Chevdove

@Pioneer1 LOL! OKAY! i am going to leave well enough alone. Yes, I agree. But here is the issue with 'the blue eyes' regarding modern mankind--- It is the gene arrangement that is specific and can be seen under a microscope exacly where on the chromosome, the specific chromosome, that connects to EUMELANIN in the cells of the eye and the position of the mutation-gene that blocks this EUMELANIN causing for blue or other eye colors. This same arrangement can be seen in anthropology in BLACK AFRICAN MALE SKELETONS; The gene arrangement of the NEANDERTHALS and earlier HOMONIDS with the huge BROW RIDGE and SLOPING LOW SKULLS do not show this Blue Eye Mutation, at all. Believe me, if White people could own it, as coming from the Denisovans or other earlier Black hominids, they would. Tlhey would gladly separate themselves from the modern mankind and say that they do not come from the origin of Africa. But they can't, this mutation is specific. Now, in this, you may be right! But so far, scientist have not detected this Blue eye mutation in the earlier hominids with the huge brow ridge, low sloping skulls, and etc. They do know, however, that Blue eyes stem from BLACKNESS. Albinos, pure albinos, have no blue eyes, and according to what has been reported, it was the Neanderthals that roamed the earth long after the other hominids had been extinct for a very long time. And for certain, Neanderthals did not have tht mutation. The re-creation of a specimen of the Neanderthal man- shows he has dark hair and eyes, and based on my research, this is partly true, but again, thier gene arrangement is specifice and very detailed and easy to see based on other proven facts. However, a true Neanderthal would have been a 'true Albino' mutation from a Denisovan typed earlier Black or darker skinned Hominid. It is a recessive trait though, because it is a mutation, meaning, an abnormality, and that is why it pops up from time to time and is not common among Black Africans. White Europeans show this recessive trait a lot because of 'sex selection' and interbreeding. What they did to express this correlates to a lot of other manifestations of recessive traits on thie eartn too. But again, I agree, in that it could have happened way before 6000 years ago.

