Jump to content

richardmurray

Boycott Amazon
  • Posts

    2,380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    90

richardmurray last won the day on April 5

richardmurray had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    All things

Recent Profile Visitors

147,295 profile views

richardmurray's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Well Followed Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated Rare

Recent Badges

640

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by richardmurray

  1. now1.jpg

    FROM : MAd SKillz < skillzva on facebook>  

    I may get crucified for this but its how I feel.(just jokes) 🤷🏾‍♂️ I grew up in a similar situation...no father tho. And I NEVER IN MY LIFE seen a woman with this many morals. EVERRR BRUH. Being that poor and having those kind of morals never made sense to me. Black Jesus brought yall good luck? You made James take him down. James finds 5k? You make him give it back. They wanted yo ass to star in a PAID Vita Brite commercial? You didnt do it cuz it had alcohol in it. James going to the pool hall cuz yall bout to get evicted? You made him put the pool stick back. They pass JJ up to the 12th grade? You made him go back to the 11th. Preacher wanted to take James on the road to do the "Im healed" scam? You made him stay home. The projects were not the villain of this show. FLORIDA WAS. YOU WERE THE BIGGEST HATER ON TELEVISION. 😂😂😂 check my story for the proof.

     

    MY REPLY

    Where do I begin? 
    Lets start with his points and he made many. 
    I will iterate the points
    POINTS
    1) he grew up similar to the scenario in good times, and he mentioned no father specificially.
    2) he never knew a woman with this many morals
    3) being fiscal bottom and having high morals never made sense. 
    4) the projects, the white system, wasn't the criminal, Florida, the specific moralled black matriarch was

    MY THOUGHTS TO EAH POINT
    1)If I ask the average person in the usa today, who are the richest people in the usa as a group, what is their phenotype. They will say, most fiscally rich people are white, a label referring to their average skin tone , which does merge into the mulatto range, ala passing. The next question is, how do they get their money? Most will say the truth, inheritance, their forebears had money and gave it to them. 
    Now, if I ask most people, why are black people poor? Most will say, Black people don't know how to play the game. Black people are lazy. Black people need to improve themselves, learn to strive more. Few will say the simple truth, Black people have no one to inherit money from. The next question is why? And this goes to history. 
    One of the problems with the black community in media, is that our poverty is rarely comprehended as simple as it needs to be. Two cultural institutions in the usa didn't allow for black inheritance. First was slavery, second was jim crow. Slavery predates the usa, which is another truth I find most in the usa don't seem to comprehend. Slavery is from the european colonial era but it survived in tact , unblemished, after the creation of the articles of confederation or the constitution, thus why most free blacks fought against the usa in its earliest wars. Slavery ended with the thirteeth amendments and the destruction of the southern states, and the desire of the northern states to eliminate the financial competition with a slave based society utilizing industrial tools.  But after a very short respite <solid seven years > called reconstruction commonly, Jim Crow was born from the dead carcass of slavery and continued the goal of denying inheritance to black people. 
    That is why the black community in the usa is fiscally poor. Jim crow ended , in my assessment, in the 1980s. So from before the usa was founded till the 1980s, Black people were in majority <yes, exceptions always exist in life but they are not stnadards or pathways or rules> denied inheritance. The projects themselves were never meant for black people. If you know the history of the projects, they were meant for poor working whites to have a place in an urban setting to refind their fiscal bearings, starting in the 1950s. White flight from big cities and continual movement to big cities by non whites made the white city governments change course and offer projects as dens for people not white mostly to congregate in the city. A eternal source of cheap labor and fiscally poor people. Whereas projects in the 1950s had storefronts, the latter ones did away with that and just became housing. 
    Did you know that when the vietnam war ended, vietnam had hundreds of thousands of orphans from usa soldiers and vietnamese women living in orphanges? now, why does this matter? 
    It connects to slavery/jim crow, and relationships between child bearers. Slavery plus Jim crow denied inheritance for black people. The primary tool was violence. but a secondary tool was separation. To be blunt, during slavery black people were not married in majority. Black women were property of the master. the master, to use crude language, tapped that ass , more than the property of the white man she called her black husband. So since the community of the usa is from the european imperial era, for most of the history of the usa or what preceded it , black children have not had either parent. I am not saying that to reject anyone's emotions, but to bring a historical reality to black people's narrative around child raising which rarely admits reality about our community in the usa. Jim crow is what rebuilt the south and spurred the usa industrial machine. That is another historical fact that goes absent. Jim crow was powered by black men in prison on false charges. These men were given sentences meant to be for life, for the purpose of rebuilding the usa. The 13th amendment says slavery can still exist in prisons so white people in power ushered black people, specifically black men, into prisons. 
    I was raised by both my parents who are still together and loving, through many challenges. And my family is upper poor, not the fiscal bottom. 
    But, white or black filmmakers push two narratives, for different reasons that are lies. The narratives are: black people's poverty is a modern thing not from a lack of inheritance over centuries, the black family unit has its members to blame for its history of fissure.
    Good times, written by whites, uniquely has a loving black father, who died because of Amos disagreement with the studios. But his death fits the truth, the environment for the black community which has been engineered by whites over centuries has successfully hindered black people, is not meant to, has hindered. And, the black people who traveled to the north to escape being burned alive and possibly find work, found fewer fires up north but less fiscal potential. But whether in the south or north the reason is a lack of inheritance, not lazyness or anything else.

