Pioneer1

ProfD Coco is a young adult having fun in her profession and taking it to the bank. I do not believe she's self-hating or insecure in her own beauty. She's living her best life. Have you noticed that for the past 10 years or so, what many young Black women call "fun" and looking their "best" involves dying their hair blonde? Going to bars, getting drunk, flirting with White men...even if they don't really find them attractive...and dying their hair blonde. Even when they're trying to be professional and serious, they think "blonde" hair is the way to go: Basically imitating...or TRYING to imitate...middle class White women. The Honorable Elijah Muhammad said: Accept your own and be yourself That has a lot of meanings, however one of them is be the best version of YOU. Don't try to improve yourself by trying to be someone else. When we did that as AfroAmericans back in the late 60s and 70s...we were the envy of the world. White people were getting perms and afros nappying their hair up trying to look like US.

ProfD Regardless (richardmurray said "gardless"....lol) of that, the fact is most Persians consider themselves "Aryan" (Iran) by race and tend to be quite racist. They'll side with the U.S. and Israel before siding with any Black nation...lol.

I think this is a trick question.....lol

Really.......... Was this during your "salad making days"???

Coco Gauff jokes about her new look: 'There's another redhead who's killing it here' Coco Gauff Leaves Nothing to Chance: Even Her Hair Color Nods to Success Since the start of the season, Coco Gauff has changed her look by opting for a new hairstyle and a reddish tint. A detail that sparked a rather surprising question in a press conference, when a journalist asked her what it felt like to "join the group" of redheaded players, alluding to Jannik Sinner. "There's another redhead who's doing very well here" The world No. 3, always ready to respond with a touch of humor and sincerity, hopes this new tint will bring her success: "I thought it might help, considering there's another redhead who's doing very well. Maybe it'll bring me luck, because he has a very good record here, unlike me. We'll see." Coco Gauff jokes about her new look: 'There's another redhead who's killing it here' Now our sista is putting red dye in her hair and trying to impress "somebody" and claiming she hope it brings her more luck. Man, man, man................. She didn't think she was beautiful enough as she was?

Even if you're just playing games, there are certain rules to them...lol.

richardmurray It is simple, smart or dumb can't be applied to groups of people. You accept the idea that a group can be labeled smart or dumb. I do not. What about MENSA, the globally recognized group for people with extremely high IQ's? What about certain special education classes for those with intellectual disabilities? These are GROUPS where people are popularly recognized as smart or dumb (dumb being a derogatory term for low intelligence), respectively. If you want to focus strictly on nations...we can do that....but you said "groups". Individually , humans can be ignorant, lacking knowledge, lacking erudition, the ability to derive knowledge, lacking wisdom, intrinsic perceptions of life that can only be gained through experience or an individuals natural ability. Groups simply succeed or fail in objectives. When I speak of "dumb"....I'm not necessarily speaking of ignorance. Although most dumb people tend to BE ignorant. When I say dumb....I'm speaking of those with low intelligence. Intelligence below average. But to be clear....YOU introduced the term "dumb" into the conversation when discussing nations. I don't believe there are any dumb nations. I believe some nations are SMARTER than others....collectively...but none of them are dumb because they are the average of the entire population. And the average population isn't dumb in any nation. The usa military is what gives the usa the edge and the usa military is ahead of all other militaries when it comes to weapons and weapons systems or security systems. Why is this? Why is the U.S.A. military so powerful and effective? The question is this, why are you sure/certain that if the firms I said go bankrupt when warranted and have all their assets placed into market or made open source as need be would lead to the inability of the services from their assets or technology to maintain an interaction with the populace of the usa absent a large delay? Are you suggesting the federal government and state governments would take too long for bankruptcy? or botch bankruptcies in some way? I'm not sure HOW to answer these questions....lol. They seem a little too complex. Are you suggesting private hospitals shouldn't exist? No. They should. However public hospitals in my opinion should predominate. I find it interesting that many black people like yourself talk about black people being financially efficient in their activity as owners or consumers while talking about white people, who own all the companies i mentioned, failing to be financial efficient as owners or consumers and yet having no penalty. So you suggesting a financial double standard of bad financial actors based on phenotype? you have to say yes. Sometimes the GOOD or SERVICE being offered is so necessary that who the company is ran or the fiscal responsibility of it's owners is of much less importance and making sure the company stays afloat is. In the last five years, in NYC, I can recall at least five hospital completely closed. No government takeover, completely closed. The city didn't fall under. PEople complained but it was completely warranted. Probably because there were so many more hospitals to cover their loss. You are a fiscal capitalist, Actually, I prefer a mixed economy of balanced Capitalism and Socialism. yes complete classlessness is impossible among humans who give themselves names. BUT, the governments that call themselves socialists have never actually tried. Do you comprehend the point. the point isn't about reaching socialism, it is about the claim of socialist countries failure. The countries you mentioned aren't socialist. they are fiscal capitalist. Again, communism is no way near socialism. communalism is really fiscal capitalsim with the faintest touch of socialism. So how do you know Socialism works for a nation if you can't point to a nation that is successfully practicing it? I think a solution exists that I have never seen tried, so it can't be proven. But, I don't think so. You're this theory a "solution" but we haven't determined that having currency is actually a PROBLEM! I personally feel that it IS a solution in and of itself in many cases to a rather limited bartering and trading system in a society as complex as ours.