@Pioneer1 I hope that, even in other threads and post, we can discuss this by and by because I think this is a broad subject. It is so great for me to have this opportunity to go deeper into this topic than I have been able to with anybody, even in the Church. I agree that Paul was helping out the Romans, Greeks, Hellenes and etc. against the Jews, but @Pioneer1 Paul was not from that origin, however, he was a Jew himself from the tribe of Benjamin. He was Hebrew Israelite-Jew. I am fascinated that you can speak about Antioch, Turkey, Asia Minor, and etc. But from what I can see, Paul, who changed sides, did not stray from the teachings of Jesus at all. I don't see Roman and Greek mythology in the core Christian followings. But, if you do, I would like a chance to think about what you recognize. Jesus too, had no intentions of freeing the Jews from 'the Roman occupiers' because it was the original people of the land that kept embracing these Romans. The so-called 'stewards were worse than the masters they came to serve'; [a parable of Jesus]. Jesus was up against a bunch of half-breed Jews that sorely oppressed the original Jews, but at one time, it was these original jews that embraced these foreigners and therefore, the Romans used the mixed-race JEws, and other ethnic peoples to further suppress them. It has been a cycle, and if we don't stop it, it would be useless for some god almighty to free us from the people we continue to embrace. The MOvement that JEsus started was to operate alongside of the Roman system, to offer relief to those who chose not to support it, a system that the Jews themselves chose and elected to have. The movement that Jesus started was due to the choice of the Jews and half-Jews, and Hebrews of Samaria, and Paul worked to set up this ‘Church’ [Christian] movement. Antioch, where the disciples were first called 'Christ followers', I agree with you, was once Syria and today, the western world has changed the map! The Romans dominated Turkey-Anatolia [ie. Asia Minor] and I think @Pioneer1 that Paul concentrated in this area because it was the Roman seat of power, but tht doesn't mean tht the other disciples didn't do significan works in Ethiopia, Gaul, and Lusitan, and Russia and elsewhere. Like Jesus, Paul conflicted with Simon-Peter [ie. Simon-the Black] and pressed him to go north up into Western Anatolia [northeast--BLACK SEA area] to set up the Church [the 7 Church Headquarters in Asia Minor] there to kick against White Supremacy. I think Paul was born in Turkey. As you said, they changed the map. Turkey now, includes the very land that their ancestor, Abraham was born--UR OF THE CHALDEES [ie. the land of Mesopotamia--- Cush Ham---Black lands] West Turkey near the Black Sea --- is ancient TROY area---THRACE---BLACK LANDS--- that very land of the descendants of AbraHAM---- Jesus called SIMON--- PETER. Paul needed Peter to go up there to start the Church to deal with Roman agression and suppression of the Original Greeks like the Carians and more. All of Turkey was once BLACK LAND, even in the east on the other side of LAKE VAN. Kultepe was found many, many CUNEIFORM CLAY TABLETS of Cush Babylon times when the Sumerians were masters of trade and dominated the trade language. Paul changed sides. I have heard it said, that Paul may have been part-Hellene himself, but nevertheless, he did not support the Romans and the Greeks [ie. Hellenes] anymore. This is why the Jews concentrated on Turkey--- it was once Black lands--- the names and history of Turkey goes all the way back to the HURRIAN times and the land, all of it, ---- was Black lands as the names do show. Yes, your right the Romans and White Greeks and Hittites fought for this land of the Lusitanians, Spartans, Luds, CARIANS,.... for thousands of years. it is Armageddon--- that is why the SELJUK TURKS [ie. HUNS] raged into this land over a thousand years after the Roman Empire. and also ATILLA- the HUN did too in the AD 400s. There is a reason why Paul concentrated on this land. Anyway, thank you for opening up, one of my favorite subjects!!! LOL. I do understand that Jesus was a NAZARENE--- I understand too--- that this custom went way back to CUSH HAM---SUMERIANS---- during the days of the epic of Gilgamesh--- when the Sumerians [ie. INKIDU, a Sumerian legendary man] were suppressed in their own lands in and around present day Iraq. So, they began an oath to grow out their hair, and other customs, and strove to be freed from oppression and upon their freedom, they shaved their heads. And so, many Jews followed this custom because they were mixed with Cush Ham and other Hamitic peoples in their origins. But this doesn't mean that they were not called 'CHRIST FOLLOWERS' too, don't you think? Syria, Antioch and much of Syria was the origin of the Hebrews and the Jews, descendants of Shem. The Assyrians were separatists and they dominated the north during the days of Terah and AbraHam, so it would be probable tht the ‘JESUS’ MOVEMENT’ [IE Christian movement] would start in this country. Assyrians [ie. As-Syria-- WHITE SYRIA--SYRO-PHOENICIAN] were White Supremacist and AbraHam's father, Terah embraced them. This is why AbraHAM was told to break off from his father. And too, this is why Stephen was stoned to death because he AMPED on the Jews about this very issue of COLORISM and Paul [ie. SAUL] stood by that day and did nothing, but later, this was what weighed on his soul. So Abra-Hams’descendants embraced the SYRIANS [ie. Original descendants] and it was after NEO-BABYLONIAN TIMES and after NEBUCHAD that the Assyrians dropped their name and became known as Syrians. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ THE WORDS OF STEPHEN Before he was stoned to death ACT CHAPTER 7, Verse 1-4. [1] Then said the high priest, Are these things so? [2] And he said, Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken; The God of glory appeared unto our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Charran, [3] And said unto him, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and come into the land which I shall shew thee. [4] Then came he out of the land of the Chaldaeans, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell. ACTS 7: 1-4. *** The Land of THE CHALDEANS means 'The Land of the BLACKS'!*** ***Kali means BLACK**** *** the CHALCOLITHIC ERA**** ********** Abra-Ham was part Shem + part CHALDEAN!!!*******

@Pioneer1 Yes, thank you for breaking this down!

He is disgusting. What a creep. me too. lol. but she was not dressed properly for a funeral.

