Chevdove

Awesome! IDK but when I read this poem, it made me think about these two thoughts: [14] They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace. JEREMIAH 6:14. I would love to purchase this book soon!

THE CHALDEANS Here are some Biblical scriptures about THE CHALDEANS: [28] And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees. [31] And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there. GENESIS 11: 28, 31. [12] But after that our fathers had provoked the God of heaven unto wrath, he gave them into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, the Chaldean, who destroyed this house, and carried the people away into Babylon. EZRA 5:12. [14] Thus saith the LORD, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; For your sake I have sent to Babylon, and have brought down all their nobles, and the Chaldeans, whose cry is in the ships. ISAIAH 43:14. Okay, so Nebuchadnezzar is a Chaldean man, meaning he is Black and a descendant of Cush Ham. And the prophet Isaiah confirms it with his prophecy of the Chaldeans of whom also become targeted and victims of the Transatlantic Slave Ship Trade! This then is the obvious confirmation that the Chaldeans were a VERY Black/Bronze African-typed people! They were absolutely NOT White at all! As I said previously, the Chaldeans laid siege against the Jews because the Jews continued to rebel against them and were in contact with the Assyrians. And the Chaldeans hated the Assyrians because they had been previously enslaved in the Assyrian Empire. But with the help of the Medes, the Chaldeans were able to overthrow the Assyrians. The Medes also hated the Assyrians! The Medes were an ethnic 'White' people of a very old civilization, 'the People of Ai' and they came together with the Chaldeans and with the Elamites to overthrow the Assyrians. At this time, the Medes had been part of the Assyrian Empire, however, they are a distinct people and later formed the Medo-Persian Empire. It was their Persian culture that clashed with the Chaldeans later. As a Christian, it is vital to understand that there are many White people and non-Black African civilizations that also hate White Supremacy. It is a major error to believe that White Supremacy and White humanity are the same. There is a huge difference.

Again, @Pioneer1 I never said that the Colchian people originally come from Egypt. But like Herodotus, I do believe that the Colchians were a later Aegyptos people. Like you all Black people have given White people credit for being all powerful enough to dominate Black African people! LOL. That is the essence of Black people obsessing over White people. That is also the essence of the Colchians! HERE IS WHAT JESUS SAID ABOUT THE COLCHIANS: [6] But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. [15] So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. REVELATION 2:6, 15. The Colchians or Nicolaitans are the Original people that intermixed with the Asiatics in the north world and became known as Caucasians of the Caucasus regions. Their supreme goddess is Ashtoreth. THE ORIGINAL EGYPTIANS In order to understand the vast history about the Egyptians would take a lot of books, however, in order to understand the origin of the Original Caucasian, I believe that it is important to understand some aspects about the Egyptians that developed before the 18th Dynasty Thutmosis Period. The Egyptians that are Abel-Mizraim are western but the earlier Egyptians came from the east and are also known as KHETY or HETH and come from the son of Noah, the oldest son JAPHETH. AFTER the flood these Egyptians originate from the east and migrated into Egypt. They were the Original Egyptians that formed a history in the east world and also became known by names such as GUPTA, GUPTAN, Romany, GYPSY, and more. From this east world formed the Colchians. The origin of the Colchian people is not Japheth but rather, Magog, another son of Japheth.

Yes, I partly agree! The Cholchian people i believe are not original Kemet or Egypt. They are a later Asiatic mixbred people of the northeast, I think. Again, Moses hated White people! He never would have done that. That's insane! STOP!!!

Awesome!!! I don't kinow about Enoch but I absolutely agree about the Colchians! Agree! The term Chaldea is linked to maybe a description in connection with the Chalcolithic Period--Copper and Bronze Age.

