power, but a majority of black people at the founding of the usa were enslaved people who prayed for the english to win, as whites in the usa fought hard to keep them enslaved while fighting the english to be free of the english. And on th historical result, it lead to a eep hatred that whites have kept relevant for 250 years.

PRIOR THOUGHTS IN COMPLETION first

Reads like the majority of FBA/ADOS Black folks are stuck in a infinite loop of imprisonment within the system of racism white supremacy.

Interesting I know you view the opposition to black folk globally or in every land under each government is centered on a system based on white supremacy. It's dismantling or destruction in your view is the path to freedom for black folk anywhere in humanity.

I also know you view the usa as a best option country. Beyond whether the usa is goodor not, your point is that, even if a black person was born in a small black town still being terrorized in 2026 by the local whites, the usa is a better option for that descended of enslaved than any other government.

Sequentially, you use the wor dstuck.

For me, descended of enslaved black people in the american continent [ canada to argentina] do have a unified heritage of oppression in the american continent to the non blacks of the americas. But I don't think that oppression is based on white supremacy as much as white suppremacy is one of the tools of said oprression. Nor do I think whites in the american continent or globally are organized enough to suggest their oppression warrants the term system.

I also think each government in humanity is unique and the situation of DOSers of Jamaica is not the same as DOSers of Brasil or DOSers of the usa.

To the usa, I think the problem is the environment of the usaa. what do I mean. before the usa was founded black people wer eenslaved to whites in european colonie. Then the usa becomes founded and black people are still enslaved to whites, but now instead of a european crown, it is a colonial businessperson.

Why does this really matter?

James Forten fought for the usa to be born with the idea that it can be changed into a positive place for black people. As barack Obama once said, fix it, don't break it.

Your very prose in this community, shows you feel the Black DOSer must try to change the usa or the usa can be changed fto black betterment. and black people need to get engaged to the usa system for that change to happen.

But, my point is, the usa can't change the way black dOSers need. In the same way the USA can't change to what Firs t Peoples or Native Americans need.

IN AMENDMENT

It is true that whites of european descent have acted in a unified or organized or systemic fashion for centuries. But for me, whites of european descent aren't cofunctional enough, and moreover, for me , each country is their own. Yes, intergovernmental actions occur and social groups can or do function within various government with a singular purpose.

But when I think of the descended of enslaved I see a black people from canada to argentina. And each country has their own situation, even though regional generalities exist.

In the USA's case, the regional [canada to argentina] generality is that each country from canada to argentina in whatever form it took, had or has a black populace who were completely enslaved to whites.

But to my prior point, the problem is the relationship of blacks to non blacks in the european colonies or the usa born from them,

PRIOR THoughts in completion second

@undefined

Reads like the majority of FBA/ADOS Black folks are stuck in a infinite loop of imprisonment within the system of racism white supremacy.

Interesting I know you view the opposition to black folk globally or in every land under each government is centered on a system based on white supremacy. It's dismantling or destruction in your view is the path to freedom for black folk anywhere in humanity.

I also know you view the usa as a best option country. Beyond whether the usa is good or not, liked or not, by those living in it, your point is that, even if a black person was born in a small black town still being terrorized in 2026 by the local whites, the usa is a better option for that descended of enslaved than any other government.

Sequentially, you use the word stuck.

All your points have positive value or truth. White European descended people sometimes, not all the time, coordinate against non whites or non white europeans.. Many people in humanity, gardless their phenotype, love the individualism of the usa. The usa is the country where the individual can defeat the group. Women in religious strict homes or communities can be lesbians or start businesses or live by themselves. Blacks whose entire clan have a negative bias to whites can marry a white person. The usa as the center of a global empire, started at world war two by franklin deleanor roosevelt, is the best place to be for the fiscally wealthy and has opportunity, albeit more and more fleeting for the fiscally poor , and in either case, rich or poor, definitely in comparison to most other countries.