@Pioneer1 I've look more for references and confirmed. I have confirmed that Psoriasis is exactly that, ALPHOS LEPROSY [ie White Leprosy]. So, the reference you gave about 'NAAMAN' would be the exact same as described for Moses and Miriam. As I wrote, it is called CLEAN LEPROSY in the Old Testaments to distinguish it from the ROT LEPROSY. Alphos Leprosy or White Leprosy or Pulsular Psoriasis, is inherited and that is why it was said it would be throughout Naamans lineage. And, it can be all over. There is no other kind of leprosy or psoriasis that has this definition. Anyway, here is the main reference and some pics of Vitiligo, the patchy skin condition that is not white: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On Diseases of the Skin. Second edition By Sir Erasmus Wilson CHAPTER XIV ALPHOUS INFECTIONS ALPHOS, the lepra alphos of the Greeks, is of the three vitiligoid or spotted affections of Celsus. “It is called alphos,” he says, “when it is white, rough, and dispersed, resembling drops sprinkled on the skin; ... Willan adopted the term “lepra” to distinguish this disease, and, at the same time, employed the word “psoriasis” for one of its forms, ...The question therefore arises: Which is the mere correct, and, at the same time, the most convenient title for the affection? Is it lepra? Is it psoriasis? ... We prefer the latter alternative, and propose to restore the specific term “alphos,” by which the disease was known to the fathers of medicine. This term was given to the disease by the Greeks, was adopted by the Latins, and was only disturbed by the confusion of literature which occurred during the dark ages. Lepra alphos is undoubtedly the most correct appellation of the disease; ... https://books.google.com/books?id=wntaAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA398&lpg=PA398&dq=alphous+leprosy,+psoriasis&source=bl&ots=4AjNKpCdZf&sig=JgRSjDFlM6nQITOsaHBotm2zsgo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwix2_Kn_pfdAhWHVt8KHeqoD9IQ6AEwDnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=alphous leprosy%2C psoriasis&f=false @Pioneer1 So therefore, today, the medical field has separated the terms and defines Psoriasis separately because it is not the contagious kind but still, this is detailed in the Bible. Whenafter a few days, the people affected with Clean Leprosy could live amongst others, but the contagious kind, they were not. One king in the Bible of the Jews, had to live in a Several house and his son had to reign in his stead because he had the contagious kind. So the confusion today is that they define the clean leprosy as a form of PSORIASIS and state that it has a different pathology, of which is no different than the Bible: What’s the Difference Between Leprosy and Psoriasis? Leprosy vs. psoriasis https://www.healthline.com/health/psoriasis/leprosy-vs-psoriasis Leprosy and the natural selection for psoriasis Author links open overlay panelloannis D. Bassukas a GeorgiosGaitanis a Max-Hundeiker b … https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2011.10.022 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987711005366 *** Today, they don't want to connect the past to the present, but it is the same pathology, the very same description. And again, Vitiligo does not show as being 'white as snow' as some of these pics show;

@Pioneer1 Vilitigo is not 'white as snow' in appearance. Isn't it patchy?

@Pioneer1 Thank you! You know, I really don't see myself as being 'religious' because well, too much confusion, but I search for the facts behind the purpose these religions came about.

@Pioneer1 Interesting. I like your break down on Medulla. Regarding HAIR STRUCTURE, that was my thesis, partly, for my college degree. I wrote my thesis on bird feather types and compared and contrasted with human hair fiber, especially that of African hair fiber. Also, I was trained on the diffeent types of hair structure for my job at one of several naval bases and shipyards where I worked in radiation, nuclear science, and all types of environmental hazards. I was employed as in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST [associate Industrial Hygienist] at one, and was trained on the various types of ASBESTOS FIBERS. Part of my training included studying many prepared slides under the microscope on how to identify asbestos fibers and included in the process was that I had to be able to identify and distinguish between the different types of HUMAN HAIR FIBER and ANIMAL FUR and hair fibers, and etc. So, African hair fiber is absolutely unique from Asian hair fiber. the term 'NATIVE AMERICAN' is very subjective as my husband is Native American and also Negro [Black Indian].

