The day we "pro-choice" women have secretly been dreading has infortunately arrived with the reversal of Roe vs Wade by the U.S. Extreme Court. With Hillary Clinton's defeat in 2016, I knew then there was a possibility of this ruling be rescinded because the political right was crawling with fetus-worshipping hypocrites frantic to make motherhood a punishment rather than a privilege, - via reinstating a ban on legal abortions. This was why I had been urging Hillary haters to get on board with the Moderates in order to maintain the supreme court liberal majority through appointments made possible by the election of a Democratic president. That majority was what would protect Roe vs Wade for years to come... Wishful thinking.
The Supreme Court Justice who wrote the decision that reversed Roe vs. Wade asserted, in part, that the Constitution doesn't protect a woman's right to abortion because no such right exists. That's on a par with saying that slaves had no right to be free because they belonged to their slave masters. On the other hand, privately and publicly bearing arms, whose only purpose is to kill or injure, was a right the Foundling Fathers endowed themselves with while playing fast and loose with the word "inalienable".
Now, over 2 centuries later, citizens are still under the thrall of a document that in this country rivals the Bible when it comes to being sacred. In reality, the revered Constitution is flawed and outdated, and those who wrote it were misogynistic, racist, potential murderers, and have been reincarnated in the form of right-wing Conservatives with their skewed interpretations of when a right exists and who is entitled to exercise it. Black folks, beware! Your right to have been emancipated might be challenged next. Lincoln could be ruled ineligible to undo what God let happen.
And speaking of rights and legacies, let's focus on the "notorious RBG". This prim, shriveled-up little Jewish lady garnered much acclaim and admiration presumably because of her great legal mind. But Ruth Bader Ginsberg wasn't above thinking small when, in her late 70s, she was approached by an uppity black POTUS daring to suggest she retire so he could appoint a younger person to secure a liberal majority in the high court. Ruth obstinately rejected this idea, implying that this was a request she preferred to grant to Hillary Clinton. But - thanks to that other disastrous ruling known as the "electoral college", Hillary lost, RBG died, Trump appointed, and the rest is history.
So, here we are. 2022. Liberals, in jeopardy of being inundated by a conservative tsunami that will wash away all the progress that honored personal choices and privacy, are now left with only one choice: Fall back and regroup.
What? Me worry?