Chevdove

@Kalexander2 @Chevdove: It's perfectly okay if you were religious, I learn the seriousness of right wrong by both the rod and the Bible. As I alluded to before, your efforts are admirable and noble. Your frustration seems to be getting the best of you though. We live in a world that has no pity for the downtrodden, nor mercy for the weak, especially if you're Black. The oppression we experience is often done with lies and deliberate misguidance through biblical scriptures. Unfortunately, you'll have to physically fight Black folk if you try to wake them up to that fact. Fact is, passages from the Bible may soon prove to be useless when you hit the heart of your research project. Be prepared for hurt and disappointment. In case you may not have noticed, I'm a pessimist with no faith in mankind, Black, nor especially white folk. Yeah, like I said, if you have an idea about something on your mind, pursue it with vigor. But be honest with yourself first; whether it's worth your while and/or capable of changing how you feel.

Ignore that statement. That was a mistake it came from the first page of this thread

C okay and thank you for the advice.

Actually, I'm not a religious person, but I like what you saying about social disparities. I am very frustrated with the Church because they only present part truths. If they use the Bible as thier text, they should use the whole Bible and this is not the case. So absolutely, people use only part of the Bible and are missing the real messages. You are so right. Yes, I get what you saying; My information, for example on BLUE EYES today, is scientifically proven by scientiest and published to be a mutation, but my research in connection to the Biblical description of Cain that matches the date today of the archeological evidence as being around 6000 years ago and found around the BLACK SEA, would be a theory. I agree with you on that. That is my conclusion and interpretation of the data provided. So yes, people need to draw their on conclusions. I don't know where you are at right now--time zone-- but I am up at some ridiculous hours for the past weeks--my sleep is off. I can't sleep. I'm up researching. I need to go to sleep... but can't.

I hope that people will focus on the facts though, the reference that is presented and published, NOT BY ME, but by others. Anyway, again, I appreciate the interchange and the well wishes, I have so much more to present.

Just presenting scientific facts and this is crucial in any kind of research. People can draw any conclusion they choose but facts are based on evidence. NEANDERTHALS and their presence today is a fact.Where they defined in published words compiled in the Bible; Yes, absolutely. Do the dates quoted by scientist today match Bible accounts; Yes, absolutely. So, my research, I choose to back up with both ancient records from the Bible, Egyptian records, and published scientifice works today. Anyway, I do appreciate the interchange with you. thank you.

But that is not th point. It is REFERENCE MATERIAL. The ancient published written works compiled in the Bible and dated are references that confirm the subject at hand; NEANDERTHALS. This is the point. The GENOME PROJECT and the Bible have the same conclusions. it's not about prediction; it about referencing published written works. This is a scholarly process that has been established for thousand of years--REFERENCING. The Bible defines MUTATION and today's scientist discovered archeological proof around the BLACK SEA AREA of Black AFrican specimens that have DNA of BLUE EYES. This is a proven MUTATION. It's dated 6000 years ago and that is the exact time span the Bible details Cain. But that is not th point. It is REFERENCE MATERIAL. The ancient published written works compiled in the Bible and dated are references that confirm the subject at hand; NEANDERTHALS. This is the point. The GENOME PROJECT and the Bible have the same conclusions.

Excellent. No it's not my theory, the GENOME PROJECT is scientific fact. But again, I've added about the mutation of BLUE EYES. I forgot to add that the date scientist provide is 6000 years ago; that is the exact dating of CAIN. ... another finding today that supports the Bible on THE ORIGINAL SIN in reference to CAIN. Recently scientiest also found archeological specimens around the BLACK SEA area and, DNA analysis proves them to have the DNA of an African-typed man, and with BLUE EYES. Scientist know now through these findings that BLUE EYES stem from BLACK PRESENCE because pre-Adamah beings did not have blue eyes!!! And they further know that Blue eyes are the result of a mutation.

All you need to do is google it. This GENOME PROJECT was released to the public I believe in 2012, so it's common knowledge now. There are so many links and I do plan to present references from secular sources, only now, I choose to concentrate on the Bible. as you did post the OXFORD DICTIONARY definition of INTERSEXED all of what I am saying here is so easy to check yourself. But I would love to add on to this subject right now and also add another finding today that supports the Bible on THE ORIGINAL SIN in reference to CAIN. Recently scientiest also found archeological specimens around the BLACK SEA area and, DNA analysis proves them to have the DNA of an African-typed man, and with BLUE EYES. Scientist know now through these findings that BLUE EYES stem from BLACK PRESENCE because pre-Adamah beings did not have blue eyes!!! And they further know that Blue eyes are the result of a mutation.

