Pioneer1

Now as we look into OTHER media sources about the incident we read...... So NOW they're saying that the home was "vacant". But didn't we just read from another source about that there were people INSIDE the home shooting at the people outside? Now the Chief of the Milwaukee Police said: Outside of the fact that there is a dispute between the police and activists about whether or not one of the girls are still missing...… Outside of the fact that according to the report the girls weren't "critical missing" and didn't qualify for a team to look for them NOR did they qualify for an Amber Alert...… Now it appears that Chief wants to ATTACK THE FAMILY of the missing girls and accuses THEM of starting all the trouble! How can he accuse the family of getting in the way and not cooperating with something THEY THEMSELVES were reluctant to do in the first place? Also, when was the last time you heard a police officer AT ALL let alone the CHIEF police officer actually ATTACK the family of the victims in the media? But let's move on...… Now, there were people on the ground at the scene who actually provide a VIDEO disputing what the Chief told the press: Frank, the community activist goes on to say: So according to THIS man: -In this SAME HOUSE that was called vacant by the media. -In this SAME HOUSE that police allegedy went to but didn't find anyone …..he's saying some people went to the house and gathered up a bunch of children and some of the children TRIED TO RUN AWAY and those people chased them through the park!! So the Police went to the home and said they didn't find anything, but the PEOPLE went into the home and found shorts with blood on it!

Ok, so the police are saying that 2 girls who've been missing for more than 2 days didn't fit the criteria for "critical missing". Whatever that means........ Nor do they qualify for an Amber Alert. Hmmm, interesting. It looks as if in Milwaukee the standards are HIGH for girls to be considered even worthy of looking for when they come up missing, but let's continue...… In that same article from the Journal Sentinel we further read: Now a FEW things that I highlighted in bold-red stood out for me...….......... 1. There were shots fired at people at/outside that house TWICE on Tuesday, yet we don't read ANYTHING about anyone being arrested. Three people were shot and injured, including TWO 14 YEAR OLD CHILDREN.....but no arrests?????? According to the article the police weren't there for the FIRST shooting at 11am, but they most CERTAINLY WAS THERE at the 5:45 shooting because the place was SURROUNDED by police and firefighters.....yet 2 children were shot and NO ARRESTS! But the Milwaukee Police Department made sure to let everyone know THEY DIDN'T shoot anyone! Damn. Police and fire fighters all over the area. Yet no suspects or atleast no arrests for all of this shooting going on! And while the police haven't reported WHO did the shooting into the crowd, they made sure to report that THEY aren't the ones who did the shooting. 2. Also, the report is that this shooting was going on between someone INSIDE of the home and those outside. Keep in mind this report of someone being INSIDE the home as we continue further. 3. At 7:30....assuming the police were still there.....a 24 year old man was shot in his car! Again, NO REPORT OF ARRESTS for who shot this man! So you have all of this shooting going on and people getting injured while the place is SURROUNDED by police, yet nobody gets cuffed during this exchange....WTF??

At first we see this tweet by our brother Tariq Nasheed letting us know what's going on in Milwaukee...…. So I dig into the story to try to get some more information from other media sources. And I fine THIS report in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Ok, before we go any further let's just stop right here. You have a 13 year old girl and a 15 year old girl who had been missing SINCE Sunday evening, about 2 days before the events took place but they're saying THAT didn't "fit the criteria" for an investigation or even an Amber Alert?????

Troy @Troy I just looked at the breaking news that New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut just announced they will quarantine people coming from states with high Covid-19 cases that are mostly in the South. I believe THIS ACTION by those three states has just now made the ongoing Civil War MUCH MUCH hotter. Don't be suprised if some of the southern states don't retaliate against the citizens as well as the governments of New York, New Jersey, and other East Coast states! I'm interested in what you have to say about this as well as how you think it will affect YOU going back home from time to time since Florida is on the quarantine list. Are you willing to be quarantined for 14 days just to go back home?

Shaun is spot on with this observation. It's been known for decades that the images of Jesus and even God being depicted as a Caucasian man has being one of the most effective tools of racism as it burns the idea of Caucasians being divine and god-like into the subconscious of many people of color who grow up around those images. However, I suspect that if people DO start smashing and knocking down those images of Caucasians that have been LABELED as "Jesus".....some of the protesters may end up making more enemies than they expected. Infact, I suspect many of the female protesters of color will be adamantly against this campaign.

