Chevdove

I believe by getting a better understanding about genes will help to diminish the negative bias in all categories you mentioned. For example, when the phenotype is regarded in terms of skin color, therefore, it would help to understand gene expression and how 'a blending affect' occurs. But when the origin of skin color is acknowledged in terms of the first modern male, this kind of truth would completely shed light on the truth and expose a lot of negativity that came about.

The entire book of Zechariah is based on the color of the horses in correlation to Colorism and racism. Social injustice based on Colorism. His entire book was based on the Bay or 'red' horse, the Black horse, the Grisled horse, the white horse, etc. Colorism and White Supremacy. Again, the genetic basis of the Bay horses correlates to the Original Sin. To add a little more about 'the Bay horse'; The Bay horse is 'a red horse' but it is due to a specific gene known as 'the agouti gene'. Otherwise, the original horse, the Bay horse is a black horse. Due to this agouti gene, the bay horse may be in phenotype, may look like a black horse, brown horse, grisled (white or gray) horse, or a beige horse, etc. But its origin is that it was a black horse. The prophet Zechariah writes about 'the Bay Horse' and the pure Black horse and the pure White horse to address the issue of Colorism in the human world. Like it was later revealed, the watered down Jews, murdered Zechariah for this prophecy. Also, I need to make a correction because I earlier wrote about Zechariah and then realized that I had forgotten when he actually lived. He lived long after the overthrow. Zechariah lived 70 years after the overthrow and at the time that the Second Temple was being built during the Persian Empire times.

Okay. I just popped in. Hope to get back to this discussion real soon.

But, my question would be; Who is innocent? Logical thinking? My question would be from what relative basis do we think logically about certain catastrophes happening in the earth? Yes. I think so. Again, this goes back to what I mentioned earlier, in that the Supreme Being did not cause problems anyway, so therefore, many circumstances are due to mankind. So whether it is the people in the Middle East today, in Israel, or the Iranians, or the Palestinians, or the Arabs, or the Americans who are said to be giving aid, these events are made byway of mankind. Logically, some may believe when innocent little children are hurt, that God has something to do with it, but no, He is not doing this. And if natural disasters happen, some may believe that it is divine intervention and the Bible does mention this kind of act many times, however, it is difficult to make logical sense, to some regards. Why would God destroy the Egyptians in the Exodus and then a few hundred years later, the Jews are forced back into brutal captivity again? Why would ancient Rome thrive for hundreds of years and then collapse and then form a massive empire again built on human slavery? Some may think that the Supreme Being did not do anything to bring about the collapse of ancient Rome and that it was just an act of nature that was soon bound to happen, while others may believe the Bible in that God did bring down ancient Rome. Some of us may believe that it is just nature while some of us may believe that it was prophecy come to light, but for now, humanity continues and humans still exist. I believe that the Redemption Plan is still unfolding. I believe that at times, the Supreme Being does intervene with acts of nature. I do not understand a lot, but through study, there are some prophecies that I can see was right on target such as the prophecy of the Transatlantic Slave Ship Trade. Another prophecy that is now old history would be when the prophet Daniel wrote about the Black Death Plague. Daniel lived during the 500s BC. He wrote that the Messiah would come after the Second Temple was bullt. He wrote that the Roman Empire would form, be destroyed and then reform. ... He wrote that in AD 1335, the Black Death Plague would come and it did, right on target, that very year. So, thousands of years after Daniel wrote and published his book, these events did occur and is now old news. And so, there are many more prophecies that have not been set to occur yet, and this may cause some people to not believe that the Supreme Being has anything to do with it, but in some way, he does make intervention to help humanity. However, He is not the one hurting innocent people. The Bible reveals that the Creator will address innocent victims of crime, even though it may seem hard to believe, nevertheless, He does address that issue.

Okay. I just popped in briefly today. But I will hope to get back into this discussion as soon as I can. not so. But I will get back with some references to show that I do not believe this to be true. The genetics of Denisovans so not have the same origin as do the homo sapiens at all. lol. I have a degree in Biology! It does not matter about the species whether human or horses. The pigment is the same!!! Eumelanin is the same whether in humans, horses, cats, etc. It is the very same!!! I am NOT addressing the issue of breed or whether human or animal, I am addressing the genetics of the pigment 'eumelanin'. period. BLACK pigment is the same! Phaeomelanin is the same in all kinds of animals. As a victim of racism, this subject is my passion. So my desire to address it would be in hopes dispelling deliberate lies to hurt people and then to bring about peace.

The Genetics of the Bay Horse Bay is a hair coat color of horses, characterized by a reddish-brown or brown body color with a black point coloration on the mane, tail, ear edges, and lower legs. Bay is one of the most common coat colors in many horse breeds. ... The black areas of a bay horse's hair coat are called "black points", and without them, a horse is not a bay horse. ... Bay horses have black skin and dark eyes, except for the skin under markings, which is pink. Skin color can help an observer distinguish between a bay horse with white markings and a horse which resembles bay but is not. ... …Therefore, "brown" can be an ambiguous term for describing horse coat color. It is clearer to refer to dark-colored horses as dark bays or liver chestnuts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_(horse) Dark bay/ black bay By Montanabw - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Purebred Arabian stallion Maclintock V (Desperado V x Marigold V) A very dark bay horse might appear to be almost black Country Berry Bay Horse https://www.pinterest.com/pin/2111131052534029/ A Dapple [Grisled/Speckled] Bay Horse https://horserookie.com/dapples-on-a-horse/ Dapple [Grisled] Horse https://www.pinterest.com/pin/AYYU2Z76hKIsv7nB-VrUV8dNJKBnztKTayvcdqCkFXP4VgyIBNqr7ho/

"I can not see how you connect race(as a social construct) and genetics with spiritual prophecies" Ok. Wait-a-minute. I did not write this scripture. It was written thousands of years ago. So, it is not about me but the prophet wrote about the genetics of color in reference to horses and he also wrote about the spirit of the horses in connection to their color. In other words, the Bay horses had 'an evil spirit'. So therefore, he definitely connected the issue of 'race' and 'racism' to the issue of color and spirit. Like I said, the prophet who wrote this prophecy initially, Zechariah, was hated so much by those stupid watered down Jews, for his writings, that they killed him for this prophecy about White Supremacy and Colorism. Then those idiots were completely overthrown by the Chaldees [Blacks]. So, if you cannot recognize that this 'spiritual' prophecy refers to the specific COLORS of the horses for a reason, that caused those stupid Jews to get upset, then what in the world do you think he wrote this 'spiritual' prophecy down for? The prophecy of 'the four horses of the apocalypse' became a powerful prophecy. But western scholars that are deceptive definitely do not reveal the real reason why it became such a major prophecy. Their hatred of 'Blackness' has caused them to debauch their interpretation to the point of being ridiculous. Even though, in this prophecy, the Black horse and chariot is defined as being completely positive, these western White Supremacists stumble over this aspect of the prophecy and misinterpret it. I can see though, how many African Americans have been made to completely misunderstand the real issues that the ancient prophets wrote about, but we need to re-look at these ancient scriptures because stuff is happening today and we are definitely living in the end end end times... So now, the prophet Zechariah lived about 400 years after Solomon was dead and gone and, Solomon wrote that 'the Greatest Beloved' which is Jesus Christ was going to be 'ruddy' and have 'black hair'. And Solomon's father, David was defined to be 'Ruddy'. But now, these crazy White people cast Richard Gere as being David-- lol. So therefore, after they carried millions of little African American children across the ocean from AFrica, we don't have any idea what those Devils did in deceiving us about the true identity of what the prophets wrote about. Therefore, Zechariah's prophecy of 'the Bay Horse' which means 'A RED HORSE' could possibly helps us to understand the issues of Colorism that has plagued the human 'Race'. We may be able to understand, through studying about the 'Bay HOrse' genetics that 'a bay horse' could actually appear to be a light skinned horse or even a dark skinned horse, so dark that the horse could actually appear to be black. And then we could understand why Solomon wrote about 'the color Black' as well and how the issues of Colorism was a contention even during his lifetime. We could also understand too, that David could not possibly look like a White man, or a Pole, or a European Jew, or Irish, because his sons were written to have NAPPY [i.e. Bushy] hair-type--Ya know! lol. -- Chromosome 16 and Chromosone 9, etc. Therefore no matter what, the Ruddy color and the hair type written about in scripture means that David couldn't possibly look like Richard Gere, a non-African man. Identity Theft is a reality. This would be why the book of GENES is crucial to understand. The Bible is much more than a book about historical events. There is definitely a spiritual aspect to this prophecy, especially when you consider the spirit of horses. Nevertheless, the reference to White Supremacy, Colorism, and the rise of the Roman Empire would be a major revelation in this prophecy. Those Jews did not attack Zechariah because he wrote about a spiritual awareness. lol. So, again though, I can understand why there would be a misunderstanding here, but hopefully, the truth about what happened in ancient times will come out. The prophet Daniel wrote that by and by, knowledge will increase and some will become wise but some people will never understand.

