Delano

@Troy if members and visitors search through El Goog do your numbers go up.?

You can buy like on Facebook. I wondering if they were bots

His support get him the office but I don't think it will keep him there.

i subsequently offered what i thought might give a back story about myself so maybe you could draw conclusions about why i have the attitude i have. That's my point I don't want to psychoanalyse or presuppose your motivation. I wanted to hear what you thought was the reason. I even posted you have answered the question. The case closed was a pun on you saying I am psychoanalysing you. It also had to ask K2 multiple questions before he answered my question. So I no longer ask K2 to clarify his position. I also won't be asking you to clarify any self referential comments that you make. It takes too long , it has the reverse effect. You get annoyed that I am either not being clear and or that I am putting you on a couch. For what reason. Years ago when Troy said I should read your chart I asked for your permission and whether you wanted it in your email.

in case you hadn't seen this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3ApTwWRQNw @Pioneer1 it seems this thread is about a question. or am I mistaken. And if not was that questioned answered.

The answer I was looking for was the one that you have given.

I am going to drop this because it is to difficult for you. I ask a question twice that is actually the point if this this thread. Can you point to one thing I said that is me psychoanalysing you? I said if you aren't aware of why or don't want to talk about it fine. This one time asking for clarity or wanting to hear your rational didn't work. You have no on test in explaining a comment that you volunteered. I make observations and sometimes statements. Case closed.

53 million are they all People?

Sentiment is how you feel, motivation is why you did it. How does my typo confuse you about the authorship, when you wrote it. You've already said you weren't proud of your behaviour. Pioneer was asking why, I have asked why? Not answering something you posted about yourself seems like deflection. It is not clear your reason and your objective for being a ball buster to men. It's not just life it is your life. You voluntarily share a behaviour and describe it as if it were someone else. "I was probably doing the guys a favour." Don't you know what you were doing or would you rather forget.l?

Cynique the bit in red is something you said. You had responded with a general statement about women in general. What was your reason for doing so? If you don't want to reveal yourself or don't know, that is fine. It just seemed like a deflection. More than an oversight from someone who is generally rational.

following

@Cynique you could she's light on this, yet you are deflecting, why? Typos

@Troy spontaneous plagiarism.

I just saw this.

@Cynique you could she's light on this, yet you are deflecting, why?

Silly Rabbit Trixs are for whores

People in glass houses shouldn't get dressed with the blinds up.

A defense mechanism is not a sign of strength. It's an internal weakness or insecurity.

You are a sage an wise beyond my years. You clearly understand and articulate my feelings better and more clearly than I do. Looking in silly to Troy you Pioneer or other people I haven't met or don't know. I was suggesting that perhaps as people we could talk respectfully. What a foolish thought that Black people could talk respectfully to one another. You hold two titles I am not a contender. I have to argue with some other people I haven't met. Catch you later.

Start at the beginning of this thread and you will see what I am saying. You are half right which is why I said you can't ruffle. Go back through the post and see who insults or questions someone's intelligence. Have a read through the thread and then tell me I am wrong. @Troy @Cynique @Pioneer1 Was the deer refence to obscure for you.

To everyone start at the beginning of the post and see who starts arguing both emotionally and off topic. Yes it does happen that a discussion strays from the topic. Just look at this or any other thread and see how often who starts with the character assessments and insults. Take any recent post and see who starts the insults and who questions the need or reason behind the insults. And you will see the projection or you will demonstrate your bias. Cynique you and K2 have a malicious intent which is why you bond with him. He will take any criticism from you. He is daymaring that you will night him. Troy will make personal statements in attempt to win an argument. However his attacks feel more like frustration than viciousness. The argument between K2 and Pioneer was so bad that it got its own topic. Mostly as Pioneer remarked I ignore K2. So here is a clear instance where Pioneer's powers of perception exceed yours. You have a Beautiful Mind but what about the Taming of the Shrew. One is a projection the other is between the covers. Straw berry picking arguments. @Pioneer1 @Troy @Cyniqueand Santa's Rain Deer.

Rubbish I have never talked about my education in all the years I have been here. Have a degree doesn't enhance or strengthen an argument.

You are confusing have with are, Mr Dick.

No he is clueless No he is clueless. He has to have my educational status explained three times Yet he wants to give me unsolicited educational advice that is wrong on more than one level. Next week is spirituality. Luckily for you I am doing that next week. Not your best combative work.