Troy

I was just thinking about how much I like Tesla’s and once they deal with that shitty battery charging time I would definitely line up to buy one or similar vehicle. I really would not consider buying a Tesla today. I’m surprised by my reaction, but I really don’t wanna do anything to support that dude financially. Someone from X reached out to me to advertise and I explained to him how I’ve been locked out of my account for 18 months and suggested it may have been some DEI bullshit. THE GUY CATEGORICALLY DENIED THAT IT WOULD BE DEI. I SENT THEM A SCREENSHOT SHOWING HOW I CAN’T EVEN SEE MY ACCOUNT AND I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING BACK SINCE. I’M NOT SURPRISED HE’S IS JUST A SALES GUY (I have no idea why that block of text changed to all caps. I’m not going back and re-dictating it again.) But back to the question; unless there were people inside the car when it was set on fire I don’t think it’s an act of domestic terrorism. Anyone setting cars on fire should be punished to the full extent of the law, but it’s not like some guy with a vest strapped to himself, walking into a mall and blowing himself and anyone nearby up.

3 People will use fake eggs like they usually do.

"Asked Wednesday about Green's measure, Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), the No. 3 House Democrat, said it wasn't a focus for the caucus."

Below are the signups since the last newsletter went out. As you can see, I banned most of the accounts out of the gate. This is typical. I believe there are only two new accounts as a direct result of my outreach. The outreach has to be a sustained effort. There were more than 2K new views on the "Child Rearing 50s Style," most of that was from views it would have gotten any way from search. There was a brief bump in the number of views on the "Do We Really Need 'The ReidOut?'” (none of which came from organic search, which will take more time, if it ever happens).

I dunno man, I don't think one gender is inherently better than the other when it comes to improving society. There are many you complain that a lot of the money given to Black Lives Matter when to enrich the woman in charge... The real key all the genders (there is more than two ) working together.

@Pioneer1 even if what you wrote is true. There are still enough sub-35-year-olds who are capable of stringing more than two sentences together to make an argument. All the data I've been seeing does suggest that literacy rates are declining, so @frankster may have a point too. But still, there are enough people with the ability to participate. They just too many other more compelling things to do. On the web, the pull of the algorithm is tough to compete against it. Even without the algorithm. Nobody is going to go through the effort of creating entertaining videos and post them here, the way they post them on TikToc, Youtube, Instrgram. It is a brilliant business model -- -take free content and push it to people to the point of addiction. The vast majority of content creators don't make much money or notoriety -- but the promise of doing so is enough to keep them trying, thus creating a never-ending supply of free content for the platform.

Are you 100% sure? If so, are you willing to base that certainty on a couple of videos and George Stephanopoulos? All I’m saying is you might be right, but you might also be wrong. Likely wrong given the bias of the media and generations of conditioning to see Black woman as irrationally angry,

yeah, one of the videos posted showed the alleged clobbered, and tears saying it was an accident. you obviously did not listen to the other girls story you just have one side of the story and have formed opinions the video may not tell the whole story, even if you were right there and watched it. You might not really understand what actually happened or what the girls intention was. I haven’t watched the video recently but I recall the girl reaching out to the girl that she accidentally struck with the baton. She did not stop running… It was a race. I’m still looking for a motive…. again, the way, good morning America cover the story I could see why people would jump to the conclusion that this was a heinous act by a violent and evil girl — because that’s the way they portrayed it… ridiculous.

Aka_contrarian is older and wiser .

@Pioneer1 at this point I reject the premise that it was a deliberate attack. But yes, I agree Black promoting Black dysfunctions no matter how obscure or unproven is what mainstream media loves to promote. We do a great many positive things that they chose to ignore.

We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance by Kellie Carter Jackson

I get the impression the “victim” has lawyered up and is fixing to sue somebody. And the more I think about it, I don’t believe for a split second the girl was concussed. It’s not like the baton is a solid, steel rod. Plus both girls were in motion. There’s just no way…. Did anybody mention a motive?

@ProfD I never watched the show either. Nothing against Joy. I just don’t watch broadcast TV. Everything I watch nowadays is streaming on demand. I was aware of the call, but did not join it. I’d support efforts to restore her program on a new platform.

FYI: @Cynique and @aka Contrarian are the same person. @Dr. Lorna thanks so much for sharing your thoughts and sharing it with you chairperson (chairperson of what?).

All those great-grands I'm sure you are tired -- whew! Seriously, It must be fascinating to see so many of your descendants. When you first wrote that post, 15 years ago, most of those great-grands were not born. It would be great to see a few more comments.

No, that type of reporting and coverage is important -- life-saving! Sure, perfect fodder for the tabloids -- which I guess GMA is TV tabloid huh? I don't watch it, so I have no clue If their MO is trolling the web for sensational stories I'm not surprised they are #1. Being popular does not mean it is the best thing for you, certainly not enough to attract my attention.

@richardmurray, do you see the spam comment on your blog? If so, please delete them. I have to manually delete these on an almost daily basis. 4 new spam messages were added today. I have not deleted them yet -- just waiting to see if you see them.

Thinking about the lack of participation on these forums I began looking at some of the most popular posts. This one is #50 in terms of popularity and has been viewed almost 16K times. You will notice that there are a couple of lurker comments posted 6 years after @aka Contrarian made the post. We can no longer take "guest" posts, because racist trolls and spammers have ruined that for us -- making it impossible for me to have an open forum. I have to require logins and accounts now. If never did post Cynique's article. I will remedy that. Connie, if you want to revise the article let me know. You can edit the original and I copy it from there. These are the kind of posts that attract readers without racing to the bottom with trash to feed the algorithm.

