Pioneer1

ProfD Sure. S8x is not one of those things. Plenty money can provide unlimited access to it though. Money can increase the QUANTITY...I'm not sure if it will increase the QUALITY. Much of the QUALITY of sex has to do with YOU and your person skills and abilities and physical fitness. Money can help, but money can't directly buy that. Every generation sees something off or wrong with those coming up behind them. Are the older generations wrong, or are they accurately assessing the contemporary situation and dysfunction of the latest generation through the eyes of wisdom and experience? Each generation THINKS they are smarter and know more than the previous, even when they have accomplished less. There was more Black love and unity between men and women back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s than there is today. There's GOT to be a reason for that. Most humans have to be trained in discipline. That's why the military puts recruits through boot camp. Tear down and build up. Facts Mainly because it's not the most important in the grand scheme of things. Again, that all night energy would be put to better use making money. I think you may projecting YOUR goals and what YOU think a person's focus should be on some other brothers. For the record, I agree with you that getting rich is more important than wearing down your prostate pursuing marathon sex records...lol. However I recognize that not every man feels this way. Some men...they're not very smart or ambitious and the ONLY thing they got going for them is being good in bed. You can preach to them until veins start popping out of your head and it won't do a bit of good. Let them do..them. When the fun is done their problems remain. Solving them would be more valuable. This is one of the reasons I wasn't a big fan of drugs OR heavy alcohol consumption. Because if you were doing it because of the "problems" in your life...they generally didn't help. The problems would remain when you sobered up. But as I got older I realized that when it comes to fun in general.... Fun provides RELIEF from constant problem. You need that relief to energize yourself and keep going. Sex is one of the best physical forms of therapy, as long as it's within reason. I now see drugs and alcohol is therapeutic for SOME people if it provides temporary relief for a stressful situation. Same thing. Grave-digger blows the back out and puts her to sleep. Sheeeeyid.... With a name like "grave digger"; that sounds like - Umar Johnson would say -it puts her to sleep: FOR GOOOOOD!!!! ...lol. Otherwise, confidence and arrogance can be clearly defined and separated Would be so kind as to give me YOUR personal/compensatory definition of "arrogant"? Black men.

ProfD Whether it is genetics or physical fitness or a combination...Black don't crack.😁 Unless she's ON Crack, lol. Two things I've seen Crack do to women. 1. Make their skin dry and prematurely wrinkled 2. Make their ass flat as pancakes. From refusing to give up thinning or straggling stands of hair in favor of a neat low cut or a bald head, some Black folks are too self-conscious to embrace a new, better look. And most Black folks' hair is too nappy to do the "comb over" that a lot of White men USED to do before WE made the bald look cool. We're close in age so you know what I'm talking about, lol. You don't see it as much today as you did back in the 80s and 90s and definitely in the 70s.

Cynique said: " you would be at the bottom of the totem pole were I to bestir my interest long enough to single out the real men on this site who have a lot going for themselves" Since you think I'm a liar... What did I lie about? Seriously. I can't speak for the other "real men" on this site but as for me....I'M COOL....lol Pleeeeeze, I don't need you to "bestir your interests" in me. "Bestir" them up for somebody else who may reciprocate them. As far as I'm concerned, your funky ass juices can dry up....lol. I just want you to show me the lies you CLAIM I'm telling on here.

ProfD True. I have met people of all races who chose to live a life of homelessness rather than conform to society. When I was homeless I met Black people who COULDN'T conform to society...lol. It wasn't necessarily from lack of effort though. But many...not all..but many of the White people who were homeless had a rebellious attitude where they WOULDN'T conform based on some sort of weird ass personal belief. They didn't want a job, not because they were lazy but because they didn't want anyone telling them "when to punch in and out". They didn't want to live with relatives because they were "adults" and didn't want to be controlled by the rules of the house. In many of them, their homelessness was a choice that with more thought or if times get hard enough..they could snap into better judgement and pull out of it. Ofcourse you had a large percentage of White people who ended up homeless simply because they were alcoholics, drug addicts, and just plain stupid. One of the benefits to being a natural-born clown/comedian is being friendly, fearless, approachable when it comes to meeting people. Makes it easier to collect comedic source material. Of course, it also helps to have a solid frame too. You don't take me as being a natural comedian....atleast not on here, lol. Too intelligent and passively confrontational. I didn't say "passive aggressive"....I said (typed...lol) passively CONFRONTATIONAL meaning you're not afraid to get in that ass but in a smooth and intelligent way. I say that to say, you seem a little too serious or intense to be "clownish" or "comedic" in your demeanor. Not that you remind me of him, because he was as sweet as a bag of skittles...but the late great Paul Mooney was another person who looked too serious....and a little angry....to be a comedian. He was naturally intelligent and quick witted but his demeanor was way to serious and sometimes you wouldn't know if he's being serious about an issue or joking about one. I've met some people who the world would see as bums having no idea of these folks are former scientists, doctors, engineers, professors, doctors, lawyers, etc. They literally dropped out of society. This is true. I personally met homeless people who were school teachers and engineers by profession. Some tragedy in their life and often times and addiction landed them in that position.