Chev It looked genuine to me. Remember, most White folks turn red when they get into heated arguments. Neither one of those two did....lol. That alone makes me suspicious about how sincere they were even if neither one knew eachother. Also, why wasn't that ICE agent wearing a mask like the others? But then, we can't ignore the truth either. Many non-Black people have sacrificed their lives for a 'Black cause' and of whom were not the perpetrators. Yes. And for that, we should be grateful. I appreciate the ~JOHN BROWNS~ of America. I did recognize that fellow was Somali. The mayor in Minneapolis said that although President Trump is going after the Somalis, however, he said mostly 90% of them are all here legally. Trump also said that Somalis were "trash" and made it clear he didn't want them in the country. He didn't distinguish the legal ones from the illegal ones...lol. That tells me that their legal status really doesn't make a difference. I listened to a little of the video that you posted yesterday and plan to listen to all of it later, but when I heard one man say that AFrican Americans have a heritage here in America because we've been here for 400 years, I tell you that caused me to be emotional. Most AFrican Americans are probably 50% American Indian, if not more, therefore, we've been here a lot longer than 400 years--try thousands of years. The problem is people are making this an EITHER/OR argument instead of realizing that both camps are right in proper context. -There WERE Black people here for thousands of years before the Europeans came -Many AfroAmericans today have Native American ancestry (but Native Americans are a different race) -Most of our ancestors came to the Americas 500 years ago from Africa to be slaves All three of these are facts. ProfD Millions of dollars has a different type of healing power.🤣 People grieve differently but time seems to heal all wounds,😎 When I was younger....meaning a kid...I often wondered were people who asked for millions of dollars in law suits really trying to finesse and get a bag? But as I've gotten older, I've realized that there are some things that money can't buy. Like Mo Greene said in The Godfather that he'd give a million dollars just to take a piss without it hurting. That's an unforgettable line. Would any amount of money be able to fill the emptiness of an adolescent who's loving and caring mother or father were suddenly taken away in such a violent and public way? Seeing on social media that their own mother was killed, had to be surreal. Ofcourse they'd rather have the money than not have it. It helps. But I wonder if we were to find them at around 40 or 50 years of age after some life experience and maturity... Would they rather have $20 million, or have their mother back and healthy? ....then again you have some children as crazy as Gator from Jungle Fever, who'd kill their own parents over a damn piggy bank.