I'm sure she could have come up with something to compensate a low-level thug Seriously, here is the scenario: A teenager accidently hits another teenager with her baton during a track meet. No one is seriously injured. Someone posts the video online exclaiming, "Black Girl Clobbers Another Black Girl with Baton During Track Meet." The video goes viral. Good Morning America, desperate for ratings, jumps all over it the video, without vetting the story giving it national attention. We have all been manipulated into outrage. The story as presented is indeed outrageous, but looking deeper it is of no consequence -- certainly not newsworthy. The entire situation is absurd.

@aka Contrarian that explanation sounds perfectly plausible and reasonable; indeed, it appears to be an accurate description is what is going on. The nameless, faceless lurkers keep the forums alive. I think the software and perhaps how I have organized things here is perhaps a bit confusing for a newcomer. I thought about streamlining things by consolidating the forums and ditching the underlined features. I really wish I could get rid of the registration process. The creates additional effort that really hurts participation, but the huge amount of spam and racist hate makes having an open forum impossible. I'll consider a provocative question for the week. I'll add it to a newsletter and see what happens. My problem will be keeping it up. Here is the first provocative question of the week ▶ (given the state of the net it may not be provocative enough)

I post this question in an effort to encourage more discussion from people who read posts but don't comment (lurk). The thought was that my questions should be "provocative." I not sure it this question exactly fits the bill Kicking things off: MSNBC cancelled “The ReidOut.” What are we gonna do about it? Was anyone here on the emergency Zoom call, attended by nearly 10,000 people, in support of Joy Reid, the first Black woman to host a prime-time cable news show? If we really needed her program we would come together and ensure she has a platform and the resources to continue, and even expand upon, what she was doing... right? We could boycott MSNBC or we create our own “The ReidOut,” in the same way the Roland Martin created ★ The Black Star Network. We have the tech, the money, and obviously the talent. What we need is the commitment and fortitude. PQOTW#1

On the contrary, Del boy are particularly good at answering questions. In the old days before the proliferation of AI I had a bot that would go out and look for conversations about books and post a comment with the link to Amazon. I made a little bit of money every day with that until Twitter shut down the ability to do that sort of thing. I had another bot that would go out search for profiles that had anything to do with Books or African-Americans and follow that profile. Sometime later, it will go back and Unfollow that profile. This was an easy way to increase your followers. The reason is that a percentage of people you follow will follow you back again. This was all automated. I recall reading an estimate that 60% of the traffic on Twitter was bot traffic. Facebook is obviously different and I don’t recall the bot traffic figures for Facebook I’m sure the tools and bots used by people with resources are far more sophisticated and effective today. I’ve been told by social media marketers that personal pages perform better than business pages in terms of organic reach. I deleted my original Facebook profile page so I’m not about to rebuild a new one to find out if personal Pages perform better than business ones.

I disagree. When I was in high school, a kid from boys high picked up the starting blocks and hit another kid with it during a track meet. Today where everyone post everything on social media I’m sure that would’ve went viral. But in New York City, where people will be murdered every day that incident was not newsworthy. Kids lash out in all kinds of situations all the time unfortunately. If the national news covered every time these situations occurred. They wouldn’t have time to talk about anything else. to make matters worse, the girl denies deliberately hitting the other runner. She says it was an accident so this is not even a clear case of violence, and George Stephanopoulos is covering it as if it is. The girl was not seriously injured. She was allegedly diagnosed with a concussion, but looking at the video that strains credulity. Now, if it was a small market, where high school sports is regularly covered. I could see it making the news, but national coverage really?! yeah, I about that figure skating situation as well. But clearly this track incident does not rise to the level of hiring a hitman to take someone out.

i actually don’t think you can… not without being manipulated on some level. You’re constantly prompted to do something even LinkedIn shares with you the activity of your friends what they liked or if they have an anniversary or birthday you’re being prompted to send them a congratulations. Now sending someone a birthday greeting in response to a prompt sounds pretty innocuous, but it’s not because it potentially begins a whole chain of exchanges that you might not be interested in engaging in, and if you ignore it, then you feel like a dirtbag who can’t be bothered to say happy birthday… On Facebook, I post to my business account remotely and occasionally I look at the meager engagement that I get and I will reply to that if someone writes something that requires a response. My homeowner’s association has a private Facebook group that I look at periodically because sometimes there’s some useful information on it or I can get a question answered. But I generally go in there with blinders on. I know I may come across as being very judgmental regarding the use of social media. I have no issue with anything that an adult chooses to do with their free time. when I talk about social media, I’m typically talking about us collectively as a group. I contend that as a group our data and attention and privacy are being exploited. Indeed, we are being exploited and creating vast wealth for a relatively small number of people (small compared to the number being exploited). I don’t come to this position from a place of ignorance. I used all of these social media platforms from the moment they were invented. I was very active on them for years, but I saw had operated and I decided to quit. It’s like the cigarette smoker who learns how bad the product is and stops using it.

It originally broadcast on Good Morning America (GMA), which is a nationally broadcast program. The video got 1.4 million views on YouTube -- not counting the ones here, because YouTube does not publish embedded views as to encourage creators to direct viewers to YouTube to watch video. Here too GMA is feeding the algorithm and debasing their content to get more viewers. Look, someone getting hit over the head with a stick is simply not newsworthy. @Delano it is possible that the clip started out on social, went viral and GMA picked up on the story. If that is the case, that is a pathetic waste of journalism and sad to think the national news may have come to this.