Why White People are Called Caucasian I came across this scholarly video a few years ago and believe that it is very informative! At about the 16:25 minute mark a Black American man gives his viewpoint on his experience when he lived in Moscow about how Caucasians are viewed today in that area. However, my research goes much deeper than this scholarship! Although what I am going to share is not part of this video but I do believe it is very important. For example, in this video it is brought out that the term Caucasians was applied to White people around the modern age of our history. But now, I will share my research. First of all, the term Caucasian may not have referred to skin color. The Original Caucasians were, as the name reveals, ASIAN but they were a mix-bred people. They were Cauca-Asian. The first Caucasians were not White but actually, they were a dark skinned people that developed a culture in the east world in very early times and many of them later migrated down from the Caucasus and the Iberian Peninsula into other areas like India and to also become known as the Cholchians and a distinct Aegyptos people too. I believe that initially, the term 'Cauca' was connected to their culture that revolved around their ancient worship of THE COW. So therefore, the term Cauca-asian referred to their connection to cattle and cow worship. By Kami888 - Own work by uploader, based on ArdadN's 2008 South Ossetia map derived from Wikipedia and the CIA regional map of 1994., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5178613

Both names Phoenicia and Kena'an are in ancient script and I agree in what you write. Yes, the Chaldeans, I agree stem from ancient Akkad and the First Babylonia. But the name Caucasian and Chaldean are two different terms with two different origins. Also, I got it wrong about 'Urartu'. I later realized i meant to say Ugarit of Syria. Hold on to your hat @Pioneer1! I hope to share my research about the Original Caucasians. I've said it years ago but never got around to posting that the Caucasians today are not the same as the ancient times. The date of the flood is in the 2300s BC and so NO, the Kenanites did not develop a culture until after this time period. Anyway let me start my research with the Original Caucasians: Unlike the Chaldeans who are Sumerians of Babylon, the Original Caucasians are a north eastern people. I will start a new thread though with a video of a research!

@Pioneer1 I am only focusing on the history of Egypt and the 18th Dynasty Thutmosis and King Tut is the last king. After him was the High priest Ay and Horemheb. The Moses in their script is my focus.

The Catholic Chaldean community you mentioned are completely different from the ancient Chaldeans. Since you mentioned them, I googled and read about their immigrating from Iraq in the AD 1800s. Interesting! When I think about this group, it reminds me of the term 'SOUTH AFRICAN'. South AFricans and Africans are completely distinct, and it's so incredible too, how White Europeans take on names that completely confuse history! Again though, the root name 'Chal' and 'Cal' means Black and the ancient Chaldees were definitely Cush Ham. It is also amazing too, that even the name CALIFORNIA stems from this ancient origin and is based on a legend from the east world about a Black woman or tribe thought to be in California in ancient times! Calafia, or Califia, is the fictional queen of the island of California, . . . She is the namesake of the California region encompassing the U.S. state of California and the Mexican states of Baja California and Baja California Sur. In the novel, Calafia is a pagan warrior queen who ruled over a kingdom of Black women living on the Island of California (an island off the coast of Asia). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calafia By Maynard Dixon (January 24, 1875 – November 11, 1946) artwork // Wysinger at English Wikipedia - No machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims). photo, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51612543 https://www.pinterest.com/pin/19281104633152797/ Many sources only date this legend to the AD 1500s but earlier sources reveal that this legend began much earlier in ancient times and not in Mexico but in the Mediterranean world and in India during the early times when the Arabs became dominant.

I don't know how to answer that completely. The Syrians, according to ancient scripture are descendants of Asshur Shem and he was 'Bi-racial'. His father is Shem is mother is a Canaanite/White woman. So, because Shem was real Black skinned then the original Syrians or Asshurians were African-typed. But the culture developed in Ur of the Chaldees so, they were a culture of Ur, a distinct culture. The Hur culture was another distinct culture in Ur of the Chladees and so, there were many distinct and ethnic Ur cultures in the First Babylonia. But then over the course of decades there developed unique Shurian cultures or Syrians. The Israelites were one distinct Syrian people themselves but they were distinct from other Syrian peoples. But the Assyrians were separatist and so, they through sex selection, and the ancient White women fertility MOON sex cult, became a unique people and were concentrated in North Syria while the Syrians 'Black' people were concentrated in South Syria. Urartu culture in Syria, South Syria. The Phoenician and/or early Aramaic language, I think stems from B linear script and language, from what I can remember. The Chaldean peoples stem from the earliest Babylonia Sumerians but by the time of Nebuchad, it had been over a thousand years. So I think that the earliest languages actually stem from Babylon but Aramaic is defined as a Semitic language, I think. The Medes origin is Medo-Persian or Madai Japheth according to ancient script. They are a White people, an ethnic White people. The Elamites are defined as being decendants of Shem, however their origins are heavily intermixed with Cush Ham, so they are defined in ancient script as being Ethiopian.