Yes. The Bible supports the science of today. The GENOME PROJECT has successfully mapped a portion of NEANDERTHAL DNA. The major confirmation is sort of ironic; when I was young, I heard most of the Church goers, Blacks, say that CAIN WAS CURSED and turned BLACK, but the science of today proves that could not be possible; based on the GENOME PROJECT and so many other facts; the presence of the NEANDERTHALS and that they could not produce a VIABLE MALEFACTOR amazingly confirms the bible account of GENESIS 3:15. Prior to the modern mankind, there was no VIABLE MALE REPRODUCTION going on!!!-- Not until the African man was on the earth in recent human history!!!

That the Neanderthal that had sex with Eve was White. or more scientifically put ALBINO. The GENOME PROJECT supports my findings and it also supports the Bible account of THE ORIGINAL SIN. Also, Science is observational as well. Look around you, what do you see; a world filled with racism and Colorism. This beginning of this phenomena revolves around SATANISM. SATANISM and WHITE SUPREMACY is one and the same. We are all, whether we are White, or African, affected by this REPRODUCTION that occurred of which the Biblical account of it I referenced in GENESIS 3:15.

That the Neanderthal that had sex with Eve was White. or more scientifically put ALBINO.

It's a reference. The reference you gave from the OXFORD DICTIONARY is another reference about the subject of INTERSEXED BEINGS. The Biblical references I gave are supporting the science of INTERSEX BEINGS. The fact that there are people living today that are medically determined to be INTERSEXED is not a theory. It is a proven fact. You can google yourself for these types of references. There are a lot of INTERSEXED athletes that had conflicts competing in the Olympics due to this reality. There are many ancient references to this reality and I just chose to use the Bible as my reference source. SATAN'S SEED, in order for him to have HIS SEED, THERE HAD TO BE REPRODUCTION. And today's presence of his seed is a reality, in the form of INTERSEXED people and so many other manifestations. I reference a MAP of ITALY to correlate to the ROMAN EMPIRE and yes, SOUTHERN ITALY for historical correlation. Do you understand the purpose a reference source serves? It supports research or a statement.

The Bible reference I gave absolutely defined INTERSEX. Jesus said that angels were intersexed! That is not a theory, that is called A REFERENCE! LOL. And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. GENESIS 3:15. Most Bible scholars interpret this scripture to mean that JESUS, as the woman's seed [ie Eve's seed] will be persecuted. But the HEAD [ie. Satan's government] of Satan's seed will be bruised or, his government ended.

Yes. I do believe that the 'pre-adamic' world was actually people of color. I've had the chance to visit the Smithsonion Hominid museum and it is quite enlightening. But if I had not done my own research, I would have been upset and offended. But I think it is true. Most of the hominids in the museum were either black or very dark skinned except for the Neanderthal. And the dark hominids are dated to have existed long before the Neanderthal. By the time the Neanderthal existed at some point all of the dark hominids were gone.

THANK YOU! Yes. I do believe that the 'pre-adamic' world was actually people of color. I've had the chance to visit the Smithsonion Hominid museum and it is quite enlightening. But if I had not done my own research, I would have been upset and offended. But I think it is true. Most of the hominids in the museum were either black or very dark skinned except for the Neanderthal. And the dark hominids are dated to have existed long before the Neanderthal. By the time the Neanderthal existed at some point all of the dark hominids were gone.

LOL! You're kidding. No. the science of INTERSEX beings is no theory. Your own reference from the Oxford dictionary was excellent. Now onto the example of Exodus 14:28-29, that kind of history is my passion! Even though this government supported lies about this event, actually, it is marked down to the very day it occurred!!! The very 'military leader' is well recorded even now, in that he was MIA. He was supposed to be married to Nefertiti's sister. And furthermore, in regards to SATAN'S SEED all of the major colleges and educational curriculum speaks of this birth. in GENESIS 3:15. Only the Black Church that I grew up in completely ignores this issue. And, I know that you know who I'm talking about. Come on!

I won't argue that theory point, but will continue to hopefully share the details on the scientific basis of the issues I presented in regards to INTERSEXED BEINGS. My references was in the Book of Genesis and in the Gospel when Jesus addressed this very issue. Also, I don't understan what you mean by conspiracy theory? Anyway, here another reference: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. GENESIS 3:15. Satan's Seed; This key issue has been missed by many. Satan's seed. Prior to the presence of the modern man, all he could reproduce was beings that had many, many, defects...of which a lot of this science still presents today. Contrary to what many believe, we are all not one human species. Oh no, not at all. I hope to present much more references.