Oh. Okay. No, that was not me. That was just one part of the reference and scientific explanation. To clarify, I will have to re-post that reference and then perhaps share more of what the scientist have found out about that specific LHX2 gene, because there is much more about it. That gene is just one aspect of how Black African hair is made to 'nap' and they explain that there is much more genes and proteins that they do not understand right now in how African hair naps or locks. So the LHX2 gene is part of all humans and has something to do with follicles in all humans and even animals too. But African hair is specifically unique and this gene is one factor out of several others that scientist have not been able to understand. Some human follicles are circular shaped and I think African follicles are said to be more oval and so, this may just one of many other factors that make African hair unique. I say this; It is the SEAL of the Living God in the forehead. Scientist are probably not ever going to find out. lol.

@Pioneer1 I believe that the Supreme Being knows what he's doing though. If he stopped the unrighteous, it would never solve the problem right now, because history has shown that plenty of times. As soon as certain unrighteous are stopped, these sorry azz white lovin negroes open the dmn door and beg them to come right back in and be the head. This is the main problem. When Black African people can stop worshiping white people and recognize that no one is more supreme just because they are white, then this world will be a better place. This is why it would be the wrong move for the Supreme Being to stop that kind of behavior on a large scale right now. It's hard to understand how the Supreme Being could be precise when little children are hurt, but I believe that he still knows what he's doing. Little children are not being hurt because of him though. If the world was not so evil then, these natural disasters may not happen. It's not easy to see from the ground up or the whole scope but, time will prove that, in regards to your analogy of 14 people, the unrighteous leaders are educated, and they can see that their end is near more than us 'masses' even if in one incident, it seems like only a few of the guilty are punished. The leaders rely on expert counsel. I hope that you rethink that. There are 8 billion people on this planet and even though judgment may seem like a blip in time for the guilty, nevertheless, the Supreme Being knows what he is doing. If he lowered the boom on humanity right now, it would be a waste of time. I don't care, if like ProfD posted, if the numbers of casualties are 500,000 or 4 million, nevertheless, in the grand scheme of things, we can see that today, if has not changed us humans for the better. Those figures don't even match the 200 years of little children forced on the slave ships and over the ocean during the Transatlantic Slave Ship trade, and of which many of them didn't just get shipped over the ocean, but landed in the ocean. Now today, that is history, but 4000 years ago, it was prophecy that was going to happen. And it did. Because those Africans loved white people so much, they let their guard down and ended up having their children stolen from them and shipped over to America to be slaves until they died. God knows what he is doing. So, I still say, yes, this recent incident in Texas is definitely Divine intervention. Just because the victims are white don't mean that Black people should think that this kind of occurrence is a black, white, issue of retribution. However, it seems to me, that the world is being warned. It's not just Texas that's in the news. I just heard that New Jersey is also dealing with major flooding and boston too. In Canada too, there was a hailstorm, and Mexico is facing major floods and earthquakes. A major earthquake just happened off the coast of Alaska and some of these disasters are not usual, meaning there is no obvious warning like a hurricane or a known low pressure system reported. I think that it might be some type of meteor that maybe the scientist cannot see because it may be hidden in the sun's glare. Two weeks ago, there was a meteor that hit a house in Georgia and scientist reported that certain asteroids from the planet Venus might become a problem for the earth. Also, the Middle East is always seeming to be at war but, I don't trust this American government. I wonder if there is something going on bigger than what they are reporting. I just saw in the news that China and 20 other countries are angry and -- 'wars and rumors of wars'-- they are saying that they might do something to try and stop Israel. scary! lol Yeah, but I can understand why Black people sometimes feel hopeless. Nevertheless, I am not asking this government to realize that 'Black Lives Matter'. I am not asking this government to do what they know that they are suppose to do. I don't begrudge anyone though, that feels they need to fight to sit at the soda counter at Woolworth though, or who petition the Black Caucus to speak up for us. I highly appreciate the sacrifices of Black leaders in trying to send representatives to the White House to try and help us get out of this Second Class citizenship status. No matter what, though, I just don't believe that Black people are meant to stay down forever.