Moses had a deep hatred for White people so, this would contradict the Moses that conflicted with Egypt though. The God of the Exodus also judged the Egyptians due to White Supremacy, therefore, he would never send Moses from Egypt to teach Caucasians. That's completely insane @Pioneer1! Again, remember Moses married a Cushitic woman. So true!

Definitely! The Chaldeans were black and Cushitic. It's in their name. The root name 'Chal' means 'Black' as in the Chalcolithic Age and in the words like California, Calcol, etc. Absolutely two different deities. But again, Baal worship stemmed from the earlier Bel worship. There were Black civilizations though that were Baal worshipers and in this religion, they heavily practiced headhunting. Asshur Shem is the ancestor of the Asshurians and the Shurians. The Asshurians became the Assyrians and their civilizations was in North Syria and they became a predominantly White people. The name 'Assyria' means 'White Syrian'. The Syrians were ethnic peoples who lived in the South in ancient Syria. The Assyrians were Separatist and separated from the Syrians. The Chaldeans were completely different from the Assyrians. The Chaldeans were Cush Ham and formed their cultures in Babylon. They were enslaved by the Assyrians and so, Nebuchadnezzar's name was Nabopolassar [i.e. Nabo-Pul-Asshur]. However, after the Chaldeans overthrew the Assyrians, they changed their names to Nabuchadnezzar. At times, in the Bible, the name is written as Nabuchadrezzar [i.e. Rezzar] because he became famous for his method of destroying cities by RAZING. Razing is his method of destroying ancient city palaces as he did to the First Temple of Solomon as well. Nebuchadnezzar [i.e. Nebuchadrezzar] razed the cities of the Assyrian empire. According to the Bible, the Chaldeans were definitely Black Hamitic and they had help to overthrow the Assyrians too. The Medes and the Elamites also helped in this endeavor. 2Kgs.24 [1] In his days Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up, and Jehoiakim became his servant three years: then he turned and rebelled against him. [2] And the LORD sent against him bands of the Chaldees, and bands of the Syrians, and bands of the Moabites, and bands of the children of Ammon, and sent them against Judah to destroy it, according to the word of the LORD, which he spake by his servants the prophets. Jer.25 [1] The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the people of Judah in the fourth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, that was the first year of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon; *Both names are written Nebuchadnezzar and Nebuchadrezzar of which each carry a specific aspect of this king. As 'Nezzar', he was a Nazarite who freed his people from captivity in the Assyrian empire. As 'Rezzar' he was a warrior who razed cities. The name 'Nebuchad' also means Dark Cloud or Storm Cloud.

lol. I only listened to a little and stopped. But again, I believe that this American prison system is not designed as a penal system or correctional system in the positive light especially when it comes to protecting humans from being victimized. In a recent thread in this community I listened to to Black professionals who addressed this very issue. In that video it was said that at times a person with a minor offense was put with a criminal with a serious offense and this was done to undermine Black people.

The Caucasus is no where near Egypt so, again, you are referencing two different stories. And Baal worship itself would be the key to Moses never doing that. He had an intense hatred for White Supremacy. He married Zippora, a Black Cushitic women and would never take her to teach White people anything.

WOW! I wonder why authorities allow him to do this? IDK but I think this kind of rage goes much deeper though. I think this government has set him up and others like him to be the aggressor when in fact, this man however ignorant he comes off as, is probably a victim and that is why he is now out of control. He was probably victimized in prison. His human rights has been abridged and he is demonstrating that he did not submit. He may be showing PTSD.

Sad!!! But yeah, I believe all of this is an attack on the Horn anyway. The Ukraine conflict, the Sudan conflict and now this, I believe is the western world being angry of the Horn's dealings with China and Russia. I've heard it said that it is a proxy war fought in Africa about other powers who are fighting over the goods in Africa. Earlier before the west has now put their ships in the Red Sea, there was a horrible attack launched against a number of African people trying to leave Africa in search of refuge in Saudi Arabia. So now, I hear about this sad news! I just don't understand because we are such a minority here in America anyway! Why would the Middle East target Black Americans as a source of any problem going on over there!? There's probably a hidden agenda that has not been brought to light yet.