ProfD Maybe so. But, that energy is put to better use making money Some things are worth MORE than money. Self respect and the future of our Race and specifically our ethnic group is worth more than dead presidents, lol. Infact, some would argue that it's priceless. If there is a plot or conspiracy to turn our own women against us through subliminal messaging to the point that they'd rather "turn" Lesbian or willingly enslave themselves to a White man RATHER than be with another AfroAmerican man -we need to know this. Something is definitely "off" with what I'm seeing with a lot of young AfroAmerican men and women. A well disciplined man knows how to use his testosterone efficiently. Facts. Most men aren't well disciplined. They haven't been taught or trained in that art. Not really. He's easily replaceable. Especially when a man with more money shows up. You'd be surprised at how many men CAN'T keep a hard dick and fuck all night...lol. They can TALK that talk in the clubs or in her DM's but when "crunch time" comes and it's time for some action....I'm almost sure most men aren't putting it down the way they sold it. But if she finds one who can talk shit AND back it up, she's found a "high value" man in HER eyes...lol. Value is substantive when it comes down to money. Fun and games don't count. Fun and the ability to make a person happy is VERY valuable, especially if they're going through a lot of trauma. A lot of women who are married to or atleast in relationships with rich business men have "boy toys" on the side not because of the sex but because she can talk to him and he can make her laugh and "gets" her despite not being business savvy or wealthy. You can't always put a price tag on happiness. Women for the streets are fine with getting their backs blown out up to a certain point. Facts. A quality woman wants more than a grave-digger. Lol.... What about a nappy-dug-out digger??? When a woman wants real life sh8t...house, clothes, shoes, handbags, jewelry, transportation, vacations, etc., they're going to look for a man who can sling money and drop the hammer. This is true, however many women will still seek and be weak for a broke-ass "side piece" who knows how to talk to her, lay it down right in bed, and make her happy about life in general. Some women are smart enough to juggle BOTH. And a REALLY smart woman will make her "side piece" a friend of the family's to the point that her husband would never even SUSPECT their relationship! Some women will even try to make her "side piece" her husband's FRIEND. I knew a woman who her and her husband had a house and I guess they got a little financially strapped and she convinced him that since they had an extra room they should take on a border. Even got him to put an add in Craig's List...lol. And GUESS who was one of the first people to answer the add and get into contact with them! Yes....😆...he moved in. I'm not sure if the husband ever found out because me and her parted ways 6 or 7 months after that but.....man, oh, man...lol. These were White people, btw.... Chev and ProfD Seems to me that the difference between Confidence and Arrogance is based on OPINION. If you think the person DESERVES to feel good and talk good about themselves....you see it as confidence. If you think they DON'T DESERVE to feel good about their achievements or talk good about themselves....you see it as bragging and arrogance. A lot of Black men are accused of Arrogance.

"Rejection"???? In order for you to "reject" me that means I had to APPROACH your little tight-eyed ass if the first place. If you don't QUIT with the nonsense....lol But you shoooooo' took your time to type out that long ass response for somebody you think is a "loser" whom you find "disgusting"....lol. Like I said, you ain't fooling NOBODY on here but yourself. Well, atleast you admitted that you PM'd me. But "once"??? You contacted me "just once"... Cynique???? Seriously??? ((Pioneer1 smiles and looks away from the screen)) Ok.... I could say more but I don't want to hurt your little feelings (really your "ego") and have you threatening to leave the site like you did a few years ago. I guess the other posters wou WE -wouldn't want that and enjoy your presence around here too much. Mr. Disgusting bids you a nice evening. 👍

Yes, Chaka Khan is another attractive sista who's been attractive all her life. Yet....another one was Nichelle Nichols (Lt. Uhura from Star Trek), RIP. There's a lot of sistaz who look good at advanced ages but I'm thinking of the ones who NATURALLY look good without a lot of make-up or plastic surgery or manipulation of the pictures and videos.