The Prophecy of the Bay & Grisled Horse [1] And I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came four chariots out from between two mountains; and the mountains were mountains of brass. [2] In the first chariot were red horses; and in the second chariot black horses; [3] And in the third chariot white horses; and in the fourth chariot grisled and bay horses. ZECHARIAH 6:1-3. The prophet Zechariah wrote this before the Jews were overthrown and it became known as 'the Four Horses of the Apocalypse'. He wrote this about 500 years before the rise of the Roman Empire and in the Gospel, when Jesus Christ walked, he said that the Jews attacked Zechariah. I think he was martyred. The prophets warned the Jews that they were going to be overthrown but most of them were powerful warriors and scriptures say that they laughed the prophets to shame because they did not believe them. Anyway, Zechariah was not the only prophet that wrote about this prophecy and it covers a huge subject about White Supremacy and Colorism that has plagued this world. So in order to understand the whole meaning about 'the Pale Horse' in how the prophets revealed the Movement of White Supremacy, other scriptures also need to be addressed so this is just part of it for now. About six (6) hundred years after Zechariah wrote, then John-the-Revelator also wrote and revealed more about this same prophecy in how the horse genetics was related to human genetics about the genetics of skin color and Colorism. By the time that the prophet John wrote his book, the Second Temple was destroyed and Jesus was long gone. John wrote his book about A.D. 90 and revealed more detail about this prophecy. So I can understand why it would seem that there was a contradiction in what I wrote because there is a lot of information in what was written, by and by, and not all was revealed by one prophet. Even long before the prophet Zechariah was born, Solomon wrote about the contention that existed among the Israelites about Colorism and then long before that Moses wrote about it too. So, over thousands of years, more and more was written about issues of Colorism that existed among the human world. So, for now, I will try to share a little because there happens to be a lot of information. [1] And I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came four chariots out from between two mountains; and the mountains were mountains of brass. [2] In the first chariot were red horses; and in the second chariot black horses; [3] And in the third chariot white horses; and in the fourth chariot grisled and bay horses. ZECHARIAH 6:1-3. [2] And I saw, and behold a white horse: ... [4] And there went out another horse that was red: ... [5] And I beheld, and lo a black horse; ... [8] And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. REVELATION 6: 2-8. *****My Note: The Bible Concordance links the scriptures. The Bay and Grisled horses are the same as the Pale Horse. The Bay and Grisled horse would be linked to the Pale Horse. The Bay and Grisled horse genetically are black, however, they can look black or white, etc. The bay and grisled horses represent that they are not pure black or white, or other due to albinism/the pale gene. The prophet John refers to the 'bay and grisled' horses as the Pale horse [speckled horse] of death and destruction. The bay or grisled horse are not pure black and white because of the 'pale gene', however, their black tips reveal that they were originally a black horse. The grisled and bay horse [i.e. Gog and Magog] represent the Pale Horse and would be the embodiment of the Pale Horse. The grisled and bay horse represent White Supremacy and Colorism; the Roman Empire, the government of the Great Adversary. The Pale horses, as the bay horses, originate from the black horse, however, the Pale Horse of John's vision does not come from the Bay horses. The bay horses, --both the grisled horse and the bay horse are bay horses,--both have black tips and are black horses, however, they are also connected to the Pale horse. But the Black horse and the White horse are not linked to the Pale horse. The Black horse goes to the north first, [Solomon/Israel & the Chaldeans]-- the golden empire-- linked to Jesus Christ The White horse goes to the north afterwards [the Church, Persians, & the Protestants] and are linked to Jesus Christ The Bay horse of death and Hell go to the South -- Africa, etc. [the Transatlantic Slave Ship Trade empire; Rome/the Amorites] [6] Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. [7] And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. JOB 1:7. [7] And the bay went forth, and sought to go that they might walk to and fro through the earth: and he said, Get you hence, walk to and fro through the earth. So they walked to and fro through the earth. ZECHARIAH 6:7.

The Primitive mankind, the Neanderthalensis species, are lighter skinned not completely 'pale' skin. They are not completely albino at all. Is there such a human that is completely albino? No. Neanderthals have variations of phaeomelanin and the pale/albino gene. The albino gene is a recessive trait and it is also a disorder. Therefore, the original Black human was not albino at all because the eumelanin pigment has nothing to do with this kind of disorder. I will try to jump down and quote and try to address a little and then clarify more: The Bible reference to 'the pale gene' is the 'albino gene'. Okay. Noah could not possibly have the albino gene based on scripture because he would be the scientific term of 'Bottleneck' GENESIS and a direct descendant of both Adam and Eve therefore, he would be a perfect reproduction of them and of Seth, etc. He was perfect in his generations. Therefore he would express the eumelanin pigment and be a black man. And to also speak a little more about what you ask me to clarify what I mentioned about the reference to 'pure white', I will share a little more with this following scriptures about the 'bay and grisled' horse, however, it is a lot, so I will try and share some now and hopefully more later. I only earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology and therefore, I don't believe that I can provide the whole truth about genes and genetics, however, I can share what I know. Also, you asked me about the actual gene that produces the eumelanin, and I was surprised at how easy it was to get this information! I am well aware of how scientist have confirmed so many facts about certain genes and chromosomes, so in the past, I never really bothered to find out the actual gene. But since you asked, I did a quick research. The gene that produces the Eumelanin/Black pigment is called The MC1R gene. This gene is located on Chromosome 16 in all Modern humans. Now the unique factor about the Afro would come from an additional gene on another chromosome. The afro texture and other factors about hair texture stems from the LHX2 gene and is partially due to the gene function about follicles. That gene is found to be on Chromosome 9. However, scientist say that it is complex in how African hair is expressed. Now, the many variations of human pigment is due to other genes. I will put some references. The Black pigment in hair color is the same gene that is in Black skin and etc. in humans and the animal kingdom too. For this reason, it becomes easy to see how White Supremacist have published false reports to form their racist concepts and confuse the world. One of many lies would be that humans with Blue eyes have it because of Black/brown melanin; This is a complete lie because blue eyes stem directly from 'eumelanin' and not brown melanin. Eumelanin is not black and brown, rather, it is just black melanin. Phaeomelanin produces 'red', 'yellow' and 'brown' melanin. A young adult lion does not have brown melanin in his man, but pure black, unless there is the 'pale gene', but not brown. A pure black horse has eumelanin and absolutely no brown or phaeomelanin. Today, there is no such human that is completely black skin but they can appear as being black skin meaning phenotype. Due to the Original Sin, therefore, all black skinned people like some people of South Sudan, they express both the black and the brown gene. They express both the eumelanin and the phaeomelanin, but the western scholars put out false reports when they say that the eumelanin is black and brown. No. It's just black pigment. That's all. The MC1R gene, which plays a significant role in determining human hair and skin pigmentation, is found on chromosome 16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_hair#:~:text=African%20American%20hair-,Color,of%20melanin%20pigmentation%20called%20eumelanin. Redheads typically carry two copies of a mutated version of the MC1R gene, resulting in reduced production of eumelanin (responsible for brown and black hair) and increased production of pheomelanin (responsible for red and yellow tones).May 26, 2024 https://cosmoins.com/the-genetic-mystique-of-redheads-unique-mutations-and-health-implications/#:~:text=Redheads%20typically%20carry%20two%20copies,for%20red%20and%20yellow%20tones). Black hair is the product of an inherited genetic trait. The most studied black hair gene is MC1R which causes the body to produce a protein called melanocortin. [3] This protein causes hair follicles to produce a type of melanin pigmentation called eumelanin. [3] … Black hair has the highest concentration of this pigmentation with brown, blonde and red hair following behind.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_hair#:~:text=African%20American%20hair-,Color,of%20melanin%20pigmentation%20called%20eumelanin. The specific gene versions that lead to textured hair are almost exclusive to Africans. The LHX2 gene is located on chromosome 9 in humans. More specifically, its human locus is 9q33.3, with coordinates on the forward strand being 124,001,670 to 124,033,301. https://answersresearchjournal.org/neanderthal/ancient-dna/#:~:text=A%20histogram%20of%20sequence%20similarity,Mez2%2C%20Elsd%2C%20and%20Spy1.

Yes, pretty much. No.... Irish Poles Jews and Italians were not always considered members of the White race...yet their skin was white Whilst people from Iran Lebanon and Egypt or MENA Descent were consider members of the White race....yet the vast majority of whose skin is brown. All Modern human origins are the same when it comes to male Y-DNA Haplogroups. So this means, both scientifically and Biblically, that all Modern mankind haplogroups begins with one Black African male individual. So, I can understand why you say this. Just like the word 'race' again, the word 'White' is not scientifically accurate, however, since the big government has deemed the word to be acceptable, then it's not a big deal. So even though the word 'Race' is not accurate, again, it is deemed acceptable due to big government and their usage of it on a federal basis. All White people today that you mentioned, Irish Poles Jews and Italians considered themselves to be of the White race and that is a federal category. Their ethnicity may also be that they identify as an ethnic people or European, etc. but they are regarded by many today as being of the White race if they are European by others, even if some of them may agree or not. When I worked for in a census office, that is what all of those kinds of people you mentioned checked on the federal forms. Most of them, even the European Jews checked White and some may also check, along with the category 'white' as being 'other' and then wrote in that they wee Irish, or European, etc. But nevertheless, they identify as being White; of the White Race. Further down, you asked me about 'White' again with regards to Primitive mankind, and I will clarify, a little more now; The Biblical 'Pale' horse I will put the reference and clarify more too.