I comprehend your point, but I think the question is,

Can the usa change in a way to make it a positive place for the majority of black people, which is never happened before?

James Forten, Frederick Douglass , MLK jr., Barack Obama, and yourself argue the UA can change to be a positive place for a majority of black people. I argue the usa can not change to be a place of prosperity for a majority of DOSers or Majority of First people./ native americans.

The reason isn't white supremacy but a weakness in the design of the usa itself. The usa is a country designed for willing immigrants, not indigenous people or enslaved immigrants. The change ability of the usa doesn't argue, how to fitx the past. It arguses how to change the future. And that is enough fr willing immigrants, as each willing immigrant populace in the usa or the european colonies who preceded it has shown. But back dues don't work. The Usa argues back dues of a non financial nature, have no remedy but need to be accepted as a civil act of citizenship.

The problem from JAmes forten to various folk i mentioned to now. Most DOSers whether they admit it in media or not, want the revenge and the usa can never change to give that revenge. Not from white supremacy but from the way the usais designed.

@undefined

To what other countries should the Black person born in the USA flee?

I am not giving a country I think a Black DOSer should go to alone or in a group, for themselves or actually for the village, but I can say that to each continent I know a Black DOSer from the USA who left the usa to happiness for themselves.

Nothing can be done to heal mental wounds. No apologies or money will ever be enough.

I argue it isn't mental wounds but spiritual wounds.

@undefined



The destruction of the system of racism white supremacy will free non-whites & whites too.

so the people black or non black who are profiting under the current order of things, whether a system or by chance are not free? or are they human to you?



There is a reason the USA has a diverse of mix of people. Immigrants from every corner of the planet; some risk their lives to come here.

yes, the reason is far simpler, the usa was born from the english colonies, the english colonies were not financially profitable compared to the french or spanish in the caribbean. the biggest business of the colonies was land acquisiton which morehonestly is the killing of native americans and taking of their land, which in the english colonies before the usa was founded was a multicultural set of whites from europe. The usa is born from the english colonies. the english colonies are the source of the multiracialist in the usa today , new york alone is a proof, when the english took new amsterdam they didn't kick the dutch out but invited them to stay, that is multiraciality, not phenotypically, but heritagewise plus linguistically. Historically the reason for the usa's makeup is very simple. the heritage of immigration is older than the usa itself, it stems from individuals coming to the usa for their individual betterment, with soft communal connections. the whites in europe ha sstrict countries but in the usa, germans/english/dutch/french lived alongside each other as neighbors in municipalities, unlike in europe. From the first english illegal immigrants before the english colonies to whomever is coming to the usa now, the reasons have always been the same, individual betterments, gardless of the populace they were from. And wisely, no other country of power has ever openeed itself to the kind of immiigraiton the usa has and modern immigration isn't from the founding it is from the 1960s as a result fo the commonly called cold war , what i call the third white european imperial global war. the union of soviet socialist republics global strategy was for each governments poor people to rise up and make socialist republics toppling the one percent in each country. the ussr was winning that war, so the usa had to make a counter strategy, their answer was the 1960s laws, the civil rights act to provide some levels of allowances for blacks/women/jews that could not be closed, which is why said groups have more wealth todday than before in the usa, the voting rights act so that the regions of the usa where whites were willing to allow non whites levels of prosperity could do it, and the immigration act of 1965 to allow the flood of poor aoutside the usa to come in, which would create a constant stream of labor willing to work under the market value which the governent would allow by not penalizing illegal immigrants by putting them in jail and destabilizing many countries by creating a populace of financially beholden foreigners who will support the usa for their financial desires while undercut the countries they come from by maintaining a class of people living off of remitance who are able to survive in the country so will suppor tregimes the usa puts in while oppose those who want to make real change.... Most whites in the usa were completely against all three laws, most blacks in the usa were completely against all three law as well. just for the record, so it wasn't done for white unity or some form of white supremacy, I repeat, a majority of whites in the usa were opposed to all three laws. The white one percent, did it for themselves, not the larger white populace. Time has proven the blacks or non blacks who opposed all three laws correct. The civil rights act used the black populace surviving whte terorr to empower whites who were unwilling to go against the system, meaning white women or white jews The voting rights act didn't undo the damage of white terror unto the black voting base, which is why black people fled the southern states in the first place. Blacks didn't flee the south for money , they fled because whites terrorized blacks at every turn so that blacks realized the south was a land of no opportunity in anyway for black people. Laslty, the immigration act deleted the labor union movements of blacks and whites by flooding the usa with cheap laborers willing to work under market rate or outside labor unions for their own personal gratifications. The immigration act also flooded the usa with a horde of more cultures or heritages absent having settled the problems between the native america/ the black DOS/ the white european descent so modern usa is more mixed than any collective in human history and without any possibility of finding a center, outside a fourth war between the peoples in the lands now called the usa, the first being the commonly called independence, the second the commonly called 1812, the third the commonly called civil war ending in 1865 .