    2)+3) I must combine. His comments prove how many black people either do not know the history of black people in the usa or have a false interpretation of it.
    The Club Women was a group of black christian women who believed that if black people educated themselves and showed utmost manner that will overcome white violence. The sit-ins was based on a similar principle. This was black people saying I will go into a story where a sign outside says for people like me to NOT ENTER. The result is obvious, you enter a place where you are told by its owners for you not to come, you get your ass beat. Hell, most people know about romeo or juliet but what do you think the capulets and the mantagues were like? What is funny about the usa and the sit-ins and the club women is how , in human history it is so common for groups of people to ban others. In northern ireland they have many places where catholics can't go and protestants can't go. 
    So, When he says he didn't know any woman with this many morals, I will not deny his statement. But it proves he didn't know enough older black people who could tell him of many who did such things. Remember, non violence isn't merely about the white man not being violent to blacks but it is about blacks not being violent ourselves even when faced with reason to be. 
    Most black leaders, including MLK jr, never prescribed to such extreme views of non violence personally. but, the black community in the usa from the time of reconstruction has a long history of it. 
    Now is, Florida a caricature? of course she is. BUT, she reflects the truth of the black community from the end of the war between the states to the 1970s. I know that some black people who were land owners told relatives to not fight whites and sent them away. I do not concur to the idea of fighting wars with morals, but that was and is a residual from slavery and jim crow. 
    And that comes to his dysfunctional allusion. Black people were not merely poor during slavery or jim crow, we were impotent. Fiscal poverty is one thing, but when one is fiscally poor PLUS under constant assault. It changes ow you view things. Again, I can tell you I know of black people off line who were alive in decades past and admitted that every black women in their town was raped by whites. every black woman. 
    When your community is under assault , and under watch for any action that is deemed illegal /criminal/amoral, it can teach you to desire morality not for god but for self. if you can't stop your wife from being raped, your child from being spat at, yourself, from being put in prison, and you don't have arms, you don't have resources, you don't have a community enabled, then following a higher moral code can be deciphered as your only defense. 
    Again, Florida is a caricature, but what she represents is truth. Any one's Esther Rolle's character's age knew that the system will destroy any black person it finds doing a simple crime. My great proof of that is the rockefeller laws, initiated in the 1970s. In NYC, white men could sell cocaine in mountainfulls and get lesser to no sentence that black men selling a bag of marijuana. That is why Florida feared crime, feared illegality. IT wasn't cause she feared or opposed money. But what if? What if the white man knew? what if the white man discovered? Just remember, the chicago police department went into fred hamptons house and murdered him, absent any crime. In that kind of environment, you are so keen to risk? 
    Some, yes, but Florida is not that big a caricature. She is, but not that big a caricature based on the black community in the usa. 
    The problem with black or white filmmakers is black goodness is touted as religious, spiritual, never historical, never based on life.
    The goodness isn't about christianity , it is about a fear of the system treating you unfairly, which it will, which it proved over centuries it will do and is still doing. Movies from all sort of directorso or writers make is religious, and that is the flaw. Florida is scared. She has been scared her entire life and will die scared. 
    In the great Daughters of the Dust, the gullah live in those spare island lands, surrounded by bayou and absent any infrastructure, but will rather that than live exposed to whites. That is fear. The people of Tracadie in nova scotia, survived cause they lived so far away , in a wilderness, they were free from assault, whether they committed an illegality or not, and that is why Florida feared in her urban project surrounded by whites, in the heart of the white kingdom. 
    His point is to invalidate her fears by suggesting her morality is based on morals, but her morals are based on fear. 