One the main reasons why it is wrong for Black people to worship Baal and the priesthood of Baal is because it ultimately leads them to being UNKNOWINGLY and SYSTEMATICALLY suppressed under White domination. The religion starts out as being NON-White maybe but then eventually it transforms into White Idols becoming a representation of Black idols and then accepted and then eventually Black people find themselves becoming targeted and violently suppressed. Modern day preachers do a good job of explaining the negative consequences but, they keep it completely hidden to the Black world. Nevertheless, I believe that if we don't understand their deception in how they can use the Bible to confuse Black people we will never see the truth completely. So let's take a look at what most of the White preachers say and how they use the Bible to answer this question. [4] For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. [5] For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. 1KINGS 11:5. White preachers today do a good job of explaining why Ashtoreth is defined as an ABOMINATION as the Hebrew prophets wrote. she is the supreme goddess of Lebanon, or ancient Zidon which is in present day Lebanon. It is the land of the Canaanite Phoenicians [Kenanites]. Today many modern day preachers break it down by explaining more, in that it is the kind of ABOMINATION THAT MAKES DESOLATION that Daniel spoke about and later that Jesus spoke about. So the reason why Baal worship and Baal and Ashtoreth worship is an abomination for the Hebrews to worship is because it is the kind of abomination that leads to utter desolation. Preachers today go farther and explain more how this kind of worship leads to that kind of desolation in the outcome of what happened after the Crucifixion. They explain that because the Jews worshiped Baal and Ashtoreth, they eventually were overthrown and completely and viotently attacked with the residue driven away from their lands and sold off into slavery, never to return. So, this would be the negative consequences of worshiping Baal. Prior to the set up of the Roman Empire and Daniel's prophecy, it happened as well. That is why the Creator is not worried about the Hebrews in their rebellion because that kind of idol worship will always eventually turn on them and they will be utterly attacked and destroyed anyway! LOL! The very Assyrians that they [Northern Israel] idolized overthrew them violently! LOL. They were skinned alive, and forced marched out of their lands, never to return. Then decades later, the Jews who continued to mix this Baal worship with their religion were finally attacked by the Chaldeans and completely overthrown. The Chaldeans were Bel worshippers NOT Baal worshipers and they hated the Assyrians and therefore, they watched them Jews for decades and tried to work with them in hopes that they would identify as being a Black people. But they continued to resist the Chaldeans and attempted to make bonds with the Assyrians. But again, the Chaldeans hated the Assyrians and so, they finally got fed up with the Jews and laid seige against them and overthrew them completely. But today, it is still a confusion because the heroes are telling the story and so many Black people don't understand the issue of Colorism that sets in with this kind of Baal religion. It does not start out as being a White dominated religion. Originally it was Bel Worship. In the land of Canaan, Bel Worship transformed to being Baal worship but later the definition of Bel came to mean white after all Black civilizations were destroyed. But in ancient times, Bel worship was a religion in Black civilizations. There is much more to this history about Baal worship!

For the Hebrew Israelites, the answer would absolutely be YES, Baal worship is completely forbidden for them to observe. It is an ancient Canaanite religion that has deeper origins too, and goes all the way back to being simply Satan worship.

Okay, firstly, I apologize for not getting back sooner. I have had a mandatory event that I had to attend in my family. Thank you!!!