Many AfroAmerican conservatives are smart and have a keen sense of morality. So they often choose the conservative idealogy and join the Republican party based on it's RHETORIC rather than it's actions. That can be understood and in many respects excused. Problem is, many people like Larry Elder and Candace Owens even after UNCOVERING the racist hypocrisy of the Republican party and Conservative movement continue to support it. They do so for the benefits. Money, political office, good jobs, as well as RELIABLE ALLIES (Caucasians Democrats can't be trusted to have your back as well as Caucasian Republicans). While this is understood, I don't think it's a valid enough excuse to collaborate with the open destruction of your own people. Jesse Lee Peterson is a GOOD example of a negro who KNOWS the rampant racism and hypocrisy of the Conservative movement in the United States yet he still continues to support them every chance he gets to the point it's absolutely comical.

Lol.... Yeah, I saw that special Dave Chapelle did and where he mentioned Candace. I don't remember seeing Dave so serious and so angry as when he was talking about the George Floyd situation. He was also more militant than I had ever heard him before, even bringing up the Christopher Dorner (Black LAPD officer accused of going on a killing spree) incident. As for Candace...… Yes, she is an attractive and smart young lady but like most AfroAmerican conservatives, she is CONFUSED and is a TOOL for White Supremacy although she does bring up some good points. Personally, if I had my way I wouldn't have centered the injustices of law enforcement around the George Floyd and Rayshard Brooks cases. I would have focused like a laser on the Breonna Taylor case because it was so CLEAR CUT that this girl was innocent and was slaughtered while in her own home! That would have resonated much more with the rest of the planet than focusing on these 2 brothers who have questionable backgrounds. AfroAmericans need to learn to be more strategic in how they present their arguments so as not to be made fools out of.

Chev You are so right in that this has been happening on a routine basis, however, with the lynching!!!? Man! This is even hard for me to grasp! I was born in the 60s and by the time I was old enough to understand, I was conditioned that the lynching and Jim Crow aspect was long ago. I am not kidding! I was made to believe that it was a long time ago... and I was made to focus on a new Black wave. I was made to be captivated with Diana Ross and the Supremes, Motown, Aretha Franklin, the Fifth Demension, the Jackson Five, hoola hoops, Black baby dolls, jump ropes, five and dime candy, the astronauts going to the moon, Black Power, etc. I was completely distracted Well, this is one of the main functions of Entertainment in Western society.....to distract people. One of the reasons that the protests have grown so much and are so huge right now is because there's not a lot of sports or music programs on television right now to further distract the people. Add that to the fact that nearly a third of the adult population ISN'T EVEN WORKING right now due to the virus and you have the perfect stew. Since there are no sports or talent shows for them to watch, or even jobs for them to go to, people have little choice BUT to focus on the injustices in society now.....lol. Well, yes but, this is only one aspect, and the other more pressing aspect are the AfroAmerican men who have NOT given up their BIRTHRIGHT to be males!!! THANK GOD! I think that Black men are constantly being targeted because you guys are the beginning of God's strength--creation; that's why!--and the enemy does not like it. When mankind can accept that the first modern anatomically straight male originated from an African origin, then they are no different than even Black men, but the problem is that there is a strange presence on this earth and they do not want to accept this truth--White Supremacy! To go along with what you said, one of the main reasons AfroAmericans in general are targeted by the White Supremacists is because we are the main people of color who actually criticize and challenge White Supremacy. Most other people of color both in and outside of the United States have capitulated and succumb to it and have become willing slaves. When you look at how Asians and Latinos are treated in society, although the White Supremacists in power seem to be giving them economic and political breaks....many of the average Caucasians on the street HATE them and commit BLATANT acts of racism against them. But unlike most AfroAmericans, most of them don't fight back. They just accept it, ignore it, and keep working to maintain the system. Many AfroAmericans REFUSE to do so, which is why so many are targeted. Troy Now that most reasonable people know he was a mistake, I'm confident to predict he will be booted out of office in 2020. Things will start to improve, for everyone, after 2020 for everyone barring a Russian invasion, another pandemic, or some other calamity. I don't know about "everyone". I predict things will DEFINATELY start to improve for AfroAmericans not only after 2020 but before this Summer is out! There are a number of reasons why I believe this, but the Civil War that I say is already underway will be a major reason for this. Just like the first Civil War benefited AfroAmericans. I believe the second Civil War will benefit us also, but to a MUCH greater extent. As far as your example with police departments. They have changed a great deal -- even in my life time. It was not long ago when minorities and women were excluded from the ranks of police officers. Today is a completely different picture in places like NYC. Improving is a work in progress. Clearly things have changed on a SURFACE level, but have they changed for the BETTER? Since your childhood (and mind) we have seen the police become more militarized, more killing of civilians by law enforcement, the prison industrial complex grow.....all with more "minorities" and women added to the force to add to the confusion. In the case of New York....... It could be argued that the "powers that be" had decided to add more AfroAmerican and Puerto Rican officers to the NYPD so that THEY can do the dirty work and handle their own people so that the Caucasian officers don't have to get their hands dirty. Look at how some of the non-Caucasian and female NYPD officers you speak of GO AFTER the AfroAmerican kid even though it was the Caucasian boys who were the ones talking the most shit. Institution bend to the will of the people they are intended to serve. I agree. The question is WHO were the various police departments around the nation intended to serve? If they were intended to serve the interests of wealth Caucasians, they have been and are doing JUST THAT.

