Yes is the Western world and their statement that many scientific professionals report yet they rarely state the obvious that all scientist confirm and that would be 'eyewitnesses or lack thereof.' In other words, if there were no humans until after the earth split, even it were millions of years ago', then this would only be 'a wild guess'.
If there are NO humans who existed in other parts of earth other than Africa until after the earth split, therefore, this would not even be a theory because, a scientific theory would have some sets of proofs based on a 'control group' which would be ancient records that would have to come from ancient scribes in Africa being the first civilization; people who kept records of humans.
So where are the ancient records about these Primitive humans that did not write or keep records that began in a distinct continent; Africa?
But here are other questions that reveal this prepared statement about Pangaea, a super continent, stated by modern scientist to be uninhabited by no humans until after it split. If it did not begin to split until 2 million years ago, then
[1] Why are there mounds, archaeological structures, all over the world constructed almost exactly, or very similar like the ones in ancient Egypt which would have the same dates and timelines, proving humans used the same shared skills and transfer of ideas and knowledge of which was transferred back and forth on the planet earth, likely before it split? The Egyptian mound builders, mounds in ancient China, the mounds in the ancient Americas, and the temples in Iraq have similar dates, showing that ideas were transferred over land and that the earth could not have split at this time which was around the 3000s B.C.
And so, by this time, the Homo Erectus were long gone. Who can prove, scientifically, that they began in Africa when, prior to the 3000s AD, there was NO Africa as a separate continent?
University of California, Berkely
Tests confirm humans tramped around North America more than 20,000 years ago
preserved in mud in New Mexico were made by humans thousands of years before any people were thought to be in the Americas
By Robert Sanders
https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/10/05/tests-confirm-humans-tramped-around-north-america-more-than-20-000-years-ago/#:~:text=Find an expert-,Tests confirm humans tramped around North America more than 20%2C000,of the last Ice Age.
The University of Arizona
Footprints found at White Sands National Park in New Mexico provide the earliest unequivocal evidence of human activity in the Americas and provide insight into life over 23,000 years ago.
The findings are described in a Science journal article co-authored by University of Arizona archaeologist Vance Holliday.
https://news.arizona.edu/news/earliest-evidence-human-activity-found-americas#:~:text=Footprints found at White Sands,of Arizona archaeologist Vance Holliday.
Did Homo Sapiens interbreed with Homo erectus to produce fertile offspring?
No, humans did not live on Pangea. . Pangea existed approximately 335 to 175 million years ago,
while the first hominids appeared only about 6-7 million years ago and Homo sapiens appeared only about 300,000 years ago.
AI Overview
Based on geological, biological, and archaeological evidence, there are no written records or any other evidence of human civilization existing during the time of Pangea.
AI Overview
[2] And then what about the Cave Depictions. The dates all across the world of cave depictions prove, byway of archaeological studies, that they can be dated. Therefore these ancient drawings should reflect some proof
*****Note: I'm falling to sleep, so I will finish later.