You and i are different. You are satisfied with expert opinion. I spent more time trying to understand temperature, weather, climate and statistics. It is very difficult to find people with any willingness to out in the effort to understand this issue. Its about being informed in order to ask intelligent questions. If there's a referendum yiy can make an intelligent choice. You are projecting your own rigidness.
You have forgotten my response to National Geographic. You hadn't read the link thst had the pros and cons. Or perhaps you didn't comprehend the implications of the responses. You have belief, I have questions which neither you nor climatologists can answer.
They changed the name from global warming, because the actual weather didn't match. How come they couldn't see that, because they are bending the numbers.
Al Gore had a staff of four people and the were using more than $100,000 a year in electricity. He was flying all around promoting his program which probably isnt free. I have easily spent scores of hours trying ti understand this issue. Its silly to debate it with those who don't msje any effort to educate themselves.