ProfD That white man would be the exception. Plenty white folks living at or below the poverty line. When a White man "claims" to be in poverty, I usually don't believe him right off the bat. I've seen too many instances where White people come from wealthy immediate families and have access to plenty of money but CHOOSE to live like bums simply because they like being rebellious and not following the "rules" of wealth or being White. Some of them will go as far as living homeless, just so that nobody else will tell them what to do or how to live. If you see a homeless Black man....he's homeless sho'nuff. But if you see a homeless White man...there's a good chance he has access to money, had family in law enforcement, but has some sort of substance abuse problem or is just rebellious and wants to live like that. White folks have status classes among themselves. I don't blame them. Our people used to...or perhaps they still do. Civilization must be TAUGHT. How to dress, eat, speak, conduct yourself in appropriate settings. This makes for a cultured and cosmopolitan citizen.

ProfD S8x is a recurring theme in your posts. There's a reason for this...lol. Most women do not place as much weight and emphasis on bumping and grinding as some men do. True. That's because they don't have the testosterone rate that we have. Testosterone largely governs sex drive in both men and women. A women doesn't see that man as a high value. He is one step above a s8x toy. He's a play-thing. She's not going to want to marry or build a life with that man. He's temporary. But she still values him...highly. Value isn't about substance so much as it's about perspective. A child values delicious candy MORE than a diamond ring. To them...CANDY is high value, not jewelry. Those are women for the streets. They aren't high value themselves. I have an uncle who would beg to differ with you that HIS women he used to have on the streets weren't high value...lol. "Nicca I don't know WHAT you talkin' bout. I gots some high value hoez as cleeeeeean as Skeeta'z peeta back at the spot!" Not always. But, talk to a bunch of women. Ask what they want/value in a man. Well now you know most women aren't going to initially say what they REALLY want in a man anyway. How many women...even if that's what she really wants... will admit that ALL she wants is a man with a big %#@&$ who can grab her by the neck and just %&$(#! and then flip her around and %$#@(^*$ right in her $%#@%. THEN turn around and do it in her @#$@!%* !!! ....atleast twice in one night? It may be the very thing she wants the most but the LAST thing she'd admit to wanting...lol.

Troy We need to figure how to run a country where large swaths of the population are simply unneeded in the work force. Perhaps El Salvator has beat us to this

frankster (I presume....lol) No it does not....the fact that there is diversity on a large scale is evidence of Toleration. Diversity of people LIVING TOGETHER IN PEACE AND HARMONY is evidence of toleration. A diverse group of people fighting and killing eachother for entire generations and centuries is evidence to the CONTRARY. Is Ike and Tina Turner just appearing "together" in a photo evidence enough of a stable and happy marriage? "Bit'....if you don't... HURRY UP and bring yo' ass..." (( high heels clicking and jewelry jangling)) Yes nature is the creator of the diversity.....Africa being home to the earliest humans and some of the oldest human populations to still also have the most diversity is a testament to Africans toleration and acceptance of differences. No sir. They are far too petty and fight eachother over religion and ethnicity way to much for tolerance. Homosexuals aren't tolerated in most African nations (actually any that I'm aware of) either. That doesn't seem like tolerance and acceptance of differences. I'm not religious NOR am I pro-LGBTQIA+ agenda; however the fact that diversity in sexual orientation is not only NOT tolerated but vehemently REJECTED and even in many cases PUNISHED is noteworthy, lol. Many innocents have gone to the gallows simply because they could not prove their truths or facts True. People shouldn't be killed for not being able to prove that they DIDN'T do something. The onus should be on those accusing them OF doing it to provide the proof. No its not...it is very relavant Without proof of citizenship you will not be granted or allow to exercise the rights of citizenship. A person's TREATMENT as a citizen may depend on their ability to prove. But them simply BEING one....in actuality...doesn't. You may very well be considered an illegal immigrant and end up in deportation proceedings. BEING someone and "considered" someone are often different. We now only know it to be true because the situation was studied. Did they discover that the sun was hot BECAUSE they studied the snow on top of mountains? Did they discover that the moon was round BECAUSE they studied how it would crescent and half through out the month? Or were these FACTS discovered by other means OTHER than those studies? Curious minds want to know. Yes....Knowing and Proving are different Proving is not only to benefit a sceptic....it can also mean that you know how to use the knowledge Ok ok ok.....thanks for agreeing with me. That something occurred is true....but what and why is in question Those may be questions for YOU...but the "what" question has already been answer for me by MY observation. The name and password is useful in order to gain access to this space and exercise my rights as a member....if a cannot provide either I will not be granted access as frankster. Never the less, the member known as "frankster" IS your identity. It's your name and identity in the AALBC community. Just like your government name is your identity in the off-line community.

