Del

Or why critical thinking is disappearing. @Troy @Pioneer1 @Mel Hopkins @Cynique

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fseG2IwpBqM

Troy this is what you wrote This well help you understand why people like @Delano and 40% of Americans, some very well "educated," are deniers of man made climate change and why those who believe the science not not moved to do anything about it You also wrote this Del, since you failed to point out what I wrote that was inaccurate, I'll take it that to mean you retract the allegation that I misrepresented what you wrote. And This The video I posted here was really not about you specifically. Sure I mentioned you by name but that was because I wanted alert you in hopes that you would watch the video. You could easily change my mind with facts that deal with the following issues. Even if you could explain one I would reconsider. You seem to conveniently forget that I have analysed over 200 years of economic activity, temperature and CO2 emissions. The other thing you also seem to forget. I said even though it is a fiction we should still clean up the environment and cut waste Here are the bullet points in order of ease. The data has the mid 1980's a baseline. They don't use temperature they use the change in temperature. They don't provide their souce data. Which makes it impossible to replicate or compare their findings. Explain how come the scientist didn't notice that the globe was warming, but some parts where cooling. Which is possibly why they changed the name to Global warming. In the climate scientists' own literature they state modelling temperature is exceedingly difficult. And the past may not be indicative of the future. Can you find one model that shows a strong link between Production and Global temperature . The last point is difficult because it is a two stage correlation. Finally the Union of Concern Scientist is a not for profit that is combating Climate Change. They say that 80% of their donations goes to funding programs and 4% goes to administration costs. However looking at their tax statements tells a different story. 60% of the contributions they receive pay salary. The average salary per employ is about $99,000. The organisation is in Cambridge Massachusetts, one of the richer cities in America. The median income for a household in Cambridge is about $79,000 - $85,000. Per capita income is about $48,000 - $55,000. So the figures are intentionally misleading and obscured. Waste and consumption of resources is a problem. Climate change scientist don't have the solution. They are misleading people sometimes with good intentions and other times to make money. So Troy can you show me any statistical data that refutes and of my bullet points. We are talking science and my arguments are based on the numbers.

Troy can you use your powers of observation.Why do you think of this organisation that is trying to combat climate change? You are free to use this or any other data. Then I will elucidate the problem.

Let's try bullet points. Hidden Source Data Altered Data. Cherry picked base year. 20 models and only 4 sometimes work. That is the "science" you are defending. It used to be called Global Warming. They had to change the name because some places were getting colder. They had to change the name. Let that sink in for a minute or longer. They had to changed to change the name because the actual temperature didn't match the prediction.

Do Black Men and White Men cheat for different reasons. What about the other colors and shades?

@Pioneer1perhaps one day you will see how wrong your assumptions are concerning me. However it is fruitless for me to engae that conversation.

Hey Troy Actually you have Mercury in Taurus so you will tend to be more fixed in ideals.

@Troy what time period were people served?

I actually think Troy is pretty open. He took an astrology class drew up a few charts. And experimenting with astral traveling. I'd be more interested in your interpretation of your dream. @Cynique

When was there parity anywhere or anytime on tbe planet. Judgements ranking and comparisons even happy in this discussion. I was just thinking thst perhaps society encourages these distinctions to both advance the society as a whole. And to exploit the "common" "man"

Cynique while she may still care ahe sold out to big business. I agree with your assessment about her not being saint and him being a bully. But he loves the spotlight and it makes it easier to see his dirt.

That's what i thought in 2011,Troy. You're going to find that what i have said about the models is true.

Hilary used to care about kids, and women's issues. However I don't see much of that left in her. I thought Trump was the better choice because of his ham fisted obvious way if doing things. Hilary is savvy and clever. She is a scorpion. He is a Gemini. They seem like their aigb types.

Again this is from the site. The Elusive Absolute Surface Air Temperature (SAT) The GISTEMP analysis concerns only temperature anomalies, not absolute temperature. Temperature anomalies are computed relative to the base period 1951-1980. The reason to work with anomalies, rather than absolute temperature is that absolute temperature varies markedly in short distances, while monthly or annual temperature anomalies are representative of a much larger region. Indeed, we have shown (Hansen and Lebedeff, 1987) that temperature anomalies are strongly correlated out to distances of the order of 1000 km.

It's more psychedelic than weedy.

No I meant the book I am workingon with the palmist. Thank you, I appreciate the acknowledgement.

No credible model exist. Which is why you cant find one. You also will have a hard time seeing the source data. Prove me wrong and I will change my mind. The more you look the more you will see you the Emperor's new clothes. You will start having doubts when you realise how hard it is to find unaltered data.

I believe they went after Clinton because they didn't like Hilary. Her problem is that she is smart and opinionated. And is seen as cold. Which is unacceptable to a large number of men and women. I am suspicious of people who start foundations. Foundations are a clever form of estate management. Bill Gates can't sell his shares in Microsoft without negatively effecting the stock price. The perception is the company is tanking. And he's trying to get out. By setting up a charity you don't have that problem . And you can use the funds for investment. I believe both Gates and Zuckerberg married lawyers. So usually the funds make a lot more more than they donate. I look at the financials. The Clinton foundation has a catering arm. Which is three times more profitable than the average catering firm. Which means either their cost are a lot lower or they charge a lot more than their competitors. Also they spend more on travel expenses than program spending. Due to security they either fly First Class or they charter a plane. So its always good to follow the money. The Clinton's were broke when the left the Whitehouse. Collectively they have made upwards of $85 million. For speeches. Hilary's are private and no copies of the transcripts are available. Trump is what he has always been a self obsessed misogynist racist spoiled rich kid, with no interest other than self promotion, making money and finding etays to make someone else bear the risk. He doesn't pay his contractors. Apparently those two young girls who sang at his inauguration are sueing him for non payment. His foundation was used as his personal piggy bank. He purchsed a six foot painting of himself. Eric had a foundation that used his father's Golf course. At first there was no fee. And then the charges were significantly more than other Golf clubs would charge. He is our PT Barnum and i believe we are watching a Greek Tragedy. The overseas donations due to the hurricanes , were less than previous years even from our allies. Trump is the President that Business people and disgruntled disenfranchised people want in office. He was voted in to make America great by returning to its preregulation,pre civil women gay and handicap rights, pre voting rights. Only White Male land owners could vote .

Thanks for the clarification.

Funny I was just thinking I haven't supported you enough. I come here for the conversation and you. Depending on how the book project goes, would like to work with you.

I agree Cynique But Saudi Arabia is a nation. Although not certain if it is the birth place of Arabians. Pioneer in addition to writing a protocol on who women should choose as partners. Yiu should craft a list of acceptable friends and associations.

Got it. Yeah I think i going ti sip an herbal tea. And have a chai later. Thanks, Pioneer.

Let me lay it out differently. If all tanning products were Black owned. It wouldn't matter that Black's didn't support that business. What we have is the reverse. Blacks neither owning or supporting black business. Asian shops in Black communities do fine without patronage by Asians.

There is meteorological data pre mid 1700's. However please do share a source if you have one at hand or can reference one. Since I am not aware of it existing.