Kalexander2

Sounds like a very, very interesting activity, wish I were there!

Keyword, "opinion" based on both what is known and unknown. Leaves room for any suspicion, every suspicion! Is not 'entirely' about hiding or having something to hid; failure to disclose one's true identity, if not lie, what is it? Exactly. A liar who never cheats is still a liar. A mischief maker who supports human rights is no less a mischief maker. A person who hides his true identity/image diberately does not make her/him an honest person until proven otherwise - by truthful disclosure. Play with the semantics: Oposite of truth; oposite of honesty, etc.

The argument, based on scientific survey's and analysis (plus or minus margin of errors) coincides (match) with identity verbiage of the statistical data displayed, not some 'off-the-wall' correction of identity misuse. All groups, especially the hegemony will face equal poverty levels. So-called facts pointed out in the rebuttal are irrelevant.

Highly unlikely law violations will be a significant cause of Trump' demise and even less a problem for Congress, obviously. Economics is steadily becoming the new bogeyman for Trump, Congress, corporations, and foreign governments (powers that be). We now are on the brink of a trade war between the United States and its allies. White Americans are heading towards economic disaster while Blacks and Hispanics are being driven out, almost entirely. Blacks and Hispanics still typically earn far less than whites, in part because whites dominate higher-paying fields, such as technology and finance. The income gap has held steady for the past 40 years. When it comes to wealth, the difference is staggering. Whites have roughly 10 times the wealth of blacks and Hispanics. Over the past 25 years, the wealth gap between blacks and whites has nearly tripled, according to research by Brandeis University. And that's only the tip of the ever melting iceberg: Spatial assimilation theory (value, trend, or data) predicts that racial and ethnic segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping patterns. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all socioeconomic status (SES) levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians and has changed little since 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans. The inequality gap is closing bringing Whites down to levels of Blacks and Hispanics. Republican candidates are already losing long held deep-red districts due to what many (especially White folk) see as a tax scam, breaks for large corporation, cuts to vital social institutions, and threats to entitlements enjoyed by old White men. THAT, coupled with inevitable class conflict when Trump is ousted will certainly send him to the big house as a scapegoat under the guise of a criminal. "Make America Great (Depression) Again Like 1929" is a more accurate slogan. After all, it was this same kind of blanket protectionism why America had a Great Depression. My prediction, based on data analysis, is that the "the powers that be" will come to their senses (but all too late) just before November mid-terms; when they realize unhappy poor White folk as poor Whites feel the pinch at levels equal to Blacks and Hispanics; that'll take precedence over their desire for greater privilege at the gas stations, grocery stores, and tax forms.

@Dalano: I am, again, inclined to acknowledge you and respond; it wasn't my words, it was instruction(s) that (probably) saved a helpless woman' life. It was a racist legal system exalting in what they call Black on Black crime that put her away for 8-years. Furthermore, I'm not angry, annoyed, or even impatient with you; and again, not giving you advice. A reasonable person would simply ignore advice they don't like or useless to them. Are you a reasonable person? Oh, Delano, I should also add that after her release I told her that the redemption for a Black woman, with a violent felony, criminal record was to arm herself with a college degree. Which she acknowledged, though she has two more children with a married man, she's also a successful language translator for an online service company. How's that for a suggestion that was never meant to be advice?

The radical combination of classically opposed left-wing and right-wing (neo-populists) attitudes using electronic media as a means of dissemination is the new animation of racism today. Roseanne Barr and White celebrities like her has gotten away with racism since radio was invented. Old extreme White supremacy have always been authoritarian and exalted the state. Neo-populists, including many Blacks, accept the existing democratic order; hostility toward government, rather than its exaltation, is their hallmark. A hostility shared by Blacks. Charismatic leadership like Donald Trump distinguishes neo-populism as a unique type I believe also accounts for their success and appeal. Brother Troy is right. The political stunts of Starbucks, IHOP, etc. Play a vital role in neo-populism which even Barr is part of, though I also believe she is less racist than Trump.