To what other countries should the Black person born in the USA flee?

I usually answer this question in this forum, which you have asked multiple times, with I will not say. But this time I will give another answer. I know Black DOSers who have left the usa to the following countries: jamaica/france/japan/South Africa . So I repeat I am not giivng a country I think a Black DOSer should go to, but I can say that in every continent black individuals have left to happiness. the american continent outside the usa, europe, asia, africa.



That is one aspect of the USA people find attractive. There is more to the USA that draws people from all over the planet to it.



Yeah, and the only aspect that has historical consistency. Everything is are temporaries that are not true from the european colonial period circa 1492 to 2026. I repeat Individual allowance is the only historically consistent reason people have come to the usa or the european colonies that preceded it. everything else are temproaries that are not consistent from circa 1492 to circa 2026





Opportunity makes the USA most attractive to people around the globe.





yes individual opportunity. Not just opportunity, opportunity comes in many forms. It is specific, the usa has never bettered any community or collective.



Most of the people born in the USA & certainly not the immigrants who come here really know &/or care about how the country stolen & built with several hundred years of slave labor.



Most people don't know &/or care about how the government was designed either.

in 2026 i am 1005 certain this is true, the biggest proof is voting patterns, again, if you look at voting patterns in the usa, it is clear all demographics, i reepat, all demographics are disengaged from voting. That proves they don't believe in the usa system as something they can change or will change based on the majority of the people, so they don't beleive in the usa, that many who talk about the usa in media suggest the usa is.





That's why immigrants keep showing up. If Black folks born in the USA were to leave, those same immigrants would gladly take their place under the system of racism white supremacy.

yes but as individuals, that is important, it works because they are willing to immigrate and be about themselves as individuals. it isn't a collective harmony. As someone who lived in nyc i can tell you, many immigrants may wave a flag for some country outside the usa when some independence day occurs but most have a negative relationship to the larger populace of pepople from the country they immigrated from. And that is the usa way? again, the kansas nebraska wars that preceded the war between the states prove this. MEdia creates the idea that immigrants are communalists or collectivist, i argue the reality is immigrants in the usa are individualsist to proud to admit it and hide behind a impotent showing of communalism.



The USA could offer 1-way tickets to any country of choice to persons with a non-monetary grievance & who want to leave.



Even better, those individuals can buy their own plane ticket & sky up outta the USA. Nobody is stopping them.

History shows the policy of the usa is to raise the cost of leaving the usa. Their is a legal process to leaving the usa, it requires payment, it is not free, and the federal government raises the price near annually. I don't know where this idea that people can just leave the usa for free comes from. Laws exist for this to be done and with the international legal environments it is unadvisable to not follow the law.





Nothing can be done to heal mental wounds. No apologies or money will ever be enough.

I argue it isn't mental wounds but spiritual wounds. Wounds in the bloodline, as some say.