Ok please provide a quote and link to back up or prove this argument. Okay. I will look at the International Genome Project again, and provide some references. But I will also add another reference and will re-look that up too: The National Smithsonian Museum; Human Origins! There, in that science museum, if you visit, you can see for yourself the many dark skinned primitive humans! Even though some of them look very dark skinned, almost black, however, they are not black at all. There is no such presence of a false white 'race' of humans. I have no idea about the presence of primitive humans being 'white'. Primitive humans like the Neanderthals were light skinned and express 'the pale gene' meaning, albinism. But according to the Bible there are 'white' beings and completely pure and without blemish. The Biblical scriptures explain that 'pure white' skin comes from a black origin though. I meant to edit and clarify what I wrote about the 'bay and grisled horse'. The grisled horse is also a bay horse and there is a lot more scriptures about that too. Furthermore, this kind of genetics of 'a pure white gene' gene expression is present in the modern human race too, however, due to interbreeding with impure primitive humans, this genetic expression of pure white skin and also that kind of gene, is rare. This type of genetics is also said to be found in colored humans too; it's a kind of gene transfer. Like I said, it is a huge topic. It is part of human reproduction though, but all humans today express some type of gene mutation due to our ancestors. Do they have a name? There is no such presence of 'a white race'; It's about White Supremacy. There is no such presence of 'a Pale Race'; It's about White Supremacy and Color Supremacy; Colorism. All modern humans today, whether we are light skinned or dark skinned, Nigerian, or British, we are a manifestation of interbreeding. The Biblical scripture about the 'Pale Horse' is referring to 'the Bay Horse' a black horse with mutation. The Pale horse or grisled horse is the embodiment of White Supremacy. The Pale Horse represents 'albinism'. There is no such existence of an albino 'race' of people; people with albinism are either of African descent or European descent, or Asian, etc. I know that I have some of those genes in me and I am African American. Anyone can have that recessive trait. I cannot see how that is relevant....but i am sure you will tell me. This is a huge topic. One prophet, the prophet Zechariah wrote this prophecy. And then other wrote later about the same prophecy that revolves around the issue of White Supremacy and Colorism. Yes, I hope to share more because this is relevant, of course. This whole world is plagued with the issue of White Supremacy and Colorism. I will now though, provide a Biblical reference; another Biblical reference and that would be the prophet Job. The very first entry in his book is linked to the 'bay and grisled' horse. But here in the Book of Job, the reference would be to the 'bay horse' and specifically not the grisled bay horse. So the prophets reveal that the embodiment of the Bay and Grisled Horse is the Great Adversary. I jumped down to this comment because I am tired and will come back and finish reading the rest, okay. But, I want to address this and a little more before I take a break: No way. This would not be true even in the scientific world as well as the Bible. Today, scientist define Neanderthals as being a separate hominid versus the Denisovans of which is their MRCA. The Neanderthal's Most Recent Common Ancestors are the Denisovans, however, the Neanderthals are distinct. The Denisovans are dark skinned, the Neanderthals are not. The Denisovans produced males but are now extinct. The Neanderthals can be male or female, however, they cannot produce any Denisovan male offspring!!! They became so mutated that they lost that genetic material and therefore, are in a distinct scientific human classification apart from the Denisovan. Likewise, it would be the same for animals and modern humans too. Like I said, through periods of 'sex selection' this kind of mutation can lead to a specific ethnic identity. It has nothing to do with having a certain amount of black blood. The White Supremacist movement formed many ethnic groups on this very basis. Although all modern humans have a common origin, nevertheless, due to certain kinds of movements of sex selective reproduction, many non-African nations exist today. To ignore this leads to great oppression. Calling a racist European, Black, is ridiculous because you would not be doing that to those kind of people, however, this kind of rhetoric is directed towards the victim. That is crazy. Black people need to stop that type of rhetoric towards each other. I knew that I needed to come back and clarify this!!! This is a huge topic that I have been hoping to share more about! I hope to start a separate thread though about it, however, I will clarify a little now. Black African people can express all hair types, but the nation MUST express the phenotype of the Original Adam and Eve to a certain percentage. In other words, it would be ridiculous for ancient men to bond with a foreign wife with light skin and straight hair and not define his offspring as being like him, African. His offspring would be African, no matter if they have straight, curly, wavy hair, etc. or no matter if they were fair skinned like the mother. I could say much more, but again, I will provide references to further explain the Biblical history on this very issue of interbreeding and sex selection due to White Supremacy. But I am going to provide a reference right now, one of them, and write more about it later, so that you can go and read it and confirm what I have written about in the meantime; The Book of JOB. The prophet Job had to address this issue of Colorism in a most incredible way. Many Bible scholars believe that his book is one of the most profound. At any rate, Job was not a Black African man as the Bible attest. However, he married an ethnic woman and his friends attacked viciously for this very reason. He was almost on his deathbed, and they came to badger him because they believed that he was being judged by God for his decision to embrace Black Africans. So although most Black people are sitting around waiting for Europeans to interpret the Bible for them, or either, they have believed the false interpretations byway of White Supremacist, and have rejected the Bible altogether, but that is one of my references!!! Job told his friends that their problem was that they were afraid of the negroes. He told them that he was NOT stupid and he did not embrace the kind of Blacks [Sabeans and Chaldeans] that were evil. Job was mocked because his sons were evil, and his wife was lukewarm. Nevertheless, to the surprise of his friends, Job did not die, but went on to live for many more years. He was blessed through his daughters and one of his descendants came to be a mind blowing awesome 'Black African' man!!! Salah-a-Din! Yes, Saladin, this man of Syria that rose up and had to contend with the Crusaders was known in ancient times as 'Son-of-Job'. Another huge topic, but I will say a little more and offer a 'general reference' for now; According to the scriptures, by the time that Adam was created, the DOMINANT presence of ALL primitive males were completely extinct. However, by the time that Adam was created, the RECESSIVE presence of primitive males [Hybridization] still exist on this earth!!! In other words, when I explained about the lion and the tiger species reproducing, I was not complete and they would not be a good example to explain completely what happened to the human world. Perhaps I should throw in the genetics of the cheetah, because the scientific term 'Bottleneck' would explain the human world more complete. So, hopefully, I will share more about this topic later to better understand. So then, white people would no more be Neanderthals than I am, and I certainly possess some genes that come from primitive humans. It's simply not a big deal though. It doesn't deter me from being the best human being that I can be. And so, there is no way that I could have these genes in me, if at one point, the primitive human male was not reproducing. He was definitely reproducing, however, what our educational system has conveniently omitted is how their genes are distinct from modern mankind. This is a vast subject and why I cited the International Genome Project because they conducted gene sequencing and I find that some of their findings confirm the ancient scriptures. okay. I gotta take a break. Yes! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