Now that's the truth of it all. Though the only sport I play is tennis because it's a fast game of exercise, I must agree that having our own Black professional sport organizations to past-time is the best way to go, for athletes unwilling to give up sports. Or, just boycott the entire industry; this can work by Black fans only.

Delano said: Reread my post. Unsolicited is an important word. I give you too much credit thinking you would get the point. I have stated directly my issue yet you want to deflect and offer more unsolicited advice and assessments. This post is to clarify my issue with your words. Since both Troy and Cynique are under different assumptions of my peevishness. An entire American culture tries to dminish everyone who isn't a white male. Your duplicitous advice mixed with criticism is not up to par. So I am sitting out the subsequent rounds of golf. AH, so now it's criticism. I give-up, you win! I'll be the villain and let you be the victim; unless you prefer being the good guy and me the bad the guy. How much did I take or owe you; what have you lost, exactly? Quickly now, your creditability is on the line, everybody's watching. Oh, I have another idea for your appeal, you're a, what, seer, fortuneteller or reader? What do you see in the stars of your future, what's your strength and weakness's and how's your emotional state today? No, I'm not talking to you, don't see you, nor acknowledge your existence!!!!!!!!!!!!

Another, on point, observation is you still firing when there's a STAND DOWN!!!

Fair enough, though not well taken. And how much ill advice and misguidance have you given to people in the form of paid readings? You're not being honest because NOTHING I've posted in these discussions were aimed toward advisement, to anyone. Another question mark on your ability to discern opionated rhetoric! The issue you have with me doesn't seem to be about me or perceptions of me giving advice at all; but rather issues you have WITH YOURSELF.

Delano, there are no checks, deposits, or bounces. I Believe what you are trying to say is, without all the words, I've failed, there is no change in how YOU PRECIEVE my discussion responses, resolve here. And that's okay too because I'm still not trying to be your friend or seek your approval of me. WHAT I AM DOING is attempting to show you the REAL ME without all the BS mixed in. Well, maybe a little BS. Take me as is or reject me but without looking at me as an offer. I'M NOT A NICE PERSON, so I'm constantly told. Which is obviously a threat, challenge to you; probably because of your personal insecurities, which we all have. YOUR personal insecurity trigger seems to be any challenge to your academic achievement(s) which I've not challenged or disrespected. Now, however, I (do) herein pose a challenge to the strength, depth of your academic achievement(s): that you are not capable of looking beyond the words to notice the meaning; and that meanings are foreign, unacceptable to you whenever your position is rejected. That's normal, not a (my) problem for or to me; who cares about you more than you do? LOOK MAN, you're not child nor my son and I'm not going to change who I am because you don't like me. My love for you start with you being a Black man and ends with your humanity. I think all humans beasts only with reason capabilities, never to be completely trusted. Although I never apologize I have no problem is calling for a TRUCE, to preserve what's left after war.

Not true, brother, shortly after I subscribed to this site, during a discussion between you and I, you responded with an assertion that you've been to Troy's house ... I took this to mean your way of demonstrating you're special, I am not because you know brother Troy better than I. Sister Cynique corrected my spelling of bosom buddies. Furthermore, I have no powers, except over myself, brother. And if I am indeed the only person who's suggested you should learn more -- than you may need more honest people around you. In-case you havn't noticed, sister Cynique requires no defending from a man, nor wo-man, I give credit where it is due and sometimes whenever it is simply convenient, for me. That's the truth! Not only have I made references to gay men, I suggested Pioneer1 may be gay; especially after he posted a depiction of a half-naked male. Regardless of the reason he did it. You see, I'm fine with who I am. Though I remain always open to constructive criticism I find little use of such coming from a person who seems to always need to lean on other people for validation and approval. Again, I do not compare to anyone. Cynique may demonstrate her passion however she like. I simply like the sister. I assure you, my passion is often offensive because I don't give a Fu*k!!! But you do recognize when you're being checked; there's nothing wrong with that. It's a good sign. Most people just cover their eyes believing the matter doesn't exist if they can't see it. I'm not one of them, as a child does! By no means do suggest you're a child. You're not!