frankster Yes.... Doctrine is about what to believe or how to think......in a given situation Policy is about what actions are permissible to take....in a given situation True. But while this is Policy vs Doctrine...I'm talking Policy vs LAW! Laws are even stronger that policies! Policies are basically rules of operation that can be broken at whim based on judgement and scenario. Laws aren't meant to be broken unless absolutely necessary and often come with a LEGAL penalty for doing so. This is why policies usually are made by businesses where laws are made by governments. Congressional Authority to declare war is a CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. What it usually mean is there is not enough evidence to prosecute....hence it does not rise to the level of beyond a reasonable doubt as to its criminality or unconstitutionality. That... And sometimes it's about CONSPIRACY. Secret agreements on BOTH sides of the aisle are made to allow a President to carry out a particularly illegal act with the promise that he won't be called into account for it by either party. One of the reasons you have PROSECUTORS in the U.S. criminal justice system is so they can PICK AND CHOOSE who to go after for breaking the law. Politics is a dirty unfair game.... Some are allowed to flaunt the rules.....while others are penalize for it. While this is known and understood by many, too many don't realize this and remain confused and...to quote you "befuddled"...lol....at why certain politicians are constantly allowed to get away with their crimes with seeming impunity. God is Law.... I'm not going there with you, lol. Free Will is also a BirthRight Give to Man To a certain degree, yes. To die usually you must first have Lived. Can the Will of Man be Imprisoned? If HE is imprisoned, then ASPECTS of his will is imprisoned because what he can will physically is extremely limited. Also, I'm not sure how extensive the Zombification process is on the psyche of it's victims. Yes...that is true. Isn't there a division of responsible and limits on how much the Federal Government can interfere in the internal affairs of a State on certain issues? Yes, ofcourse. But when it comes to Federal Laws that are already established....there is no compromise. It's like Pops telling you to be in the house by 10pm at night. You can go where you WANT to go....before 10pm...lol. You can go to the dance. You can go to the party. You can go to the mall. You can stay home. You can play some basket ball down in the Rec Center. Might even take a trip to the TRAP HOUSE if he don't now about it....lol. Go where you wanna go. But regardless....yo' ass better be in by 10pm at night!

richardmurray From the photos i have seen every winner of the Miss Black America pageant has been a black woman of medium to dark brown skin. Now I haven't seen photos of every winner. I haven't seen photos of every contestant. But the direction you have taken this post about uplifting a black owned beauty pageant has many questions, you didn't provide answers for when you shifted directions. Because there were no questions that begged to BE answered, lol. I just dropped a casual observation. Again, as I said....it wasn't meant TO take this thread into another direction. Your response actually did that....lol. 1. How do you define actual Black ? My PERSONAL definition of "Black" is people of sub-Saharan African descent who are either unmixed or if they are mixed-race SHOW very little of that admixture in their phenotype. Moreover why should the operators of Miss Black America adhere to such a definition? They don't HAVE to obviously, however in my opinion organizations and contests like this should be used to UPLIFT Black women and improve their self esteem and especially the self esteem of Black girls growing up in this society. How can this be done if an organization/contest routinely uplifts and promotes females who don't look like them as role models they should aspire to? For example, if a woman with with two parents from india born in NYC with skin asians will call very dark, which is equivalent to what people in the USA call black, which is common among many Indian people, wants to run for Miss Black America, does she fit what you mean by Black? No. Race is phenotypical...but is more than JUST skin color. From a phenotypical perspective, said example woman is Black. I personally don't consider East Indians Black in modern racial terms. Infact, most of them don't even consider themselves Black either...no matter how dark they are. Now Dravidians (dark skinned Indians) USED TO be considered what we'd today call "Black", in the ancient world. They were called East Ethiopians. Africans were called West Ethiopians. The only phenotypical difference recognized between the two being the hair texture. But today, they are not considered Black. 