I didn't mean to offend you. I guess you are INTERSEXED. I didn't mean to offend you. That was not my intentions. Hey, as I did say, according to the Bible, and science this whole earth has been affected by the ORIGINAL SIN. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. REVELATION 13:18. 666 or 2/3rds of a person = intersexed

LOL! You may need to have medical attention then, about your lunacy. If you don't know how to have a discussion without being aggressive and attacking people then why are you here? I responded to this thread... and what do you know?... here you are in the midst... Anyway, again... this Revelation about THE MARK OF THE BEAST in association with 'a man' and the number 666, and the description of his government being defined as THE BABYLONIAN WHORE is what I addressed. I did not attack you or anyone. But hey, I will keep it moving... Another Biblical reference that I would like to add is in THE GOSPEL. When the Pharisees drilled Jesus and asked him who would be the wife of Abraham, Jesus responded and revealed this very aspect of the pre-Adamah world, in that 'angels' were INTERSEXED BEINGS. So the Bible prophets deals with this reality all throughout the Bible. I have a lot of science references to share overtime, but this was, as was most of the Bible mysteries, A SEALED PROPHECY, that has now been revealed by JOHN THE REVELATOR completely.

LOL! If you don't know how to have a discussion without being aggressive and attacking people then why are you here? I responded to this thread... and what do you know?... here you are in the midst... Anyway, again... this Revelation about THE MARK OF THE BEAST in association with 'a man' and the number 666, and the description of his government being defined as THE BABYLONIAN WHORE is what I addressed. I did not attack you or anyone. But hey, I will keep it moving... Another Biblical reference that I would like to add is in THE GOSPEL. When the Pharisees drilled Jesus and asked him who would be the wife of Abraham, Jesus responded and revealed this very aspect of the pre-Adamah world, in that 'angels' were INTERSEXED BEINGS. So the Bible prophets deals with this reality all throughout the Bible. I have a lot of science references to share overtime, but this was, as was most of the Bible mysteries, A SEALED PROPHECY, that has now been revealed by JOHN THE REVELATOR completely.

lol! Man are you upset! your Oxford link hits all that I have said about many people being born even today with both gender traits, and doctors today who assign gender as opposed to the Bible definition. If the Y chromosome is present, the Bible regarded Satan and refers to him as male. But in the Book of Genesis HIS SEED was stated as being FEMALE, because God already knew that it would be... because his Y-CHROMOSOME was unable to produce a viable malefactor! LOL Oh no. Intersex is a reality. It's scientific fact. I have done deep research. and yes, I plan and hope to add much much more of my research to this written prophecy publish some 2000 years ago and published all over the world! NOw, I have gave you one more added insight to what happened in the ORIGINAL SIN... and I will definitely or plan to definitely add much more information to this scripture written by JOHN THE REVELATOR about the connection of 'a man' to this government system [ie BEAST] tht is also defined in female representation as well... as THE GREAT BABYLONIAN WHORE!!! LOL [there's another reference]...

Oh no. Intersex is a reality. It's scientific fact. I done deep research. But you can google for yourself. It's no theory Let's be clear here: 2/3rds means it is 2/3rd of a whole unit. IT means that it is not WHOLE. 666 is another mathematical expression for 2/3rds. The American Slavery laws state in many records that the Black slave was valued at 2/3rds a person and, this was also in the records in England and India and etc. Therefore, the ancient written and published words in the Bible was taken seriously

doesn't matter what you think. Intersexed science is factual. not theory. 666 is another way of writing the fraction 2/3rd and, this was a law in American Slavery. It was on the books in England, America, India and elsewhere for Black African Slaves. So this Biblical scripture was taken very seriously. Your futile attempt to hide scientific facts is really funny. This prophecy has nothing to do with your opinions on religion. I did not write the Bible. It was written and published all over the world long before I was born or before you were born. You are not going to be able to hide this revelation about THE MARK OF THE BEAST. NO. The explanation of 'the Black vote' was much later in time. The law books have it that Blacks were valued at 2/3rds a person in many books... again... in England, India, America and elsewhere. It was originally based on the slave ships. But you keep looking and trying to hide published works that have been translated about this scripture ALL OVER THE WORLD. When a Black person can reveal the truth that NO ONE ELSE WILL, it's scary isn't it... makes one think White Supremacy might be dealt with now more decisively.

Yes, that is what I am contending, -- that Native Americans and Anglo-Saxons are descendants of Africans. Black Africans. But the subject is broad for just a simple answer. This statement caught me off guard! It took me a minute to stop laughing. It's hard now, to be serious. But yeah, the word 'Africa' might not be the right word to use here. Black beings a long time ago prior to Afrian people we see today, would not be defined as African. A whole other concept.