"It also amazes me how transparent the reason is for Del's reaction to you, being so different from his reaction to Pioneer. It's like he imagines that adopting pioneer makes him look more magnanimous and compassionate, as he tries to fit a square peg into a round hole by totally mis-characterizing Pioneer as humble - and wise(?) I'm disappointed in how he has stooped to such bathos. ) Whatever. But at least he admitted that he was not objective or concerned with facts." Truth is, I understand and regress, Delano felt challenged when I questioned his academic exposure; when I attempted to recant it apparently wasn't to his satisfaction. He chose the easy, more unchallenged route, "Pioneer1" who gave him what he needed to hear, for validation and approval. Convenient for Pioneer1 because now he has an ally when he feels threaten. They're just ordinary, important human beings, at least one Black, seeking approval from each other. The first time we clashed (Delano and I) his supporting response was "I've been to Troy's house" said a great deal about him. 

@Cynique: I opined before and now again. THAT GUY HAS A SERIOUS CRUSH ON YOU; I don't know, maybe he's compensating for some other personal inadequacy which would explain why he's not actively stalking you. Please stay alert for things like that. Incidentally, I do apologize TO YOU AND MY OTHER BLACK SISTERS here, for my profane rhetoric in response to some of the yo-yo's here. And don't worry about Pioneer1 the prilgrim0.01 because if you were available he never had what it'll take to best me. With, and only with your discretionary approval of course; because as opposed to him, I respect and revere my Black sisters! Another reason I boil just thinking of him using that damn 'N' word. Astrology/astronomy, anywhere but on the planet earth which brings back into question your so-called education. Is astrology/astronomy your definition, idea of a sound education, if so than its little wonder of my previous assumption of you lacking in that department. I am curious, just how much effort, weight have your responses to these discussions are, is, were based on something in the stars? Thus far, I've taken you partially serious as to your reasoning and logic, I'm starting to conclude you have no idea what you're talking about, on everything.

UH OH, the antiquated imposture, unable to accept rejection, is attempting another psychological flirt, only with a bit more zest this time; will probably find little changed: "When someone shows you who they are they are, believe them the first time" - Maya Angelou. You've always had at least one worm who loves you! Maybe not Cynique though! Why can't you correct me yourself, do you always call on a woman to fight your battles?

Yes, it's true, Cynique does have a way of getting under your skin. Perhaps if she used an astronomical chart, crystal ball, or Ouija board she would be equal to you; I'm sure her level of academic exposure is quite profound, however. More than I can say for some here, maybe even myself. Obviously, it is also true complimenting each other, and the likeminded trends towards two worms copulating in their own bucket of snot, your comfort zone. How slimy is that?

Simple, the 'vain' assumption I was referring to you!!! Or, was that meant to be a clever disclaimer of the obvious? One thing is certain, Delano, much of what you say is accurate, among your many pointed views are unintelligible assertions, but I use silence and avoidance in unscrupulous ways towards obscure ends. Also, I don't like to see a Black underdog dogged, especially by other Blacks.

To reiterate my point on education, was there not a discussion of its importance and opinions arguing to the contrary? I also recall a point I put forth, made with regards to one 'Delano's' need to expand his academic horizons; which was also a purely "honest" opinion based on my observations guided by empirical evidence of most of my Black brothers. YES, I ADMIT, that I too am conflicted with profiling other people; sometimes inaccurately, I might add. Considering I'm in need of additional academic exposure myself, I understand no-one can know everything and so, everyone stands in need of additional academically exposure. Regardless of achievements. What I never do is apologize for my 'honest' shortcomings or deliberate unprovoked misstatements. Even if I offend people. I attempt to see through all clever rhetoric and interpret opinionated commentary in ways that conform to my biased, emotional allegiance the Black perspective, worldview. However, there are some members here who think, believe that my offensive position(s) require apology, suckers for gratitude and compliments.

Honor, or lack thereof, of honesty, usually hidden within plain-sight is open to revelation of one's character. People need to appear, outwardly, virtuous or otherwise demonstrate humility by, say, looking you in the eye when telling you a lie. It's a myth to believe they're being honest when they look you in the eye. Because they need to see if you believe they lies. People believe what they hear and/or see only when it's convenient, is the reason we have Ben Carsons, Bill Cosby's, and Barack Obama's of the world. There's no limit to what people will believe or who they'll follow out of convenience.

