Pioneer1

Who said anything about being "friends"??? I simply gave you an offer to end the friction and unnecessary hostility. Instead, you took that olive branch and WEAPONIZED it. But I'll move on, 'cuz it looks like you're busy trying to pick a fight with somebody else right now.....lol.

This is nothing new to me. It's just confirming what I already knew as well as waking OTHER Black men up to what's been going on for a while now.

I think yall may be taking this "tribes" business a little too far....lol. richardmurray but what is important is that many black people have thought like you from the founding of the usa That's because there's always been INTELLIGENT Black people, from the founding of the USA...lol. and many black people have thought like me in opposition to you and yours, since the usa was founded. Well, that's because there's also been Black people who were NOT so......well....never mind....lol. the black experience in the usa is one of being terorrized abused, whether legally or illegally by whites. Have YOU been personally? Are you being, now? So, how black people in the usa, view the law is essential to how we see the usa, non blacks, or ourselves. True. Because I see myself and other AfroAmericans as valuable CITIZENS of this nation with power....limited ofcourse...to change the conditions IN this nation for our betterment and empowerment. It takes unity, intelligence, and a DESIRE to do so; however it can definitely be done. That would be more effective and beneficial to us than sitting packed together somewhere in a hot ass room cussing and crying about how hopeless and helpless you are and how you "don't belong" in the country you were born and raised in, lol.

I didn't know Black Marxist were even still a thing....lol. I know quite a few Black people on line and in real life who bash Capitalism, but none of them actually call themselves Marxists or fully embrace the ideology.

ProfD Good that you understand my point! Which is one of the reasons I'm no longer religious nor do I ascribe to dogma and so-called "scriptures". If you read what Chevdove was saying about this "evil world" collapsing and a "new kingdom" being established......I was hearing and reading about that since I was a kid. It has yet to happen.

You declined because you like drama and the attention.

ProfD I don't know WHAT Cynique was talking about. You were posting messages a day or 2 before she made the thread. It wasn't like you were gone for a week or a month....lol. Dang...... Any playa is entitled to a break from playing every ONCE in a while.....lol. People got business to 'tend to. But like Troy, if you DO go for an extended period of time your presence would be truly missed around here. However we're used to Troy dipping out for weeks at a time and so it doesn't hit as hard....lol. Besides being one of the few people who agree with me from time to time......lol...your wit, intelligence, and insight is invaluable. Play on playa. ✊🏿

Despite the different pictures, both stories are about the same man. Some Russian dude who went down into Kenya and Ghana picking up women and spreading diseases.

I won't bother telling YOU what you need to do to be worthy of my approval. ....because I know it's a standard you're not capable of achieving anyway, lol.

NOW you're starting to learn 😉 It might have took you 90 years or so, but you're getting there. Keep it up.

richarmurray Laws can't stop an illegal act directly, but it can INDIRECTLY by: 1. Establishing law enforcement officers who CAN directly stop illegal activity 2. Discourage illegal activity through deterrence 3. Change the prevailing attitudes of the current and especially succeeding generations by equating that which is illegal to being ethically and eventually morally "bad" One of the reasons many of the laws around the world don't change things is because they aren't ENFORCED. Ofcourse slavery will continue in a culture where it's illegal only on paper but not ENFORCED. Ofcourse human trafficking will continue in a culture where it's illegal only on paper but not ENFORCED Laws can definitely change the prevailing attitude and even morals and norms of a society when adequately ENFORCED.

And if we ARE dealing with theories....and not established facts.....then why not? Especially if one theory has just as much evidence to support it as the others.