Troy While you're right..... Gayle is just naturally pretty and attractive..in MY opinion. Gayle King 2025 I like thick as well as slim women and her body is nice and slim but still curvy as it was 30 years ago when she was kicking it on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Gayle King 1990s That's why I had to fall out with Snoop Dogg for calling her a "dog faced" something-or-other....lol. Speaking of her face.... Some people focus on how pretty she is but her body is straight up BANGIN' too! I bet Fi'ty Cent is really MISSING all of that....lol.

umbrarchist How many adults help kids find books that they might LIKE TO READ? What good is forcing kids to read what they Hate? That is why I try to push informative science fiction. That's another issue. I won't say "problem" because it's not really a problem for most, but it is an issue. Most children don't go to a library and focus on ONE book or THREE books to read or take home like I was a kid. They spend all day surfing the internet for thier information and don't have the patience to read through the entire page...lol. Too many options/choices. Too short of an attention span. Troy Yes, society is increasingly complex, but we seem to adapt. That's the issue, you say WE seem to adapt because YOU are adapting. Many who came up with you....didn't. Many...aren't. They end up dead or locked up. Most people my parents age never engaged with technology, however, people, my kids, age and younger, took to technology it like fish to water. And who's lives do you think were more stressful and confusing? The people of your parents' age or the children of today? Compared to the past things so much easier we have a lot more free time and can do a lot more with that time. In some ways yes. But it really depends on the individual In Michigan atleast, I grew up watching most adults support a home, buy cars, and take care of their children with ONE JOB. Most people worked ONE JOB for 30 or 40 years with some overtime and that was enough to get them what they wanted. Today I'm seeing many adults working 2 and in some cases 3 jobs and don't have nearly as much as the adults with I saw working one job had 30 or 40 years ago. Obviously advances of medicine have led to more comfortable and longer lifespans Are you sure people are actually living longer than they did....100 years ago. Or is that a calculated "average"? And speaking of advances in medicine.... Do you think the general public in the United States is HEALTHIER with LESS CHRONIC DISEASES than when you were a kid? When I was a kid maybe 2 or 3 kids in a class room had asthma and only 2 or 3 in an entire school had Autism. Today...sheeeyid. So many kids have Autism they don't even bother PUTTING them in separate classes anymore. So what diseases have they actually "cured" in the past 70 years? ProfD Most people in society are of average or less intelligence. Correct. Most problems and addictions are self-inflicted. Has little or nothing to do with the complexity of society. I'll agree. However both self-inflicted problems and addictions are a result of IGNORANCE. People made choices without fully understanding and considering or even knowing the consequences of their actions. That's where the intelligence (and experience) factor comes in. But most people use hard drugs to ESCAPE their Reality. Often times they feel that what they're going through in life is so difficult or hard that...it's either use that as an escape or suicide. Some people have to work harder to get things done if they cannot work smarter. True. But laziness and taking the easy way is part of human nature and most of the time they're NOT going to work harder regardless of how smart they are or aren't. I know what you say..."too bad"...but it's not that simple. In my opinion they SHOULDN'T have to work harder to achieve CERTAIN things. If a person of average intelligence or less can make money illegally, they should be able to apply that energy/effort constructively. 1. They may not know how. Even a person of average intelligence may be steeped in ignorance depending on the environment they grew up in. 2. It may be easier to do that which is illegal. Again, taking the easy road is a human trait. How badly a person wants the gains in life will determine the level of energy/effort they are willing to put into making it happen. It depends on the person, but I understand fully what you're saying and this typically applies to a person of average and above average intelligence. Exactly. We either adapt or die. The latter is inevitable. Well as I said to Troy earlier, many people are NOT adapting. They are dying or suffering in many ways.