Like many others, those Black folks who hated white folks found a comfortable spot under the system of racism white supremacy & made the most of their lives.

JAmes BAldwin's whole point was that it isn't comfortable. It is interesting you think James BAldwin's father was comfortable. That is an erroneous position to me. In your mind, a person is comfortable while in a daily bind of hate and numbing routine.



Black folks in the USA know they cannot undo its history.

Why did you say this? What in my words usggested anyone black is trying to undo history, anywhere? It isn't just the usa were blacks were enslaved to whites completely. My point is black people are lying about the relationship the majority of black people have to the usa or the european colonies that preceded it.

I have never said the usa wasn't founded. I have nevrer said some black people didn't fight for the usa to exist. BUT, the relationship the uncontested majority of black people had to the usa at its founding was not love or hope but lament or desperation, while completely shackled.

To restate, it isn't that black people are trying to undo history but they are lying about black history. JAmes Forten's viewpoint was not the viiewpoint of an unchalelngeable majority of black people from 1492 to the 1960s. I Argue from 1960s to day, the majority of blacks are still the same, but it ins't in the ninety or eighty percent but in the sixty to seventy percent with so many black immigrants from the caribbean/africa/asia who are akin to nonblacks in their relatonship to the usa, not Black DOSers.



Until Black folks do something about that hate, they are in a holding pattern of finding a comfortable spot under the system of racism white supremacy.

Again, i really despise you calling people comfortable who are in pain, i find it insulting in all earnest. I can imagine you telling a black child that doesn't know about history that black people in the usa or the european colonies preceding it have been comfortable the whole time.



James Forten had choices...1) live the best life possible under the conditions or 2) overthrow the government or 3) flee to another country or 4) kill himself.

The wording of 1) and 3) are dysfunctional or vague.

I argue no one can get two human beings to concur on what the best life possible looks like or is defined. 2)3)4) are all well defined, but 1 ) is a vagueness.

you use the word flee, it is historically known, some black people immigrated to monrovia, as free peoples who owned business, they were not individually unhappy, but they couldn't stand the majority of black peoples unhappiness, so they wanted to go somewhere where the majority of black peopel are not under local a non black boot. I prefe rusing the word immigrate. Or having an adjective with it. y enslaved forebears were immigrants but were unwillingly enslaved immigrants. I know it is more wordy but again, I hope you are not speaking to black children about black history like this.

You are msising many other choices,

5) live unhappily waiting to die naturally, that is james baldwins father

6) become an agent of non blacks , underrated how many blacks have done this.

7) set up a black government in the usa, this is the exodusters

8) if the language of 3 must be then , immigrate to another country not for individual needs but to be about a safer community, thus wanting their best life under other conditions

Interesting how you mention the choices 1) to 4) and not the others .





The majority of enslaved Black folks were given religion to quell their hatred of & anger towards the white who enslaved them.



Instead of joining with other groups who love to destroy white people, Black folks are still using religion to deal with the existence of living under a system of racism white supremacy.😎

I oppose this read of history. The majority of peoples in humanity adhere to religions, that were handed down from their lineage which originally were forced unto most peoples, including chirstianity in europe, to grow the influence of churches. in every tongue has to confess by zora neale hurston it is clear, that white religious groups circa 1865 were fighting to gain members to their churches from the Black DOS populace for political power, not to quell hatred or anger towards whites.



other groups , like who ? can you name one of the other groups?

@undefined





Fair enough. I know far more Black folks from other countries who find happiness here in the USA than I hear from FBA/AfroAmerican/ADOS ex-pats living abroad.



All of my FBA/AfroAmerican/ADOS enjoy visiting other countries & working in them for periods of time but they always come back to the USA.



yeah , remember, the Black DOS relationship to the european colonies or the usa or others like brasil or mexico or india isn't financial. Our forebears had their world destroyed and then their children lived under the manipulation of enemies for hundreds of years. Money can't repair that. What Black DOSers should be looking for isn't money but a home that was lost a long time ago. A positive, overwhelmingly Black home.