Troy Well they are our Brothers and Sisters. Now they may not be out "Soul Brothers and Sistas" but we all belong to the same family man. Failure to recognize this is why we are still running around killing each other. Not sure what you mean by "we"....lol. It seems that Caucasians are doing a lot of the KILLING while people of color are doing a lot of crying, begging, weed smoking, and head scratching. ...and recognize America's blatant hypocrisy. What we as AfroAmericans need to understand is that Western civilization was FOUNDED on lies and hypocrisy; so exposing them is no big deal. Too many of our people keep trying to appeal to some sort of "morality" they are assuming these racists have. They don't care about lying and being hypocritical as long as it serves their purposes of oppression and domination. Yes, the average person around the planet may see the hypocrisy....but how much weight does THEIR opinion hold? What power do THEY have to do anything about it even if they recognize it? They know they better shut up and go back to that rice-paddy or factory and get to sweating again before THEIR leader puts a foot in THEIR ass. Who cares what powerless people think. It's like those people standing on the sidewalk jumping up and down squealing and hollering while a race-soldier is beating and killing a brother. They feel holding up a cell phone camera and recording it while saying, "We got yall on tape.....better stop it!" is real power. The race soldiers are steadily whopping the brother's ass and bouncing his head off the pavement while the crowd is pointing out how wrong and hypocritical it is. Why is THIS time different? ...…who said it was.

Chev You are comparing a king to a man. Even a Black African king cannot be compared to a black man Isn't a king a man? He's a man in a powerful position. Just because he's in a powerful position doesn't mean he is NOT creepy. Look at your President....lol. That is SO not true based on Bible. Exactly....the BIBLE says it. Which is one of the reasons I question it and go with other sources to make a correct determination. The Bible details a Black Hamitic founded civilization. Are you sure? Because that same Bible details that Cain (son of Adam....whatever color you believe he was) went off into wandering and FOUNDED A CITY naming it after his son. So according to the Bible, clearly there was civilization before Noah and his sons. Akkad was completely developed by Black Negro males long before their CIVILIZATION was infiltrated by White Caucasians and other people from the east. You may be correct to a certain extent. There is reason to believe that just like Caucasians had help from Africans (Musa and his crew) to be lifted up into civilization, they probably had some help from certain Africans to build thier first city Akkad. The Jews were not even born at the time Byblos was developed. Ofcourse not. Byblos was THOUSANDS of years old at the time...probably millions, we don't know. I'm just saying that however old it is, that is one of the major places they were taken to get further training on how to go back and uplift the rest of their people. Abram was born in Ur of the CHALDEES, the ancestor of the Jews. I'm not sure that Abram.....if he existed....was the ancestor of the Jews. As I said before, the Jews were a group of Caucasians (many of whom had a lot of African blood) smart enough and well trained enough to help uplift the rest of their race from savagery. I'm not sure if Abram was even in the picture. I just can't tell you in one sentence so-to-speak of his contributions to humanity. HIs contributions are largely that of conquering and pillaging the Black peoples of the Middle East. He founded Akkad on the blood of those we now call Sumerians and Elamites. To show you how arrogant he was, he saw ziggarauts in the area and decided to try and build HIS OWN ziggaraut (tower of Babel) as a launching pad for the aircraft he saw Black men flying around in. Some say it was also to challenge the Elohim.