frankster All Contracts are Agreements.....with binding consequences. An Agreement is mutual.....usually between two or more parties - each having their Role - duties and responsibilities. Failure by any party to execute its obligation will result in incongruity. ...makes sense. S/He has broken the Contractual agreement and is now suffering the consequence.....inability to distinguish between realities and behave appropriately. Hmmm..... I wouldn't say this is always the case with people who are schizophrenic. That's suggesting that they are suffering as punishment for some sort of sin or offense. For this to be the case, we'd need to know: 1. What exactly was the offense or sin they committed to meet such a fate? 2. Examine the lives of OTHERS who are guilty of the same offense or sin, and see if THEY are suffering the same punishment. Only then can we confirm that THIS is the reason they are suffering from hallucinations or delusions. Otherwise, we're just speculating and unfairly blaming the victim of an illness beyond their control. The article did not referred to him directly.... But you said: As I said colorism this the White men light skinned men they were referring to Lol... Why say it, if you didn't mean it? In reference to me saying: Chinese aren't White...but they are still seen as a different race than Nigerians. Eskimos aren't White....but they're still seen a a different race than Pakistanis. You said: Yes this is true to people who accept the idea of races according to modern day Western European definition Ok, and do those who DO NOT accept Western European definitions consider Chinese and Nigerians of the same race? Do those who DO NOT accept Western European racial definitions consider Eskimos and Pakistanis of the same race? Because if they still don't, what point are you making? No...These would be considered the same race by modern Western European standards The difference between both groups is as a result that some see themselves as Arabized Africans (ethnicity) and muslim(religion) while the other are Native African(ethnicity) christian or animist(Religion). But Sudan isn't Western Europe, they use DIFFERENT standards to determine race. In the system THEY use....Arabs and Black Africans are of different races. If race is a SOCIAL construct then you have to define it based on which SOCIETY it's being used in. You are the one who is trying to make all realities one and the same.. Again, I've asked you to please show me where I've said this. Says you.... But it is obvious that the unrestrained is more free than the restrained. The restrained aren't free AT ALL. You may believe they are true.....I do not I can produce evidence to support my beliefs, can you? Do YOU think that white people are trustworthy in general or only tell the truth all the time? Obviously I don't. Which is why I don't accept their religions and question their "science". Especially when it comes to scientific assertions that I can't easily prove or observe for myself. Their is the Human Race and Socio-political ideology of Races. Flavor and color is just the various Ethnicities. In some contexts, ethnicities ARE races. Race simply means category. Ethnicity is simply race based on culture rather than phenotype.

I'm sure 700 years ago back in some African village...... If you said that people with "pale skins and green eyes" will come and kidnap their children, take them across vast waters, kill them, and sometimes even eat them -THAT TOO would seem pretty ridiculous. A fairy tale only little children would believe. When I was a kid my Father....who was from down South....told me about lynching and how not only would they hang Black men but would cut their dick off. He was the first one I heard that from before reading it and seeing people talk about it on television, and it seemed almost unbelievable to my young ears. Nearly anything is possible. Especially if you understand it in context.

But do you agree or disagree with my statement? As a philosophical question, if you DID believe in THE SUPREME BEING....would you believe that BEING would Author and inspire books that confuse people, or make up books written in "codes" and "metaphors" and "symbols" that would be up to so much interpretation that nearly anybody could draw any type of conclusion they wanted from it? That sounds like something other HUMANS would do, not a Superior Being who could easily articulate exactly what They wanted to convey perfectly and directly.

It's hard to "prove" ancient history. Proof involves presenting evidence to support an assertion that convinces a target audience beyond reasonable doubt. This usually involves evidence that you can either experience or witness for yourself. Unless you have a time machine to actually take somebody back in time to experience or witness an event, it's hard to "prove" it beyond dispute. However the most popular alternatives to the Theory of Evolution is Creationism and Interplanetary Seeding.