Also to clarify, I think that the Hebrews defined by culture as being Syrian can be seen as a point where some of them defined their tribes based on a matri-lineal origin starting with either Leah, Rachel, Bilhah or Zilpah, but the Matriarchal aspect was, at times, a contention due to the Canaanite presence that they had been dealing with. For example, the story of Solomon and his mother presents one of many stories of how that Matriarchal head government contended with the kings of Israel. Solomon fell in love with, Abishag, the Black Virgin that became a nurse for David. He was one of the shepherds that was part of the party go and find a nurse and as he was assigned in that region in the mountains of Lebanon for a season, he party found Abishag and brought her back to the Capitol in Mt. Moriah. But once there, Solomon's mother revealed that she had a bad spirit and shocked Solomon. After the death of David, Solomon wanted to marry Abishag and he pursued her. But his older brother became enraged that David intercepted him and gave the kingdom to Solomon and therefore, he plotted against Solomon. He went behind Solomon's back and asked Bathsheba to give him Abishag. And Bathsheba then surprised Solomon one day and told Solomon to give Abishag to his older brother Adonaijah. Bathsheba ordered the life of that young girl to be given away as if she was a slave and WOW! Her dark nature was revealed. Solomon could not believe it because, as he mother too is black skinned and he knew what she endured due to Colorism, he could not believe that she would try to destroy the life of another Black skinned beauty. So Solomon told his mother, 'you are going to make me a slave to my brother--and I am the king'. But as Bathsheba was the Queen of queens, as David's wife, Solomon did not cross her, but what he did was have his brother killed. So after that, he married Abishag, and Bathsheba went down in shame. Later, when Abishag was older, she co-authored the love story between her and Solomon that became the Book Song of Solomon. This book Song of Solomon became the rendition of the famous fairy tale we know today as Cinderella. Bathsheba became the 'evil step-mother' syndrome and her name was also written out of the GOSPEL. She was written in as 'the wife of Uriah-the-Hittite'. She was written out of the Bible, even though it is Bathsheba, that is the matri-lineal basis of both Joseph and Mary! From David and Bathsheba, the lineage of Jesus' parents came! So in conclusion, the Matriarchal system did contend with the kings of Israel from time to time due to the Canaanites, the Hittites and other Asiatics old civilizations that had infiltrated the western world of Ham whereby women would challenge the patriarchal systems. Another dramatic historic event of this contention was the story about Ahab and Jezebel.

Yes! Thank you! @Mel Hopkins I believe that it would take many books to bring out the deeper history about that name Ashteroth. I did see that there are many script versions of how this name is written such as 'Ashtar', Ashter', 'Ash-tartu', 'Astarte', ... and all have a specific meaning. And, I am completely aware that Ashteroth was once a male aspect that later changed in Canaanite literature. Coupled with the religion as being Baal and Ashteroth, I believe the origins of this male aspect lies deep. As I wrote before, I could write a book, books, on this subject because there is a lot that needs to come to light to understand how this religion became a tool that led to White Supremacy in Black lands. Before this Canaanite religion became known as 'Baal and Ashteroth', it may have just been the supreme worship of Ashteroth when it represented a male deity. However, I do believe it was originally female, then maybe it changed to a dual deity and then it split to being Baal and Ashteroth, with Baal being male. By the time that Nefertiti became the head of the Aten religion, her high priest Ay was the Baal priest and therefore, she became supreme and Akhenaten was pharaoh in name only. I think that the earlier Roman Triad is also vital in understanding the dual nature of Ashteroth too. Also how their supreme god An transformed is part of this ancient religion as well.

I absolutely understand this! And thank you! in times past, I would sometimes write without making a complete clarification as these two terms have often been misunderstood! And, I partly understand what you wrote about the Hebrews being matrilineal too, at some point. The timeline of Jesus in the Book of Matthews definitely is NOT matri-lineal though. It starts with Adam and goes all the way down to Joseph and Mary. The timeline of Shem also starts with a male, Adam and goes all the way down to Abraham--NO FEMALE as the head. The timeline of Abraham's grandson, Jacob also is NOT Matri-lineal as he covers his whole progeny. HOWEVER after the Exodus, the Hebrews are defined BY CULTURE as being Syrian and here is where I can understand why some may define Hebrews as being Matri-lineal. Because Jacob bonded with four women from that region, he embraced that culture to a point. Later, the Jews of Ethiopia do have the name 'MARY' in some form as their name titles and this too is a very important point about them defining themselves from the Virgin birth. Very interesting point!

Yes. I agree. Wonderful statement. Ah! @Mel Hopkins That, in my mind is why I think of you as a perfectionist. When I read you, I get the feeling that you rely on background digging up of information and then you advance from this point. I try to do the same.

@richardmurray I think the contention about the missing books does connect to what you are highlighting. Whether it is about the Jews, the later Torah version of what happened in the days of the Exodus or the later Christian government that set up around AD 90, the missing books revolve around all of these developments. And also, the missing books connect to the later time period when Europeans were at contention too. The vital importance though, of the validity of the missing books, will probably always come up because the the importance that all civilizations have in developing a book of records that actually records truth and are able to apply their law books to the people that they are suppose to protect is crucial.

OH WOW! I am interested. Anything you post seems so incredible IMO. I am sure that you've been described as a perfectionist. Thank you!