I will be the first person to my knowledge anywhere (television, online, ect….) to make the prediction that they will RE-OPEN the Jussie Smollett case sometime THIS YEAR and eventually declare him innocent and that he told the truth about his racial attack! So, not only did I make a prediction but I gave you a time frame. Now let's see what happens......

Troy Institutions take time to create and by virtue of the fact that they are institutions they are necessarily slow moving. Yes, but their effects are longer lasting. Look at the residual effects that the "institution" of monogamous marriage STILL has on society despite having decades of freedom from it. There is a lag but institutions ultimately reflect the people who run them. Give me a counter example? AfroAmerican police officers. Institutions usually reflect the people who FOUNDED them more so than the people who currently operate them or populate them. The police as an institution in the United States was set up to protect private property and also to prevent slaves from escaping. So the founders were racist Caucasian men who established a system that reflects their value of property over life. AfroAmericans may become officers and even Chiefs and commanders inside the institution, but they still have a hard time trying to change and reform that institution because of it's very FOUNDATION. Institutions have a way of changing the individuals who join them. Not only do institutions share the values of those who establish them, but my point is that even those who DON'T share those values end up abiding by them and even ADOPTING them at some point out of necessity and in the name of getting along with collegeaus.

Troy "At some level we have to act as spirit for our brothers and sisters [white people] .... some are trying to make amends, but they just don;t know how..." Well I don't know about the rest of your buddies but watch out for THAT buddy....lol. That's the type of brother who will get you in trouble! For one thing, he calls Caucasians his "brothers and sisters". Most Caucasians KNOW they aren't our brothers or sisters because we didn't come from the same origin. But him calling them brother and sister is an example of him HOPING and WISHING for intimate acceptance by them. Often times AfroAmerican men who think like that get caught up in some sexual legal problem from being to reckless with a Caucasian "sister" he thought was cool. Until she called "the man". Second, he sincerely believes that THEY are sincere about "making amends" but don't know how. Which tells me he's easily deceived, by Caucasians atleast. Most people who have wronged you and SINCERELY want to make amends will first STOP doing you harm and THEN rectify the situation by repaing the damage. If he believes that someone who just called the police on him the other day while he was peacefully watching birds in the park and even told the police it was an "aggressive black guy" hoping for a violent response....is a "sister" who is remorseful and wants to make amends, he's a natural born sucker....lol. Like I said, watch out for them kind of buddies because they'll MESS YOU UP and won't even know he did it. He's the type of friend who will get chatty with one of his Caucasian "brothers" about you and unwittingly pass on some important personal information about you that may be potentially damaging and he wouldn't even know what he did wrong. You'll be laying on a cot somewhere looking up at the ceiling wondering what happened, and he'll STILL be chatting away to his Caucasian "brothers and sisters" giving them more information. There is also the realization that what we want is all over the map, so the inability to understand what will make Black folks happy is understandable confusing. Well, I know what MOST AfroAmerians want. When a Caucasian ever wanted to REALLY know what most AfroAmericans wanted they asked ME....lol. Most AfroAmericans want to be loved and accepted by Caucasians. They don't just want justice and respect, they want MORE than that....they want ACCEPTANCE by Caucasians because many of our people see Caucasians as the epitome of humanity and being on an intimate and accepted basis with them is one of the main goals of many. Having a nice big house isn't good enough for them. They have to have a nice big house in a Caucasian neighborhood! Infact, a small cramped apartment will do....as long as it's OUT of the hood and in a Caucasian neighborhood. The global reaction to what is happening here is America is also so telling isn't it? Yes. Because they know what happens in America is simply a prelude to what will happen over the rest of the globe.

