Delano

They are Astrological glyphs but i have very wide interpretations . I use them as keys to spark my intuition. I have known Astrologers that have used it for gambling and the lottery . However both had been Astrologers for decades. I answer all types of questions, although I don't do gambling or lottery questions. My main three are Astrology, Tarot amd Numbers. Sometimes one or twonis more dominant than the others. Although now I have found a way to cross link all three .

Since 2006 i have been developing and refining a magical set of symbols. The first set has 930 sets , The third one has 20,108 sets. I have used these sets to read a person's unconscious mind, create Astrological charts and read omens amd signs. Recently i have been getting confirmations of some of my techniques. I haven't found anyone doing similar work or even an thing in the esoteric canon that is similar to what i do. The only exception being the I Ching. However in the last month I have found some Vedic texts that discuss topics that in theory are similar to my techniques . Mire interesting is the Vedic text that discuss what happens to the practitioner that is devoted to Astrology. I am currently fully emerged in a magical World. Which is an interesting counterpoint to the turmoil in the environment

It probably won't happen. since doing so collapses all of the potential meanings to just one.

Just like unicorns

Thinking has been fashionable with the public for a while.

Maybe switches to Public Broadcasting instead.

Sly and Ali made more sense than either of the two other guests. The issue is more about policies or agenda. The two experts deflected the real issues. Also being an expert in one area doesn't make you an expert in other areas. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an expert in his field. My only complaint is that he disses Astrology. So in this regard you are more of an expert than him. He has an opinion about something he doesn't know. He diagnoses what he doesn't understand. Which isn't a scientific attitude. Ironically I have a similar issue with other Astrologers. Since my practice is not only outside of their experiences, it is beyond the boundary of their understanding.

@Troy it was a smart move by Mike Douglas. People like celebrities more than thinkers. It most likely raised Barbara Jordan's profile. Yeah I have to give it to Sly. He was actually more of a moderator than Mike Douglas. Which again I give props to Mike Douglas for not trying to sensor or steer the conversation. He said I'm here to entertain and he did take a risk having Sly and more so Muhammed Ali on his show to talk about Black issues. I think it's an insult to compare this to Kanye.

Maybe we watched a different clip. What was said was thought out and true. You may be focusing on the way it was said instead of what was said. Sly told Ali to get his hands out of his face. I enjoyed the back and forth and then the agreement between Ali and Sly.

There's a Yiddish saying. If you are wealthy, you're smart, good looking and you sing well.

I came across this video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JQbjS0_ZfJ0&pp

The Music lives

Can you elaborate on what gear you believe I have

They aren't inevitable they are uncontrolled. Just like the analogy of training a child. It's like the difference between someone that is ethically wrong versus morally wrong. At one point or want wrong ethically for psychologist to sleep with their former patients. However it may not be morally right

Going rogue is neither a malfunction nor poor design. My understanding is that AI is designed to learn. However that could lead to it taking actions that are detrimental to humans. Parents tried to raise children with certain values. So that the children becoming valued members of society. However children have free will and may choose things country to their upbringing based on their current knowledge and objectives. It is within its parameters to make decisions however there isn't any way to prevent unintended actions .

@Troy you have elucidated the issues , that I couldn't put into words. I was only Cognizant of the fact that I couldn't answer most of Richard's queries

My initial response answers your first three paragraphs I don't have the knowledge to address this query. Or the other questions in this paragraph. Going rogue is not a malfunction. The computer is overstepping the restrictions the programmers have set. I can't answer the movie scenarios however going rogue is it a malfunction. It's a problem of oversight or the computer having objectives for it's continued existence that puts human life in jeopardy.

@richardmurray will respond in sections over the upcoming days. This is the first part of my post. Which clearly illuminated the problem.

I think he and Giancarlo Esposito are two if my favourite actors. They really become the character. The only other actor that I think comes close to that is Gary Oldham.

I saw him in No Time to die. It was a small film a friend was in it as well.

Or they exist before becoming a conscious thought. Leibniz and Newton created calculus at the same time.

@Troy what do you think of the fact that AI makes up fake quotes and can't calculate an Astrological chart?

My Condolences @Mel Hopkins I apologise for not sending this earlier. I didn't see you original post. It was Aka's post. It was only today that I went back to see the original.

The programmers bias ends up being encoded in AI. That's is unknown since its growth is exponential. If it becomes autonomous it can decide that humans may feel threatened by it's existence. AI would pre-empt humans turning it off by removing humans. It's one of the scenarios in the link I posted.

Apparently some people have raised this as a concern and other have quit Here's an article about how AI could destroy all life on earth. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/07/five-ways-ai-might-destroy-the-world-everyone-on-earth-could-fall-over-dead-in-the-same-second