@Pioneer1 I read your conversations sometimes , and @Cynique cares enough to take the time to debate with you so, I hope you can respect that. Right? I think it is worth it to hear other viewpoints, even if we disagree. @Pioneer1 Yes and no. Based on the facts through study, it has been proven to be 'A MUTATION'. This mutation has been traced back to having occurred around 6000 years ago and the archeology points at an origin of Africans. Therefore, it would be 'an African trait' that is RECESSIVE TRAIT based on the mutation steming from EUMELANIN, meaning Black pigment in 'brown eyes', and in which the gene blocked the pigmentation, causing for blue eyes. The Eumelanin and PHaemelanin [ie spelling] acts the same way in all living, and White people do NOT make EUMELANIN. Therefore it has become obvious to scientist that BLUE EYES ARE INDEED, AN AFRICAN TRAIT in origin. You can't have Bue eyes without Eumelanin. This is why they have to admit its origin. Eumelanin is the same pigmentation that gives color to hair and also skin and etc. So, it is not that it is 'not enough melanin' but that it is 'blocked pigmentation' at a specific point on the gene that gives eye color like blue, grey, hazel, green and light brown. there are more than one type of 'blue eyes' but they all stem from this MUTATION that occurred about 6000 years ago. Prior to this, the primitive mankind, homonids, never expressed blue eyes!!! Their gene arrangement is significantly different from modern mankind!!!

@Pioneer1 Yes, at the very least. In terms of psoriasis, yes there are many differnt kinds of psoriasis and, in terms of leprosy, yes again there are many differnt kinds of leprosy. But in terms of the reference you put about 'Naaman' are you referring to this or about Miriam, being 'as white as snow all over'? The reason why I am wondering because, this type of 'PSORIASIS' can be just that pervasive, in that it can be all over and so far, there is no other kind that is that white in color? In terms of leprosy, again, this is the very description in that it is INHERITED and it is a form of CLEAN LEPROSY. So this would be easy to understand that it would be in all of the lineage of Naaman. The term for leprosy in this very description was given other terms, but again, this is the only kind, 'PULSULAR PSORIASIS' that is that white, as I have shown in pictures. If you know of a type of leprosy other than this kind, I would be interested in you offering some reference. The term 'ALPHOUS LEPROSY' has the same description as PULSULAR PSORIASIS.

@Troy LOL. Oh this is too funny. Really now. I get your point too. Trump is now complaining and now, he singing our song... so now we might drop our guard!... As if we didn't know about Google already! LOL. @Cynique Well said. But @Delano What can he do? What can 'we' do for now? America claims they are a Democracy of free enterprise, but this doesn't seem so to me. They claim they were against Communism but, I know i don't understand 'Communism' completely but it seems to me that it means something like 'Community property' and if so, it seems they have underhandedly forced most of us Americans to become dependent on this basis. They forced most of us out of business and free enterprise... but some people are smart enough to know how to use the best resources for now to get where they need to be later. So many of us still need to make our dollars count and go to the Walmarts and McDonalds and the Ford.... used car dealers, but only for now!

@Delano Thank you!!! The Sistas broke it down! I aint mad at Wendy Williams though. She may not have heard the Clark Sisters recently. They've gotten better---if you can believe that based on their past talents. Hey, you never know, maybe they might give Snoop and invite! I'll give him that--He is also talented and he has a beautiful voice.

@Cynique Thank you! You're right. That is probably what has happened. @Pioneer1 Yes, this unfortunately seems to be what is happening. I'd thought I would have heard much more from the Black Church on some pressing issues during these times, but no. What do you mean 501C3? @Pioneer1 Yes but hopefully, not for long. As before, at times, those leaders over there wised up and kicked some groups out, and it help their people, and IMO, when they stand strong against Black oppression over there, it helps us too, over here. @Pioneer1 What do you mean when you say this? Are you saying that Christianity was FOUNDED by European racist after the movement was started, or are you saying it was founded by them, meaning that none of the friends of Jesus had anything to do with it, and/or that Jesus and his friend are European Jews? I know Christianity to be a movement, but I am wondering what you think in terms of 'the Eurpean racist and the people in Turkey?

Yes, this i believe though, in that 'false Christianity Have Black People Spiritually Enslaved...' False Christianity, the Anti-Christ idol, and the false movement has corrupted this world. But the original Jews were just as Black African or dark skinned with African traits as it has been thouroughly written in the srcriptures. We've just been tricked and now, many have become the very mouthpiece to throw down the whole entire movement behind White Supremacist. We are now doing their work. Whether you believe in Jesus, the Christ or not, the original Moors and Pirathons, and Huns were Negroes and the Romans conflicted against the Black presence. Who did the Romans fight against? themselves? No. They were against the Black African presence in and around North Africa and that same movement is why we have endured American slavery and etc.