Mel Actually I don't have any chattel slavery on my maternal side probably because of the "white' foremother. Well if YOUR mother was White, then that would be a pretty safe bet to make; but according to you that was your GREAT GREAT grandmother. I'm sure she wasn't the ONLY ancestor in your lineage....lol. If your mother was Black or anywhere near Black, then that would mean she had OTHER Black people in her lineage as well and some of them were highly likely descendants of Slavery even if they didn't come from the lineage of your White foremother. .. My paternal ancestors got their papers, land and were recorded in the first census in the late 1700 before slavery ended in America. Same thing. That was 300 years ago. Maybe THEY weren't slaves but somewhere between them and you those who WERE descendants of slavery mated into that lineage. ..It's kind of weird to see how both sides of the families avoided slavery or got their freemen papers Again, this was centuries ago. Unless they practiced incest mating where they only mated with fellow family members....it is highly likely that being in America they mated with Black people who WERE descended from Slavery. How else would you get the name "Hopkins"? Like John Hopkins University and Research center in Maryland.....lol. Infact, the Nation of Islam teaches that one of the first British slave traders was NAMED John Hopkins/Hawkins. but I think that's why I don't suffer from the trauma of enslavement Even if your ancestors weren't enslaved, they still suffered from the brutal, traumatic, and inhuman effects of Racism. Not just physically but emotionally and psychologically. Even after the horror of Chattel Slavery: -perhaps one of them was a victim of or a witness to a lynching. -perhaps one was a victim of job, housing, and educational discrimination. -perhaps one of them was a victim of medical experimentation -perhaps one of them was a victim of various other types of social and biological experiments carried out on AfroAmericans. ALL Black people living in the United States have experienced the trauma of Systemic Racism to various degrees, which is why ALL who live under this system deserve a FORM of Reparation. - but I think that's why I don't suffer from the trauma of enslavement - Still, I identify as Black although my ancestors were white, mulatto, black, indigenous or colored. Typical AfroAmerican lineage...lol. I think if folks start digging for their roots (I have, thanks to finding a cousin on my father's side) many would find they migrated to the Americas long before chattel slavery was a thing. Ofcourse. There were Black people in the Americas for CENTURIES before White people came here or brought us here. Infact one of the earliest founders of Pre-Mexican civilization were Black people called "Olmecs" We showed THEM how to get here...lol. There was a Black man named Pedro Nino....a descendant of Moors....who sailed with Columbus and helped him navigate his way over here. However despite this FACT, the other fact is that the majority of us DID come here by way of the Middle Passage in the great Ma'afa. A lot of FBA and Freedmen adherents use the fact that there were already Black people here in the Americas to totally dismiss the idea that Slavery even existed. But one fact doesn't negate the other.

richardmurray Second, detroit's percentage of the whole who are black is in the rare range. Most cities in the usa that have a certain total quantity, don't have anywhere near the percentage of black as detroit. There are several reasons for this. Among them: The Nation of Islam as we know it today was founded in Detroit. It was one of the earlier "woke" movements in the AfroAmerican community and this put Detroit on the radar of other progressive and militant Black people who came here looking for some action. Also Henry Ford openly recruited Black people to come to Detroit and fill factory jobs. He did this in part to break the strong hold the unions had on his business as well as the city in general. It was an earlier form of "cheap labor" before illegal immigration. Also unlike New York and even Chicago, Detroit has a lot of single family houses with front and back yards that Black people from down South are used to. They like the spacious living that you don't find in New York or Philly. From time to time I visited my relatives in Washington D.C. and New York and as we'd sit in the living room I could see heads bobbling up and down past the window and occasionally people looking in THROUGH it at us....LOL. This is because the houses were so close up to the sidewalk....lol. No front yard. I wouldn't want to live in a place were any nigga walking down the street can just reach in and GRAB my lady's ass if the window is open....lol. Those white counties about atlanta or D.C. make me think of Black Tulsa or Rosewood all the time. Wayne county that detroit sits in is anti black, but they tend to be more hands off with detroit overall. Apparently you don't know as much about the Detroit area as you THINK you do....lol. Detroit is not only Black but even many of it's SUBURBS are Black too, including those in Wayne and Oakland counties. Wayne county has over a half dozen other Black cities in it like Inkster, River Rouge, and Highland Park. Wayne county also has an AfroAmerican Sheriff and Prosecutor As far as New Orleans being it's own state. Not only is that highly unlikely but it's highly unadvisable. It's not big enough and doesn't have enough resources for statehood. I think what got Ray Nagin targeted was 2 things: 1. During Katrina in a moment of passionate anger he let the cat out of the bag and in the national media he openly accused the government of bringing drugs into the Black community. 2. Also on national television he said that New Orleans was "chocolate city" and as long as he's mayor would REMAIN chocolate city....lol. After those incidents....it was on, lol.