2. How do you define not-black or mixed? Those are 2 different terms that require 2 different PERSONAL definitions: 1. Not-Black is anybody who descends from races that are not sub-Saharan African as well as those who are mixed race with some sub-Saharan African ancestry but very few characteristics of this ancestry show in their phenotype. 2. Mixed is anybody from a multi-racial background who shows phenotypical characteristics of those races in fairly "even" proportion. For example, this is Fredi Washington. Who played the Peola character in the earliest film version of "immitation of life". She called herself black. She rejected hollywoods desire to have her lie about her background and claim she is white. And lived most of her life as a maid/nurse in Harlem. She definitely looked mixed. I call people like her yella. She is definitely more yella than Beyonce or Hally Berry or Dorothy Dandridge. And arguably even more yella than Hailee Steinfeld which says a lot. But she is black to me. From your definition she is mixed, so she couldn't apply for Miss Black America, correct? Correct. Infact, going by her phenotypical characteristics....I wouldn't even call her "mixed". I'd call her Caucasian/White...lol. 3. Are you suggesting each candidate must be a citizen of the USA? ???? Well, if it's for Miss Black America or Miss Black U.S.A...one would presume that would be a given....lol. How can someone who is NOT an American even enter let alone "win" a contest designed FOR Americans????? I didn't read the rules of entry so I don't know how citizenship fits in Miss Black America. But a Black woman from Africa is Black so if she lives in the USA, why can't she run? Because if she's not a citizen, she's not America....lol. So how can a person not FROM here properly represent the beauty of those native here? This is almost common sense. If we're having a contest for the best tasting Chinese food.....would you bring tasty TACOS to the contest? They may taste good. They may be food. But they aren't CHINESE food. Being CHINESE is an essential qualification for a contest ABOUT Chinese food...lol. You didn't mention Hailee Steinfield. But, the issues you mention here are not about the participants but the organizers of events. The organizers of events aren't being self haters, the organizers of events are doing what you did in your reply, not be concise or specific in definitions. Expecting everyone else to somehow know what they are thinking or how they define. That isn't functional. If you wanted to block out certain black women... or any women, all you have to do is make the rules clear. But if the rules don't block out certain women from running then why shouldn't they run. Excellent point. But this....in my opinion...expresses how short sighted the organizers of the event would be to fail to establish these qualifications. It's like having an athletic event for women without first defining WHO a woman actually is. For some people....most people....who a woman is is a given. It's common sense. But for others....especially those with nefarious motives....they'll try to twist the definition of it or take advantage of their NOT being a definition to push their own subversive agendas. It's the same with these beauty contests. If we don't clearly define WHO is Black, then soon you'll have White contestants being presented as "Black" and winning them to promote the idea that White skin, light hair, and light eyes are the most beautiful traits to be found among "Black" people. I call it the "Beyonce Effect" Where people who aren't Black are promoted as the "ideal Black". When you organize an event it is up to you to be clear, concise on definitions, not the people entering. I agree 100% Pioneer1 chose to segway from talking about miss black america, for which he had nothing to add, into talking about we are too concerned with arguments online. Perhaps you are confusing healthy DISCOURSE with DISCORD.