@Mel Hopkins Thank you for the link. I think the comments after the article are also interesting. It is frustrating to see how White Europeans constantly attempt to offer suggestings so as to still claim that Bue eyes and Blonde hair come from them and not a Black African origin, for instance: ...Not only are Europeans far more likely to have blue eyes (95 per cent in some Scandinavian countries), they also have a far greater range of skin tones and hair colour than any other ethnic grouping. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-511473/All-blue-eyed-people-traced-ancestor-lived-10-000-years-ago-near-Black-Sea.html#axzz2JygCna42 See, this statement is misleading. It may be true in the percentage, but this doesn't mean that they have the origin. It simply means that this is a recessive trait and through their constant inbreeding and selective breeding, they become the manifestation of this recessive trait. I posted thread on this subject, earlier, and so, this connects to what I posted. Thanks again for the links. I will post this too, in my thread about Blue eye origin. Also, the common phrase of 'good hair' and 'bad hair' definitely goes along with this subject in how our ideas stem from earlier origins. I now use this term for 'bad hair' but not in the sense of the yesteryears. I have a lot of 'bad hair' days! LOL.

@Troy Before I had my first child, I read about pregnant women having normal nightmares about accidentally forgetting and leaving thier babies on the roof of a car, and then I did have those nightmares. NOw, when I think back and in lieu of this issue, I am wondering if it's not a normal feeling for many of us to have these thought when we are in a conference or something where, in the south especially, there are many White people. Anyway, this was a gretat post. She is such a lovely person! And she looks like her heritage. Her speech was so wonderful. So inspiring. So true!

This whole post is so awesome! It is time for a new dawn! It's time to weigh options and think individually and rethink about some old cliches' because they may not fit today! I am not kicking against old views either, but in the past, we have not been given the proper tools to understand everything so now, we need to be refreshed! @Delano This is a hard truth, at times. I once heard it this way; When the poor oppress the poor, it is like the sweeping rain.

@Cynique unfortunately, this is not true, altogether. In Hampton Va. last year, I visited an all Black Church congregation and a huge, gigantic portrait, painting of a 'White Jesus' [ie. Anti-Christ idol] was hanging on just about the entire wall behind the pulpit. I went to another all-black Church congreation in Durham NC and in the pastors study hanging on the wall behind the pastors' desk was a painting of a 'White Jesus' and I looked at it while the pastor, a very dark skinned Black African man, was talking. The contrast was so contrary, IMO. Then in Emporia, Va. I visited another all-Black church and another giganitc painting of a 'White Jesus' hung on just about the entire wall behind the pulpit. I mentioned it to this pastor, an AFrican American man, and he became indignent. Then back in Durham, NC, I visited a mostly all-black MEGA-CHURCH, with about 10,000 members and three sunday services, and again, ... the same thing. During praise and worship service, the screen slowly came down showing a profile picture of MEL GIBSON, depicted as 'White Jesus'. I walked up front after service and spoke to one of the church bishops about it. He said that he didn't have a problem with it. Then I phoned another of the pastors, and while he admitted that he knew the ancient records showed otherwise, he said he didn't have a problem with it. Maybe not all Black Churches are corrupt, but a lot of them still are ridiculous. Many of us are still plagued by the slaveyard teachings. Because, I think tht I was a Navy Brat, and moved away from a small town setting in my youth, I have become more open to other viewpoints, but my relatives are obsessed with White people to the point it is sickening for me. LOL! @TroyYes, I think it did. It caught me off guard because around the same time, Snoop Dog, supposedly reached #1 status for hiis gospel hit, he was on youtube supporting JAY-Z like many of the other rappers and blasting the murderer of Trayvon Martin this past spring around March 2018. George Zimmerman, the man who killed Trayvon Martin, threatened to kill Jay-z and he said something like, 'what he did in 2012, referencing how he killed Trayvon Martin'. And he threatened to feed JAY-Z to the alligators because of the documentary. I dunno, I am having a hard time wrapping my head around Snoop Dog's latest hit... but it's cool though. And you're right about Wendy Williams, and I'm sure she didn't mean any intent to harm the gospel group.

