Del

That's on of the drugs that's currently popular for mind / spirit expansion.

Guest Darren Take some notes so when you start working in the Real World of capitalism so you don't lose your head. Socialism and communism are economic in addition to social and a political organisational structure. Before i left Uni i worked in every type of organisation, not for profit, governmental and corporate. My first job i worked in Wall Street my job in 1987 was to count $2 billion. I worked with a guy who was in his 40's and who had a female assitant in her 20's. Both ended up with cocaine habits. We had one guy that had a staff of young women. Regulatory Department didnt restrict Michael Milliken because he created junk bonds and he made a lot of money for the firm. His bonus was 550 mil in 1986. So the firm made multiples of that. It wasn't the utopia you mention. However it was better than some places because if you delivered you got paid. In 1986 across the board bonus was 40% Do your homework , get a job or take off your roses colored googles. I worked in places that were legendary. Read up on Drexel Burnham, Lehman Brothers American Express, Wang Labs. Do some legwork before you say I'm wrong. Junior. @Guest Darren. I liked what you posted with Troy. Either you're in University or institutional racism doesn't effect you. Because you are assuming your situation is universal. You are a well meaning white guy.

You said we are Alpha Males , despite my initial rejection i realized you were correct. And was the first to acknowledge this. Alpha prime hee hee hee Del Which one of my assumptions did I ignore? My position wasn't that intellectuals DID NOTHING. To the contrary, they did TOO MUCH...lol ....but of the wrong thing. My position was that highly educated intellectuals tend to over analyze things (too much thinking) and most of their "solutions" are convoluted and impractical. I never said ALL of them did or were, which is why I used the terms "tend to" and "most". Huey Newton agreed with you which is why he didn't put Angela David in charge to intellectual. So another great thunder agrees with you. Ofcourse. The mark of a good leader is to place people where their talents can be of best use to the movement. Huey WAS a real leader and he came straight up from the streets so he had social experience necessary to influence and motivate the masses of Black people from the streets. Unfortunately his drug use had influence over HIM. Quo

Peope here ask me whats wrong with America. Home is where the heart is.

Home is where the heart is.

Program trading starting coming in the the late 1980 when I worked on Wall Street. Its also not economically viable to automate jobs out if existence. So we may end up with a few data jockeys, hackers, waiters, nurses, barrista, drug dealers, thieves and prostitutes.

Pioneer if Black people can't survive this system. How do you think we can create a new one when there's no concept of a collective. There's the bourgeoisie, skin colour, hair texture, coastal, sexaulity, attractiveness, country vs city, street vs school. Yet those differences matter little when it comes to discrimination. Pioneer i have heard you discriminate against black people that are different than you. A house divided baby. And you running around with a chainsaw and a whip. To get them soft homeosexual men in line. Yeah man I am not keen on giving up one oppression for another. Holla Black Blacks are under the eight. It's like always some Blacks will do well. Denmark Vesey was free and his wife was a slave. Or am I mistaken.

The universe is a frequency. And i read the universal mind through numbers and symbols. It's my stock and trade.

So I only want to initially work with a select group of people. I am member of several astrological groups on Facebook. Which in total have several thousand members. There are three that are predominantly indigenous/black. Out of that there are about maybe ten Astrologers that are either knowledgeable or are serous about their craft. I probably spebd a minimum of 100 hours a year on my craft. Although there have been months where i have spent a minimum of 2 - 5 hours a day on my craft. Which means i am not going ti work with people that don't have that type of dedication. I am willing to bet you Pioneer that i have or will have read someone from one of my cities you lived in. I hope you and like minded brethren have success with your approach. While I tend ti my "garden" Some people may dream of wanting more but they don't act that way. When I was at U Mass Boston. The Boston Blacks said the Haitians and the Africans didn't interact with them. Which was interesting because i hung with the Nigerians and was seeing a Nigerian princess. So i asked a Haitian. He said he came across the world to get an education and the Boston blacks seemed to being missing something. He didn't know what it was but he didn't want to catch it. Successful people surround themselves with succesful or at least driven people. In closing i work with people who can think have drive or have a big heart. But they have ro be motivated by their vision to effect a change and invest in themselves rather than a dope pair of kicks.

Pioneer in your own words. I ain't black enough. I don't have patience for nonsense. So there's only a few people that can work with me. Even though Troy and I have major disagreements I would work with him because I respect his ability. He was a gymnast and body builders. I could work with she would be a combination of fun and serious. I could work with Cynique she is he only one of two people i have spoken with the I can't fault their logic. In addition they have been able to be successful in the wider world. I don't know but i feel that they have kept the center and didn't feel like victims while being fully aware of the obstacles that their race ir sex created. Pioneer you doubt my ability because it is western. Yet a Vedic palmist, aVedic astrologer, an Italian Astrologer and thousands of clients and known several well known and knowledgeable Astrologers respect my ability and research. Perhaps you are indicative of other black that can't see another black person as an expert. I can neither partake nor condone Black Whinerys. So i am coloborating with non Black occultist since Black people have either nit taken my scholarship seriously or they don't put in the time. Which means I can't take them seriously. Business is really like minded or focused people assisting each other in creating wealth.

Now to answer the question. My sister said i need to prepare my children for the world you have aptly described Mel. My answer was I am teaching them ti think critically. Learning the curriculum is learning tactics. However without the ability to think, you will be a pawn. I know tactics without strategy is dead. My favorite scientist is Richard Feynmann. He was wasn't the smartest scientist in a room but he was the most clever. Plus he was fun anvery flexible mentally because he had a different toolset. I will address my concept of an approach for success. For the deviants, outliers, dreamers and oddballs. Since they are the true leaders. Learn the basics of what everyone else learns. In addition follow one passion and have a creative expression. Einstein played the violin, Feynmann played the bongos and went to strip clubs, and Newtown was into alchemical experiments. We are approaching , we are in a time where the okd rules hold less sway. Which means the ascendancy of visionaries, non linear or freethinkers. I encourage my children to think for themselves and not to accept anyone's opinions with giving it thought. So when i see my kids, they want to play word games, test their spelling. In addition I encourage them to respect the choices if other people, especially when it is counter to theirs. Because their mother is an artist. They are immersed in art, dance and sport. However I can't take credit for that.