I agree about the color 'red' but I have researched this and know that this term has been debauched and mistranslated with regards to the complete meaning of Adam, the man created by God. This too is a huge topic. And I actually touched upon it when I spoke about the Biblical scriptures about Bay and Grisled horse. I hope to share much more about this topic. But for now, I will briefly say something about this planet earth and how the Bible says the Adam was created from the dust of the earth. When the astronauts bent down as picked up the ground on the moon, they were amazed and said, that it was black. This planet is black. Kemet. There are minerals in this earth such as iron that causes some parts of the earth to have different color, but this planet is black. Adam was black and he had red blood running through his veins. But again, there is a lot to this subject of why the name 'Adam' would also be connected to the color red as you have said. All humans have this red blood running through our veins, but this planet is black. You know, I am going to STOP using that term 'Malefactor'! I looked up the definition and WOW. I had no idea! I guess it's true that all mankind are born in sin, but my usage of the term 'malefactor' was not to reference that! Maybe I should say 'male individual' or something. I won't be using that word in context anymore for what I have been writing about with regards to the origins of mankind. Scientist use many different terms when they speak about primitive humans. For example, 'Denisovan', I think they said, they use that term because they found bones in a cave in Siberia of primitive beings and because there was a hermit in that cave with that name or something, that is the term they used to mark that cave. Then the term 'Neanderthal' was used due to an area where they found certain bones, or something. So there are many names used to define primitive hominids in the scientific world. But the Bible uses different terms. The Bible uses terms like 'angel' and then of course 'Satan' and more. I never said that there were two different black races. Adam is the first that has the gene that produces the Black pigment in humans. Prior to Adam, many animals have this black pigment. But he is the very first human to have it. Okay, so you are 'about to get real'!? I could expect that you and other men will get a little upset with me because I don't think that men can take it so well, at first, when a female enters into this kind of topic! LOL. But I hope that you are going to be okay.

WOW! I will respond to some now, but will take some time to respond to all of your comments. But when I saw this comment, I want to respond to this one first; The term RACE, whether or not it is associated with skin color or based on skin color is NOT an argument to even address because, this issue is determined by this government and the western world and the leaders have used 'RACE' to determine human social groups. They did this! So therefore, they used 'SKIN COLOR' which is a GENETIC FACTOR to organize humans into a social construct. This government used a GENETIC FACTOR, which is SKIN COLOR to define humans and categorized us into racial categories. So therefore, Race is based on this genetic factor, and this government decided to use this genetic factor to define humans in this way. Again, this is a huge topic! But in short, as I tried to write some aspects of my research on it a little, this is due to the NEW CREATION of the color BLACK in the first modern human. He is the first and single origin of this 'gene expression'. I meant to come back and CORRECT my statement about it being 'a gene'. The gene is one aspect, and there is a specific gene that produces the pigment EUMELANIN, which is the BLACK PIGMENT. Furthermore, this eumelanin is firmly linked to 'african hair type'. And since genes tend to travel in pairs, this is the key to your question! And so, this one African male individual is the origin of it and all modern humans stem from him and have this kind of genetics. But this gene is completely absent in the primitive humans. Therefore the primitive male genetics determines their 'kind' because in reproduction, the absence of this eumelanin will simply NOT be present! So, primitive human genes that produce skin color, in reproduction, will show how a female or male from this kind of reproduction is either male or female from that specific origin. And furthermore, females don't have male organs and this too is key.

You mean like the Neanderthals? They too are descendant from Africa -- all humans are descendant from Africa. I'll wait to read what you cite from Stanford in your research before commenting on the rest. No. Neanderthals were not descended from Africa. This landmass, meaning earth, was one mass prior to modern humans and Neanderthals were not descended from 'Africa'. Scientist say they were descended from dark skinned hominids, they call Denisovans. Okay; So you want me to cite my reference source; the Genome Project. I will look at that info and get back. But again, no. Primitive humans are not the same as Modern humans at all. Primitive humans are NOT defined by male haplogroups.

Well, if there is something significant, the masses won't know until it has happened. Just another day for the poor and oppressed I guess. Oppressed people just live, continue to be oppressed, and die in this big blue marble with no hope of escape...

Edit: Clarify the dates of the beginning invasion and the date of the destruction of the temple. The second and final invasion began in the forth month, June 9, but the destruction of the temple of Solomon began in July on the 7th and lasted until the 10th. The national Day of Remembrance of the Destruction of the temple was on July 9, the Jewish month Av on the ninth day; July 9. [8] And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month, which is the nineteenth year of king Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzar-adan, captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, unto Jerusalem: [9] And he burnt the house of the LORD, and the king's house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man's house burnt he with fire. [10] And all the army of the Chaldees, that were with the captain of the guard, brake down the walls of Jerusalem round about. 2 KINGS 25: 8-10. The temple was burnt down in the fifth month which is July; beginning on the 7th to the 10th day, the temple and surrounding buildings were burnt down. The invasion began in the 4th month 'Tammuz', the ninth day, (June 9) which is our June. the temple was burnt in the 5th month 'Av', from the 7th to the 10th (July 7-10), which is our July. From July 7-10 the temple was destroyed. [12] Now in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month, which was the nineteenth year of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzar-adan, captain of the guard, which served the king of Babylon, into Jerusalem, [13] And burned the house of the LORD, and the king's house; and all the houses of Jerusalem, and all the houses of the great men, burned he with fire [14] And all the army of the Chaldeans, that were with the captain of the guard, brake down all the walls of Jerusalem round about. JEREMIAH 52:12-14. On Tisha B'Av, July 587 or 586 BC, the Babylonians took Jerusalem, destroyed the First Temple and burned down the city.[1][2][8] The small settlements surrounding the city, and those close to the western border of the kingdom, were destroyed as well.[8] According to the Bible, Zedekiah attempted to escape, but was captured near Jericho. He was forced to watch the execution of his sons in Riblah, and his eyes were then put out.[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(587_BC)#:~:text=On%20Tisha%20B'Av%2C%20July,kingdom%2C%20were%20destroyed%20as%20well. What is Tisha B’Av? Tisha B’Av, the ninth day of the Jewish month of Av, is recognized as the saddest day on the Jewish calendar. It is a day of mourning for tragedies across Jewish history, most particularly the destruction and loss of the first and second Temple and Jerusalem nearly 2,000 years ago. https://www.hillel.org/what-is-tisha-bav/#:~:text=Tisha B'Av%2C the ninth,Jerusalem nearly 2%2C000 years ago. Tisha B'Av, a day of mourning in Judaism, is commemorated annually on the 9th of Av, which falls in July or August. While the day commemorates the destruction of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem, the actual siege and capture by the Babylonians that led to the First Temple's destruction occurred in the month of Av... The Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, which preceded the destruction of the First Temple, occurred in the month of Av, which is the Jewish month corresponding to July/August. What does Tisha B’Av commemorate? Tisha B’Av, the ninth day of the Hebrew month of Av (which falls in July or August), commemorates two catastrophic events: the destruction of the first and second temples. Both events occurred on or near 9 Av. The first temple was destroyed by the Neo-Babylonians in 586 BCE (see 2Kgs 25; Jer 52; 2Chr 36:11-21), and the second temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/tisha-bav/#:~:text=What does Tisha B'Av,biblical and later Jewish thought.