@Pioneer1 So the phrase 'AS WHITE AS SNOW' can clearly be seen in this form of leprosy or psoriasis even on European-type skin.

Pustular psoriasis consists of well-defined, white pustules on the skin. These are filled with pus that is non-infectious. The skin around the bumps is reddish and large portions of the skin may redden as well. It can follow a cycle of redness of the skin, followed by pustules and scaling. …Right now there is no cure for psoriasis. The disease can go into remission where there are no symptoms or signs present. Current research is underway for better treatments and a possible cure. Psoriasis is not contagious even with skin-to-skin contact. You cannot catch it from touching someone who has it, nor can you pass it on to anyone else if you have it. https://www.healthline.com/health/pustular-psoriasis#diagnosis And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. NUMBERS 12:1. And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous. And Moses cried unto the LORD, saying, Heal her now, O God, I beseech thee. NUMBERS 12:10-13.

@Pioneer1 Oh no! Well, yes, Moses was definitely a 'Negroe' and he had the NAPS [ie. hair] and other traits that goes along with his forefathers but, nonetheless, he was very, very light skinned. Furthermore, after I read your reference, I went back and searched picture references to give more proof in that the Bible can be viewed as sort of like a 'code book' and is science and GENETIC-based. Moses and his family and etc. are 'chosen' or used as sort of like 'a control group' to help all mankind. Moses own writings about this issue of his having 'LEPROSY' helps to explain and give a deep insight to a lot. He is one of many examples of Black African peoples that show that what happened way back in 'the Garden of Eden' when Eve 'GOT NAKED' [IE. HAD SEX] with that 'being' and brought forth 'his seed', tht this whole world is infected in various ways. Moses looked nothing like his brother Aaron, skin color wise. Moses had a skin condition that was termed LEPROSY back in those times but today science term it as PSORAISIS. And like Leprosy, in tht there are many forms of it, so is Psoriasis. There are many forms of Psoriasis. Most fair skinned people are plagued with this kind of leprosy, but dark-skinned people can get it too although the percentage is low. That form of leprosy that Moses had, it was defined as 'CLEAN LEPROSY' meaning, it is not contagious and it didn’t rot the lower skin layer. And it can come and go, and be in remission, but usually shows up when a person becomes an adult. It is an INHERITED condition. Scientist, today, are saying they want to get rid of the term RECESSIVE DOMINANT INHERITANCE. They continue to use the term RECESSIVE INHERITANCE though. But what MOses had was RECESSIVE DOMINANT INHERITANCE. This means that it came down through 'X CHROMOSOME', and a person can receive ‘just one’ infected X-chromosome and it would be enough to have the particular disease. But typical recessive inheritance means that ‘an infected X-Chromosome’ can be passed on in reproduction and be present but the offspring will not be affected and is only ‘a carrier’. I have done much research on this topic. It seems complex to understand, but the Bible makes it very easy to follow if you study Moses’ family line. In order for Moses and his sister Miriam to have this kind of LEPROSY, then it had to have come down through his family line due to 'incest'. Moses mother was also his father's aunt. So here is a little how it goes: One earlier female ancestor passed it on to her son [ie a Levite man] and then he had XY and is affected. He then has a daughter and she receives his X and is affected. So then ... fast forward. When Moses mother, Jochebed, came into the picture, she also had 'an infected X', just one though, and she was infected. Thanks to the writings of Moses and hindsight and THE EGYPTIAN RECORDS, we can see the truth; Moses' father, Amram who, like his son Moses, had obviously been affected too, gave [1] his 'infected X' to his only daughter, Miriam; but his sons receives his Y-DNA. However, Amram was affected by his own mother’s X-chromosome. [2] Moses, however, received an infected X from his mother, Jochebed, and he has inherited the disease of Psoriasis [ie. Known specifically and medically today as PULSULAR PSORIASIS] from her. [3] Aaron has NO PROBLEM at all with this condition because he obviously received the Y from his dad and the one good X from his mom. This is how we know that Jochebed only had ‘1 bad X and 1 good X chromosome’, otherwise Aaron would have also been affected. And also, she would have had the extreme form of it as well, and no man in his right mind would have married her to have children. But, [4] Miriam receives not only the infected X-chromosome from her dad, but she received the 'bad, infected X-chromosome from her mother too. Therefore, unlike Moses, she receives 2-BAD X-CHROMOSOMES and comes down with the more extreme and severe form of that disease. When Moses mated with his wife, and if he had no daughters, that's the end of the disease in his line. But Miriam would have had further problems if she continued to reproduce. But Aaron, never received the bad X-chromosome from his Mother, and being dark skinned would be a sign too, that he did not have the condition. The Egyptian records depicted Aaron as being very dark-skinned [ie. A deep reddish-brown]. So, his generation would not have been affected at all, unless his wife had one bad X-chromosome. ONLY ONE BAD X-CHROMOSOME CAUSES THE DISEASE. That is why MOses had the problem. That is the definition of RECESSIVE-DOMINANT-INHERITANCE. So, yes, the Bible was exact in that Moses was a very, very, light skinned Negro and he had that form of leprosy, that he inherited from his mother. Albinism has so many forms that only the ‘being’ in the Garden of Eden had completely and it shows up in many ways in the world and leprosy is one of its variants. Being White or Black, African or European has nothing to do with ‘albinism’ but we all show variants of that sin because that ‘being’ was mutated in his Y-DNA which also connects to him being ‘pure albino’ and therefore, he passed his genes down to us through his affected X-chromosomes in so many ways. Therefore, ‘skin diseases’ through the lack of melanin are just a major indication of his genetic contributions to this world. Moses was not albino and he had a lot of ‘Black blood’ [ie African blood] hence, his thick hair depicted under his scribe cap, but he was light skinned. He was able to produce viable malefactors that continued this reproduction for the next three and four generations, and that is the key. He also lived to be very old and had excellent health otherwise. His vision was said to be fully operable until his death and his strength was manifested as in his youth, even in his old age and this would be a confirmation that he was not albino and did not come down with cancer, as is the case with extreme albinism. Okay so, now onto some reference pictures of what it looks like as it appears on the skin, even Europeans, as being 'white like snow'. Miriam had it, according to the Bible from the tip of her head to the soles of her feet. And like the medical scholars have to admit, this kind of leprosy can appear on the top of the head and on the soles of the feet, and all over. It's hard to find pictures because, this is a protected issue. But I have seen photos of it on the back, and head and feet. White Supremacist do Not want to validate the Bible, so they work tirelessly to hide truth. Also, it is difficult to view as well because of the human suffering that goes along with this condition.