.......lol @ "gardless" In answer to the question in the title: No Infact, I truly believe that America is and will continue to IMPROVE and PROGRESS humanity. I'm not trying to be funny or facetious either, I sincerely mean that. The United States is the main reason racism and sexism and even slavery itself is no longer OPENLY tolerated in most societies. Before the existence of the United States.....racism, sexism, and slavery was not only rampant around the planet but brazen and openly practiced as a normal way of life for many if not most.

Now a days, they are few and far in between. I think Black Journalism (true Black journalism....not gossip or sensationalism) has been on the decline since the 80s. Back in the day, nearly every city with a decent sized Black population had a Black newspaper. Infact, nearly every HIGH SCHOOL in the United States with a Black population had a Black student newspaper.

Chev If you cannot determine the origin of 'original script', @Pioneer1 that is a huge issue because it connects to you not accepting or even understanding the origin of all mankind begins with the Black African humans that formed the first civilizations. Where IS this "original script"? You ask whether or not I can determine the origin of it but have YOU determined the origin of it? Have you read it for yourself or located it? If you cannot accept that the first civilization began byway of African men, then that is why you cannot accept the obvious origin of script would begin with Black Africa. I don't believe civilizations began ON THIS PLANET....let alone tied to one particular continent. You are giving White people credit for the origin of the word 'Genes' and 'Genesis'. Case close. LOL. Facts. Case closed, because "gene" is a European term. You did not experience it first hand. Neither did anyone who told you those stories. The same goes for all history before you were born. I have seen the evidence first hand. I've seen the plantations. I see Black people here who look just like Africans. I've seen the slave shacks. I've seen more evidence to say it DID happen than I've seen evidence to the contrary....lol. GENESIS Chapter 15. OK, let's go........ Genesis 15 1 After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward. 2 And Abram said, Lord GOD, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus? 3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir. 4 And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir. 5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. 6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness. 7 And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it. 8 And he said, Lord GOD, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it? 9 And he said unto him, Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon. 10 And he took unto him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another: but the birds divided he not. 11 And when the fowls came down upon the carcases, Abram drove them away. 12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. 13 And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 14 And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. 15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age. 16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. 17 And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces. 18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites. Ok, now WHERE in that chapter does it meaning that Egypt will be completely overthrown???? The Bible is written in codes so that many will not understand. Well a "code" is something deceptive and not accurate. It's not what it presents itself to be. So if this is the case, then YOU won't understand it either because anybody who reads it can CLAIM it means whatever they want it to. I cannot change that. The prophet DANIEL wrote that many will never understand scripture. If that's the case, then YOU can't understand it either! What give YOU the right to claim to understand it more than me or anybody else if it's "coded" and sealed by Daniel? Why even possess the book if you can't understand it? If the Creator does not want you to understand, then you won't understand. While this is true, it's also an EXCUSE for a person to interpret the scriptures however THEY see fit and claim they say one thing when they mean another. When it comes to false material, it's not THE CREATOR that's keeping you from understanding it but the fact that it's FALSE, is what's keeping you from understanding it. If it's written plainly and openly, everyone can see what it clearly says and either get on board with it or reject it. But if it's written in codes and symbols and allegories.....any deceiver can manipulate them to mean what THEY want. THE SUPREME BEING is not the author of confusion. I don't believe THE SUPREME BEING would give us a book full of codes and mysteries and confusing metaphors for people to argue over. This is the work of man, meant to confuse people and have them fighting and arguing over religion and dogma while they manipulate them. Also, the prophet Isaiah as well, stated that judgment period [i.e. Judgement Day] will last for a thousand years. It's 'a Day for a Year' prophecy. More confusion. A day for a year is NOT TRUE. I'm not saying it doesn't say that....I'm saying it's not true that a day = a year. It's a false statement. This is promoting falsehood and confusion. THE SUPREME BEING doesn't support or provide human beings with false statements....whether you want to call them "codes" or "interpretations" or whatever. The New World will not be completely formed until after 'a time and a season', that is how Daniel wrote it. More confusion. A time and seasons could mean a lot of things. It's a way of claiming something will happen without giving a date so that you can't confront them on it NOT happening. This is not DIVINE work...it's the work of man. about the formation of the New World. This is a repetitive 'timed appointed prophecy' as 'the Crusades' marks a past time when this has already occurred. The Crusades began after A.D. 1090 and thus began the so-called 'Christian Movement' back into Jerusalem to fight against the Muslims and Jews for control over 'the Middle East' and etc. The book of Daniel says NOTHING about this. This is taking history and INCORPORATING IT in with Biblical scripture to make it fit. There are people who took World War 1 and did the same thing with IT that you're doing with the Crusades. Others who took the Gulf War in Iraq and did the same. See how this works Chev? People just taking scriptures and MAKING them fit any scenario THEY desire. Any war....any plague....any major event can be taken and made to FIT in with some Biblical scripture if you want it to. But despite all of these things happening.....the Kingdom hasn't been established yet...that's the point. But you do know that Europeans do get 'leprosy'!? Light skinned humans do get leprosy. In fact, leprosy more commonly affects lighter skinned humans, no matter if they are light skinned Negroes or White Europeans First of all, what is referred to in the Bible is NOT leprosy. Leprosy is an ENGLISH word that was used in the translation. The original Hebrew word was "tzaraat" and referred to 2 different conditions: psoriasis and vitiligo I said the King James Version, and specifically did not say anything about him. When Black people continued to obsess over White Idols, the Creator allowed them to be governed as such. Is that true, or is that accusing THE CREATOR of something that is NOT true? If the White people are evil too, then why would THE CREATOR use THEM as his tools or agents? Think about that? Why use MORE evil people to punish the "chosen" people????? That doesn't make a lot of sense when you think about it. The fact is White people were able to take advantage of a lot of darker people because they had better technology....plain and simple. It had little to do with one being "good" and the other being "bad" or some Divine punishment for idolatry. These are EXCUSES people use to justify why they got conquered instead of simply admitting that White folks out smarted them. So, as the Book of DANIEL states 'a time, times, and a half of times' humans are under White governments, but he never said any one government was headed up by a perfect human. That is why he sent His Son, Jesus. And He will have to come again because mankind has proven that if he does not come back, we are in trouble. The Creator judges the world at times by HIMSELF as He did during the time of the Exodus no man can stop Him. He is not going to accept White Supremacist even if they are of African descent. You can't say that if those who believe in White Supremacist ideology are running the world! They ARE running much of the world...so what do you mean they won't be "accepted"?????? They're BEING accepted! The Arabs are not any more evil than the Original Egyptians, that is just your opinion. They killed and enslaved more people than the original Black people of Kemet. That's a historical fact. Again, why would the Divine take one evil empire and replace it with another? Again, more people trying to justify why Black kingdoms fell and got taken over by non-Blacks. Instead of admitting that they got out smarted and we need to try better....too many of us want to "blame the victims" and claim it was a divine punishment that those kingdoms fell. Well look at America and Europe....... They promote homosexuality and now you have the Epstein files!!! So why are THEY still ruling? Why haven't THEY been replaced by African or Chinese governments where that type of sexual deviance isn't tolerated?