Troy Yes. I'm quite creative when I want to be....lol. One of the things I neglected to say at the beginning of this thread when you were asking me about the various characteristics of Caucasians that should be emulated was their remarkable ability to talk in "code" with eachother. A Caucasian in an executive position can say something to ALL of the members of a corporation and while all of the fellow Caucasians will understand EXACTLY what he means the other non-Caucasians will be totally clueless and take his words on face value. They will carry out his orders EXACTLY the way he meant them to be carried out while many of the non-Caucasians will do what they THOUGHT he wanted done.....but much of it will turn out to be wrong. When Agent Orange said he wanted to "Make America Great Again" other Caucasians knew EXACTLY what he meant by that but only a few people of color did and had to de-code it into "Make America White Again". This is why most of the police reform efforts they are talking about won't work UNTIL you remove the racists from the various departments. Because as long as you have race-soldiers occupying the positions of police officers and officials they will continue to speak to eachother in code to continue their brutal objectives. All you need is a racist chief to tell ALL of the officers they need to be more aggressive on motorists speeding in the streets, and the racists will immediately hear "Ok guys.....I need you to start stopping more Blacks and getting some ticket money up for revenue".

Uh...yeaaah. What else could it have been, given the timing? At any rate, congratulations on your success. I think we should enjoy it and take advantage of the times Caucasians are being nice, supportive, and generous REGARDLESS as to why they're doing it.

Troy A MAGA hat is not a symbol of racism to many of the white who wear them. That is you projecting your sterotype. Lol...??? And neither is burning a cross a symbol of racism to most KKK members, if you ask them! Should we start believing what racist hypocrites SAY out of their mouths instead of judging them by their actions? Had you even consudered that the old guy might have simply been trying to help you? Or is white skin and a red hat enough to set you off? Yes, I briefly considered it as a possiblity. But logic forced me to side with COMMON SENSE. Man you act like it is still the 19th century. Things are nit oerfect but they are FAR better than what they used to be. Indications are, given recent events, white people want to improve things for us too. Perhaps. But I wasn't around to witness the 19th century to draw a comparison. Injustice and racial oppression is injustice and racial oppression regardless as to the degree one is suffering from it. If a person goes to see a doctor with stage 4 cancer and they manage to get it under control and down to stage 2.....should the doctor tell their patient to leave well enough alone? Should that doctor assure the patient that they may not be perfectly healthy, but atleast they are far less likely to die from stage 2 than stage 4? A good doctor would try their best to get rid of ALL cancer in their patient and impliment a routine that prevents it from ever re-occuring again!

No, I don't see the difference. Institutions are not autonomous or sentient entities. They reflect the will of the people who run them But not necessarily the will of those SUBORDINATE to them, and that's the difference. The consequences of personal prejudices and discriminatory behavior is ideally limited ONLY to the person holding those views and those they personally choose to interact with. When discrimination and prejudice is INSTITUTIONALIZED then even those who don't share those views are forced to behave as if they do. Clearly the two aren't the same. Racist people run institutions that write antimesigenation laws. But again, NON-racists have to live under and by them. And there again is the difference. So you can't compare the severity of individual prejudice with institutonalized prejudice and discrimination.

Troy Of course personal experiences are important in making decisions. If you live in come urban ghetto, it might make sense to assume a young Black man may rob you. However it was be illogical to assume all young Black men will rob you. Do you see the difference? Yes. However the examples you offered for a comparison were lopsided. You gave the Caucasian man a characteristic (wearing a Trump supporter's hat) that is well known to be a symbol of bigotry. But you gave the AfroAmerican man a charactristic of simply being young. You didn't say he had a rag around his face, a gun in his waist, ect....no outward sign of aggression. So in the two examples you offered, distrusting the Caucasian man is MORE JUSTIFIED because of his open display of symbolic racism. You choose to distrust all white people based upon all the bad shit some of them have done over the centuries. That is fine. I don't have the emotional and mental capacity to distrust the majority of the people who live in this country. Besides I'm don't think it is necessary. 1. It's not simply based on the bad shit some of them HAVE DONE....but what they are STILL DOING! You act as if the war that racists have been waging against people of color on this planet is somehow over. -Look at the behavior of some Caucasian so-called "police". -Look at the strikingly high cases of Covid 19 among people of color. -Look at the disproportionate amount of AfroAmericans in jails and prisons. -The AfroAmerican men still being hung in trees We're not just talking about the crimes of the past but the crimes STILL being committed by racist Caucasians. To blanketly trust all Caucasians UNTIL they give you a reason not to is akin to suicide. 2. From what you're saying, it appears that you see dis-trusting someone alone in and of itself as a HOSTILE act. Do you believe that human beings are OBLIGAGED to trust eachother? The only penis i'm interested is in my own. You obviously have a lot of interest and knowledge about other penises. Can you be more specific on how you've come to be so knowledgeable on the subject of penises? Why? Lol.....are you interested in becoming a Peniologist during your spare time? Does do you believe thst people with big feet have big ones too? Ofcourse not.....lol.....not the women atleast.