Black Immigrants are looking for money. The USA is great at individual profiteering. IT was from the time of the european colonies to today. Robust Communities never survive in the usa, even white ones, individuals can always do well in the usa.



Point taken. I started to list physical & spiritual as wounds too.



Bottom line is deep wounds never truly heal without some form of revenge.



Otherwise, people remain scarred for life & from one generation to the next.😎



And that is the battle in the modern usa. Although the following is a crude summarization,

it boils down to those, of all lphenotypes, who see the usa s empire, enslaver, white that regardless of its media appearance needs to embrace its historic truths, which is strategically wiser, at least from a historic perspective

against those who see the usa as a country that can become a binder for humanity. They want to expand what the usa started as a strategy against the soviet union into something to unite all humanity, which has never been achieved for obvious reasons, but if successful can lead to an unprecedented era of healing.

@undefined



Fair enough. I know far more Black folks from other countries who find happiness here in the USA than I hear from FBA/AfroAmerican/ADOS ex-pats living abroad.



All of my FBA/AfroAmerican/ADOS enjoy visiting other countries & working in them for periods of time but they always come back to the USA.

Remember one thing, Black DOSers relationship to the usa is a thing of enslavement, in my mind, the desire to the leave the usa has never been about money but culture/heritage/community. Black Immigrants don't come to the usa to find a culture/heritage/community, they already had that in the fiscally poor country they were in, they left what Black DOSers should be looking for. To restate, the reason Black DOSers should want to leave the usa is not the same reason why Black Immigrants from outside the usa come into the usa. If you are form jamaica/nigeria/sri lanka, you aren't coming to the usa for culture or community, you are coming for one thing only, the only thing the usa can offer, individual financial betterment. But, if you are a Black DOSers in USA/Brasil/Mexico/Venezuela/India/Bangladesh/Pakistan you aren't leaving for financials, you are leaving. . or should be leaving for what none of those countries have, positive plus dominant black community/nationalism/culture/heritage..

Black DOSers had our freedom taken collectively or as individuals, communities destroyed sometimes annihilated, Culture manipulated or mangled. . Money can't buy or repair or change those things. Getting a true Black potent community is not something easy, no matter where one goes. Black DOSers aren't or shouldn't be looking for el dorado. We are looking for a home better than haiti under dessalines, far better than quilomboes or gullah islands ever were. The white european jew has learned and continues to learn that money can't buy a home for your people. The lesson any Black DOSer should had learned with freetown or monrovia. Getting a home for the individual self is a chalelnge but easy compared toa home for your people. But if you can get a home for your people, as history has proven in moments, like haiti under dessalines or henrit christophe. These can be golden times for your people. But, the times will fade cause to truly achieve a new home for any people is a task.

Black Immigrants want money for their individual selves, which is bereft or inaccessible in most countries outside their one percent. USA can help anyone looking for money for themselves. Like the hwites who annihilated the poor first peoples of the american continent, they are looking for el dorados. The USA very nature is to be a place for individual financial profit , take land, kill others, step over others, lie about your true intensions with others, all of that is the way of the usa. In NYC alone, i can tout tons of examples of immigrants hurting other immigrants for financial profit. Hurting others for profit is the true nature of the usa, and thus, immigrants looking to make money will succeed.







Point taken. I started to list physical & spiritual as wounds too.



Bottom line is deep wounds never truly heal without some form of revenge.



Otherwise, people remain scarred for life & from one generation to the next.😎

Two other ways exist, a very kind heart, very kind, which is very rare. This is what Ghandi meant to india, butI still think most indians don't comprehend it.

the other is true happiness. Having a truly happy life, not a life of settling masqueraded as happiness can do it. But these two things are so rare, revenge is the common chnanel.