I think there may be a lot of truth in these claims, however I don't trust WHO this "truth" is coming from. I don't trust right-wing White people or the information they put out. Independent self-respecting AfroAmerican researchers and influencers should be doing THEIR OWN investigations of these claims and bringing the information to the community instead of simply co-signing with racist right-wing influencers like Joe Rogan and Alex Jones.

richardmurray Well... The black populace of Los Angeles is , taking out detroit which is an odd city, bigger than the black populace of any of those places you mentioned. So los angeles based on quantity has a higher chance of having more people in all fiscal levels than atlanta or d.c. Perhaps. But the White and Latino population of Los Angeles is in the MILLIONS. Far bigger than the Black population; which means more opponents and opportunities to sabotage and replace potential Black success You compare Los Angeles with Detroit by highlighting the Black populations of both cities without factoring in the NON-BLACK populations and how that affects the success (or lack there of) of each city. A high Black population with a low non-Black population....such as places like Detroit, Atlanta, and D.C....ensures more Black success because there is less competition WITH that Black population. As opposed to Los Angeles with millions of Whites and Latinos conspiring together to keep Black success to a minimum. Humans are free to choose. Choose what? Complacency over annihilation? Outside of Divine Help.....which is Real but we don't control it.....what other "choices" do subjugated people have? I argue Nagin should had called for new orleans to be its own state in the union after the actions of louisiana, but he didn't have the courage or wisdom or strategic skill for that , Lol.... Are you serious or joking?