What's interesting is that analysts focus on retrieving the data but aren't as strong in analysing that data. Although that is an outside perspective. Unless there are going to be universal payments we may see the rise of system disintegrators. I think that critical and stratehic thinking has always been in fashion. I have spent about 36 of my 52 years exploring researching and applying esoteric and occult practices. I think there's ages. the age of force. Manpower and horse power predominate. The age of tools to leverage your force. Then yiu have toils of rhe mind mathematics and computers. At every stage the individual can maximum their force whike also minimizing the importance of the individual. The next age i believe will be if imagination/creative thinking/intuituon. Since problem solving will require more sociological and emotional intelligence than technological know how. I could be just blowing my own horn. Ask me every year on December 1, until 2024. That is analysis and a time prediction. I hope my answer leads to both provocation and invocation.

Troy lets discuss numbers and models. Because that's is what the experts are using. You have studied more mathematics. Read the last report so we can in the words of Bill Nye study "relevant " facts. So after you put in the time to inform your opinion by having a rudimentary knowledge of weather. Then we can have an intelligent discussion. Although I don't think you have either the time or inclination to do so. There are too many illogical and contradictory statements by you. Perhaps someone else will pickup the baton. Which means this is my last response.

The system is designed to have only a few successes

Thanks Nubian Fellow. Indigenous people of America have a culture a language and a place. That makes a huge difference.

@Troy I did an analysis that spanned three centuries and taught myself some of the drivers of weather. This study didn't change my mind it's changing your mind. I have said to you repeatedly look at the numbers not what is being said and let's discuss that. It's only taken you four months. Instead of me explainging the models why not read the links i posted. Starting with 10 pro and cons concerning climate change.

@Troy I am going to paraphrase the first sentence of your quote. There is no way to confidently use the projections to predict future climate. That being said invalidates the projections. Basically what they do saying is the predictions from the model dont match the actual observations. But we have high correlations on the models independent variable with the dependent variable. You are correct i am not a climatologist nor a meteorologist. However I am really good with statistics. The other issue is each model is good with predicting one variable let say sea levels. But there isn't one model that is inclusive. Which is why i stated there are about 20 models but only a handful work and not inclusively.

Find one prediction model that has good predictive ability. If you can do that I will concede the point since that is proof. Plus I couldn't find one. It should have a correlation of .7 and t values close to 2.

Nonsense you care about truth. And you are brutally honest. No its ugliness that you find repulsive and it is increasingly on display. That's my take.You make me think more or wider about thinking. I am very grateful for that and you. You are the heart, Lady Leo of this forum.

The problem with race unlike plant animal and mineral classifications is that you can have mixtures s across race. Although yiu can do this with plant grafting. I am not certain about the limitations.

@Troy this is for you. Lits of numbers are predicted. Xan you post the model that's the source for these predictions . Open to all.

@NubianFellow My guess is the traffic to your website is mostly men. And they outnumber the woman by 10 to 1. Would that be right.

You are again attributing opinions to me that are totally against my position. Do not state my opinion. That is a propagandist technique. I will state my position explicitly since you have conveniently forgotten it. I didnt have an opinion about global warming. So i decided to look at the data for 250 + years and do a statistical analyis. The numbers show a stronger link to population than productuon. The emissions numbers also don't track well with changes in production. There is no large change in emission numbers after the invention of the combustion engine. Also up until recently there weren't any statiscal models. If you look at the data it starts trending upwards dramatically in the 1980's. So 250 years of prodction, no large jumps. I have also looked at the prediction models. I posted that here. There isn't one model that tracks climate. You for whatever reason didn't look at that. I also sent you a link that had ten reasons from both sides of the argument. You also refused to read it. And finally i have said even though I dont believe anthropomorhic climate change, it is still a good idea to clean up the environment. So stop linking me to either side. I have analysed the data. And my concerns have never been answered nor addressed since doing the study in 2011. And you patently refuse to consider anything other than its caused by man. So who is being irrational. The steady state scientists got it wrong. Look them up. They were astrophysicist . A lot of people like to reference science and statistics without really understanding either. If you post numbers be on your A game. However every couple of months you bring some irrelevant argument to the discussion. Post a model that proves your point. What a second you can't do that because climate change is a fiction. You would have to post about 20 models. And only a handful are good at predicting one component of weather.

Naw it is relevant even as just a counter point.

Troy really man. I have no allegiance to either side. My position was and is, look at the statistics have a rudimentary understanding of weather and come to a conclusion. I have looked at data from 1700 to 1980. And have yet to come across any credible statistics. I have since 2011 asked anyone to find a model that shows the relationship. No one can because it doesn't exist. What you will find are models that make predictions but none that show the relationship. Do a little t Just a little. You can't find a statistical model showing the linkage. Troy I am a thinker and I am really good with statistics. Have been since 1982. Bring your A game and put on your thinking cap. Or repeat what you have heard. I reckon within 8 years you will see that I am correct. Troy reread my post to Nubian Fellow. I said are you intentionally avoiding the question or do you not know who owns the site. Troy one storm no matter how big is not new statistical information. Even though there are statistics related to this storm. Are yiu being intentionally dense or do you not know the difference between the statistics of one event a sample and the population. Troy show me one model that makes the case for climate change. You can even post a few even if you can't interpret them.