ProfD Women would prefer a high value man. Actually, exactly who is a "high value" sexually speaking varies from woman to woman because it depends on what SHE values more than what WE think women should be valuing. We think a "high value" man is a man who is wealthy, intelligent, dominant, confident, brave, a general go-getter. That's what WE as men think describes a high value man. But SOME women will see a man with a low wage job and average to below IQ but with a 9 inch dick that stays hard all night and who knows what he's doing in bed -as a HIGH VALUE man, lol. Other women will see a broke, dumb ass nigga who knows how to fight and will get in ANYBODY'S face including the police over disrespecting him or anybody he's cool with (including her) as a high value man because of his courage and toughness. What WE as men place value on or THINK should be valuable doesn't always line up with what a lot of women place value on.

Never did care too much for Eartha Kitt....even when she was younger. Something about her...that voice alone...was a turn off. But Gayle King is so pretty in the face that I'd tolerate more imperfections in her body. A woman's body jiggling like jello isn't necessarily a bad thing in MY opinion unless she's pruned up like somebody's fingers after washing dishes. But I've always liked older women. Even when I was in my 20s....and actually before then because when I was a teenager I used to TRY to talk to women in their 30s and 40s...lol. When it comes to older women I tend to grade women on a CURVE...lol. In other words...... I'll accept more physical faults from a women in her 60s than I would from one in her 30s. Sagging titties...as long as they don't look like deflated weather balloons....isn't necessarily bad on a 60 or 70 year old because I understand the laws of gravity. Just as long as they're round at the bottom. The older the woman and the more children I know she's had...the more stretchmarks I'll accept on her. The older and more children she's had...the looser the coochie I'll put up with...as long as it's not prolapsed, lol. For real, I'm not lying. I used logic and understanding when it comes to the women I'm attracted to. I was having this discussion today with some African women. They saw me flirting with an Indian women who was in her 70s and although I'm in my 50s there's still a 20 years difference. Anybody could she she's clearly far older than me and they saw here as near "elderly" and was asking me why would I flirt with and play around with someone old enough to be my mother. I was flirting HARD with her...and she was enjoying it as usual, lol. I explained to them I don't go by age so much as looks and over all attractiveness...as most men do.... and we had BIG ass discussion about it....lol. Then the discussion turned to weight...and we REALLY had some fun discussing African standards vs American standards. ...you know I had to take a dig at White men during that discussion (wink~wink)

I believe this society is becoming too complex or too complicated for the AVERAGE person of AVERAGE intelligence to navigate through. I suspect that's where a lot of problems and dysfunctions are coming from and this is probably why there are so many addictions. So many people are trying to cope....and escape....psychologically....with just trying to keep their heads above water in a society where they find it increasingly difficult just to meet their basic needs like food, clothing, shelter, and health care. Let alone deal with loved ones who are also going through their own personal problems. I alluded to this in another thread about "endless amounts of passwords". Most people are busy trying to make ends meet, they don't have the time or mental energy to navigate through all of the bullshit that....30 or 40 years ago a simple phone-call could have handled. A good example of this is the very high and increasing incarceration rate in the United States. People of less or even average intelligence have a hard time trying to make enough money in a society that too often requires degrees and advanced education in careers that SHOULDN'T require them....forcing people to find money elsewhere and often illegally. But that's just one example......