JEDIDIAH! --July 9, 2025; The Shortest Day in History & the Temple of SOLOMON Here is a recent video that reveals more Hidden History about the Biblical Solomon! Even though the scriptures have not changed, however, many of us African Americans have been deceived to accept the false sermons that what we have heard. We have been encouraged to NOT read the scriptures for ourselves. And although, months ago, I asked AI the question about Jesus' appearance, now it seems the answer has changed. Months ago, the response to my question about the ethnic (racial) identity of Jesus was that 'no one really knows' but now, the scriptures are now coming to light and this video shares this information too. But even more amazing would be the strange happenings these past few days. On the 4th of July, the American Independence Day holiday, there were terrible and unexpected floods that happened in Texas and Central North Carolina. For many years, I lived in North Durham and never experienced the floods reported! I drove up and down North Roxboro road and the Eno River Park and never would have imagined that kind of catastrophe. Wow. These storms in Durham were reported to be due to the tropical storm system. However, due to all of the other phenomena that have occurred in so many other parts of the world, such as the recent volcano eruptions, etc. I wondered if a celestial phenomenon had come close to earth. Well, it just so happens that an incredible 'interstellar comet star' was detected on July 1, 2025 and has shocked the scientific world! Although the star has been recorded to be way too far away from earth to cause, any harm, nonetheless, it has become Breaking News! This star would only be the third of its kind ever detected to enter our solar system. Because of the technology today, scientist are able to detect this star and track it as it moves through our solar system. So we are living during a time of great wonders. Even though the internet has not shared this astonishing fact about the shortest day on record, July 9, 2025, however, it just so happens that this too is an incredible date in ancient times. July 9 and 10, actually began the very day of the shocking downfall of Jerusalem and the Destruction of Solomon's Temple; the First Temple of Jerusalem: [1] And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. [2] And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. [3] And on the ninth day of the fourth month the famine prevailed in the city, and there was no bread for the people of the land. ... 2 KINGS 25: 1-3. [1] In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, came Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon and all his army against Jerusalem, and they beseiged it. [2] And in the eleventh year of Zedekiah, in the fourth month, the ninth day of the month, the city was broken up. [3] And all the princes of the king of Babylon came in, and sat in the middle gate, even Nergal-sharezer, Samgar-nebo, Sarsechim, Rab-saris, Nergal-sharezer, Rabmag, with all the residue of the princes of the king of Babylon. JEREMIAH 39: 1-3. Under Nebuchadnezzar, the Invasion of the Chaldeans occurred on this fateful day, and it was so devastating that for hundreds of years, it became a National Day of Remembrance for the Jews. Although the prophet Daniel had already been part of an earlier forced march out of Jerusalem years earlier, the king of Babylon did not invade Jerusalem completely at that time. It was about eleven years later, on July 9, 586 B.C. that the final invasion occurred, Many of the Jews were forced marched away from their lands into captivity during this time. And just as the prophet Jeremiah had prophesied, seventy (70) years later, many Jews migrated back down into their homelands during the Persian Empire domination in 516 B.C. But long before this day, July 9, the Biblical month of Az, Solomon had built of the lands and infrastructure of Jerusalem so much so, that it became an astonishment and like a Mecca whereby many people traveled to Jerusalem to see the great city and Temple of Jerusalem. So, it seems incredible that today, scientist are broadcasting this day, July 9, 2025, thousands of years later, to be the shortest day on record! How Interesting! So, not only does this news become so fascinating because it marks the destruction of the once awesome temple that was constructed by Solomon, but in recent times, it becomes interesting that the truth about Solomon's identity has also become revisited. Interestingly too, Solomon was born and named Jedidiah, and many people may not know this! [24] And David comforted Bath-sheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her: and she bare a son, and he called his name Solomon: and the LORD loved him. [25] And he sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet; and he called his name Jedidiah, because of the LORD. 2 SAMUEL 12:24-25.

It's a lot of information about the origins of 'race' in connection to 'gender'!!! I will try to explain some aspects of it. So, this topic is huge! So I need some time to explain what I researched. Perhaps, I will share in other threads too that must be considered as well. Even though the Bible provides the truth, however, because most people reject the Bible, and because science also confirms this, I will try and provide a scientific explanation. But for now, I will start and hopefully offer more proof in what I am saying. For now, I will start with the term 'Race' but this would not be the accurate and scientific term for us modern humans today. Again, the term 'Race' would be inaccurate but since today, this is the term used; loosely the belief that there was once, a White Race and a Black Race, has an origin. But in essence, it would never be 'a White Race' or 'a Black Race' for a major reason; all of the Human Modern Races have one single origin and from one Human individual; a Malefactor. This malefactor is the beginning of all Y-DNA Haplogroups and he was a Black skinned African male, the Bible names Adam. So technically, there is a Black Race, but but today not humans stem from that human race!!! Why because there were other humans on this earth long before this BLACK RACE and the proof is in GENETICS. Humans today reveal in our genes that we have intermixed with primitive humans that were on this earth long before the Black 'race' of humans. And there are other ways that scientist have proven this. Genetics prove that these primitive humans DID NOT express ANY BLACK GENES!!! So one could say, that they were the WHITE RACE but that would be completely false. However, due to the genetic proof that modern humans intermixed with these primitive humans, it has become a confusion. Nevertheless, the predominant presence of lighter skinned humans directly stems from these primitive humans. But a better term for 'the White Race' could be 'the Pale Race'!!! But again, this too would not be scientifically accurate because the term pale refers to more than one aspect of both dark skinned and light skinned humans today. Although the Bible breaks the genetics of skin color down in so many ways, one major way revolves around the prophecies about THE BAY & GRISLED HORSE. The genetics of other living things on this earth, not only the horse, but so many others, reveals the scientific truth about human skin color too But the scripture about the Bay and Grisled horse is detailed. In these scriptures, it becomes revealed that there is one single origin of all modern humans today and that would be a Black Gene origin that was only in the very first individual, the anatomically straight male, an African malefactor. And all modern males today stem from him, no matter if they are European, Hispanic, or African, etc. Prior to him, there were no males with that kind of genetics. However, there were males on this earth though, but they were existing in a mutated from. The primitive males could absolutely NOT produce any anatomically straight Y-DNA haplogroup. This too, is linked to the complete ABSENCE of the BLACK GENE that produces black skin. I've written about this so many times. The scientific term for the black gene is called EUMELANIN. This is the very NEW Creation of God that only begins with the presence of the anatomically straight Y-DNA haplogroups. But to say that the primitive males, were the White Race, would be completely false. You will not find the eumelanin gene in any primitive hominid however, prior to the Neanderthals, there were many dark skinned hominids. Although they have have looked very dark, they were not all black. Black begins with the haplogroups and also, genetically, the original males express the afro. That black gene is linked to african hair-type. So then, if you look at humans today and they do not express african hair, it is due to MUTATION. Because of intermixing with the primitive humans, and if the practice of sex selection occurs, within a few generations, this genetic trait will undergo a mutation and therefore, they would not be defined as 'an African human'. These kind of mutations that completely erases the reproduction of black skin and afro hair is due to the origin of THE PRIMITIVE MALE!!! The genetics of the primitive male is the other origin of why there is a confusion about the human race. So no, the term 'race' is not scientifically accurate, rather the term should be 'SPECIES'. The Neanderthalensis species were a primitive species and the eumelanin gene was completely absent in their genetics. Their genetics expressed 'pale genes' which was also a mutation. However, the Bible reveals that there is such an expression of 'white genes' but due to the mutated pale gene that humans express, this is a rare expression. And, also, the white gene stems from 'the black gene'!!! The genetics of the white gene is fascinating in how it can manifest. To understand this too, though, the Bible reveals it in the scriptures about the Bay and Grisled horses. In conclusion, for now, the genetics of skin color is manifested in humanity because reproduction produces 'a blending' of gene in pigments and so, that is why the term 'race' is so ridiculous. A 'bay' color horse genetically can appear as a black horse, gray horse, white horse, red horse, etc. However, a bay horse is actually 'a Black horse' but has other gene pigments. They are identified in phenotype because they have 'black tips'. A true black horse is rare and for this reason, they cost a fortune. Some of them may appear lighter than black but, genetic test prove they have pure eumelanin. A bay horse that is very dark and can look black is actually 'a red horse'. A white or gray horse is actually a bay horse. If they are white, they mostly have that 'pale gene' and are extremely cancer prone. So then, the Biblical break down on 'the Pale horse' is referencing the primitive being that was mutated ... that is why some prophets wrote about the bay horse and then another wrote that it was a pale horse. All horses are a product of the one 'black horse'!!! -- even the white horse... So therefore, even today, there is not 'one human race' as this term is not scientifically accurate. And there is no 'one human species' either. When two different species can reproduce, something will go wrong!!! The definition of 'species' is scientific and one aspect may revolve around the type or even specific number of chromosomes that species have unique to them. These species may be similar 'family' and genus but, due to chromosomes, they are different species. So then, if a lion reproduces with a tiger, they can have offspring but there will be a significant problem. However, that is NOT the point for this explanation that needs to be exposed. What needs to be exposed here is that, for example, for a liger or a tigon to be born, and then reproduce again and again for generations, therefore, both the original lion and the original tiger must still be present and reproducing to a significant percentage. In other words, for a tigon, then a titigon and so forth to continue to be born and express, tiger genetics, after a while, that kind of birth will become extinct, UNLESS that is, another male tiger ever so often is reproducing with that kind of offspring. This is where the topic of 'recessive traits' needs to be further explained. So therefore, for modern day scholars to say that humans today express that 'pale gene', a recessive trait, but on the other hand the human that is the source of that very 'pale gene' is extinct would be a complete lie. Nevertheless, the other 'linked traits' to the origin of the carrier of that gene would also be transferred and this genetic patter can also be seen. Ultimately too, the origin of these kinds of reproductions BEGIN with the MALE being, whether, the lion, the tiger, ... or the human! So if an animal expresses the dominant presence of lion, even if they are intermixed with two species, the male determines the SPECIES of the animal. So if a male lion mates with a female tiger, that offspring, the liger would be a lion species. But there is so much more about this transfer of genes within two different species... It is the absence or presence of the MALE SEX ORGANS or lack thereof that determines if the offspring would be either a lion or tiger but here is where the shock comes in... this too determines whether the offspring will be either a male or female too. The presence or absence of male reproductive organs reveals the presence of a modern human or a primitive human and this is connected to the genetics of how a particular species genes are transferred through reproduction. So what becomes evident then is that GENDER is linked to SPECIES -- or it could be loosely understood that 'RACE origins can be in connection to GENDER'. So, in terms of the origin of the first anatomical male and the modern humans today, the term can be a confusion but with a better understanding of human origins, it would not be a huge a deterrent. If sex selection is deliberately practiced, then over a few generations, recessive traits would be expressed and so, due to mutation, that kind of human would not be 'an African' at all!!! No matter what, that kind of human would not be able to reproduce another gender nor the afro hair type at all. period. Now, I can say this another way, but for now, think about what I have just written and see if you understand what I have just said! One of many references I will provide, of course would be 'the International Genome Project' headed up by Stanford University.