They should have started 30 or 40 years ago by vehently going after everybody....including other Black people...who were openly promoting what once were whispered rumors of his womanizing and cheating on Coretta. Now to be honest, I don't know whether they are true or not. Most people seem to believe they are. Funny how they didn't come up while he was alive. However regardless.....most of the information on them comes directly from racist organizations that were clearly against him and everything he stood for so why should THEY even be believed? As soon as people started talking about his extra-marital affairs in public....there should have been a "drop squad" that pulled up on them, took them to the side and asked them what would it profit our community by exposing the indiscretions of such a great and influential leader or repeating these accusations that come from the enemies of our people about him? " We heard you been talking shit about Martin Luther The King. He's not around to defend himself. You know it's not good to speak ill of the dead, nigga! How would you like it if people started roasting YOU at your funeral, next week?"

ProfD But the Orangeman said that killing has stopped. Shows over. Call off the dogs. ....yeah right, lol. It's to the point now that you can't trust what anybody says when it comes to Middle East politics. For all we know that head of Iran might BE America and Israel's guy....but just pretending that he's not.

🤣 ....where DO you come up with these analogies???

richardmurray first thank you for stating where you think he went wrong. of the three comments your the only one which means 33% I ponder how many black people are unwilling to question the likes of mlk jr in 2026 ? I have no way of getting a statistic but by this simple post the potential is frightening. I know I haven't spoken on your judgment but it's funny in this community we can bicker with each other so easily and then some of us in here can't speak a judgement against dead leaders. It is a revealing balance. Lol.... Now you said you loved MLK jr so your critiques are not condemnations. Just assessments all should have in the future to any past. Exactly. And thank you for understanding this. I know very few human beings who are so far "above" even a philosophical critique. So MLK jr didn't have a reference growing up of empowered separation. The only reference he had was integration in various forms. From atlanta, to morehouse, to the greater georgia integration was the system about him. Could he had focused on empowered separation ? 100% yes. Would it been a bad choice? no idea, but it could had succeeded. Was an example around to compel him? no. He needed a successful example. MLK jr like most leaders is thoughtful. The reason something isn't present isn't because it can't work but because it will take more time or more effort to do. True, but he was a very smart man with powerful observation skills. Growing up in the South among very angry, hostile, and violent White people....it seems he should have known how possible or impossible it would be for Black people to get along with these people. The usa government has a very big problem in terms of federal application, in equal access and opportunity. The power of states rights. It is the year 2026 and Schrumpt is the first president after circa two hundred and fifty years to try and actually impose the federal government on the states with the resources to actually do something. Not merely cause of federal power but states in the usa are lower than they are ever been, all are welfare recipients. the original idea was states would never need the federal government. Andrew jackson, Abraham Lincoln, even FDR for all of their fervor, didn't have the means to actually make a federal imposition on the states like Schrumpft today. What does this mean? states got away with a lot of federal crimes within themselves, because the constitution clearly gives states freedom to be themselves and forces citizens to take a state to court for changes. I'm not sure if the Constitution gives states the freedom to "be themselves". Federal law still always "trumps" (no pun intended) states' laws. Federal law supersedes state law like state law supersedes local law. So what your suggesting was doable by him, but he would had to stop being a preacher to do that. Because nonviolence in the usa means taking whomever your suing to the supreme court,a very lengthy process , one that is not guaranteed to get to the surpreme court, and one most importantly, that doesn't necessarily stop the person/entity being sued from continuing their actions. While the said black man in mississippi is suing, white people are harassing or worse constantly. Your top down is doable, but It isn't impossible. The NAACP was full of lawyers for that reason; their strategy was take every federal crime at the state levels to the supreme court. But so many crimes at the state level occurred. The volume was i argue insurmountable. I understand what you're saying, and you're right; but sometimes it's like playing the one-armed-bandit enough time to hit the jackpot. If you take enough cases to court, one of them will "hit" and get the attention of the SCOTUS or a Federal Judge who will then ENFORCE the Federal laws against the offending state and protect citizens from being disenfranchised. This is what happened with the School Desegregation situation in Arkansas. Enough pressure was put on the Federal government to do their job and FORCE the states to obey the law. MLK jr didn't spend enough time on the heritage/what is carried + culture/what is grown of DOSers. He clearly comprehended the importance, ala his plea to Nichelle Nichols. As an aside , I ponder your thoughts on the larger black church? from circa 1865 to 1965 arguably, the black churches in the usa, all denominations combined, are the center of black life. What hindered the churches from focusing on heritage+ culture? Because there was no threat to AfroAmerican culture to justify them doing so. There were very few immigrants in the United States at that time. No other cultures to compete with ours and garner more attention. The ONLY cultures were basically the 2 sub-cultures of White America and Black America. So there was no need for Black people to "delineate" themselves and distinguish ourselves from other ethnic groups that would compete with us and our issues as there are today. Your second part slightly answers the last segment of the first. I argue that MLK jr and others , many others, wanted the culturee of the black descended of enslaved populace to be as shepards to a better usa for all peoples, this goes back to frederick douglass and the 1800s black church. they knew the heritage was of a people who survived white terror but I think their culture was as a people who made the integrated future nonviolently. and thus by 2026 would become the heritage. Which arguably it has. IF you look at media, most non blacks in the usa view black people as the integrators in the usa. More than anyone else. You're right. While many non-Blacks OUTSIDE of the United States don't even recognize Black Americans AS American....most of the non-Black IN the United States after staying here a while begin to realize WE ARE America...in terms of culture and social interactions. They know we are the innovators and trend setters and are America's true moral compass. just from a labeling perspective, this goes back to my issue with people using the term communism. I said it already, but communism is a form of fiscal capitalism. Communism isn't a form of socialism because of one party of governance under a government plus a government having a larger role as a fiscal operator. Communism is merely fiscal capitalism with one party having overwhelming majority and the government taking 80% or more of the fiscal operation.' Exactly. This is something I've been observing for years, especially with the Communist nations of China and North Korea. They are ruled by Communist Parties but those parties actually operate the same as Capitalists AND Dictators by controlling the workers, not giving them a real say-so, and enjoying the fruits of the labor of the masses. In this respect, the Communism as practiced by China and North Korea is just ultra-Capitalism Instead of the 10% ruling or even the 1% ruling.....only the .005% party members rule and own everything in the nation. It is like I say with Troy race/class/rank/order/classification/species/clan all have the same basic definition. Some arrangement of things based on a factor. When black people or non blacks say, race doesn't exist? how? do humans being not look different? do human beings not have clan names? do human beings not call themselves by a religious label? race is ever present. Does this mean a consensus exist on race? no. Right! So next time me and Troy get into a fight over the existence of multiple races, I expect you to answer the call and pull up to the scene for some back-up....LOL