Either that or Negroes were acting so hostile and crazy a few weeks ago that Caucasians got spooked and PRETENDED to start giving a damn to avoid further hostitlity.

Troy Institutions are run by people. If those people believe in thqlstereotypes, like white supremacy. I understand, but it's not the same. Institutionalized prejudices are far more dangerous than individual prejudices because it FORCES people into committing acts of hostitlity. If you live around women who refuse to go out with AfroAmerican men based on person choice, as much as you don't like it you can't say they should be punished because it's a personal preference. However if the city or state you lived in made it a LAW that women are not allowed to go out with AfroAmerican men....then it's no longer just a personal choice but an INSTITUTIONALIZED act of enforced discrimination that takes away the individual's freedom to choose. See the difference? You really shouldn't compare individual choices and tastes with institutionalized discrimination in which a prejudiced standard is FORCED on the people.

Troy My point is the "rule" should not be based upon one's gender (or sexuality or skin color). Perhaps you're correct, but you'd have to admit that human society would be far more akward if people didn't make generalizations about eachother and instead took everyone on an individual basis as you suggest. How long do you think your business would last if everytime someone offered to buy your merchandise you looked at them and asked, "Well, yeah....but do you have enough money? Because by looking at you....I can't tell!" There have been far too many situations in which people have been excluded from particular roles because of characteristics that have nothing to do with the skills required for the role. Collectively we all lose out because of this. What you're talking about is institutionalized discrimination. That is different than personal assumptions and generalizations based on individual experiences.

In addition to what I said, this pretty much sums up why I don't support the term. I see a lot more people of all races are "celebrating" and talking about Juneteenth way more this year than they were before. I wonder did the riots and AfroAmericans hitting the streets have anything to do with this new found respect and interest in AfroAmerican history....lol?