Yes. There's a lot of blaming going around. Some are blaming Black people, if you can believe that! I believe that God may be hardening the heart of pharaoh, so-to-speak. However, I do want to send out my prayers and sympathy for the awful deaths of the little ones and for their love ones hurting right now. May the little ones' souls RIP and go back to God. But yeah, some of these people are blaming the Black people and saying that if the money did not go to DEI, then lives would not have been lost. So now, some people are defining this homosexual community as meaning the Black Communities. OMG. So now, it's the MAGA group vs the DEI group? This one video, a young White woman said that the camp was an exclusive camp for wealthy people. She said it's strange that the other two camps nearby had kids and no one died. Then a Black woman said that one camp was a lot of Black kids and none of them died. But, here's the intrigue; This flood happened on July 4!!! Okay so here we go; President Trump was supposedly to have signed his Big Beautiful Bill Act on July 4!? So now, I heard that this bill will mostly affect Immigration Law, and African American children!? What!? This MAGA regime is going to take food out of the mouths of little Black children!? I heard that Medicaid is part of the deal and will be cut and that mothers will have to work and put in 80 hours per month. Who is going to keep the kids then? So much for Reparations! Let's sacrifice the Black Americans again, after we've done rolled over them to make America. Jesus Christ. So now, AFrican Americans are aligned with immigrants as being the reason for the financial deficit of America? This is insane. So therefore, on July 4, their Independence Day, this flood comes in and on this same day, a bill is signed to sacrifice little Black children? And on this same day, there is an incredible freak flood and today, after 7 days, there's still about 160 humans missing!? WOW. Don't sound like mother nature to me, but it's sounds like a move of God. Not only that but, North Carolina was hit too, and this storm is still ongoing and New Mexico was hit just recently. And let's not forget what has happened in Iran and Israel too. Something is up!

It's a lot of information about the origins of 'race' in connection to 'gender'!!! I will try to explain some aspects of it. To say that 'Race' is a social construct does not address the issue in that, it is based on 'skin color' and then not to realize that it means too, that 'SKIN COLOR' is indeed based on 'genetics' sounds like confusion. Skin Color is definitely genetic based!!! Skin color stems directly from GENES!!! Therefore 'race' defined as a social construct is definitely genetic-based, however, skin color would be only one genetic factor out of many other genes in how humans exist and this is the problem. The modern governments were somehow able to use skin color to organize social groups and then define them as being superior or inferior based on this one genetic aspect that all humans possess. But just as @Pioneer1 said in an earlier post, the term 'race' is used today, but in ancient times there were other terms used to define humans for similar topics. So it is wrong for governments to use one genetic aspect of humans to organize social groups and maybe that is the confusion. Even though 'color' is a definite aspect of how humans are defined, however, it would only be ONE genetic aspect and without other genetic characteristics, it cannot be a primary determinant. The physical world has the same determinants in how rocks are defined too. In order to determine a unique rock, there are a specific number of characteristics that must be considered and COLOR is one vital aspect. So then, the hardness of a rock, if it streaks, has luster, the color, etc. reveals what kind of rock it is. So there are many different kinds of rocks and all rocks have ONE basic definition that makes them be 'rocks', however, there are different rocks. Rocks can be made up of different minerals. So, color is a vital aspect of how a particular rock is classified, but without the other characteristics, color means nothing. And there here is another issue; If a powerful government or society deliberately oppressed people for a long period of time who expressed a certain skin color or some other trait by not allowing them to become educated and depriving them of basic human needs, then won't that cause behavioral problems that could be mis-construed as them being 'born' more inferior to lighter skinned humans? That kind of conditioning to also be defined as 'truth' whether or not, people are born that way or not. So, if for thousands of years, Black African people are born into a world where they are already thought of as being inferior and then denied basic human rights, then they could be defined as being two-thirds human. You can hate the 'racial' category or not, but if that is true, then how can we ignore it and have a better existence? If your own nurturer believes that too, and treats her own offspring as being ugly compared to her lighter skinned children, then should this be ignored? My husband would always come home and tell me how the Black women, both young and old, on his job(s) would talk about their kids based on Colorism and it would get on his nerves. He said, an old Black woman told the manager in light conversation, [paraphrasing] 'She had three brothers and she told her Momma, you can keep that one with the bad hair. I don't want that one. I'll babysit the light skinned one though, with the good hair.' LOL. This woman was not all that light skinned herself but she would say things like that all of the time within ear shot of other Black workers too. And most of the workers were AFrican American males. LOL. Get this; what kind of hair do you think she had!? LOL. I hear this all of the time, but it does not bother me. It's so common. However, it always upset my husband. His own mother said stuff like that too. etc. At any rate, I believe that if we don't get at the origin of how this issue with 'race' and 'skin color' being used to form social constructs came about and exploited, then humanity will never have peace. So that is why I believe it is important to know about the link between 'skin color' and 'gender'. I hope to try and explain the scientific and genetics aspect of this soon.