First of all, without getting into the conspiratorial talk about them.....there was and is too much confusion about both HIV and AIDS. Most people think they are synonymous when they are actually 2 separate conditions that often overlap. AIDS (Acquire Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is a multi-symptom illness which basically means your immune system no longer works effectively so you end up with a bunch of diseases you wouldn't ordinarily get if it were working properly. Any major long term illness can give you AIDS because it wears down on your immune system. Malnutrition can give you AIDS because you need nutrients for your immune system to work effectively. This is one of the reasons you hear about millions of Africans having AIDS but most of them not dying of it. Because they are being deceptive about what TYPE of "AIDS" they have. Much of the AIDS in Africa is caused by malnutrition and actually other long term diseases, not HIV. HIV (Human Immuno-deficiency Virus) is a virus. It's a virus that is meant to destroy the immune system and that's what it does when it's left unchecked. Not everyone with the HIV virus actually reaches the point where it destroys their immune system or causes AIDS in them. Like Covid and other virus disorders, sometimes the virus just goes away on it's own or stays relatively stable in the body. Magic Johnson my be HIV positive (not sure if he's even THAT now) but he doesn't have AIDS. Understanding nature of these two entities is key to our people properly treating them and protecting themselves from them.

ProfD Take a deep breath and walk with me here.😁 ....a walk around my island? "By all means.....come my friend. Let us....as they say....sharpen steel." Semantics aside, what is the difference between a *woman king* and a masculine gay dude? The 56,500 women on that island won't be looking at the gay dudes as "inspiration". They won't see them as role models who'd inspire them to acquire power and eventually overthrow my position as head of the island....like that "woman king" figure would, lol. Hopefully, you're not looking at it from the angle that *masculine gay dudes* won't be chasing after 56,500 women around.🤣 Why shouldn't I? If they were truly gay.....wouldn't this be one of the benefits? This is one of the reasons the old kings in the Middle East used to use EUNUCH to guard their harems instead of normal men. I did type that a woman king and her army would control the island. I was referring to them whatever form of security or protection you would expect from those masculine gay dudes. Look at her title "woman king". That means SHE would be "king" or have complete authoritarian rule over the army if not the entire island....not me. I'd just OWN it...but she'd be RULING over it essentially. That wouldn't work out. With the gay militia....lol....they'd just be a police or security force without a leader except ranking officers necessary to keep discipline.

ProfD AI is being created to do things humans are either too slow or incapable of doing efficiently and quickly. AI is designed to replace humans wherever feasible. I hear (read...lol) you. If this is the case...... Then just like you had human beings who's job it was to find ways to employ their population with good paying beneficial jobs...task AI to do it! Surely AI....as smart as it is...should be able to come up with ways to employ 10 or 15 million unemployed workers. Producing jobs cost money. That's not the way capitalism works. Sure production costs money....but the SELL of that product offsets the cost. The profits you get from it's sale not only covers the manufacturing of it but incentivizes you to produce more. That's also how capitalism works.....lol. That's where capitalism and free market comes into to play. Enterprising folks are allowed to make money first. The government makes rules and regulations to reign in capitalists and provides essential services for people who cannot afford it for one reason or another. The government has never really been in the business of creating industrial jobs. It leaves that up to capitalists within the free market system. It did during the Great Depression. FDRs New Deal produced MILLIONS of jobs that this nation is still benefiting off of today. But the jobs don't necessarily have to be industrial. As mentioned before they could be in the medical field, in defense, in education, in agriculture. There are literally BILLIONS of opportunities waiting to be taken advantage and AI could be used to come up with and manage them.

I wouldn't refer to it as a secret, but it certainly wasn't something people talked about much. When the subject of immigration came up...it almost always centered around Latinos and what Trump was going to do with THEM. However I already saw how Black immigrants had been treated in the past and how they're still being treated, so I wasn't going to assume anything but wait until the "get down" comes to see who they really went after.

Yes, and I'd especially like to know the DEMOGRAPHICS of those who actually left. I don't know about the rest of the country, but I haven't seen much of a drop in the Latino population in my locality. The same ones who were living down the street from me 2 years ago are STILL there.....with an extra 2 cars....lol.

If I were silly enough to accept some "woman king" with her own army....taking charge of my island, there would be no need for ME on that fucking island....lol. Speaking of "woman king". I didn't like how that movie was titled. It gave the impression that Black people had limited vocabulary. What's the difference between a "woman king" and a "queen"?