It depends on the woman and society. In most societies, a man's looks don't count because women are looking for more important traits like money and strength and somebody to support her and her children. In THIS society looks often matter more because a lot of younger women don't need a man to take care of them because they make their own money. So they can focus less on finding an alpha man who is running things and focus more on having "fun" and going after who they REALLY want which a man who looks good to them and/or is good at sex. Chev And another question....... Are all or most of these women UNDER the age of 40?

frankster Yes That doesn't mean they are no wars in Africa.... Yes it does. If they tolerate eachother and are amicable towards eachother, then there would BE NO wars. The fact that there are wars cancels out this assertion. The Diversity on the continent is testament in and of itself to the Tolerance that exist there. No, it is not. It's a testament to NATURE and the diversity of NATURE. The BEHAVIOR of human beings is a totally different thing and the fact that these diverse groups fight eachother is a testament to and "proof" of the fact that they DO NOT tolerate eachother. If there is no proof found or he cannot provide proof of citizenship.... He is in fact not a citizen until proven so and will in all regards be treated as a alien No sir, he's STILL a citizen whether he's proven to be or not. I agree that if an authority figure is LOOKING for proof of his citizenship and he can not provide it, then he will NOT be regarded as a citizen. That doesn't mean he's not. It simply means he can not prove that which IS true about him. Again, truth is truth whether it's validated or not. Yes...truth stands on its on veracity - but if only you know the truth then it is personal and subjective(relative) Truth is the reality or how things actually are Correct. Which is why his documentation and proof are irrelevant as far as his actual citizenship goes. Even when it is experienced it needs to be studied.... Not really. ...especially when it's a generally accepted truth. If someone DISPUTES it, then yes...we can do a study on it but other than that, that wouldn't be necessary. If the sun is hot why when I get closer to it I find snow....like the top of mountains Sometimes when a look at the moon it is a crescent and not round or spherical??? Both are irrelevant if the truth about them is known and accepted. Useful knowledge to have...but doesn't affect what we ALREADY know to be truth. How do you prove anything? You must gather evidence and test them.....that is a system Ok. But KNOWING things and PROVING them are different. Unless you're a lawyer....lol...having knowledge is generally more important than being able to prove it to some skeptic standing there with his arms crossed. You observed a happening.... You have very little idea as to why it is occuring and what factors are being played out or the context in which it is happening True. But the TRUTH is....I did observe it happen so it IS true whether I'm able to "prove" it to you or not. It is not what you have seen.....it is your conclusion and interpretation It's more than simply a conclusion, it's also an OBSERVATION. My observation is true, whether I have or can prove it or not. Frankster is fictitious.....it is not my real true or factual name It may not be your real life off-line name but it's your identity. Some would argue that all a "real life" name is is simply an identity. Trump on the other hand is his real name and we have a system of checks....to be asssured it is Donald Trump Are you sure? Some say his actual name is "Drumph" instead of "Trump". They say "Trump" is just an Americanized version of the Germanic "Drumph" of which some of his ancestors hailed from.

F' the hair, I'm curious to see what the real GAYLE KING looks like under them clothes and that make up....lol. That woman's about 70 years old and doesn't look OR sound like it. I know she's got a lot of money to keep herself up but money can only take you so far....she's clearly got good genetics too.

🙄 🤨-What the HECK you mean -she may not be able to "deflect it right away"????? LOL...I'm not sure I understand THAT one Chev. If a man is coming on to a married woman and she doesn't "deflect" it....right away....well then....what happens next???? 😮 And what do you mean if she doesn't do it "right away"??? So, how long does she wait BEFORE she puts up her hands and "deflects" his advances???? AFTER they've had sex a few times???? I'm asking for a friend who really wants to know these things....lol.

ProfD Alpha-males attract women naturally. They do not have to compete with other men for attention. Lol...... What if he's an UGLY Alpha?

The Germans also showed up "White"...lol. The American Whites will help out....or atleast not hinder...the German Whites out of racial respect. I've said for over a decade now that we really don't KNOW how White people get their wealth and power. We THINK we know, based on what we see....but we really don't know. I'm not just talking about Whites collectively but even as idividuals. Here's a White man working at Taco Bell AND he's an alcoholic....but he's got a stay at home wife, 2 kids, and is buying the house he live in AND they have 2 cars. How is he able to afford that from his one low wage job? I've jokingly said that White people seem to have some sort of "hook up" that they put eachother on to. Some secret spot underground where Black folks are not only not allowed but are clueless as to it's existence. That's where your wholesome foods and meats and other groceries are kept. That's where your better hospitals are kept with the REAL cures for certain diseases.....lol. Declare yourself "white" on the census form and all of a sudden as Neely Fuller Jr. put it..."mysterious sources of income" start getting delivered to you out of the blue...lol. Checks for $15,000 or $20,000 a month start coming to your home and you don't even know why. So much money you don't even know WHAT to do with it....so you start investing with it and playing around with it and it ends up making you MORE money, lol. May even get a secret type of cell phone or radio where only White folks can communicate with eachother and share information...lol. Oh, to be White....lol.