Troy While your personal experience important to you it still can't not be used to judge broad swaths of people. Why can't it? Isn't that how human beings learn and socialize with eachother? Isn't that how babies and children learn, by using their personal experiences and observations to LEARN how to navigate their way through the world? A baby learns to expect that sucking on a titty will get them milk based on numerous personal experiences of sucking on them before....lol. A child learns to love candy IN GENERAL because of their numerous personal experiences from eating candy. People enroll in schools and IN GENERAL expect to be educated based on numerous personal experiences in other such institutions. Can you not understand how sound judgements and other decisions can be based on personal experiences? Knowing that a moving vehicle may kill you, if you step in front of it, is entirely different than knowing if the white Guy with the MAGA hat will. We have 100% knowledge of the car even before we see it. You can never truly know how the white guy will behave -- even if you know him. It's not about KNOWING....it's about ESTIMATING to make the best decision for your safety and well being. You know the car has the POTENTIAL to kill you but you don't know for sure if it would even hit you. And if it does hit you it may not kill you or even seriously injury you. But you GENERALIZE based on SAFETY.....because you don't want to find out the hard way you estimate that it could and that it's best to avoid taking any of the chances. And it's the same with the Caucasian with the MAGA hat. He may not necessarily be racist or harmful but he may be and it would be unwise for you to take unnecessary chances by ASSUMING that he isn't and giving him an opportunity to harm you FIRST before not-trusting him. I have a good example for you....... A couple months ago I was standing in line in a grocery store and some old Caucasian man in a red MAGA hat TRIED to walk up to me without a mask on asking me did I need help finding something on the shelf. I ran his ass away! He stood back constantly asking what was wrong and babbling about how he was only trying to help me find what I was looking for. He looked sickly and his eyes were rimmed in red like a zombie. The more I looked at the devil the angrier I got. If he hadn't left, there's no telling if a can of something would have gotten thrown at him.....lol. Did I over-react? Perhaps. Now this was before it came out that White Supremacists were intentionally trying to spread coronavirus among AfroAmerican populations. So why did I behave the way I did toward this old man? Becaues I I DID NOT TRUST HIM base on generalizations! 1. He wasn't an employee at the store, so why was he interested in helping me out? 2. He was a Caucasian...member of a race with a long documented history of doing more harm to AfroAmericans than good but that harm is often DISGUISED as good. 3. His hat told me he was a proud and open supporter of "Agent Orange", a man of whom most of his followers are racist. My antennae was raised and I acted on my instincts and because of that it probably prevented me from being harmed. A lot of AfroAmericans....perhaps even yourself....seem to see virtue in blanketly trusting Caucasians UNTIL they do something malicious to you to erode that trust. I don't. Because if you let them get too close and do the wrong thing you may not LIVE to learn better next time. You can't possible know this. Again just because you believe it based upon your limited experience does not make it true for the whole. Lol... Well if I can't possibly know this is NOT the case, how can you possibly know that it IS the case? I'm using my limited experience to argue against a position that you've taken based YOUR LIMITED EXPERIENCE. Who among us has had enough expriences with all or the majority of humanity to prove or disprove our positions? Being based in truth and actually being true are too different things. I know this. However they don't necessarily contradict eachother either. As far as penis sizes, I actually have not seen too many, and I've never seen a Chinese penis. " Come on man, stop playing...you KNOW you done seen some Chinese penisez befoe' ! " How did you come to see so many penises that you can, so confidently, draw conclusions about their relative lengths? 😲 ...that is unless you can show me the data. Gyms, internet, women who've seen them, ect...... There is plenty of data out there about the length of men's penises based on their race. Much of it is clouded and obscure and presented as "inconclusive" but it's out there.

Troy you've made very broad generalizations about people based only on their skin color. This is sterotyping people and prejudicial. This is the exact same reasoning the white supremacist uses. Yes, it is true that I have made very broad generalizations about people....but those generalizations are based on YEARS of observation and personal experience dealing with different races of people. NOT based "only" on their skin color. Unlike conventional ethics, I DO NOT necessarily condemn or decry broad generalizations. I believe they are appropriate and logical sometimes, and not at other times. But it's a matter of discretion. You don't walk out infront of on-coming traffic because of the BROAD GENERALIZATION that a car will hit you and kill you.....although that may not necessarily be the case. All of the characteristics you've ascribed to white people are characteristics Black people have and vice versa. Not generally. Perhaps in a few individual cases, but certainly not collectively. Again, you believe this because people perpetuate and internalize that stereotype. Because people hold on to stereotypes does not make them true, but i guess it does form their reality Although a stereotype isn't NECESSARILY true, I'd offer the stronger argument that to the contrary....most stereotypes are actually BASED ON a certain amount of truth! For example..... There is a PERSISTENT stereotype that African men have larger penises than other races of men. This stereotype didn't come out of the blue. I don't hear it being said about Asian men. If it was completely made up and untrue then they could just as easily attach the myth to Asian men.....but they didn't and haven't. Just because something is a stereotype, doesn't necessarily mean that it IS true or that it is NOT true. BTW.... I believe the larger penis size of the average African man is MORE than just some "stereotype" but a scientific FACT. The only reason it's argued and called as stereotype is because the SCIENCE that has confirmed this FACT has been intentionally clouded. This scientific fact CAN BE and HAS BEEN easily confirmed not only by direct observation but with measurements by medical professionals....no need for the doubt and confusion. But because having a larger penis suggests that African men are more masculine...which contradicts White Supremacy....again, this well established fact is intentionally clouded and wrapped up in irrelevant discussions in order to cause confusion and stir up doubt. Notice when it comes to things like RACE AND CRIME STATISTICS.....which is much harder to measure than simply measuring a penis.....Caucasians have no problems offering endless documents of hard clear statistics.