Chev Homo Erectus are Primitive and were extinct thousands of years before modern mankind were Created. If you think they're extinct..... Go to San Francisco or Atlanta and you'll see THOUSANDS of "homo erections" walking around. Don't believe me? Unlike theories from millions of years ago....you can go there TODAY and see that madness for yourself....lol. frankster Professionals and scientist are not so easily led astray by fakes fraudsand counterfeit. No, it takes MONEY and directives from their superiors to lead THEM astray and produce false information. And it happens on a daily basis. The facts pertaining to the theory of evolution are all open to questions and disputations.. The FACTS aren't what's being disputed. The unproven CLAIMS are. Like people coming from monkeys. They have yet to find the "missing link". And the most racist supporters of this theory actually claim that BLACK PEOPLE are the missing link! The are also levels to realities True It is a contract.....if a signatory decides to unilaterally break a contractual agreement then they be consequences. I don't know if I'd call it a "contract" but more like an agreement. A Spiritual Agreement. Sounds like a Psychosis....Delusionary That's what psychosis IS...a break from Reality. As I said colorism this the White men light skinned men they were referring to.....does he look like he would be thought of as a white man US. 1. What article referred to him as "white"??? 2. They don't have to be "white" to be seen as a different race. Race in most cases simply refer to groups with to phenotypical DIFFERENCES, not necessarily opposite or extreme differences. Chinese aren't White...but they are still seen as a different race than Nigerians. Eskimos aren't White....but they're still seen a a different race than Pakistanis. Most northern Sudanese aren't White (though some are) but are still seen as Arab and of a different race than those of South Sudan Very likely colorism.... ethnic hatred - as both Indians and Africans are considered black in America My Sister is Considered Black in America....White in Ghana....and Colored in South Africa.....Whose rubric are you using??? It depends on the country. Like you said....race is a SOCIAL construct...and it's categories vary based on the SOCIETY in which it operates. Race as it is currently define all over the Globe is primarily a Western European Ideology. The same can be said for modern science, education, and entertainment. What's new? You are the one who is trying to make all realities one and the same.. Show me where I've said that. That is a degree of free Being restrained is a lessor degree of free That is a greater degree of free 🤣 There is no "degree of free" Either you're free or you're not. Either a person is dead or not. Unless they got killed by G Money, from New Jack City..... "Take him out and kill him 5 times!" Life like energy can only be transform.....never destroyed This is a common saying, but we don't know if this is true or not Who can verify that? Even our liberties has restrictions..... True As they should, for our safety. African Cultural mores and spirituality also agrees Again, show me a traditional African writing that makes the claim that ALL human beings came from Africa. Africans has always consider fellow creatures as our brothers....as in Brer Rabbit Africans have traditionally promoted respect for nature and animals. Considering them our "brothers" is a different story....lol. Brer Rabbit is part of AFROAMERICAN folklore. Those two claims are pure falsities They are absolutely true. Both sources are White people. And the biggest of those lies is.....the idea of Races If the idea of "race" is a lie...then the ideas of "flavor" and "color" is too.

This is the origin of the Theory Of Evolution Charlese Darwin.....a notorious racist.....is widely considered one of the founding fathers of this Theory that White archeologists and other scientists promote in their institutions and that so many silly Black folks support for it's "out of Africa" claims. Notice the term "the preservation of FAVOURED races" in the subtitle? In a nutshell, the Theory of Evolution states that apes OR an ape like species evolved into Africans....and then the Africans evolved into other races. In other word, Africans are LESS EVOLVED and CLOSER TO APES! That's the theory! Do any of you support that? If you support the THEORY of Evolution, then you do.