Ohhh that sexy ass Gayle King. Man I love that woman.

Troy Do you think that it would have been a SECURITY problem for her if she were actually standing that close to that large of a group of presumed violent gangsters, sometimes with the cell bars wide open? Did you doubt the authenticity of those photos because their eyes don't seem to be on her and the expressions on their faces don't look as if a relatively attractive middle aged woman is standing in front of them? And as I look at these photos, I must ask again...where are the older men and disabled men? Are they in another unit? Are they in another prison all together?

frankster No it does not..... At least three of the 5 or 7 major continents have wars on going today in and on them. Ok? And what does THIS fact have to do with YOU erroneously claiming that Africans tolerate eachother's differences and live together amicably? The difference as you yourself stated aAfrica has the most Languages and tribes....that means they were allowed to survive and not subsumed by the stronger. You must not know the history of Shaka Zulu and how HE was leading the Zulu people to swallow up the weaker tribes in the area similar to how the Romans did around Europe. Infact, it was the White people who stopped Shaka BECAUSE they knew that if nature took it's course and the stronger Zulu tribe dominated the region and united it under their rule....it wouldn't be long before they rivaled Europe in military might. I will try not to....but we are talking about your general characterization as to whether or not it is a fact or an opinion. It remains an opinion until proven as true I'll agree that FACTS need to be proven, but truth doesn't. Just like a citizen is a citizen whether or not he can VERIFY his citizenship. He may be lying. But if he's NOT lying and IS a citizen, not being able to show proof of this doesn't invalidate that truth. For it to be a fact is must be true and to be accept as true it must be proven I'll agree that a "fact" is an accepted truth. But truth ITSELF doesn't have to be proven in order to still be truth. A fact is more an official "documenting" concept that separates truth information from false information. Truth is beyond that. No a study is not necessary for it to be true... But for us to know if it is true....a study is necessary I'm inclined to agree that this is the case for things that are NOT experienced. Even then, it depends on the subject at hand. You don't need a "study" to determine that the sun is hot or that the moon is a sphere. You can see these truths. Proof Is a system design to test the veracity of an idea Proof is not a "system" Proof is evidence strong enough that it verifies or confirms something to a reasonable audience. The "scientific method" is a system....but not proof itself. Yes but if you cannot provide your birth papers....I have not reason to accept your words as true Correct, you don't. However your doubt or ignorance DOES NOT affect my citizenship. Right? It's TRUE....whether it's an actual "fact" to you or not. What you stated above has not been proven as fact and then you went on to say Well wait a minute..... I was stating what I have seen and what I haven't seen. How can you dispute what ANOTHER person has seen, even if you saw it differently? Even if it was happening in the very same ROOM I was in...if I didn't see it I DIDN'T SEE IT. You can't say what I said was a lie if I really DID NOT see it...despite it being there. For it to be a fact it must be studied and proven. No. It doesn't have to be studied. Proven...I'd agree. But not studied. So your statement above is a lie....you have not shown where your statments are based in facts It's not a lie. You can't call it that out of sheer ignorance. Rather you should admit you simply don't know whether I'm telling the truth or not. Calling it a lie now places the weight on YOU to prove how YOU know what I've seen and what I haven't seen. So how DO you? ((what???)) How do YOU know what my eyes have and haven't seen, that you can sit there and say that I was lying about not seeing African men by themselves piled up at a table over each other eating? How do YOU know that I actually have seen it and have decided to lie and say I haven't? No...you obseving what you think is a man and a woman doing what you think is walking down the street. It could be two men and one is dressed as a woman....did they reveal their sex organs to you? and if the did are the real or fake facsimiles While you make a good point in theory, you're drawing too many conclusions for a reasonable argument of this. If you want to take it there...you could say that about over 90% of the FACTS that are accepted. I say it's a FACT that I'm communicating with you on the internet. But how do I know it's really "frankster" instead of a family member posting instead? We say it's a FACT that Donald Trump is president, but how do we know it's really him and not a clone? If you wanna take it there, what you just said could apply to most things accepted as "fact".