@Cynique You're welcome and THANK YOU! But, I didn't take it personally. Funny yes, --but no, I didn't think you were spiteful because, Girl!, if you is alien.... well, I guess I need to check myself! LOL, okay, but hopefully, things will smooth out... @Cynique He wished you Happy Birthday! Thank you so much!

@Cynique I agree with this statement and with most of what you wrote! Geez! So true.

@Pioneer1Interesting observation! Yeah! They are not that light in person! This is so true,.. but it won't ever reached a totality. They are trying to 'hijack Christianity' and White wash Negroes and sadly many Black churches have embraced this crap. Colorism and Color Supremacy [ie White Supremacy] has been plaguing Black AfroAmericans for thousands of years and also proves that some of us are blaming racism on White people when it is actually coming from us. We pick out of the past what we choose and then selectively ignore other strong points about our cultural and ethnic background and origins. We are okay with Moses and David being depicted as some ugly white, heavily bearded Greek Zeus god, or Charleston Heston depicted as this same Greek idol and etc. and the Black church says nothing about how Zippora, the wife of Moses was portrayed in White face or, how Solomon has been portrayed. Solomon strategically wrote about himself in that he was very, very Black skinned but you never hear any of this in the Black church. Having blond hair and light skin means nothing to the Creator, however, it would be ridiculous to think that He did not meet mankind on this sickness. Having dark skin, black skin or etc. means nothing to the Creator accept that all colors are beautiful and can be expressed globally, but it is mankind that has perverted Colorism, not the higher power. But he is definitely dealing with this issue because it is destroying us. Thank you, @Pioneer1 for your strength and willingness to address it. I wish other brothers would do the same.

@Cynique yes!!! absolutely! @Pioneer1 Truth! @Pioneer1 Yes. It makes sense to me! Okay... LOL... that is enough.