    4)LAstly, his final thought. The criminal wasn't the white system , it is the black moralled matriarch. 
    Of course he is wrong, he admitted he is joking. But, I will defend his hypothesis with a little fortune telling. Slavery plus Jim crow denied black inheritance. But, after jim crow, I will call it the rainbow era, Black people in the usa have acquired and started to inherit fiscal wealth. Florida's fears was suitable in the days where black people were denied by white people the ability to  inherit fiscal wealth. But, when one is wealthy, one must take risks, and though most risks fail in fiscal capitalism , some will succeed. 
    The black community isn't potent. My proof is simple. Name me one city with a financial growth in the usa, where over half the cities fiscal quality/industry is owned by blacks? I will help you, you can't find one. So, Black people are not in some place of suitability yet. But, it will happen eventually. That is why whites blockaded black inheritance. when one inherits, money is different. 
    Back to movies, hollywood hasn't found a way to approvingly display multiracial wealth. We all know in modernity, black millionaires or billionaires exists in the usa. But, hollywood usually places fiscally wealthy black characters in fiscally white characters roles. The problem storytelling wise is simple. Being rich is being rich but in different communities, the collective path to being rich matters. The black fiscal elite, live as gluttonous as the white, but they have subtle variances and hollywood or independent film, has not found a set of films to visualize that difference. In the show atlanta, the black rich are ugly, but mirrors of white rich and that is not exactly true. As F Scott fitzgerald said, the wicked rich, I concur to that, but they have variances. My proof is fiscally rich white jews in film. in films, fiscally rich white jews are as corrupt as other fiscally rich white people but their is anuance to their design which shows, the other. 
    Films have yet , black or white made, to solidify the other aspect to the black fiscal rich which is clear to see, but not such a great selling point

     

    IN CONCLUSION, history is important, but also challenging. The challenge in history is when it forces you to look at scenarios you can't control or undo that are not merely negative, but have a lasting communal impact. The nonviolent community , based in the black church, near 170 years ago, rejected violence, rejected a mass movement away, rejected a foscused movement in the usa. The nonviolent movement had three main strategies. No violence against whites, a focus on individual liberty to black people wherever we live, a responsibility on black individuals or the black community to maintain the nonviolent stance while moving ever upward in the fiscal or governmental halls in the usa. 
    Today is the result of that plan in the usa. it didn't fit all black people, it wans't meant to. It had casualty, though all black paths were and will have casualties. But, in the same way, Florida is chided while Mrs. Huxtable is beloved, the modern reality has meant a cultural precipice has been reached that isn't defined by either woman or their larger media spaces. Neither is an enemy, but neither reflect a black community that can finally , in peace, inherit.

     

    1. richardmurray

      richardmurray

      Was Florida Evans the criminal? is the question. 
      Lets take a look at her crimes. All her crimes he listed involve her hesitation at opportunities from luck,system, illegality. 
      Luck is black jesus/finding 5,000/Vita brite commercial
      System is JJ passed up a grade
      James Pool stick/Preacher scam

      From Slavery which predates the founding of the usa and was unchanged through the founding, thus why most free blacks fought against the usa, to the end of Jim crow, which in my view ended in the 1980s as a holistic system, but started immediately after slavery ended, Black people were denied the ability to inherit/have stable homes. Remember, the murdering and imprisonment of blacks, who mostly lived in southern states, started while the war between the states was finalizing. And before said war was slavery, where most black people were property not free. The black woman who calls that property her husband is in error. That black man who calls that property his wife is in error. The child in her belly is not their's. Their child is property of the person who owns them. 
      Now you can say, Rich, you just said Jim crow ended in the 1980s. Goodtimes is 1970s, can't Florida Evans let all the past go. Florida evans is a caricature, any extremity in any human character is a caricature, but her problem isn't morality or living in the past, her problem exists in most black people. Said problem is fear. 
      Florida is afraid. Black people today, who live better than black people ever before, as a community, in the usa, don't seem to realize, most black people in the usa or the european colonies that preceded it were terrorized. Slavery or Jim crow are mostly remembered as fiscal scenarios. One is absent money, but these scenarios also came with an equal share of terror. You cut the foot off a slave to terrorize, you whip a female slaves skin off to terrorize, you burn black towns or communities down to the ground to terrorize. You place false and exorbitant charges on a suspect to terrorize. The goal is to make the person you are terrorizing fear everything. 
      This is what the poster miss about Florida Evans. Just remember, Fred Hampton was murdered in his home no different than medgar evers was murdered outside his. 
      The christian god gives you luck, but what about the devil. You find 5,000 but what happens if someone comes to claim it. You are in a commercial but what if your hungry neighbors find out or your fellow church members see you in an alcoholic commercial. JJ is passed up a grade, but what has he truly merited. James is gambling but what happens if he wins and someone kills him for it. 
      Fear. And Black fear in the usa is well founded. Yes, Florida is a caricature. But, the history of the black community in the usa is full of reasons to fear, especially to those of her age. 
      Sequentially, why Mrs. Huxtable is beloved far more than Florida Evans. MRS Huxtable is afraid to. Why do you think she acts like the governess to everybody? She is no different than Florida in fears or matriarchal tactics. The difference is her husband was fortunate/lucky to become a doctor at a time when whites were willing to pay black doctors. Remember, black doctors have been in the usa since the 1800s, but getting paid fairly, fairly, was a modern inviention circa the 1980s.
      Florida is a woman of her times, reflecting, even as a caricature, the warranted fears of a nonviolent community in majority denied: income/inheritance.
      Black people for the first multiple of decades in the history of the usa or the european colonies that preceded it can now inherit. With that inheritance and all that it implies comes a lofty perch that it is easy to look down on those far less fortunate. Even if you are merely joking. 
       

×
×
  • Create New...