It's a lot of information about the origins of 'race' in connection to 'gender'!!! I will try to explain some aspects of it. That is so false. The term 'race' stems from the basis of 'genetics' before it could ever become defined as a social construct. Race is based on genetics. The genetics of White America and Black America is gene based, and this modern government has exploited certain genetics to their benefit and out of this certain social constructs have occurred. Oh WOW. Thank you.

Yes. Absolutely. They migrated during the AD 1300s after the Bubonic Plague which broke out in the AD 1330s. The Black Death Plague or Bubonic Plague started in faraway China and made its' way all over the Eurasian continent. The Azteca fled Europe, I think Portugal, during this time period. Historians say one million of them fled Europe and came to the Americas. Although the AI has now erased that information, there are still MANY published books that record their origins as about a million of them fled Europe due to the Bubonic Plague. The fact that modern source writers cannot ignore proof that they did not organize until AD 1325, or AD 1345 which is obviously after the breakout of the Black Death Plgue reveals this hidden truth of their origins. Some European sources say they came from Southwest America, or California, or that Aztlan was in Wisconsin, etc. but try to hide the truth. When the Aztec people migrated down into South America and Mexico, they did so, because they were violently rejected by the other American Indians that they attempted to settle amongst. They were also violently rejected in Mexico too. Why!? Because they were foreigners and the indigenous peoples had a problem with them just about everywhere they tried to settle.

The Last Egyptian Slave Seaport, Suakim & Israelites on the Slave Ships-Deuteronomy 28:68. Suakin [i.e. Suakim] Suakin/Suakim The prophets wrote about the setup and the downfall of both, the First Roman Empire and the Second Roman Empire. However, one major mark of the Second Roman Empire would be the slave ship trade of which Moses prophesied would happen in the BOOK of DEUTERONOMY 28:68. Furthermore, Moses was not the only prophet to write about the First Coming and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ of which both coincides with the setup and downfall of both Roman Empires. Some of the Biblical prophets highlighted different aspects of the future of which, amazingly, some of the prophesies have now, come to past. Today, some ancient prophecies, astonishingly have become history! Crazy! Would anyone deny that there was a time in our history of a time whereby there was a significant movement of Slave Ship Trade and human cargo became a major part of the cargo? Would anyone deny that human slaves in our modern time became a major aspect of how certain world governments were able to form? The question though, in regards to the prophecy of Moses, would be just where did these slaves ships sail out of Egypt and end up? What was the major destination? Did the Second Roman Empire reset up in Rome, Italy? The answer to this last question lies in Biblical prophecy too, especially as written by the prophet Daniel and the prophet John-the-Revelator. https://youtu.be/LI9-LWcXkLw Although today, Port Suakin is defined as being in Sudan, however, in ancient times, that region was Egypt. It was the last slave port in Egypt. It was a very ancient seaport, however, large slave ships did not dock there because of the shallow water. After the end of the Civil War in America, soon after, the Suez Canal was constructed and eventually, this ancient seaport was deserted. A new seaport was founded to the north of ancient Suakin [i.e. Sawakin] named Port Sudan. Prior to the Transatlantic slave port, there were other major seaport to the south of Suakim in the land of present day Eritrea and further south at a time the Ottoman Turkish government dominated sea trade. By the time that the Pashas formed in Egypt however, the ancient ports in the south in the region of the Sulu sea had ended. Therefore, Suakim became the last major seaport in the southern parts of Egypt during a time when steamships were invented. This then would seem to be the very prophecy written by Moses some 4000 years ago that came to pass. The prophet Daniel describe a major superpower government that would form long after the downfall of the First Roman Empire. John described this great government in one vision to have Seven Heads and Ten Horns. Out of this government would form another government, the eighth government. So therefore, after the downfall of the First Roman Empire, both Daniel and John wrote that the Second Coming of Jesus Christ would not happen until after this Second Roman Empire would be brought to an end. Some Bible scholars believe that there will be a long time period after the downfall of the Second Roman Empire as the Tribulation Period. Most people today have a good understanding about the downfall of the First Roman Empire because of the many secular historical records that agree with the Bible prophecy and other major ancient civilizations that existed at the time of the Roman Empire. However, the prophecy about the Second Roman Empire has been almost completely omitted in Bible teachings here in America. Because the Bible prophets do not pinpoint the actual name of the future governments they prophesied about that would form after the downfall of the First Roman Empire, therefore, many different interpretations about this prophecy has occurred. Some scriptures define this future world government as being like ancient Egypt and ancient Babylon. Nevertheless, one key factor would be that one of the most important time markers for this prophecy revolves around the Slave Ship Voyages and the human captives that were forced onto these slave ships. Another time marker would be when the Creator spoke to Abraham defined the ancient Romans by their origins as as being Amorites: [13] And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; [14] And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. [15] And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age. [16] But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. GENESIS 15:13-16. So whether this future government was describe as being like ancient Egypt or Babylon, however it would be the presence of certain Amorite people that would always infiltrate foreign governments and then become elevated to become the head. It would be a certain kind of Amorite people that would infiltrate and then form a movement and present strange ideas and practices that would be adverse to the government of the Creator and lead to great human sacrifice. The prophets write that the Amorites, along with a people called Gog and Magog would deceive 'the four corners of the world'. This would be simply be another way of saying that, the Amorites, Gog and Magog, would deceive 'the whole world'. One practice that the prophets write of the Great Adversary and his government being in opposition to the Creator would be that he formed his government on the basis of idolatry, however, there are more. In the last Book of the Bible, the prophet John reveals one major practice that was an hidden agenda in ancient times: [1] And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. [2] And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. ...[3] For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, ... [11] And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: [12] The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and slaves, and souls of men. REVELATION 18: 1-3, 11, 12. And so, another way of saying '[buyeth]Souls of men' would simply mean '[buyeth] boys for homosexualism'. Sexual rape and forced homosexulism on young little children born with gender specific and biological genetics would be the kind of human sacrifice that was the foundation of the formation of the Roman Empire. Child Slavery would be the back bone of how the Roman Empire was able to form and transfer strange and adverse ideas into unsuspected kingdoms. This too would be the beginning of Magog. His soul was stolen from him in the cradle. When a child becomes a victim of a sexual predator and then allowed to grow into adulthood and nurtured by the enemy, therefore, his justification would be that he was abandoned and a victim too. When a government allows a child predator to be rewarded, then the child victim could become that same kind of predator. Would you allow that type of man or woman to keep company with your little child? That would be the fate of the Babylonian Hor. That would be the fate of Magog. His soul was robbed in the cradle. The Roman empire was able to form due to child slavery and the transfer of strange ideas through the exploitation of innocent souls that became agents and used to infiltrate many other peoples. For this reason, the Creator will judge the government of the Great Adversary: [10] He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: e that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. REVELATION 13:10.