Gentlemen, the argument between empirical experience, science, and external realities (objectivity) all stem from an internal natural need to make sense of our worldviews which we proclaim in the form of opinions. Opinions are like buttholes, lol, because everyone has one - only size and functionality really matter; or weight and accurateness. Darwinism's validity, if any, is based entirely on creationism's argument regardless of how scientifically reasoned; just as the doctrine of ideas/theories that God immediately creates life out of nothing is rejected for theory, the need for something more natural and tangible. As for me, I'm still learning to resist the temptation to be right all the time, in the face of obvious wrongs. And i'm getting there little by little. You know! It's useless explaining to someone who knows everything; changing the minds of people with unmovable convictions, a fool and his money, etc. Now, if that sounds like "why develop medicine when everyone's going to eventually die; or why elect anyone for president if nothing will ever change than it comes back to each of us, what's in it for me/us? That character, or aggregate quality that distinguishes one person or thing from another; sole or personal nature. A target on the back of my people is a target on my back, a victory for my people is a victory for me. Me, me, me. Everybody's about her/his self; it's nature, morally not wrong but is the nuke that'll destroy us all. In time.

@Troy: That's an impressive, well thought-out assessment of your osmotic and empirical way of absorbing information. For distinguishing between what you know and what you learn. Unfortunately, most people do not understand the difference.

Yeah, brother Troy, your piece and the segment are virtually identical. Though I believe more of Google's DOD drone and weaponization of social media aspirations merit greater scrutiny as well. Especially since Google's aim appear to target the Black business community. Thanks for the share!

@Troy: Not only that but since it appears representatives such as Adam Schiff, knowing more than he's letting on, are in unofficial coordination with special counsel, they're all waiting for GOP majority to grab the life buoy of impeachment before following through on the criminal end. The GOP is still contemplating other avenues to preserve their base. Little deceive action is expected from them before, at least, 8-4 weeks to November 8th. The sh*t is surely to hit the fan before the year end, if matter drag on that far. As it is also reasonable January 2019 could very well be the "Oh a Happy Month!" In which case the charity of your choice is gonna be, at least, $50 bucks richer, but I doubt it!

Manafort, Don Jr., still playing 'hardball' with special counsel; to no avail because DT's threat to take the fifth is already short lived. There's no Federal Court in this land that'll recognize such a right when material matters are directly dependent on direct testimony, and have nothing to do with National Security or National secrets; these are proceedings of crime, treason, and corruption of the highest order, from source defendant or witness. Which is something to watch out for; for a sitting president, the right to take the 'Fifth' disposition may have to be officially settled before a subpoena is validated. These things take time. July is unrealistic. I'm confident Manafort will fold soon, especially after he's presented with a criminal forfeiture claim. No money, no means to support his family and no property equals desperation. And that means going for the 'life boat' to make sure DT goes down with the ship, alone. Jr., and his sister are going down too!! Kushner's case is the most intersting; with Israel, the American and Russian Jewish community influencing on his behalf is another can of worms that'll spill over on Congress and foriegn policy.

WELL, brother Troy, unfortunately, IT IS the 'physical attraction' thing that first bring the sexes together. Among most males that is; except for women. A woman's priority is maternally related. of course! She is a mother or potential mother whose natural maternal instincts defines her character and motivation. That's PART of what make a woman far more dangerous than males. They are doer's who think first as opposed to us males who, often, do before we think. You bother, and Black men who think like you are the ones who put equality in humanity, among the sexes. Though the friendship thing usually leads to physical thing, I, like you settle for only friendship with a woman whom I like, including even my wife. That makes for a more nurturing interaction. Societal patriarchal White men, and Black who adapt to those ideas attempt to hide behind the façade of age and "men will be men" which is actually the most perverse of perversity. Just ask Bill Cosby – how he feels now that his unlimited male freedom has been checked – about his one-sided objective approach to the opposite sex; and how a subjective (friendship) approach might have made his desire more settled. Great point, brother, thank you!!