Without a doubt MANY do this! And I'm in no way trying to excuse or justify their behavior. Well.....I will justify it just a LITTLE BIT...because we haven't given them too much of an alternative....lol. Like Neely Fuller Jr. often said: "You constantly here Black people say, 'We need to get together' Get together for what? Unite to do what? What will me or any other Black person get out of just 'getting together'?" Many AfroAmericans are understandable upset and ever hurt that many Africans don't want to unite with or even be around AfroAmericans and talk down on our people without putting themselves in THEIR position and asking what would the benefit be of linking up with us? What can WE do for them? They came here to find financial success and escape violence or oppression, not form a Black liberation army....lol. So that's one side of it. Embracing the enemy is another side. I agree that going out of their way to side with open racists is intolerable and must be called out.

I believe prostitution is still pretty much illegal across the board, but I'm not sure what the laws are regarding porn for consenting adults. I'm not sure what the boundaries are but it would seem that anti-discrimination and anti-racism laws would cover the porn industry too. If a White man isn't allowed to grab a Black woman and call her a "Black slave bitch" at Home Depot or on the set of NBC.....why should he be allowed to do it in a porn flick?

I think MLK is one of the greatest leaders AfroAmericans and this nation period has produced. He was and is a brilliant and brave man. If I had to name 2 things where I thought he went wrong................. 1. He focused too much on integration instead of empowered separation. He should have fought for the laws to be changed at every level to make sure we had equal access and opportunity at every level in the United States and fight to make sure those laws were enforce. Outside of that, the focus should have been on progressing our ethnicity and culture as AfroAmericans. 2. Him and the rest of the Civil Rights leaders at that time should have focused more on fighting STRICTLY for the rights of FBA/AfroAmericans and not other minority groups. They should have been very specific about the Civil Rights bill making it for us alone. Not that other groups shouldn't have rights in this nation, but that they should have been the ones to fight for it themselves....not rely on us to do the fighting. The second one, it's really hard to blame on him because it's not something he could have really forseen. He was taken from us in 1968 and we didn't get a mass influx of immigrants into this nation until the 70s and later, so he didn't realize....as most of the Civil Rights leaders didn't....that so many of these non-White immigrants who BENEFITED from the Civil Rights struggle would actually come here and side with White Americans.

Not to take this thread in another direction but............ Since we're on the subject of Black women and beauty pageants, the issue of colorism should be addressed. We need to make sure the Black women who engage in and especially those who win these contests should actually be BLACK. Too often you have non-Black and mixed people who "back door" their way into these events and end up being hoisted over and on top of the actual Black participants. This is nothing but a product of self-hatred. Looking at a woman who is obviously not Black or looks like she's almost White...and calling HER "the most beautiful" woman in the community. One of my biggest problems with Beyonce wasn't Beyonce herself...but how she was often glorified as a symbol of "Black" female beauty. Whenever the subject of comparing female celebrities by race, Whites and Latinos would promote the women they thought were the most beautiful but when it came to Black people.....a lot of bruthaz would promote women like Beyonce or Halle Berry back in the day. Women who obviously weren't Black. A lot of pro-FBA podcasters are promoting lightskinned women as "ideal" models for who an FBA is or what an FBA looks like. They're pushing Beyonce and Angel Reese.

I thought we already HAD Black adult owned websites....lol. Ofcourse some Black women need them, especially if they're working in the adult industry. As long as it doesn't involved underaged or non-consenting adults.....I'm cool with it. My biggest concern isn't the content so much as the LAWS that those sites are subject to and how they may or may not be used against them. What do I mean? America is not a theocracy, but religion and so-called "morality" is often weaponized by racists to demonize Black people or their Black targets and take away public empathy for them. You saw this with the Puff Daddy case and how he was demonized in part because he liked to throw a lot of sex parties. Sex parties aren't in and of themselves illegal. But even if you aren't doing anything illegal, they'll often times use your sexuality to besmirch your image and make you look like a "bad guy" so when they DO come after you, you won't get a lot of public support because you are looked at as some sex crazed pervert who needed to be punished. In a lot of porn, Black women are mistreated and berated and even racially insulted. "How about we play slave and master? You're gonna take this white cock you black whore! I'm gonna have you calling me 'massa'. Say it...gal. Don't call me daddy, call me 'massa'!" But because it's porn and the public sentiment is "well she shouldn't be engaging in it anyway".....their complaints go unheard. Many just don't even bother to complain at all. Ghetto Gaggers is a good example of racist shit like that. All the more reason Black people should have their own adult-sites and outlets that comply with all laws.